Aller au contenu

Photo

Destroyers: How far are you prepared to go?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
935 réponses à ce sujet

#351
Grand Admiral Cheesecake

Grand Admiral Cheesecake
  • Members
  • 5 704 messages

Alien Number Six wrote...

Xilizhra you do realize Mass Effect is not real right. And if it were I would be the leader of the Destroy faction because I have killed off every character in Mass Effect that can die. Wiping out Liara was my personal favorite. I even yelled "Gotcha!" when the tank hit her. What can I say? I guess I'm a Mass Effect murderer! Lol lol lol


Whooooo Low EMS destroy!

Killing off just about everything like a BAWSS!

Screw just killing synthetics I want to destroy EVERYTHING!!! Muahahahahahahahahahhaaaaa!!

#352
Alien Number Six

Alien Number Six
  • Members
  • 1 900 messages
Do you think the FBI knows I am the leader? Go fourth and Destroy my children!

#353
robertthebard

robertthebard
  • Members
  • 6 108 messages

Alien Number Six wrote...

Do you think the FBI knows I am the leader? Go fourth and Destroy my children!

Can't I go third instead?Image IPBImage IPB

#354
goose2989

goose2989
  • Members
  • 1 888 messages

krukow wrote...

Irrelevant since it doesn't.



#355
Alien Number Six

Alien Number Six
  • Members
  • 1 900 messages
I think it's funny that some people want me to justify killing off the Geth in a video game. There people killing other people by the hundreds right now and very few people care as long as it dosen't affect them.

#356
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages
When I played Earthborn/Ruthless Shepard, I capped that guy in Chora's Den right in front of the Turian C-sec officer, and he gave me a pat on the back. BTW this Shepard made Jack look sane. Funny, Liara still loved her. lol. After Thessia she told Liara to let her rage fuel her vengeance. She chose Destroy. She lived. Something that evil never dies.

Modifié par sH0tgUn jUliA, 13 avril 2013 - 04:47 .


#357
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

When I played Earthborn/Ruthless Shepard, I capped that guy in Chora's Den right in front of the Turian C-sec officer, and he gave me a pat on the back. BTW this Shepard made Jack look sane. Funny, Liara still loved her. lol. After Thessia she told Liara to let her rage fuel her vengeance. She chose Destroy. She lived. Something that evil never dies.


Your Earthborn/Ruthless still has a LI?  My original Earthborn/Ruthless didn't make it to ME3 because he didn't have enough crew members left to save him at the end of ME2.  So had to go back and upgrade the Normandy just so enough of them survive then once he got to ME3, he chose the Geth (Legion didn't survive the Collector Mission) and watched his love interest commit suicide.

I was so disgusted by him after that I never finished the playthrough so his ass didn't make it to the end game.  Dude made the Reapers look like Mr. Rogers.

#358
Alien Number Six

Alien Number Six
  • Members
  • 1 900 messages
Rawanda, Somalia, Serbia. People where killed by the thousands in these places during the 1990's and you barely heard about it. Little or no news coverage or public outcry was made here in the United States. When a few dozen of our soliders where killed in Somalia most Americans said "Where?" But wipe out a race of machines in a video game and watch people get judgemental.

#359
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

remydat wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

When I played Earthborn/Ruthless Shepard, I capped that guy in Chora's Den right in front of the Turian C-sec officer, and he gave me a pat on the back. BTW this Shepard made Jack look sane. Funny, Liara still loved her. lol. After Thessia she told Liara to let her rage fuel her vengeance. She chose Destroy. She lived. Something that evil never dies.


Your Earthborn/Ruthless still has a LI?  My original Earthborn/Ruthless didn't make it to ME3 because he didn't have enough crew members left to save him at the end of ME2.  So had to go back and upgrade the Normandy just so enough of them survive then once he got to ME3, he chose the Geth (Legion didn't survive the Collector Mission) and watched his love interest commit suicide.

I was so disgusted by him after that I never finished the playthrough so his ass didn't make it to the end game.  Dude made the Reapers look like Mr. Rogers.


She was evil, not stupid. She'd do anything for those she cared about. All she asked was unquestioning obedience in return. Her crew was her family. Until they got out of line. Loyalty was the only thing that came before family. Rachni queen.... Liara said we went too far. Got me thinking... she could be an ally... Wrex got pissed. Virmire. Wrex questioned, got aggressive and paid the price. "Sacrificed" the Council. Liara: "Yes, a sacrifice for the greater good!" See? instead of +34 renegade it was +25 renegade +9 paragon. Same result, and it made Liara feel better. Made Irina feel less of a monster. lol.

