299 réponses à ce sujet

[BlameTheTank]

o Ventus wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Smud simply called that dude (forgot his name, but I know who you're talking about) out on his BS. He spewed a load of horsecrap, Smud simply called him out on it.

Making a video that is 10 minutes of "no, you're an idiot, and this is why you're an idiot, you moron" is not "calling him out on it".

Soo in all your wisdom you didn`t notice that there are actually 6 parts of it? And the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 6th are muuuch longer than 10 minutes? maybe take the effort and read my starting post, select one of the other vids, watch them, understand them and then come back ?

[Genshie]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Smud simply called that dude (forgot his name, but I know who you're talking about) out on his BS. He spewed a load of horsecrap, Smud simply called him out on it.

Making a video that is 10 minutes of "no, you're an idiot, and this is why you're an idiot, you moron" is not "calling him out on it".

Yes it is.

I don't like Smud but I agree sounds like you just defined what "calling someone out" is Ven.

[The Heretic of Time]

BlameTheTank wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Smud simply called that dude (forgot his name, but I know who you're talking about) out on his BS. He spewed a load of horsecrap, Smud simply called him out on it.

Making a video that is 10 minutes of "no, you're an idiot, and this is why you're an idiot, you moron" is not "calling him out on it".

Soo in all your wisdom you didn`t notice that there are actually 6 parts of it? And the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 6th are muuuch longer than 10 minutes? maybe take the effort and read my starting post, select one of the other vids, watch them, understand them and then come back ?

Just ignore him. He's just one of those drones. Perhaps he too is a paid EAware troll, who knows.

[archangel1996]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

archangel1996 wrote...

Genshie wrote...

archangel1996 wrote...

Genshie wrote...

They didn't get paid and they did it anyway when they didn't have to. That was point and this is just beating a dead horse now.

Good for them, i din't ask that....How much they pay you?

I don't know. Wouldn't tell you anyway since it really isn't any of your business. And it was an example.

:blink:Oh ****

Goddamnit I knew EAware has paid trolls on this board. 

I suspect that David-something dude to be a paid EA troll as well.

MMM...how much do you think they pay 'em?

[o Ventus]

BlameTheTank wrote...

Soo in all your wisdom you didn`t notice that there are actually 6 parts of it? And the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 6th are muuuch longer than 10 minutes? maybe take the effort and read my starting post, select one of the other vids, watch them, understand them and then come back ?

1. I'm using "10 minutes" as a generic catch-all. Because I wasn't aware that it would ever be pertinent information, I didn't bother adding all of the video runtimes the first time.

2. What are you blathering on about?

Modifié par o Ventus, 21 mars 2013 - 12:55 .

[o Ventus]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Just ignore him. He's just one of those drones. Perhaps he too is a paid EAware troll, who knows.

Me? A drone?

Wow. You know you screwed up when you call me a drone.

Protip: before you question my affiliation (lololol), maybe become familiar with my posts on the matter.

[The Heretic of Time]

archangel1996 wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

archangel1996 wrote...

Genshie wrote...

archangel1996 wrote...

Genshie wrote...

They didn't get paid and they did it anyway when they didn't have to. That was point and this is just beating a dead horse now.

Good for them, i din't ask that....How much they pay you?

I don't know. Wouldn't tell you anyway since it really isn't any of your business. And it was an example.

:blink:Oh ****

Goddamnit I knew EAware has paid trolls on this board. 

I suspect that David-something dude to be a paid EA troll as well.

MMM...how much do you think they pay 'em?

Beats me. Probably enough for them to be willing to do this.

[The Heretic of Time]

o Ventus wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Just ignore him. He's just one of those drones. Perhaps he too is a paid EAware troll, who knows.

Me? A drone?

Wow. You know you screwed up when you call me a drone.

Protip: before you question my affiliation (lololol), maybe become familiar with my posts on the matter.

Oh I'm familiar with your posts Ventus, don't you worry about that. Just because you hate the ME3 endings doesn't make you not a drone. You're especially a hardcore drone when it comes to ME2.

Yes, you are a drone Ventus, very much so.

[archangel1996]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

archangel1996 wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

archangel1996 wrote...

Genshie wrote...

archangel1996 wrote...

Genshie wrote...

They didn't get paid and they did it anyway when they didn't have to. That was point and this is just beating a dead horse now.

Good for them, i din't ask that....How much they pay you?

I don't know. Wouldn't tell you anyway since it really isn't any of your business. And it was an example.

:blink:Oh ****

Goddamnit I knew EAware has paid trolls on this board. 

I suspect that David-something dude to be a paid EA troll as well.

MMM...how much do you think they pay 'em?

Beats me. Probably enough for them to be willing to do this.

Not too much then, the guy admitted it so they obviously don't look for people too smart
maybe just an autograph from Doc Casey

[Genshie]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Just ignore him. He's just one of those drones. Perhaps he too is a paid EAware troll, who knows.

Me? A drone?

Wow. You know you screwed up when you call me a drone.

Protip: before you question my affiliation (lololol), maybe become familiar with my posts on the matter.

