1. Of course the Geth wouldnt fight the heretics. Organics have proven nothing but hilostile to them. It works both ways. If you don't expect orgainc to intervene when cerberus attacks their enemy not sure why you expect the geth to intervene when the heretics attack their enemy.
snip*
False, Pre-MW, Quarians were defending and attacking yet the Geth chose to attack everyone, Post-MW, several diplomatic ships were sent to Rannoch and they were simply shot down. The only reason the Geth were fighting the Heretics, was because the Heretics had a code that would brainwash all Geth.
False, Pre-MW, Quarians were defending and attacking yet the Geth chose to attack everyone, Post-MW, several diplomatic ships were sent to Rannoch and they were simply shot down. The only reason the Geth were fighting the Heretics, was because the Heretics had a code that would brainwash all Geth.
Who is everyone? The Geth killed the people who attacked the Quarians because they attacked. They killed people who accepted the Council laws that said they should not exist.
Several ships were sent into the PV claiming to be on diplomatic missions when they were in fact gathering intel in advance of an organic attack on Geth space. There is nothing in the story to disprove the above and it is certainly reasonable for the Geth to think this is what the organics that say they should not exist are really doing. Give me one reason why the Geth should believe these ships were actually on diplomatics missions? Because they said so, lol? Please.
Also, let's listen to our favorite Quarian as the Geth are fleeing and he orders the Geth killed. I recall you guys claiming the Quarians just wanted Rannoch back or how the Geth should not shoot at liveships shooting at them but hey the Quarians can shoot at Geth ships fleeing because they are just machines right.? And people expect the Geth to spare these dudes, lol. I love how this double standard works. The Geth are evil for shooting back. The Quarians are good for shooting an enemy that stopped firing and then is attempting to flee, lol.
Please note that I was out of this thread for the past few days and a Quarian supporter decided to respond to a post several days old. So if you wish to talk about how the cycle never ends, please direct such comments to the Quarian supporters who keep bringing this sh*t up instead of getting on my case again for responding.
Please note that I was out of this thread for the past few days and the guy who started the thread decided to respond to a post several days old. So if you wish to talk about how the cycle never ends, please direct such comments to the Quarian supporters who keep bringing this sh*t up instead of getting on my case again for responding.
Why the hell are you dragging me into this?
All I ever said, was that you don't have to post in every singlethreadabout this topic. We all heard your song and dance about the quarian and geth conflict in the other thread.
I also said, that it would be a good idea for both sides to give it a break. Are you going to ignore what I wrote here, and try to turn this into another argument? Most likely.
All I ever said, was that you don't have to post in every singlethreadabout this topic. We all heard your song and dance about the quarian and geth conflict in the other thread.
I also said, that it would be a good idea for both sides to give it a break. Are you going to ignore what I wrote here, and try to turn this into another argument? Most likely.
No I was merely observing that when the past few days was just Quarian supporters you were eerily silent. You seem to only be concered when Geth supporters respond. And I am pretty sure I see the same Quarian supporters in every thread as well.
So if I start going back and forth again, I just wanted it to be clear, I was done with this until a Quarian supporter brought it back up. I wouldn't want you to come in here shortly after I post admonishing everyone again because it might just give the appearance you only care to do so when a Geth supporter responds. I would not want people to think you biased. I mean it's not like you were in this thread within 9 minutes of my post or anything, lol.
I posted what I thought about what you guys should do. It's up to you to make the final call. I only posted now, because you called me out. Had you not posted "Yo Khelish", I would have ignored all these posts you are making.
I said "both sides", aka, both you, SAK, and Silver, should give it a rest.
I posted what I thought about what you guys should do. It's up to you to make the final call. I only posted now, because you called me out. Had you not posted "Yo Khelish", I would have ignored all these posts you are making.
I said "both sides", aka, both you, SAK, and Silver, should give it a rest.
GTBGS.
I'm done.
Is it difficult to see why from my perspective it seems a bit odd? Quarian supporters bringing this up still, 24-48 hours of silence. Remydat posts and 9 minutes later you are responding, lol.
Is it difficult to see why from my perspective it seems a bit odd? Quarian supporters bringing this up still, 24-48 hours of silence. Remydat posts and 9 minutes later you are responding, lol.
"Had you not posted "Yo Khelish", I would have ignored all these posts you are making."
"Had you not posted "Yo Khelish", I would have ignored all these posts you are making."
