Allan Schumacher wrote...
sandalisthemaker wrote...
Something doesn't have to be intentional in order to send a message.
Well, at least we're all getting insulted now (including me).
I'm rather proud of attempting to be more inclusive in our stories and characters, and at this point I think it's best for me to just take a break rather than have people tell me that our attempts have only made things worse because we're sending hidden messages. Doubly so for actually suggesting in a different post that it's like we're suggesting that if they were in heterosexual relationships things would have been fine.
At this point, I hope the writers just do what they want to do. If it's not good enough for some, so be it.
... why would you be offended?
I'm serious, I can't for the life of me to understand why you (or anybody reading this thead) would be offended by the criticism in this thead. People are pointing out a trend, and explaining why it's problematic. I haven't read a single post stating that BW has some company-wide homophobic agenda, which is geared to show only unhappy female SS relationships, or anything of that nature.
I have gay friends, and I have stayed stuff in the past that has made them uncomfortable. When they confronted me with the things I'd said, I didn't go " Well, now I'm offended that you are implying I am homophobic, even thought I hang out with you guys!" I said "I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was making you uncomfortable. I won't be doing that again."
Acknowledging your social biases and priviledges means that at some point, when we screw up (because we most certainly do) and a member of a minority points it out to us, we should listen to their grievances and try to do better next time. This is not about how we feel, this is about how the stuff we do makes them feel.
I can see this thead bringing out a lot of emotions, but I honestly can't see how anyone working for BW would be offended by this thead. Plus, we only criticize because we love you, and want you to do even better.
wetnasty wrote...
Jeff and EDI don't end out well if you choose to destroy all synthetics. There is also the possibility of your squadmates dying in ME3, so any squadmate pairings don't count.
Same with Fenris and Isabela. There is a possibility that Isabela never comes back... There's a possibility that you kill Fenris.
Gabby and Kenneth are an optional quest, and I NEVER got them together or even knew that it was possible to get them together until someone told me way after 5 or 6 of my playthroughs.
So that just leaves Aveline and Donnic? And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that an optional side quest?
You are correct, but there's still the fact that there are no examples of steady, happy NPC female SS relationships, optional sidequest/obscure or not, in either games. Or if there are, I can't name one - can you?
Again: nobody is saying all opposite sex relationships end with rainbows and puppies, or that all SS relationships should end with rainbows and puppies, or that tragic lovestories aren't welcome. We're saying that there seems to be a trend here, and its implications are somewhat problematic.
Modifié par MissOuJ, 30 mars 2013 - 07:37 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





