they have gay relationships that causes a ton of controversy so I doubt that is why. also I don't have a problem with the gay relationships but alot of people doEnvyTB075 wrote...
Because controversy methinks. They cut that scene with Ashley for reasons unknown.
Yeah, "integrity".
why does no one ask
Débuté par
arial
, mars 24 2013 02:19
#26
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:02
garrusfan1
-
- Members
- 8 047 messages
Retour en haut
#27
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:06
SmokePants
-
- Members
- 1 121 messages
Shepard doesn't remember being unconscious and why should he? Whether you believe in an afterlife or not, it is illogical to expect that your experience there is being stored in your dead brain's memories.
#28
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:12
Xplode441
-
- Members
- 232 messages
This. If there's an afterlife, it's not like it's transmitting memory of being there into your dead brain. At least, I don't see why, it would makes no sense for it to considering that the brain is not functional and can't receive or send out electrical signals anymore.SmokePants wrote...
Shepard doesn't remember being unconscious and why should he? Whether you believe in an afterlife or not, it is illogical to expect that your experience there is being stored in your dead brain's memories.
Modifié par Xplode441, 24 mars 2013 - 03:13 .
#29
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:16
arial
-
- Members
- 5 811 messages
useing your logic, revived Shepard would not remember anything from his/her life before, as when someones dead their body stops sending electrical impulses to the brain, and the brain then starts to deteriorateSmokePants wrote...
Shepard doesn't remember being unconscious and why should he? Whether you believe in an afterlife or not, it is illogical to expect that your experience there is being stored in your dead brain's memories.
#30
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:18
Zazzerka
-
- Members
- 9 532 messages
It's not there because they copped enough flak for Liara's blue butt, without pissing off major religions as well.
Doneskies.
Doneskies.
#31
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:18
XI BlackHawx IX
-
- Members
- 189 messages
His brain was obviously still working in some capacity (protected by his his helmet) body was just...gone
#32
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:20
arial
-
- Members
- 5 811 messages
protected by his Helmet? his Helmet was just.. sitting there... on that Planet... without Shepard...XI BlackHawx IX wrote...
His brain was obviously still working in some capacity (protected by his his helmet) body was just...gone
#33
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:22
Xplode441
-
- Members
- 232 messages
That doesn't follow the same logic at all. We don't know really know how memories are stored in the brain yet, and I for one don't know how well preserved Shepard's remains were. Obviously Cerberus had a brain that could be functional if brought back or Shepard might have come back sitting in a corner drooling and staring into empty space. It makes sense that out of body experiences like an afterlife wouldn't be transmitted back to a non functioning brain, but that it could retain its past memories and knowledge.arial wrote...
useing your logic, revived Shepard would not remember anything from his/her life before, as when someones dead their body stops sending electrical impulses to the brain, and the brain then starts to deteriorateSmokePants wrote...
Shepard doesn't remember being unconscious and why should he? Whether you believe in an afterlife or not, it is illogical to expect that your experience there is being stored in your dead brain's memories.
#34
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:23
Iakus
-
- Members
- 30 285 messages
arial wrote...
protected by his Helmet? his Helmet was just.. sitting there... on that Planet... without Shepard...XI BlackHawx IX wrote...
His brain was obviously still working in some capacity (protected by his his helmet) body was just...gone
The Lazarus records on Cronos station said that the helmet protected Shepard's brain "For what it's worth"
Buty yeah, that's a really lame explanation.
Actually, no, it explains nothing,
#35
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:25
XI BlackHawx IX
-
- Members
- 189 messages
arial wrote...
protected by his Helmet? his Helmet was just.. sitting there... on that Planet... without Shepard...XI BlackHawx IX wrote...
His brain was obviously still working in some capacity (protected by his his helmet) body was just...gone
If his brain was gone or even dead then there would be no possible manner he could be revived, and his memories, exp's, everything that made him who he was would be gone
#36
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:27
Zazzerka
-
- Members
- 9 532 messages
You're applying real-world logic to science-fiction.XI BlackHawx IX wrote...
If his brain was gone or even dead then there would be no possible manner he could be revived, and his memories, exp's, everything that made him who he was would be gone
Don't do that.
#37
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:29
NeonFlux117
-
- Members
- 3 627 messages
Cause bioware said so. mass effect started cause they allowed it. And it will end. Cause they demand it.
#38
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:33
XI BlackHawx IX
-
- Members
- 189 messages
GT Zazzerka wrote...
You're applying real-world logic to science-fiction.XI BlackHawx IX wrote...
