96 réponses à ce sujet

[Franky Figgs]

And I hope I'm not berating the point I wanted to make earlier, but; I've noticed a few things are not being discussed around here so I thought I'd make a few outright procloamations.


1. Indoctrination theory is correct and the crucible isnt lying about a thing.

2. The crucible isn't invested in solving a organic/synthetic problem. He is intested in solving a thrall problem. 

3. You were told what decision not to make in the first 30 minutes of the first game.

Modifié par Franky Figgs, 19 mars 2013 - 04:01 .

[Texhnolyze101]

I'm not missing anything it just sucks.

[Michotic]

*Grabs popcorn and a seat.*

[HiddenInWar]

Michotic wrote...

*Grabs popcorn and a seat.*

*and cola*

[TheIdiocyWizard2.0]

Michotic wrote...

*Grabs popcorn and a seat.*

*Joins in and waits.*

In all seriousness...I guess it is a little easy to miss an opinion, but maybe that's just me.

Modifié par TheIdiocyWizard2.0, 19 mars 2013 - 12:33 .

[The Night Mammoth]

I agree. The galaxy has never rewarded the naive.

[Link Ashland 614]

What?

[M Hedonist]

Link Ashland 614 wrote...

What?

[OdanUrr]

Franky Figgs wrote...

And I hope I'm not berating the point I wanted to make earlier, but; I've noticed a few things are not being discussed around here so I thought I'd make a few outright procloamations.


1. Indoctrination theory is correct and the crucible isnt lying about a thing.

2. The crucible isn't invested in solving a organic/synthetic problem. He is intested in solving thrall problem. 

3. You were told what decision not to make from the first 30 minutes of the first game.

Here we go again. Again.

[Franky Figgs]

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

I'm not missing anything it just sucks.

Or it might be brilliant

*patiently sips water*

Modifié par Franky Figgs, 19 mars 2013 - 04:01 .

[arial]

obvious Troll is obvious

[Eterna]

Franky Figgs wrote...

And I hope I'm not berating the point I wanted to make earlier, but; I've noticed a few things are not being discussed around here so I thought I'd make a few outright procloamations.


1. Indoctrination theory is correct and the crucible isnt lying about a thing.

2. The crucible isn't invested in solving a organic/synthetic problem. He is intested in solving thrall problem. 

3. You were told what decision not to make from the first 30 minutes of the first game.

What in the actual **** is this? 

[Village_Idiot]

In before the lock!

[Texhnolyze101]

Franky Figgs wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

I'm not missing anything it just sucks.

Or it might be brilliant

*patently sips water*

IT is trash so i doubt it.

[Ticonderoga117]

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

I'm not missing anything it just sucks.

[The Night Mammoth]

BioWare have pulled off quite literally the most amazing manipulation of an audience I've ever seen.

They've obviously managed to indoctrinate most of their fanbase so their fans are blind to the situation, just like Shepard is.

[cerberus1701]

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

Franky Figgs wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

I'm not missing anything it just sucks.

Or it might be brilliant

*patently sips water*

IT is trash so i doubt it.

It's not trash.

I never bought any of it, but there's more to support it than the notion that Control, Refuse, or Synthesis are any good.

[Franky Figgs]

3. The central conflict was to resist synthesis. That was your premonition on Eden Prime. The warnings continued throughout the series as well.

2. The catalysis is a Leviathan AI. The Leviathan had a thrall problem largely due to the organic/synthetic conflict.

1. Indoctrination is when one finds the reasoning be willfully become a thrall.

Modifié par Franky Figgs, 19 mars 2013 - 01:08 .

[Drewton]

OdanUrr wrote...

Franky Figgs wrote...

And I hope I'm not berating the point I wanted to make earlier, but; I've noticed a few things are not being discussed around here so I thought I'd make a few outright procloamations.


1. Indoctrination theory is correct and the crucible isnt lying about a thing.

2. The crucible isn't invested in solving a organic/synthetic problem. He is intested in solving thrall problem. 

3. You were told what decision not to make from the first 30 minutes of the first game.

Here we go again. Again.

Agreed with OP though.

Modifié par Drewton, 19 mars 2013 - 12:44 .

[Nykara]

I still believe bioware has a plan, at least to an extent. I am not sure that I believe it is indoctrination though.

[Drewton]

Franky Figgs wrote...

The crucible is a Leviathan AI. The Leviathan had a thrall problem largely due to the organic/synthetic conflict.

Agreed about IT, but I think the "AI" is Harbinger.

[nrobbiec]

Franky Figgs wrote...
Indoctrination theory is correct

[Sejborg]

If the crucible is talking to you, then you are probably experiencing a bug.

[Applepie_Svk]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

I agree. The galaxy has never rewarded the naive.

[Franky Figgs]

Drewton wrote...

Franky Figgs wrote...

The crucible is a Leviathan AI. The Leviathan had a thrall problem largely due to the organic/synthetic conflict.

Agreed about IT, but I think the "AI" is Harbinger.

The catalysis didn't lie about a single thing. It is a Leviathan AI controlling the Reapers. It takes it's cues from its creators just as EDI did from Shepard.

Modifié par Franky Figgs, 19 mars 2013 - 04:03 .