It may be a purpose, but it ain't no reason. We're told over and over again that the Geth are software, not hardware. Legion dies spreading "his" software to the other Geth - ergo, Legion's death is hardware-only. While there are other places Legion can die fruitlessly and isolated from the Geth collective (in the tubes trying to hack doors in the Collector base, for example), that particular ending seems to neglect that Legion's hardware platform burning out and powering off does not mean that Legion is dead. Because Legion is not his hardware platform, he is the software which he just uploaded to every other Geth.Suron wrote...
I beg to differ. Even if ham-fisted, Legions death makes more sense and serves more of a purpose than Anderson's.....There was a "reason" (even if illogical) to Legions death...to "evolve" his "people"
Anyway, in terms of saving. Since Morinth is a remorseless killer who derives satisfaction from the deed, and one who will live for hundreds more years, the universe is better off without her. If you choose her over Samara, she spends the rest of the game trying to kill you. Not cool.
I think that the idea of curing Kepral's just because people think Thane is cool would be lame. The thing I thought was cool about Thane is the way he's discovered a kind of placid detachment in the midst of his life of bloodshed, and has come to terms with his own inevitable death.
Anderson's death is pretty cheap, considering that Shepard can (in theory) survive a collission with the earth from orbit, in the midst of a bunch of burning rubble and whatnot. "Saving" Anderson might be a good usse of one save, if you had one.
Aside from the reasons enumerated above...Legion's survival seems to be in part critical to the Geth making peace with organics, which seems like a worthwhile undertaking. The Geth can download themselves into plowshares and make life better for everybody. Win-win.





Retour en haut







