NuclearTech76 wrote...
Console or PC the DOT of incendiary starts after the firing stops. The target procs the ammo effects earlier but the DOT doesn't start until after you quit firing.
If you think incendiary takes down things quicker than AP, it should be simple to actually time it and see.
UnknownMercenary wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
For some reason BW really considered spare ammo and magazine size an important balancing factor. Will never understand the logic behind that.
It's a perfectly valid balancing tactic if spare ammo is a limited resource, like it was in ME2.
If you use a Marksman or AR character, you can pop the power before unloading a clip, can't you? So, you can essentially one clip the entire wave, and then some (if you can reload while firing).RedJohn wrote...
UnknownMercenary wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
For some reason BW really considered spare ammo and magazine size an important balancing factor. Will never understand the logic behind that.
It's a perfectly valid balancing tactic if spare ammo is a limited resource, like it was in ME2.
But it isn't
The thing is, Spittfire can take 2 possessed praetorians in 1 clip, but it takes forever, but the main joke behind this thread is, that even if spittfire can do what no other gun can do in the game, still kind of "meh"
that weight.......
Jack Crapper wrote...
If you use a Marksman or AR character, you can pop the power before unloading a clip, can't you? So, you can essentially one clip the entire wave, and then some (if you can reload while firing).RedJohn wrote...
UnknownMercenary wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
For some reason BW really considered spare ammo and magazine size an important balancing factor. Will never understand the logic behind that.
It's a perfectly valid balancing tactic if spare ammo is a limited resource, like it was in ME2.
But it isn't
The thing is, Spittfire can take 2 possessed praetorians in 1 clip, but it takes forever, but the main joke behind this thread is, that even if spittfire can do what no other gun can do in the game, still kind of "meh"
that weight.......
Basically, you can one clip an entire game!
Dragonhalls wrote...
avenger is a boss killer too...
on bronze
Jack Crapper wrote...
If you use a Marksman or AR character, you can pop the power before unloading a clip, can't you? So, you can essentially one clip the entire wave, and then some (if you can reload while firing).RedJohn wrote...
UnknownMercenary wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
For some reason BW really considered spare ammo and magazine size an important balancing factor. Will never understand the logic behind that.
It's a perfectly valid balancing tactic if spare ammo is a limited resource, like it was in ME2.
But it isn't
The thing is, Spittfire can take 2 possessed praetorians in 1 clip, but it takes forever, but the main joke behind this thread is, that even if spittfire can do what no other gun can do in the game, still kind of "meh"
that weight.......
Basically, you can one clip an entire game!
The lack of spare ammo is still a better balancing factor than the abundance of spare ammo. I doesn't matter if you have 1000 rounds if it takes at least 500 to kill something. Having to stop and reload cuts down DPS and puts you at danger; think of the Pirahna.DHKany wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
For some reason BW really considered spare ammo and magazine size an important balancing factor. Will never understand the logic behind that.
Just in the same way that Harrier is 'balanced' SOLELY on its spare ammo......
inb4flamers.
RedJohn wrote...
UnknownMercenary wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
For some reason BW really considered spare ammo and magazine size an important balancing factor. Will never understand the logic behind that.
It's a perfectly valid balancing tactic if spare ammo is a limited resource, like it was in ME2.
But it isn't
The thing is, Spittfire can take 2 possessed praetorians in 1 clip, but it takes forever, but the main joke behind this thread is, that even if spittfire can do what no other gun can do in the game, still kind of "meh"
that weight.......
Modifié par Annomander, 29 mars 2013 - 04:42 .
UnknownMercenary wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
For some reason BW really considered spare ammo and magazine size an important balancing factor. Will never understand the logic behind that.
It's a perfectly valid balancing tactic if spare ammo is a limited resource, like it was in ME2.
Modifié par Zjarcal, 29 mars 2013 - 04:46 .
Modifié par Notorious P I G, 29 mars 2013 - 04:55 .
RedJohn wrote...
The DoT with incendiary starts when you stop firing your weapon, which means that if you shot the target and don't stop shotting you are just wasting incendiary ammo's potential, it's like if you don't have something equiped.
I will tell peddro myself to come here and explain you, because you have missunderstood what you read there.
Notorious P I G wrote...
Spitfire is a beast on a destroyer.
Das Rouse wrote...
Notorious P I G wrote...
Spitfire is a beast on a destroyer.
It's also an anchor.
Annomander wrote...
cerberus carrier.
Notorious P I G wrote...
Das Rouse wrote...
Notorious P I G wrote...
Spitfire is a beast on a destroyer.
It's also an anchor.
everyone knows a spitfire destroyer is the worlds greatest pizza man.
Zjarcal wrote...
Annomander wrote...
cerberus carrier.
LAWL
Annomander wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
Annomander wrote...
cerberus carrier.
LAWL
I didn't even come up with that, someone else takes the credit for that phrase...
Lol. That was hilarious yesterday. I didn't realise you wanted to carry the first one as well.Notorious P I G wrote...
Das Rouse wrote...
Notorious P I G wrote...
Spitfire is a beast on a destroyer.
It's also an anchor.
everyone knows a spitfire destroyer is the worlds greatest pizza man.
Right up till the banshee gives you a colon exam.Notorious P I G wrote...
Spitfire is a beast on a destroyer.
Not everyone keeps their colon in same place captian.NuclearTech76 wrote...
Right up till the banshee gives you a colon exam.Notorious P I G wrote...
Spitfire is a beast on a destroyer.
Notorious P I G wrote...
Spitfire is a beast on a destroyer.
nopeHeavysetRJ wrote...
Remember when RedJohn was the nice, helpful guy instead of a total attention ****?
Retour en haut
