779 réponses à ce sujet

[KENNY4753]

"You're probably wrong is some way anyway"

Seriously!? You really dont even care what her point was before you claim she is wrong. well way to be one sided and so full of yourself.

I really hope you were being sarcastic

[MegaSovereign]

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Synthesis doesn't make much sense from a role-playing perspective. Why would my Shepard choose to "fix" all life in the galaxy if his original long term goal was to save them?

Synthesis saves them and more. It advances everyone in the galaxy to a stage three civilization. 

We don't know if Synthesis is even necessary. The cycle just got broken.

It is necessary if you believe it is necessary. If you don't, then there are three other options. That's why they gave us choice. 

I meant necessary for advancement. Breaking the cycle alone would be a step forward for the galaxy.

[sH0tgUn jUliA]

Auintus wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Synthesis doesn't make much sense from a role-playing perspective. Why would my Shepard choose to "fix" all life in the galaxy if his original long term goal was to save them?

Synthesis saves them and more. It advances everyone in the galaxy to a stage three civilization. 

We don't know if Synthesis is even necessary. The cycle just got broken.

It is necessary if you believe it is necessary. If you don't, then there are three other options. That's why they gave us choice. 

Two other options. Refuse doesn't break the cycle.

HA! You are wrong! Refuse does break the cycle! I've got you now!

The next cycle eliminates the Reapers. They destroy them. We fought a terrible war so they don't have to.

[Grand Admiral Cheesecake]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Auintus wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Synthesis doesn't make much sense from a role-playing perspective. Why would my Shepard choose to "fix" all life in the galaxy if his original long term goal was to save them?

Synthesis saves them and more. It advances everyone in the galaxy to a stage three civilization. 

We don't know if Synthesis is even necessary. The cycle just got broken.

It is necessary if you believe it is necessary. If you don't, then there are three other options. That's why they gave us choice. 

Two other options. Refuse doesn't break the cycle.

HA! You are wrong! Refuse does break the cycle! I've got you now!

The next cycle eliminates the Reapers. They destroy them. We fought a terrible war so they don't have to.

And the Yahg Imperium rules the galaxy forever...yay?

[KENNY4753]

dont forget about the Raloi, Great Admiral Cheesecake

[Applepie_Svk]

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...



And the Yahg Imperium rules the galaxy forever...yay?

nope.... all species from the bronze age till the advance space age will be eliminated, even Yagh will despite that Reapers were avoiding their planet, they were not even threat to anyone.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

Auintus wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

I see my large argument against synthesis got ignored.

Many arguments are ignored here. Pointing it out won't change anything. You're probably wrong in some way anyway.

Why don't you take a look at it and tell me whats wrong.

[sH0tgUn jUliA]

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Auintus wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Synthesis doesn't make much sense from a role-playing perspective. Why would my Shepard choose to "fix" all life in the galaxy if his original long term goal was to save them?

Synthesis saves them and more. It advances everyone in the galaxy to a stage three civilization. 

We don't know if Synthesis is even necessary. The cycle just got broken.

It is necessary if you believe it is necessary. If you don't, then there are three other options. That's why they gave us choice. 

Two other options. Refuse doesn't break the cycle.

HA! You are wrong! Refuse does break the cycle! I've got you now!

The next cycle eliminates the Reapers. They destroy them. We fought a terrible war so they don't have to.

And the Yahg Imperium rules the galaxy forever...yay?

It was just winning the argument on principle. He said refuse doesn't break the cycle. He was incorrect. I MEHEM now. I used to Destroy.

[Cainhurst Crow]

Can we throw this thread out the airlock yet?

[AresKeith]

KENNY4753 wrote...

dont forget about the Raloi, Great Admiral Cheesecake

And the Sith lol

[Applepie_Svk]

AresKeith wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

dont forget about the Raloi, Great Admiral Cheesecake

And the Sith lol

pa pa paa pa pa pa papapaaaaaaa

[ObserverStatus]

Darth Brotarian wrote...
Can we throw this thread out the airlock yet?

Nope, the way that Mr. Gaider played Mass Effect 3 was wrong, very wrong. We have to keep going until he recognizes his mistake and apologizes.

Modifié par bobobo878, 02 avril 2013 - 09:47 .

