471 réponses à ce sujet

[Plaintiff]

I have yet to see a real argument for how nudity would add any sort of genuine value to the product. "It's a mature-rated game" is not a good enough reason.

[SaidRael]

Why hide nudity? Is a human body.

[Plaintiff]

rapscallioness wrote...

ME3 did a good job, too. It was undies, but it was an improvement overall from even ME1.

DA2, Anders didn't even take off his coat. The same coat he's been fighting in for 3 years. Ack.

You don't see any actual sex occur in DA2, so why on earth would you assume that Anders keeps his coat on during it? Just because he didn't take it off immediatly after kissing Hawke?

[Homebound]

the devs r just scared to show a little bit of skin.

[Ravensword]

Homebound wrote...

the devs r just scared to show a little bit of skin.

They were still shell shocked from the Faux Noise fluff piece about ME1's rampant, graphic and gratuitous nudity. Meanwhile, TW2's infamous sex scene sailed under their radar. Maybe they have something agains blue boobies.

[K_Tabris]

Pixeling out nudity is so tacky.

I thought the ME1 romance scenes were the best that they've ever done.

[Jadebaby]

ejoslin wrote...

The sims rating is Teen, and I'm not sure that pixelation would work in a cutscene. Not that underweartastic sex scenes work that well either, but I can't imagine they couldn't come up with decent camera angles and such that just show the barest hints of parts. That actually would be far sexier than full frontal anyway.

This poster has class, and I like it.

If only BioWare shared the same qualities.

[Chaos Lord Malek]

Why would full frontal nudity be out of the question? Its M rated game, its not for children.

[LTD]

Why not  stop playign video games and focus on digital " internet porn" models rather than force me to endure your carwings on a RPG forum? Seriously OP I just arrived from Internet and, I kid you not, there is actually tons o  digital püssy to be had there  you have no idea! Go check it out.

Seriously, one of these days some moderaltely large dev studio has quantity and quality of you guys figured out. Then we see an AA(A) softcore porn RPG with some heavy daytime soap elements. Mayhaps that is a day when circle jerk circles of BSN start fellating some other forum.

Modifié par LTD, 25 mars 2013 - 10:24 .

[Jadebaby]

Chaos Lord Malek wrote...

Why would full frontal nudity be out of the question? Its M rated game, its not for children.

Just because it's not for children doesn't mean it wont be marketed to children.

Look at games like Amnesia or The Witcher, kids play them all the time. All it takes these days is for them to see the poster in their local game shop and go "mommy, I wanna play that game."

[Jadebaby]

LTD wrote...

Why not  stop playign video games and focus on digital " internet porn" models rather than force me to endure your carwings on a RPG forum? Seriously OP I just arrived from Internet and, I kid you not, there is actually tons o  digital püssy to be had there  you have no idea! Go check it out.

Or go play Witcher 2. At least CDPR know how to keep things immersive.

[Walsh1980]

Julian Fuentes wrote...

Why hide nudity? Is a human body.

Or an elf. Or a dwarf. Qunari? Darkspawn?

oh right, broodmothers.

But yeah it is sad they can push the violence and aggression buttons, but are so afraid to push the titillation buttons. It just makes a scene funny and awkward when people where their underwear in the shower. And if you can't show a nipple, there are always tasteful camera angles (ME1 Liara in 3). I'm sure they would if they could, powers that be and all. Bless those European's and The Witcher 2, for treating us like adults.

[Plaintiff]

LTD wrote...

Why not  stop playign video games and focus on digital " internet porn" models rather than force me to endure your carwings on a RPG forum? Seriously OP I just arrived from Internet and, I kid you not, there is actually tons o  digital püssy to be had there  you have no idea! Go check it out.

Seriously, one of these days some moderaltely large dev studio has quantity and quality of you guys figured out. Then we see an AA(A) softcore porn RPG with some heavy daytime soap elements. Mayhaps that is a day when circle jerk circles of BSN start fellating some other forum.

[Chaos Lord Malek]

Jadebaby wrote...

Chaos Lord Malek wrote...

Why would full frontal nudity be out of the question? Its M rated game, its not for children.

Just because it's not for children doesn't mean it wont be marketed to children.

Look at games like Amnesia or The Witcher, kids play them all the time. All it takes these days is for them to see the poster in their local game shop and go "mommy, I wanna play that game."

Its M rated game. Its not marketed to children, and if parents buy the game for them, its parents fault. And Witcher has much worse things then just sex, the kids should never ever even touch that game - if they do, again its the fault of their parents.

I don't want the product that is directed on mature audiance be hampered because it could be played by children. You think if somebody is writting a book or making a movie, which will be rated 18+, is looking at things like "ohh, no we better not put this in, because children couldn't handle it" ??????

[Wulfram]

Chaos Lord Malek wrote...

Why would full frontal nudity be out of the question? Its M rated game, its not for children.

I think it can be distracting if you're trying to make the scene about the characters.  Because our culture makes it a big deal, it demands attention.

