Look, Bioware were just making stuff up as they go along, why do you think they brought in the Dark Energy mystery and then never mentioned it again?
Sovereign speech and the synthesis ending
Débuté par
L_B_123
, avril 09 2013 09:06
#26
Guest_Finn the Jakey_*
Posté 10 avril 2013 - 03:33
Guest_Finn the Jakey_*
#27
Guest_tickle267_*
Posté 10 avril 2013 - 03:37
Guest_tickle267_*
Finn the Jakey wrote...
Look, Bioware were just making stuff up as they go along, why do you think they brought in the Dark Energy mystery and then never mentioned it again?
well they made up the ending as they went along, the dark energy stuff was meant to be foreshadowing the original ending.
#28
Posté 10 avril 2013 - 05:42
sometimes i just wish the developers would at least talk about the endings. if they're so in love with it you would think they would maybe defend it a little...
#29
Posté 10 avril 2013 - 05:58
Finn the Jakey wrote...
Look, Bioware were just making stuff up as they go along, why do you think they brought in the Dark Energy mystery and then never mentioned it again?
There was a cut ME2 Codex entry on "Technological Singularity" referring pretty much to what the catalyst talks about.
They weren't winging everything.
Modifié par HYR 2.0, 10 avril 2013 - 05:58 .
#30
Posté 10 avril 2013 - 06:00
True, but to base the entire ending off of one codex entry is stretching it a bit for me.
#31
Posté 10 avril 2013 - 06:09
ruggly wrote...
True, but to base the entire ending off of one codex entry is stretching it a bit for me.
I'd argue that the patterns were there, buried in the data, so to speak.
ME2 Overlord, for example.
#32
Posté 10 avril 2013 - 06:16
Agreed, but also not everyone will have played Overlord either. I'd rather they had left the synthetics vs. organics for the future installment, and had left it 'solved' for now on Rannoch. I just read that the Geth were apparently an afterthought for ME1.





Retour en haut