Post scene: "you left Earth in a unique position. The galaxy will be looking to us for leadership." Udina said.    "That's why I did it." Shepard said.    Anderson as councilor.

Jack had it rough, and kind of reminded her of her. Miranda? one of those priviledged b****es she hated. Liara? She could trust. Loyal as a puppy. Tali? Same deal. Garrus? no problems. Zaeed? yeah, sounds like Vido needs to die. Somehow even managed to get along with Samara at 90/10 renegade. There are like 10% paragon you can't help but get. I called this one "The Terminator." "Kill him. You're a killer, Jack. That's what killer's do."

We lost some on the suicide mission: Thane (seeker swarm), Legion, Miranda (sided with Jack). Legion took it in the flashlight -- tech expert -- yeah, he tried to send that data on the Migrant Fleet back to the Geth that he took from Tali. Tali was loyal. Don't send the data. Hey, he's a machine. Machines aren't supposed to have emotional issues, right? Logic.

Yeah, this was the second run through ME3 in April. Not that I thought it would be any different. Capping The Illusive Man with the Renegade conversation using the renegade Interrupt you have to be quick. I stood there and shot the Catalyst for three minutes until I got bored.

This one was less psychologically damaged than the Colonist/Ruthless, but more far more ruthless.

#360
Indy_S

Indy_S
  • Members
  • 2 092 messages
A swarm of termites has infested the forest. They swarm every so often and devastate the area when they do. Now, I have the chance to remove the swarm. I can light a fire while the swarm is here. It will devastate the area but the swarm will be destroyed. It even turns out that the fire does less damage than the termites do each time they strike. Now the forest is free of the pests and has the chance to grow for the first time in a very long time.

I have no regrets.

#361
Astartes Marine

Astartes Marine
  • Members
  • 1 615 messages

Xilizhra wrote...
Control: Everyone lives, the Reapers rebuild things, there's peace.

With a Shepard AI that now has the collective knowledge of the Reapers (and thus might have changed his mind on a few things now that control has been taken away from the player) and is essentially overlord of the galaxy with "an army that none dare oppose". 

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely, seems like an easy setup for a police state. 
Now while I would love to forge an Imperium, I would rather humanity do it themselves rather than with outside help like the Reapers.

Xilizhra wrote...
Synthesis:
Everyone also lives, the Reapers are freed and no longer hostile,
organics and synthetics are now capable of more easily understanding
each other, and are no longer such a threat.

There's always a threat.  Synthesis, if some are to be believed, does not change who people are.  Krogan would still be Krogan, Turians would still be Turians, Batarians would still be Batarians, etc.  Conflict will never simply disappear.  With the Reapers each having free will, there's literally nothing in the way of them coming to a decision to keep killing, to kill each other, or anything else.  The immortal race of sentient cuttlefish kill-bots become an even greater wild card now that the collar and leash is off.

masster blaster wrote...
Destroy:
Organics learn that it was their fault that the cycle happened in the
first plase. They rebuild the galaxy. They now know how to treat
synthetics. They honor the fallen. The harvested Organics can now rest
in peace, free and not trapped in the Reaper.

With the EC retcon of the Geth's fate they'll probably be around to remember it as well.  The looming possibility of organic/synthetic conflict is still there, and always will be as long as everyone has free will, but the lessons learned during the Reaper War and the accomplishments of Shepard can set a precedent to treat synths like the Geth with respect and the rights that they are entitled to. 

Xilizhra wrote...
Oh, yes,
because it's so much more likely that an entire galaxy's worth of people
will maintain moral integrity longer than one specific person will. In
any case, the ending never says that synthetics will be treated any
better; why would they be anyway?

The endings leave out ALOT of details.  And I'm willing to bet that a galaxy's worth of people can come to a better consensus and better moral stances than a single man with absolute power and the most powerful army in the galaxy.

#362
Reorte

Reorte
  • Members
  • 6 601 messages

Astartes Marine wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...
Control: Everyone lives, the Reapers rebuild things, there's peace.

With a Shepard AI that now has the collective knowledge of the Reapers (and thus might have changed his mind on a few things now that control has been taken away from the player) and is essentially overlord of the galaxy with "an army that none dare oppose". 

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely, seems like an easy setup for a police state. 
Now while I would love to forge an Imperium, I would rather humanity do it themselves rather than with outside help like the Reapers.

