Which should be no one rational.M25105 wrote...
Filament wrote...
"Yes, but only for straight, I don't want to watch two guys getting it on."
Do homophobes often pursue gay romances despite themselves? Who does this option serve?
It serves anyone who votes for it.
Let's settle this once and for all and see where this forum stands on nudity with a poll.
#26
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:22
Guest_Puddi III_*
#27
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:22
#28
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:23
Xilizhra wrote...
Oddly, I don't think I've ever heard anyone on the board say that they actually dislike female nudity, even gay men.
Anyway... honestly, I don't care all that much and barely even see why it's an issue, but if I had to pick something, ME1 probably handled it the best, with DA2 coming in second. Fading to black is better than absurd underwear.
Just pointing out that the options are very one-sided and homophobic against gay men in particular.
I personally would not have a problem with female nudity if it is done tastefully.
#29
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:23
Plaintiff wrote...
There's no option on this poll for me. I want all the women to be wearing burqas while the men stroll around the city hub with their turgid, ten-inch ****s flopping around in full view. They should stop periodically to flex their biceps and compare size.
Had a long day at work, and this finally made me laugh, THANK YOU
BW, pls, make this happen.
#30
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:24
sandalisthemaker wrote...
Just pointing out that the options are very one-sided and homophobic against gay men in particular.
And also disregards straight female desire.
It's basically just straight male homophobic point of view.
#31
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:24
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Lol where's that from?Kroitz wrote...
Melca36 wrote...
Interesting how your poll admits two women but mentions two men.
#32
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:25
Fast Jimmy wrote...
M25105 wrote...
Fast Jimmy wrote...
M25105 wrote...
sandalisthemaker wrote...
M25105 wrote...
motomotogirl wrote...
Hateful wording in this poll. Nevertheless, I chose "fade to black."
How's it hateful? I tried to include every option I could think off.
You have a 'guy on guy is icky' option.
And? All possible options like I said, believe it or not some people don't want to see homosexuality in the game, the poll is there if anyone wishes to express it anonymously and if you're curious, I voted for option 5.
You did not even say "hetero sexual only, no homosexual." You specifically said "two guys." That is ignoring the fact that there could be two women and also implies that two guys are, as sandal said, "icky."
Just a little bias showing, that's all.
I wrote straight only. Last I checked woman on woman isn't straight.
What if I don't like girl on girl, but am okay with guy on guy?
You know... like I'm sure tons and tons of gay guys would be like?
And then there would be complaints "I don't want to see guy on guy, or guy on woman, only woman on woman"
#33
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:26
motomotogirl wrote...
And also disregards straight female desire.
It's basically just straight male homophobic point of view.
True.
And OP seems more genuinely oblivious as opposed to a troll.
Sad.
#34
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:27
#35
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:28
Modifié par M25105, 04 avril 2013 - 11:29 .
#36
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:29
sandalisthemaker wrote...
True.
And OP seems more genuinely oblivious as opposed to a troll.
Sad.
But it might make him think.
What irks me sometimes is that this straight male homobic viewpoint gets toted about this forum as if it's the norm. Newsflash, there are loads of progressive straight guys who aren't remotely bothered by seeing two guys together.
I guess they're not afraid they're going to "turn gay" just by seeing two happy and in love guys
#37
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:30
Bahama Mammas, Schlong dongadoodles and nates.
You want or not?
#38
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:30
M25105 wrote...
So you guys are what "Straightophobes?" Option one covers all sexes.
You're right; I hate straight people.
*stabs self*
#39
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:31
Kroitz wrote...
Bahama Mammas, Schlong dongadoodles and nates.
You want or not?
Isn't a bahama mama a drink?!
Yes, please
#40
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:31
I personally don't care for nudity, it doesn't represent the true meaning of romances and especially developing meaningful relationships. Especially since gaming still has an awkward sense of trying to not be rated G, but not too "raw" in a sense and can't find that equilibrium, so we end up getting scenes which can be seen as male dominated and not female friendly or end up with scenes where a lady will take a shower with her bra and underwear and don't forget... sketchy animation at best.
There's more to expressing that type of relationship in gaming then just showing nudity, but hey, each there own. Do I believe any game has done it right, no - not even The Witcher series.
#41
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:32
*raises hand*And then there would be complaints "I don't want to see guy on guy, or guy on woman, only woman on woman"
But, of course, I can do that just by choosing one variety of romance, so... I don't really see why there'd be a need for censoring anything else.
Also, I initially thought that the OP was actually mocking straight male homophobes by including that option, hence my not bringing it up, but I might be wrong.
#42
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:32
Chiramu wrote...
I don't think my opinion is on there.
I personally don't mind seeing nudity, just as long as a the director doesn't force censoring on nude characters like they do in movies, like taking the bedsheets with you as you walk away >.>.
I would personally like them having the start of the engagement, like in movies, have them kiss and start we need to see the romance; but after that have a fade away sequence, so some time in-between so we know they are doing something that takes awhile and then return to the couple once they are finished. Have the romance after the act.
I feel awkward watching if I have to sit through them making love.
I agree with this. It would be nice and tasteful. Maybe even add a long cuddling scene after the fact, like pillow talk to make it feel like a real experiance. We don't need full blown nudity.
#43
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:32
EpicBoot2daFace wrote...
Just have 'em kiss and fade to black for crying out loud.
#44
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:33
#45
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:34
Xilizhra wrote...
*raises hand*And then there would be complaints "I don't want to see guy on guy, or guy on woman, only woman on woman"
But, of course, I can do that just by choosing one variety of romance, so... I don't really see why there'd be a need for censoring anything else.
Also, I initially thought that the OP was actually mocking straight male homophobes by including that option, hence my not bringing it up, but I might be wrong.
I'm indifferent to it, the option is there to anyone that wishes to express that they don't want nude same sex scenes in the game. If anything this forum should be rejoicing that, even though people can vote anonymously for that option, it's still the lowest one.
#46
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:35
Well I was fine with the fade to black and even thought the underware sex was weird in Origins it didn't bother me. If they want to keep fade to black or change it to nudity with angles that don't show D's and V's and boobs thats fine with me.As long as they keep romances and make them interesting and non-corny i'm happy. Also, Schlong Dongadoodles sounds like a type of cookie.Kroitz wrote...
How about we stop freuding out over every sentence and talk about essence of this poll.
Bahama Mammas, Schlong dongadoodles and nates.
You want or not?
#47
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:35
mosesarose wrote...
I agree with this. It would be nice and tasteful. Maybe even add a long cuddling scene after the fact, like pillow talk to make it feel like a real experiance. We don't need full blown nudity.
A million per cent this
#48
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:35
Modifié par Enigmatick, 04 avril 2013 - 11:37 .
#49
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:36
What's the point? It's what we'll get anyway.Sauruz wrote...
There should be a "Whatever the developers feel like" option.
#50
Posté 04 avril 2013 - 11:39




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