If his brain was gone or even dead then there would be no possible manner he could be revived, and his memories, exp's, everything that made him who he was would be gone
Don't do that.
and why not its clear that the game has real world logic, its 200 years in the future and even then they would not be able to restore Shep intact if his brain was gone/dead, even on the cronos station they said the only reason he was able to be brought back was the utter fact that his helmet protected his brain well enough that he could be restored witheveryone of his particuler factors intact
#40
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:37
visionazzery
-
- Members
- 773 messages
Some people say ea made repeat mistake in ending of me3 as they did with start of me2 on related topic. Some of the mostcdie hard longest term fans of massveffect on my origin right from bfre origin existed. I wwas shocked to learn in lead up to compldeted me 2 product. Bioware and ea had this idea to kill off Shepard altogether after normandy blew up . That is u 50 hrs plus regardless of renegade and paragon choices in me1 after bout 40- 50 hrs of me1 gameplay was originally intended to make no diff. Shepard was to originally die NO resurrection. Now I was a late convert to mass efect tpg but it faircto say I just as devoted as the original die hard fans of this franchise. But much like the ending of me3 Shepard would die. No survival no resurrection. This would xplain the plothole gap that pple are pointing out as to matters u raising here. My sources tell me that the uproar was huge can someone verify that bbioware original intent was to kill off Shepard and continue the reaper war at start of me2 through eyes of a brand new character. It never got off the ground apparently cos the uproar was huge. So the simple xplanation for hole inogic is that it was a rushed last minute decision to make Shepard be raised from the dead through the Lazarus project and u knw what? Despite u objections bout the concept from Lazarus project not being xplauned we should all be grateful bioware did a last minute change and continued to have Shepard as the main charactte. Can u imagine how off putting it would be to do fresh character aftercsetting the story up with Shepard from me1+ ? And all this beckons the question ea bioware corrected a credibility ruining mistake bfre it was released my question is why didntvthey pull away from their final ending path when deep down much like with killing off Shepard in me2 they surely knew me3 ending would have to change? To their credit theyh stopped themselves from releasing thevoriginsl intended intro to me2 for smthing better they still aftercthatvfirst near mistake with me2 went through and made the awful misrakecofctheit awful ending c?
#41
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:39
Zazzerka
-
- Members
- 9 532 messages
Then that's what happened.XI BlackHawx IX wrote...
and why not its clear that the game has real world logic, its 200 years in the future and even then they would not be able to restore Shep intact if his brain was gone/dead, even on the cronos station they said the only reason he was able to be brought back was the utter fact that his helmet protected his brain well enough that he could be restored witheveryone of his particuler factors intact
#42
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:53
alsonamedbort
-
- Members
- 519 messages
Because they wanted to make sure people could find tiny nitpicks to complain about on forums.
(OP, not really directed at you, but moreso at people responding with the "hurr durr artistic integrity" crap)
(OP, not really directed at you, but moreso at people responding with the "hurr durr artistic integrity" crap)
#43
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 03:57
arial
-
- Members
- 5 811 messages
haha, Im not complaining.. just.... curious....alsonamedbort wrote...
Because they wanted to make sure people could find tiny nitpicks to complain about on forums.
(OP, not really directed at you, but moreso at people responding with the "hurr durr artistic integrity" crap)
#44
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 04:02
alsonamedbort
-
- Members
- 519 messages
arial wrote...
haha, Im not complaining.. just.... curious....alsonamedbort wrote...
Because they wanted to make sure people could find tiny nitpicks to complain about on forums.
(OP, not really directed at you, but moreso at people responding with the "hurr durr artistic integrity" crap)
To be honest I think it would have been really interesting to explore that issue, I guess they just didn't decide to go in that direction.
#45
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 04:19
Ishandul
-
- Members
- 22 messages
CHARK19 wrote...
He wasn't ALL dead...
Turns out your friend is only MOSTLY dead.
#47
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 06:30
jkflipflopDAO
-
- Members
- 1 543 messages
NCommand wrote...
His reconstruction took two years, was dead for quite a while though, longer than any other living being, I guess it was just nothing, man how terrifying that idea is
. . . it would make you feel better thinking there's some all-powerful and all-knowing bearded being in the sky watching everything you do and listening to all your thoughts so that incase you displease him he will throw your soul into a pit of fire and agony so you can be punished for the rest of eternity?
. . . but he loves you unconditionally LOL what a joke.
Modifié par jkflipflopDAO, 24 mars 2013 - 06:32 .
#48
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 08:11
Xamufam
-
- Members
- 1 238 messages
In ME2 you found shepards helmet not far from the normandy how the hell did shepards bode survive atmospheric entry all the water would be gone even the body itself brain would not be repairable
It's sci fi there are rules & limits on technology & natural forces
It's sci fi there are rules & limits on technology & natural forces
Modifié par Troxa, 24 mars 2013 - 08:23 .
#49
Posté 24 mars 2013 - 09:11
Hendrik.III
-
- Members
- 909 messages
Because there is no afterlife? Well, there is on Omega...
But I get your point - Ash of all people should be curious because she's religious, and it would be something she would ask, but I kind of understand BW wanting to keep such a discussion out of their game. It would come down to religious views, or lack thereof, and you don't want to touch that, it never ends well.
But I get your point - Ash of all people should be curious because she's religious, and it would be something she would ask, but I kind of understand BW wanting to keep such a discussion out of their game. It would come down to religious views, or lack thereof, and you don't want to touch that, it never ends well.