Wait for it, you'll get "MY Shepard would never do that, and since there's no follow-up anything I headcanon is correct" showing up shortly.

#363
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages
Do you see that Shepard about 4 posts up? MY SHEPARD would NEVER do that in CONTROL. MY SHEPARD would rule the galaxy with an iron fist. MY SHEPARD would rule like Stalin. But she promised Liara she would return from the battle. Consequently she chose Destroy because Starbrat didn't mention "you will die." Aren't you glad?

Modifié par sH0tgUn jUliA, 13 avril 2013 - 10:03 .


#364
Astartes Marine

Astartes Marine
  • Members
  • 1 615 messages

Reorte wrote...

Astartes Marine wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...
Control: Everyone lives, the Reapers rebuild things, there's peace.

With a Shepard AI that now has the collective knowledge of the Reapers (and thus might have changed his mind on a few things now that control has been taken away from the player) and is essentially overlord of the galaxy with "an army that none dare oppose". 

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely, seems like an easy setup for a police state. 
Now while I would love to forge an Imperium, I would rather humanity do it themselves rather than with outside help like the Reapers.

Wait for it, you'll get "MY Shepard would never do that, and since there's no follow-up anything I headcanon is correct" showing up shortly.

Once Shepard's body disintegrates and he becomes the new Catalyst he's no long the Shepard we were playing.  He is then something...different.  Something more?  None of us can really know just what Shepard will be like in the long run with all that added knowledge and perspective.

Modifié par Astartes Marine, 13 avril 2013 - 10:05 .


#365
Reorte

Reorte
  • Members
  • 6 601 messages

Astartes Marine wrote...

Once Shepard's body disintegrates and he becomes the new Catalyst he's no long the Shepard we were playing.  He is then something...different.  Something more?  None of us can really know just what Shepard will be like in the long run with all that added knowledge and perspective.

Oh, I completely agree, and the EC voiceover supports that. Furthermore it's not very plausible that the Catalyst's hardware would be set up to fully simulate a human being anyway, and that its overall mission goals aren't so hardwired in that they could be easily replaced. Or that it's got some hardware handily placed for accurately scanning any passing alien that didn't even exist at its time of construction (in a rather crude-looking destructive process). It's madness to have any trust in Control unless you're playing a control freak Shepard.

#366
JasonShepard

JasonShepard
  • Members
  • 1 466 messages

Reorte wrote...

Astartes Marine wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...
Control: Everyone lives, the Reapers rebuild things, there's peace.

With a Shepard AI that now has the collective knowledge of the Reapers (and thus might have changed his mind on a few things now that control has been taken away from the player) and is essentially overlord of the galaxy with "an army that none dare oppose". 

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely, seems like an easy setup for a police state. 
Now while I would love to forge an Imperium, I would rather humanity do it themselves rather than with outside help like the Reapers.

Wait for it, you'll get "MY Shepard would never do that, and since there's no follow-up anything I headcanon is correct" showing up shortly.


Now, while I'm guilty of that particular line, I would like to point out an important distinction:
I know what happens after I pick Control.
My Shepard doesn't.

I acknowledge that my Shepard takes a risk in picking Control. I also, as the player, as the only person who can decide what happens next, choose for that risk to pay off one last time. (Although the Shep-AI goes through hell in the process - but you're probably not interested in the particulars of my headcanon.)

Shepard takes that risk to save as many as possible - which is fairly in character for a paragon. He trusts the Catalyst - because if you can't trust the Catalyst. you've already lost - and therefore trusts that it will be him Controlling the Reapers as opposed to an AI that is just acting like him. The Catalyst says "You will Control us" not "An AI that is basically me, but made up to look like you, will Control us".

I as the player pick Control because it explores themes that I like and because it allows me to have post-ME3 galaxy where I didn't sacrifice synthetics. Both me and Shepard pick Control - but I have Shepard pick Control for different motivations to my own. My motivations include headcanon. Shepard's don't.

So while I accept "He could turn evil and conquer the galaxy" as an argument against Shepard picking Control, I don't accept "He will  turn evil and conquer the galaxy", because in-universe no-one knows that, and out-of-universe I'm the only person who can decide.

#367
Reorte

Reorte
  • Members
  • 6 601 messages

JasonShepard wrote...

So while I accept "He could turn evil and conquer the galaxy" as an argument against Shepard picking Control, I don't accept "He will  turn evil and conquer the galaxy", because in-universe no-one knows that, and out-of-universe I'm the only person who can decide.

