22 réponses à ce sujet

[chrstnmonks]

I wondered if we would have war assets in da3 like we do in me3. For example if we did could hawke and the warden become assets and their former companions. Just a thought.

[Robhuzz]

War assets...what for?

I for one have no intention of fighting for either the mages or chantry. What would these assets be doing? Playing football at camp? Hmm that actually sounds like a fun idea.

[CuriousArtemis]

Please NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! except for the playing football at camp bit; you can do that, BW 8D

[MichaelStuart]

I don't think we'll be fighting a common enemy to need such a system.

Modifié par MichaelStuart, 18 mars 2013 - 09:00 .

[Nefla]

Well that's one thing I can say would instantly make me not buy the game. :/

[RaidenXS]

why does everyone assume dragon age is mass effect?

[M Hedonist]

Instead of just saying "no", I'll try to argue for the merits of war assets first.
In ME3, it was a way of dealing with all the past decisions your Shepard has made in the first two games. They couldn't have possibly accounted for every single thing and have the game react to them in unique ways.
There's no need in DA3. It plays in a different land, with different characters. If something from the first two games affects DA3, they should be able to spend the effort to have those things change the game more substantially than through War Assets.

And god, I don't want to know how many Multiplayer characters the Warden would end up being worth.

[blackdiamonds1]

well I for one would think that would be a nice little addition...also no assumes da3 is mass effect 3...however they are made by the same developer and their are parallels between the 2 games...also there are certain crossover items in each game and themes.

[Enad]

I'm sure EA will finding something to force us to play MP.

[Neoleviathan]

They had something similar with Origins. But it will really depend on what they have planned for the Inquisitor. A war assets mechanic may not make any sense depending on what they do. If it makes sense for the character and whatever the goal is, then it might be pretty cool. Then again there is apparently going to be mp in Inquisition, so other mechanics making sense might not matter.

Modifié par Neoleviathan, 18 mars 2013 - 09:30 .

[dsl08002]

NOO no no no dont bring that up

[DarkKnightHolmes]

Dragon Age Origin did a way better job of using your recruited allies than ME3 did with those gazillions of war assets.

So...... NO.

[daaaav]

krul2k wrote...

War Assets tbh were a good idea in me3 it just wasnt handled well at all, the idea was good everything else about it was crap.

In Dragon Age the only way i could see something like this come into play is in a few games time after visiting more countries on the present continent an sorting disputes yada yada there emerges a threat from across the ocean that will take the combined might of every country to counter, which i wouldnt be opposed to but for far to many i guess it would be to similar to mass effect

I would rather Bioware develop a more imaginative way of dealing with player choice rather than distilling every single thing down to a single scalar parameter.

[Valeck]

Please no i hate this on me3

[MKDAWUSS]

And it'll be tied to your Multiplayer wins!

[Solmanian]

I liked the fluff that comes with them

[The Six Path of Pain]

HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!There better not be XP

[Twisted Path]

RaidenXS wrote...

why does everyone assume dragon age is mass effect?

To be fair Dragon Age 2 took a lot of cues from Mass Effect 2. Hopefully that won't happen this time around though.

[SgtElias]

chrstnmonks wrote...

I wondered if we would have war assets in da3 like we do in me3.

Having almost no information about the game, I suppose anything is possible, but . . . seems unlikely.

[Solmanian]

Twisted Path wrote...

RaidenXS wrote...

why does everyone assume dragon age is mass effect?

To be fair Dragon Age 2 took a lot of cues from Mass Effect 2. Hopefully that won't happen this time around though.

LolWut? ME2 is considered the best in the trilogy, while DA2 is considered by many as, well the ME3 of dA games: a good game by itself, but not standing up to the high standards that were set by the previous games. I think that DA2 (and DA:I) would've been better if they took more cues from ME. The fact is that both games (DA2&ME2) were developed at the same time by different teams, leaving very little opportunities to "copy" successful features since neither team knew what the fans would like (power evolutions) and hate (mining mini game). I can realy think of anything particularly similar between those games, especialy since they're from different genre (sci-fi vs high fantasy). Can you give some examples?

[Irx]

RaidenXS wrote...

why does everyone assume dragon age is mass effect?

Because DA2 was much more influenced by ME than DA1.