Ok just hear me out you don't have to get all mad about it. So if DA:I has MP should it affect the game. I'm not saying the way ME3's MP made it so if you didn't play it you got a bad ending. But look at it almost like buying DLC. If some one chooses to get DLC it affects the game. So now if you play MP maybe you can get a speacial mission in the game or meet a new character. Because RPG's are about chose and if some one chooses to play MP shouldn't there chose have an outcome. What do you people think.
DA:I MP Should it affect the game.
Débuté par
El Dude 9
, avril 03 2013 01:59
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:02
I WANT YOU TO FUCK ME JERY
-
- Members
- 17 349 messages
No thanks.
Then my inner single player completionist would feel like I'd have to play MP to get the most out of the game.
Then my inner single player completionist would feel like I'd have to play MP to get the most out of the game.
Modifié par SergeantSnookie, 03 avril 2013 - 02:03 .
#3
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:04
TJPags
-
- Members
- 5 694 messages
No.
There's going to be MP, guess there's no way around that. But it should not in any way effect the SP game.
Not even as some kind of DLC.
There's going to be MP, guess there's no way around that. But it should not in any way effect the SP game.
Not even as some kind of DLC.
#4
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:04
EpicBoot2daFace
-
- Members
- 3 600 messages
No! It's already bad enough that they're being forced by EA to do multiplayer.
#5
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:04
Mr.House
-
- Members
- 23 338 messages
NO!
ME3 MP having an affect on SP is why we got that horrible war asset system. MP should be its own thing and not connect to SP.
ME3 MP having an affect on SP is why we got that horrible war asset system. MP should be its own thing and not connect to SP.
#7
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:07
legbamel
-
- Members
- 2 539 messages
They haven't even verified that there will be multi-player, just that there will be some on-line element (one that, one presumes, will encourage microtransactions) as required by EA. While MP might be the most obvious way to do that it hasn't been confirmed.
#8
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:07
The Six Path of Pain
-
- Members
- 778 messages
In the words of the great Sten...No!
#9
Guest_krul2k_*
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:08
Guest_krul2k_*
Guest_krul2k_*
-
- Guests
no but no doubt they will tie something in there to make ppl play it
#10
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:14
Blarg
-
- Members
- 3 430 messages
I wouldn't want it to connect to SP. That was just a hassle in ME3. But I won't object to actually having an MP.
#11
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:19
Mornmagor
-
- Members
- 710 messages
No, although it already affects it, even if it exists.
It takes time from something else that could be in the game -.-
It takes time from something else that could be in the game -.-
#12
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:27
Iakus
-
- Members
- 30 431 messages
EpicBoot2daFace wrote...
No! It's already bad enough that they're being forced by EA to do multiplayer.
+1
I want them so separate i don't even want to have to install MP it to play SP.
#13
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:36
Fast Jimmy
-
- Members
- 17 939 messages
Only if what MP affects is the romances alone...?
#14
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:38
Guest_Puddi III_*
Guest_Puddi III_*
-
- Guests
I would have to know what kind of affect it has before deciding if I want it or not. It would be cool if it affected the ambient dialog, Orzammar criers and the like.
#15
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:39
Sanunes
-
- Members
- 4 392 messages
No.
We don't know what the online/social component of the game is going to be, but I rather not have anything like the system they have for Mass Effect 3 for it allows people to create conspiracy theories and honestly doesn't improve the game at all. If they want to add co-op or multiplayer like Mass Effect 3 that is fine by me, but I don't want to feel that if I don't want to play those aspects of the game I am being punished by missing content.
We don't know what the online/social component of the game is going to be, but I rather not have anything like the system they have for Mass Effect 3 for it allows people to create conspiracy theories and honestly doesn't improve the game at all. If they want to add co-op or multiplayer like Mass Effect 3 that is fine by me, but I don't want to feel that if I don't want to play those aspects of the game I am being punished by missing content.
#17
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:42
NovaBlastMarketing
-
- Members
- 508 messages
Mp in any form should not be allow to even exist in the SP RP universe let alone affect it
#19
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:45
ziloe
-
- Members
- 3 088 messages
HELL NO!
All that does is split the strength of the team working on the game. And if you want a good game, you shouldn't want MP at all.
All that does is split the strength of the team working on the game. And if you want a good game, you shouldn't want MP at all.
#20
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 02:56
Rawgrim
-
- Members
- 11 534 messages
Absolutely not. and this time i want Bioware to be honest about it before release too. They said MP didn`t affect ME3 when it came out, and yet it did. They fixed it with a patch later, though (after the MP had become a huge success due to forced play).
#24
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 03:49
Jaronking
-
- Members
- 141 messages
it wouldn't make sense because you get to choose what side to be on in M3 you couldn't you are building up your army for the final battle so Dragon age 3 couldn't do that
#25
Posté 03 avril 2013 - 04:25
Avalon The Elf
-
- Members
- 162 messages
I don't see why they online thing couldn't just be co-op, i hate EA, offline and online co-op would be fun
