To be fair i'm in the minority as it's part of my job to keep up with these things, but also, I usually only do this for games that I'm pretty sure i'll love. Last few were, Farcry 3, X-Com, Dishonored, D3, SimCity (only one that didnt have a pre-load wtf.) And tonight, BIOSHOCK!@#!%#
Mabye i'm just easy to please hehe.
Oh snap, is Bioshock tonight?!
.
.
.
*finger hovers over pre-order button*
.
.
.
Hurgh... unggg... must.. not.. do it....
LinksOcarina wrote...
but lets think about it. Dragon Age II
had at best, 20 months of development, Origins had over 44 months
because it was in limbo for a year or so.
If we were going to put
merits into time to determine something as ready, what would be
acceptable? You talked about the bugs in SimCity, whats a good amount of
time to make sure that doesn't happen in Inquisition, by your
estimation?
I would say, totally honestly, not less than 1 day but not more than 10 years.
Dude, I'm not setting time limits for them. I'm just asking that "[they] do their best to maintain an internal standard that they would and should be proud of." I'm an outsider looking in. It's impossible for me to say how long it should take, or what ready or not looks like. I'll be able to tell you once the game is released though. Maybe if I offer to do a review they'll send me a free copy and then it's a moot point!





Retour en haut