I've never claimed will although I've had arguments with certain people in the past who seem to think that me even raising the possibility is the same as saying will.

I argue that you can't decide out of universe either because the player's input ends at the end of the game. The player doesn't know what'll happen next any more than the characters, any more than you've got any insight on what happens after the end of a book or a film (although you can of course speculate). In the same way as my surviving Destroy Shepard has things he wants to do after the game, and will very probably try to do them, for all I know he might trip over and bash his head open when leaving the hospital.

#368
zqrahll

zqrahll
  • Members
  • 177 messages
The original Destroy ending did kill all organics-- they destroyed the entire mass relay system before retconning that for the EC.

As for your questions, I will never pick Synthesis as it is utter garbage. Control is suggested by the person who is under direct Reaper control, so it can't be a good idea either. If Refusal were a real ending rather than a big middle finger to the fanbase, I would choose it.

#369
RiptideX1090

RiptideX1090
  • Members
  • 14 659 messages
Let me put it plainly. I would gladly choose Low EMS Destroy over Synthesis, Control, and Refuse.

In no universe would I allow my Shepard to die and let Harbinger keep stomping around, in no universe would I do what a madman like Harper wanted, and the difference between Low EMS Destroy and Refuse is that at least in Destroy, you actually had the balls to make a decision and SOME people survived.

It's not about EDI, about the geth, about Shepard surviving, it's about finally giving the galaxy the freedom it deserves, to stand or fall on its own terms without the Reapers or Reaper-Shepard making that decision for it. Even if that means we have to crawl from the wreckage, broken, bleeding, barely alive.

Fortunately, the game doesn't force it to be that bad with the EC (even though the fundamentals of the ending are still broken to a large degree). The galaxy is mostly intact, we can rebuild, and life will continue, and my Shepard is even still around to advocate for AI and to party like a rockstar when it's all over and build Tali that house on Rannoch. 

Modifié par RiptideX1090, 13 avril 2013 - 11:08 .


#370
Fade9wayz

Fade9wayz
  • Members
  • 882 messages

remydat wrote...

Fade9wayz wrote...

It's a flimsy bet, but that's the best I can do. As for the argument of future synthetics thinking that all organic life is against them based on that choice, it doesn't really hold. The only ones who know about this choice are the Catalyst and Shepard. One is utterly wiped, the other very likely dies as well, and if not, can keep this to her/himself, which is what I would do.


The legend of Shep is told throughout the times as the Old Man and Boy note.  It is actually worse if the story is told without people knowing there was a choice.  If people know there was a choice then it could be rationalized that the decision to kill synthetics in Destroy was simply the fault of one man Mr. Super AI.  You can't blame us for that.

If all we know is this machined killed the Reapers and all synthetics ie there was no choice then the conclusion is that the organics tried to solve a threat to both synthetics and orgnanics by creating a machine that killed all synthetics.  ALL.  Not only that, this machine that killed ALL synthetics was created by organics over millions of years.  So try convincing Mr. Super AI that every single cylce and thus every single organic race over millions of years designed a weapon that was designed to eliminate all synthetic races.  You basically just prove to Mr Super AI that this was not a choice by one man but a concerted effort by orgnanics over millions if not billions of years to kill two birds with one stone ie kill Reapers and eliminate the synthetic threat.

Now explain to me how you are going to convince it you built a machine with such a scale that just magically killed all synthetics but you had no clue.  This dude will be like WTF, do you think I am some dumb AI like those Geth you eradicated?


Oh yeah, I'll give you that I forgot about that last, useless scene. That scene only makes sense for me in the Refuse choice where it actually brings closure. Not so much in the other choices, especially since they released the EC.

Back to topic.You seem to forget that all these past civilisations that led to the crucible were completely annihilated by a super-race of what? Synthetics. Synthetics they didn't even know about, let alone threatened. Cycles after cycles of organics were relentlessly erased by the same Synthetics who didn't care about how the future organics would feel about that, not that they ever tried to make friends with organics anyway. If that super AI has any shred of logic, its natural conclusion should be that it is normal, that in the context of war and desperate choices for self-preservation, organics wouldn't hesitate to use any means to destroy the threat, even if it means indiscriminately destroying any other tech advanced enough to suffer from a large scale sorta-EMP beam.