While just having it because your character doesn't have anything equipped would be silly.  I don't need to be flashed just because I just drunk a respec potion and can't equip my armour any more.  And having Oghren in his underwear because the Blood Dragon armour hasn't authorised was bad enough, I really don't need random naked Oghren.

And it'll probably take a disproportionate amount of attention among the media and general talk about the game.   Bioware possibly don't want their game to be thought of as primarily the game with the nudity.

[Corto81]

I don't mind the no-nudity.

But then, for pity's sake, skip the love-making cut-scenes, they are utterly ridiculous and don't work.

Shower scene in ME3 is perhaps the biggest joke of all.

Witcher 2 had a wonderfully done sex/love scene (and it was entirely optional), that was done in fairly good taste and seemed natural.
If they're not gonna show skin in DA3 (which is perfectly fine), just don't do sex/love cut-scenes.

[Urazz]

Wulfram wrote...

Chaos Lord Malek wrote...

Why would full frontal nudity be out of the question? Its M rated game, its not for children.

I think it can be distracting if you're trying to make the scene about the characters.  Because our culture makes it a big deal, it demands attention.

While just having it because your character doesn't have anything equipped would be silly.  I don't need to be flashed just because I just drunk a respec potion and can't equip my armour any more.  And having Oghren in his underwear because the Blood Dragon armour hasn't authorised was bad enough, I really don't need random naked Oghren.

And it'll probably take a disproportionate amount of attention among the media and general talk about the game.   Bioware possibly don't want their game to be thought of as primarily the game with the nudity.

They wouldn't have nudity just when you take off your armor, FYI.  Even the Witcher 2 doesn't do that.  The only nudity would only be for the sex scenes.

And who cares if the game gets attention amongst the media.  As long as it's rated for adults then no one can do anything to Bioware.  If children get ahold of it then it'll be the fault of the parents for buying M rated games for their children or the retailer for selling an M rated game to a minor.

[Uccio]

brushyourteeth wrote...

When you remove a character's clothing in the equipment screen, their arms and hands should immediately move up to cover their shameful bits.

Make it happen, Bioware!!

I've got nothing to shame, neither does my pc. let it all hang out proudly. Make it happen Bioware!!

[garrusfan1]

DinoSteve wrote...

garrusfan1 wrote...

DinoSteve wrote...

yep slaughtering 1000's of people in games is ok but nudity s not, what a world we live in.

where did you get that number I have killed 10000's in DAO over the course of all my playthroughs

I meant in games in general. Look at Mass Effect Shepard kills way more than that.

I was agreeing with you. also if you count all the times I have played shepard I killed more then 10000 people

[garrusfan1]

oh you mean for the change armor screen in that case Ithink the underwear is fine.

[garrusfan1]

Corto81 wrote...

I don't mind the no-nudity.

But then, for pity's sake, skip the love-making cut-scenes, they are utterly ridiculous and don't work.

Shower scene in ME3 is perhaps the biggest joke of all.

Witcher 2 had a wonderfully done sex/love scene (and it was entirely optional), that was done in fairly good taste and seemed natural.
If they're not gonna show skin in DA3 (which is perfectly fine), just don't do sex/love cut-scenes.

I think they should do the camera angle thing where it basically says they are but doesn't show anything that is graphic or whatever they call it. the underwear love scenes in DAO were annoying

[garrusfan1]

Jadebaby wrote...

Chaos Lord Malek wrote...

Why would full frontal nudity be out of the question? Its M rated game, its not for children.

Just because it's not for children doesn't mean it wont be marketed to children.

Look at games like Amnesia or The Witcher, kids play them all the time. All it takes these days is for them to see the poster in their local game shop and go "mommy, I wanna play that game."

it is not marketed for kids and it is upto the parents to decide if the kid should play it or not. I am 21 now and when the first halo came out I played it because I was allowed to. if a kid plays the witcher 2 though I think something is wrong cause that game is beyond graphic. that said if a game is rated m it is for adults and thus shouldn't have to be careful about kids playing it since without an adult buying it they can't legally get it.

[SerenityRebirth]

 Censorhip bars/pixilation are just as awkward. To me, it has a humourous/eye rolling feel to them. I think subtle camera angles would be better. Imply that they are naked, and that they are intimate without showing anything. Many movies do it this, especially PG-13 movies. I think they had it right in the right Mass Effect game, but I also remember the backlash, and I'm guessing that that is the reason why underwear sex as become a staple...

[garrusfan1]

SerenityRebirth wrote...

 Censorhip bars/pixilation are just as awkward. To me, it has a humourous/eye rolling feel to them. I think subtle camera angles would be better. Imply that they are naked, and that they are intimate without showing anything. Many movies do it this, especially PG-13 movies. I think they had it right in the right Mass Effect game, but I also remember the backlash, and I'm guessing that that is the reason why underwear sex as become a staple...

something people forget about is that ME1 was made in 2007 and times have changed since then. god of war had nudity and many others do now so that isn't really the issue. plus any publicity is good publicity and it doesn't effect their sales