Oberkaiser wrote...
TheBlackAdder13 wrote...
Are you suggesting gay people base their identities around their sexual preferences? The reason why "openly straight" doesn't make sense to you is because it's more commonly know by another term: the majority of every day life (--and really what do you mean "every time I read this?" -- where else have you heard it -- HeroicGreyWarden is the only person I've ever seen phrase it that way). You're wired to think that being straight is normal, or the rule, and being gay is abnormal, or the exception and thus, being openly gay means openly being abnormal or openly being an exception so, in the minds of most people, that's what gets signalled out. You hardly have to be "openly normal," do you? We call this heterosexual privilege. I hope you enjoy it.
When two people meet they generally don't assume anything about the other person's orientation or assume they're straight as a placeholder (after all, 99% of the world's population is straight). Close friends can go for years without knowing each other's sexual preferences, simply because it doesn't come up in day to day conversation. That's basically what being normal is about, gay or straight. Having a multifaceted personality that doesn't reduce every topic to their pet social issue.
*an estimated 90% of the world's population is straight (there, I fixed your baseless statistic for you)
And as a matter of fact, people do tend to assume things about other's sexualities, maybe not as much now as times are changing but when a lot of straight people meet someone, they automatically default and assume they're straight. That's what heteronormativism is. You just said "after all, 99% of the population is striaght (a clearly bumped up percentage to suit your own purposes), and are thus (innaccurately) assuming that 99 out of 100 people you meet are straight.
There was nothing in the post about taking away "multifacted personalites" from gay characters, quite the opposite obviously. You however, are the one trying to do that when you said "straight people don't base their identities around their sexual preferences," implying that gay people do base their identiteis around their sexual preferences. Your response to my post indicated that that is indeed how you feel and you trivilize being gay to "some pet social issue" (because, it's not like society has continually repressed and persecuted LGBT individuals, it's just a pet social issue after all). I don't even know why I'm responding to this as your argument is barely coherent and you clearly have some issues to work out.
ETA: Volus' flambooyancy comment has been responded to by others so I'm not even going to get started on that one.
Modifié par TheBlackAdder13, 24 mars 2013 - 01:01 .