In this case, the messenger is telling a tale of projected interpretations and hyperbolic tone and claims, with precious little support accompanying it.SpamBot2000 wrote...
Dean_the_Young wrote...
There are no villains in this tale because this isn't a work of romantic fiction. They made a product you didn't like: they don't need a motivation in order to produce something you didn't like, nor have you provided any evidence that such an outcome was their intent. All you've encountered a difference of taste, not some conspiracy.
I stand by my wild speculations. If this was just a case of weird taste and incompetence at BW, why on Earth would they shut the freaking writing team out of the room when coming up with the ending, then sneak it in the game as if ashamed? Are those the actions of people trying to provide the finest possible experience to the player?
If it seems so "stupid" to you, maybe it's because in a very real sense it is. Sadly, you misattribute the stupidity to the messanger.
It's one thing to call the messenger stupid, which I'm not. It's another to warn the messenger that he doesn't have evidence for what he's carrying, which you don't.





Retour en haut






