Auld Wulf wrote...
So, the mass murder of slaves is a "good ending?"
Oh man. The 19th century would have loved you, OP. Mistreatment and murder of slaves was viewed as a good thing back then. To me, the absolute evidence that the Reapers are enslaved yet autonomous creatures, and the fact that the Reapers choose to be benevolent when they're freed from their slavery, makes it impossible for me to see the murder of slaves as a good thing.
I'm sorry, my sense of ethics just sees that as inhuman, in fact, it's peeing over the very meaning of being human, of having empathy and understanding. You know, the things we pride ourselves on, so that we're not monsters? That stuff? Yeah.
The Reapers can't be blamed for being enslaved to the Catalyst's programming. They don't deserve to die because they're controlled.
You're saying: If a person is being mind controlled, they should be shot in the head rather than freed from the control. Because slaves deserve to die.
That's disgusting and repugnant. That's not a happy ending.
Nevermind the death of the geth, EDI, and many more.
In fact, you'd have to be kind of ... mentally disturbed to see the death of slaves and innocent species as a thing of happiness.
The death of the geth and EDI is something I cannot countenance, thus why I go for MEHEM.
But the destruction of the Reapers is something else. ME3 demonstrates to us that the Reapers are not, in fact, independant beings, but are simply another form of husk, like the scions or praetorians, only much much larger and more powerful. You're not killing them any more than you're killing a corpse. What they were died millenia ago, at least. Ending the reapers is simply putting old ghosts to rest.





Retour en haut