If that super AI feels that threatened by organics past choices, even if in that new civilisation it exists in a much more open and accepting context, then too bad for it. It will need to grow a thicker skin, so to speak, and either suck it up and prove a AI can be fully integrated in a diverse galactic civilsation, like EDI did, or take drastic measures to ensure its own self-preservation. After all the Geth did just that in the Morning War. Besides, history proved that synthetics are not the only one concerned. The Rachni were almost wiped out and only survived by sheer luck. The Krogans were neutered when they were deemed too much of a threat for the galaxy as well.

Anyway, you can't judge the descendants of a nation by the acts of some of their ancestors. Besides, it's not like there is no hope since the whole Geth/Quarians affair at least proved there is room for reconcilitation and cooperation when both parties are willing to work things out.

As it is, we simply differ on moral stands here. I find it much more unbearable to inflict a super-tyrant AI on the whole galactic community than taking the risk of wiping any sentient life in this cycle in the hope the next galactic civilisation, organic or synthetic, can grow and develop freely. The best way to ensure that is destroy. As it is, other synthetics are destroyed in the process, but it's not like organics survive this without a scratch either, Batarians were almost wiped out, depending of the player's choices, Hanar and Drells are essentially exctinct, Krogans and Rachni too.

The ironic thing is that Geth might have survived if they hadn't just integrated Reaper code... So I don't see why I should be afraid a future hypothetical AI might feel hurt in its feelings that organics might so selfishly chose self-preservation in such an extreme context.

Edit: tldr, judging things out of their context is no good.

Besides, I don't see why you care so much about our motivations for chosing Destroy. I don't care for your motivations in chosing Control or Synthesis, it's just a game after all, and I might very well take the other choices in other playthroughs for sh** and giggles.

Modifié par Fade9wayz, 13 avril 2013 - 11:18 .


#371
RiptideX1090

RiptideX1090
  • Members
  • 14 659 messages

Fade9wayz wrote...

If that super AI feels that threatened by organics past choices, even if in that new civilisation it exists in a much more open and accepting context, then too bad for it. It will need to grow a thicker skin, so to speak, and either suck it up and prove a AI can be fully integrated in a diverse galactic civilsation, like EDI did, or take drastic measures to ensure its own self-preservation. After all the Geth did just that in the Morning War. Besides, history proved that synthetics are not the only one concerned. The Rachni were almost wiped out and only survived by sheer luck. The Krogans were neutered when they were deemed too much of a threat for the galaxy as well.


That actually raises a good point, I wonder how EDI would have felt meeting the Catalyst. Until that point, she had only ever held a very visceral hatred for the Reapers and their obsession with preserving everything in their twisted way. As the embodiment of that, I imagine EDI would have despised the Catalyst and everything it stood for.

#372
Delacruz

Delacruz
  • Members
  • 151 messages

krukow wrote...

Irrelevant since it doesn't.


This

#373
Fade9wayz

Fade9wayz
  • Members
  • 882 messages

RiptideX1090 wrote...

Fade9wayz wrote...

If that super AI feels that threatened by organics past choices, even if in that new civilisation it exists in a much more open and accepting context, then too bad for it. It will need to grow a thicker skin, so to speak, and either suck it up and prove a AI can be fully integrated in a diverse galactic civilsation, like EDI did, or take drastic measures to ensure its own self-preservation. After all the Geth did just that in the Morning War. Besides, history proved that synthetics are not the only one concerned. The Rachni were almost wiped out and only survived by sheer luck. The Krogans were neutered when they were deemed too much of a threat for the galaxy as well.


That actually raises a good point, I wonder how EDI would have felt meeting the Catalyst. Until that point, she had only ever held a very visceral hatred for the Reapers and their obsession with preserving everything in their twisted way. As the embodiment of that, I imagine EDI would have despised the Catalyst and everything it stood for.


Exactly my feeling about it. The catalyst basis for reasoning are so wrong and warped that it's conclusions could only be idiotic. EDI would have spanked him to the next galaxy

#374
wiccame

wiccame
  • Members
  • 2 076 messages
If saving the galaxy meant you had to destroy an entire race to do so then yes, rather one race die out than the whole galaxy. Thats why my Shepard let the council die in 1, wasnt gonna to risk diminishing my forces for one ship. And why the Batarian colony had to die too.

#375
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages
It's not really like a "destroy" ending hadn't already happened before in human history. Just think about Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They were both destroyed by american nukes, and it ended the war in two quick strikes. Had the US not used the nukes, many more americans and japanese alike would have died.

It's just ruthless calculus, nothing more. And that's not new to humans at all. You already had to face this dilemma in the arrival DLC.