It depends on how you use it, I would say.
--Self-sacrifice (i.e. your own life force to augment your casting ability): not really evil. In this case, it's nothing more than a useful tool. Although, if a mage must deal with a demon to acquire the ability, the attached strings could cause much suffering later on. Given this, you might say the mage is either evil (doesn't care), oblivious (doesn't know), short-sighted (feels the consequences can be dealt with later), overconfident (feels he can successfully negotiate with demons without unintended consequences), or just rightly confident (because he can and does negotiate for blood magic without unintended consequences).
--Sacrificing others: probably more on the evil side, particularly if it's against they're will. Although, hypothetically, if one were to sacrifice the life force of one's opponents on the battlefield, would that really be any worse than using fire, lightning, etc? Probably not, I'd say.
--Paralysis: not really evil, IMO. No more than paralyzing poisons, or the Entropy versions of paralysis. Or any other weapon of war, really.
--Mind control/Blood control: Well, there's certainly a visceral "wrongness" about it which makes it repulsive, and the idea of it being employed by tyrants is chilling, but, merely as a weapon of war, I'm not so sure it's any less "ethical" that stabbing someone in the face and killing them dead.
Of course, that's all from a pragmatic and nonspiritual point of view. Surely the Chantry would counter that your life force is a sacred thing and that to sacrifice it for power is blasphemous in the eyes of the Maker. Hence, even without manipulating other people in possibly objectionable ways, you're still committing evil. According to them.
I would also say that necromancy is not inherently evil. Sure, necromancy is usually about a dark necromancer plotting to take over the world with hordes of undead, but think of how useful it could be. Yeah, that is your undead mother fighting darkspawn on the front lines, but she's infinitely more useful as an undead warrior than as a dead hunk of darkspawn food-- or worse yet, as a.. well, spoilery monster, perhaps. Ostagar would've been a piece of cake if all of the defenders effectively had twice as many lives to give in the service of Ferelden.
(p.s. -- Ostagar isn't a spoiler, is it? I've seen it mentioned other times in this thread...)
Modifié par filaminstrel, 16 janvier 2010 - 03:37 .