[TheRealJayDee]

After reading through this thread I'm feeling kinda glad that I've more or less completly given up discussing the endings. I will always stand on the side of the "haters", but I don't see the point of talking about them anymore. By now I'm not even really interested in hearing anything about the endings from the people responsible for them anymore. Mass Effect is over...

[MassivelyEffective0730]

KENNY4753 wrote...

"You're probably wrong is some way anyway"

Seriously!? You really dont even care what her point was before you claim she is wrong. well way to be one sided and so full of yourself.

I really hope you were being sarcastic

Thanks for backing me up man.

But, I'm a dude...

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 02 avril 2013 - 09:47 .

[Auintus]

KENNY4753 wrote...

"You're probably wrong is some way anyway"

Seriously!? You really dont even care what her point was before you claim she is wrong. well way to be one sided and so full of yourself.

I really hope you were being sarcastic

...I'm not going to trek back through twenty pages and try to figure out which argument he considered valid. I don't know which point he is refering to. He posts here rather frequently. The goal was to goad him into clarifying.
Note the word "probably." Fantastic little thing. Lets me rattle a reaction out of people while still being able to say "Okay, that was actually a pretty good point." if it happens to be so.

Settle down a bit.

Modifié par Auintus, 02 avril 2013 - 09:47 .

[sH0tgUn jUliA]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

Can we throw this thread out the airlock yet?

Now that I've declared victory. Yes.

[cerberus1701]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Auintus wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Synthesis doesn't make much sense from a role-playing perspective. Why would my Shepard choose to "fix" all life in the galaxy if his original long term goal was to save them?

Synthesis saves them and more. It advances everyone in the galaxy to a stage three civilization. 

We don't know if Synthesis is even necessary. The cycle just got broken.

It is necessary if you believe it is necessary. If you don't, then there are three other options. That's why they gave us choice. 

Two other options. Refuse doesn't break the cycle.

HA! You are wrong! Refuse does break the cycle! I've got you now!

The next cycle eliminates the Reapers. They destroy them. We fought a terrible war so they don't have to.

It does break the cycle, but, wait for it,  you have no idea at all if the end scene is the NEXT cycle.

You assume, but that scene could have been 10 cycles down the road. Or more.

Modifié par cerberus1701, 02 avril 2013 - 09:53 .

[ObserverStatus]

Scepsis wrote...

bobobo878 wrote...

Scepsis wrote...
*facepalm*
...and my point is missed entirely.

I can accept that the gamers who chose this option are not bad people. After all, it is just a game. However, I still think that in this case they would prove that the character they play is a bad person.

Adding fuel to the prevebial fire doesn't help the toxicity of these boards was what I meant originally.

And I dismissed your assertion that I should be concerned about the site's toxicity.

[Grand Admiral Cheesecake]

AresKeith wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

dont forget about the Raloi, Great Admiral Cheesecake

And the Sith lol

Harbinger: You cannot resist.

Admiral Cheesecake: All forces open fire.


*curbstomp ensues*

Admiral Cheesecake: *surveying the wreckage* No machine is a match for the empire!


*Admiral Cheesecake was killed three years later by an Ewok*

Modifié par Grand Admiral Cheesecake, 02 avril 2013 - 09:51 .

[Auintus]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

HA! You are wrong! Refuse does break the cycle! I've got you now!

The next cycle eliminates the Reapers. They destroy them. We fought a terrible war so they don't have to.

You died. You lost. Game over. You failed.
The next round broke the cycle. With Glyph's help, of course, but the fact remains that you had the chance and failed to capitalize, leaving someone else to pick up the slack. They did it, not you. If you consider that victory, that's your game, but I can't.

Modifié par Auintus, 02 avril 2013 - 09:50 .

[MassivelyEffective0730]

Scepsis wrote...

bobobo878 wrote...

Scepsis wrote...
*facepalm*
...and my point is missed entirely.

I can accept that the gamers who chose this option are not bad people. After all, it is just a game. However, I still think that in this case they would prove that the character they play is a bad person.

Adding fuel to the prevebial fire doesn't help the toxicity of these boards was what I meant originally.

Dude, these boards have more crap in them than a West Virgina septic tank. It's not changing anytime soon.