7 réponses à ce sujet

[capn233]

Now that I am playing with ME3 Explorer I figured I would post this for the hell of it.  I don't think these are posted in a thread here.

Lancer I - X

Damage: 82.2 - 92.2
Weight: 1 - 0.5
Mag Size: 38 - 57
Rate of Fire: 600

Suppressor I - X

Damage: 383.3 - 412.2
Headshot Damage Multiplier: 4x
Weight: 1.25 - 0.7
Mag Size: 6
Max Spare Ammo: 30 - 40
Rate of Fire: 600

Since both have an ROF of 600, you can simply multiply the base damage by 10 to get burst DPS.  If you do that it should be readily apparent why the Suppressor is ridiculous.

[Abraham_uk]

Thanks man.

[CoffeeHolic93]

DPS of 4000 and a DPS of 16000 on headshots... 5600 on boss headshots?

[capn233]

Mi-Chan wrote...

DPS of 4000 and a DPS of 16000 on headshots... 5600 on boss headshots?

Probably.

Before bonuses of course.  Like Adrenaline Rush and Tactical Cloak...

[UnknownMercenary]

Strange how they're both stronger than their MP counterparts; the Suppressor especially.... it's now a Carnifex with an insane refire time and headshot multplier.

[HolyAvenger]

I find ammo collection more problematic in certain SP missions than I ever do in MP, maybe that's why the Suppressor is more powerful

[capn233]

HolyAvenger wrote...

I find ammo collection more problematic in certain SP missions than I ever do in MP, maybe that's why the Suppressor is more powerful

Or "pay to win" if you are into tinfoil hat stuff.  All the DLC guns are extremely powerful really.

[HolyAvenger]

capn233 wrote...

HolyAvenger wrote...

I find ammo collection more problematic in certain SP missions than I ever do in MP, maybe that's why the Suppressor is more powerful

Or "pay to win" if you are into tinfoil hat stuff.  All the DLC guns are extremely powerful really.

 

That too. I never buy the weapon DLCs partly for that reason.