Oh I'm familiar with your posts Ventus, don't you worry about that. Just because you hate the ME3 endings doesn't make you not a drone. You're especially a hardcore drone when it comes to ME2.

Yes, you are a drone Ventus, very much so.

And he can call you a troll what is your point by doing this? This isn't even about smud anymore or Mass Effect.

[phillip100]

Genshie wrote...

And he can call you a troll what is your point by doing this? This isn't even about smud anymore or Mass Effect.

Yeah this thread is completely derailed right now. I already reported this thread for the bickering that's going on.

Modifié par phillip100, 21 mars 2013 - 01:07 .

[o Ventus]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Oh I'm familiar with your posts Ventus, don't you worry about that. Just because you hate the ME3 endings doesn't make you not a drone. You're especially a hardcore drone when it comes to ME2.

Yes, you are a drone Ventus, very much so.

I wasn't aware that liking 1 game (well, 2, including ME1) constitutes me as a "drone", considering Bioware's lineup consists of 20 or so titles at the moment.

Edit: I'm just going to drop this now, even if I still be banned for derailing this thread. Sorry OP.

Modifié par o Ventus, 21 mars 2013 - 01:06 .

[tonofluck21]

I like the ending, but no matter what I say its not going to change your mind. I can respect your opinion, but not smudboy or clevernoob. Not everyone has the same taste in writing that you do, but telling them they are wrong kind of makes it hard to understand the point you are trying to make.

As for this thread I find it highly entertaining.

[The Heretic of Time]

o Ventus wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Oh I'm familiar with your posts Ventus, don't you worry about that. Just because you hate the ME3 endings doesn't make you not a drone. You're especially a hardcore drone when it comes to ME2.

Yes, you are a drone Ventus, very much so.

I wasn't aware that liking 1 game (well, 2, including ME1) constitutes me as a "drone", considering Bioware's lineup consists of 20 or so titles at the moment.

Edit: I'm just going to drop this now, even if I still be banned for derailing this thread. Sorry OP.

Liking a game or a company doesn't make someone a drone. Being completely blind to all and any flaws within that game, and defending said game or company to the death, is what makes someone a drone.

Modifié par Heretic_Hanar, 21 mars 2013 - 01:11 .

[eye basher]

You do know he makes mass effect videos for the views right because he knows all the suckers that subcribe to he's channel will watch it no matter what kind of dribble spouts.

[The Heretic of Time]

eye basher wrote...

You do know he makes mass effect videos for the views right because he knows all the suckers that subcribe to he's channel will watch it no matter what kind of dribble spouts.

While Smud certainly doesn't spout dribble, you most certainly are right about his motivations behind his videos. I'm glad finally someone here is smart enough to understand that.

[o Ventus]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Liking a game or a company doesn't make someone a drone. Being completely blind to all and any flaws within that game, and defending said game or company to the death, is what makes someone a drone.

So... I'm not a drone then. Gotcha.

I know, I said I would drop it. Done now.

[Eterna]

I'm actually rather pleased the people like Archangel and Smudboy didn't get an ending they want. They don't deserve it.

[archangel1996]

Eterna5 wrote...

I'm actually rather pleased the people like Archangel and Smudboy didn't get an ending they want. They don't deserve it.

Garrus?

[Han Shot First]

Gangnam Style wrote...

smudboy is terrible.

Agreed.

[CronoDragoon]

Still waiting for anyone to counter my points concerning the Catalyst from like 4 pages back. There's plenty of reasons to still dislike the endings; there's no reason to keep latching onto "the Catalyst's logic sucks!" when it's been explained now.

[BlameTheTank]

Eterna5 wrote...

I'm actually rather pleased the people like Archangel and Smudboy didn't get an ending they want. They don't deserve it.

Why they don`t deserve it? You just sound like Starkid now, saying something, without giving explanation.

Like in one of my "bestest" scenes in the ending:

Shepard: "So who designed it?"  (the Crucible)
Starkid: "You would not know them, and there is not much time to explain"

Huh? EC gives explanations much? o.O

[Eterna]

BlameTheTank wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

I'm actually rather pleased the people like Archangel and Smudboy didn't get an ending they want. They don't deserve it.

Why they don`t deserve it? You just sound like Starkid now, saying something, without giving explanation.

Like in one of my "bestest" scenes in the ending:

Shepard: "So who designed it?"  (the Crucible)
Starkid: "You would not know them, and there is not much time to explain"

Huh? EC gives explanations much? o.O

Previous organics from past cylces who are ultimately irrelevant to the plot at hand. 

[Scam_poo]

I am the only guy on this planet who thinks so, but...

I still like the original ending. Also, I didn't check out your links. You will never be able to convince me that the ending is 'BS'.

[o Ventus]

CronoDragoon wrote...

Still waiting for anyone to counter my points concerning the Catalyst from like 4 pages back. There's plenty of reasons to still dislike the endings; there's no reason to keep latching onto "the Catalyst's logic sucks!" when it's been explained now.

The logic being explained doesn't give it pardon.