Perhaps. Perhaps not. I suppose I will never know since I decided to act pre-emptively based on your prior actions where you only bothered to comment when I responded.
Perhaps. Perhaps not. I suppose I will never know since I decided to act pre-emptively based on your prior actions where you only bothered to comment when I responded.
Hey Remy, please go read this entire thread, and tell me you didn't reply to me first.
I said both sides need to take a break from this, that includes both quarian and geth supporters. I'm done saying this.
Hey Remy, please go read this entire thread, and tell me you didn't reply to me first.
I said both sides need to take a break from this, that includes both quarian and geth supporters. I'm done saying this.
Have fun in here, I'm done.
And yet when one side complied and took a break and the other side kept going, you said nothing. Of course the side that kept going is the side that agrees with you. If you are not going to do anything when your side continued then you shouldn't have brought it up in the first place. It just looks biased. That's all I am saying.
Hey Remy, please go read this entire thread, and tell me you didn't reply to me first.
I said both sides need to take a break from this, that includes both quarian and geth supporters. I'm done saying this.
Have fun in here, I'm done.
And yet when one side complied and took a break and the other side kept going, you said nothing. Of course the side that kept going is the side that agrees with you. If you are not going to do anything when your side continued then you shouldn't have brought it up in the first place. It just looks biased. That's all I am saying.
For God's Sake! You NEVER let anything go, do you? @Khelish said not to drag him into this. You continue to do so. Do you have some obsession with getting the last word in? YOU are the one that started this. Everyone can see that by looking at the previous pages. Let. It. Go.
EDI speculated that AIs that operate via networked consensus are less likely to developed "preferences" and safeties that would prevent them from making decisions that could potentially endanger anyone they've grown "attached" to.
The post-Reaper upgraded Geth are now individuals sooo.
For God's Sake! You NEVER let anything go, do you? @Khelish said not to drag him into this. You continue to do so. Do you have some obsession with getting the last word in? YOU are the one that started this. Everyone can see that by looking at the previous pages. Let. It. Go.
The solution to not being dragged in is to not get on the soapbox in the first place. Sorry, when a Quarian supporter makes a thread, I respond and then another Quarian supporter gets on the soapbox about how the cycle never ends then is completely silent when I stand down and the other Quarian supporters continue to the point of quoting my 2 day old post then I will point out the seeming bias there.
You guys asked for a ceasefire, I gave you a ceasefire for 2 days and then one of you chose to violate that ceasefire and here we are.
It's a forum. Not war. Discussion and debate is a good thing unless you're doing it wrong. If you guys hate the debate, then you probably are doing it wrong.
It's a forum. Not war. Discussion and debate is a good thing unless you're doing it wrong. If you guys hate the debate, then you probably are doing it wrong.
Hey, I am fine either way. I simply tried to be nice and comply with a request and came out swinging once it was clear the other side had no intention of complying. So war it is. At least in this one, billions won't have to die, lol.
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
What was ApplepieSVK's signature: "When a forum burns is it in hate? Is it in conflict? Or is it just doing what it was created to do?"
This is all highly entertaining, please keep it up. It pleases us me.
As a side note Remy your utter drive for the last word in any and all forum discussions is gold. We approve.
No problem, I equally enjoy the frequent attempts of people who claim they don't like to have the last word to try and get the last word by saying something and then trying to shame me into not responding by saying stuff like "why do you always like to have the last word," as if that is going to dissuade me. If you also didn't like to have the last word, you would not feel the constant need to mention it. Only difference is I freely admit I do and am willing to fight for it instead of pretending I don't and trying to get the last word in cheaply.
Incidentally, when I stopped posting in this thread and the Quarian supporters continued going so far to quote days old posts by me, were they trying to get the last word? I always get confused by you Quarian supporters and your double standards.
For God's Sake! You NEVER let anything go, do you? @Khelish said not to drag him into this. You continue to do so. Do you have some obsession with getting the last word in? YOU are the one that started this. Everyone can see that by looking at the previous pages. Let. It. Go.
The solution to not being dragged in is to not get on the soapbox in the first place. Sorry, when a Quarian supporter makes a thread, I respond and then another Quarian supporter gets on the soapbox about how the cycle never ends then is completely silent when I stand down and the other Quarian supporters continue to the point of quoting my 2 day old post then I will point out the seeming bias there.
You guys asked for a ceasefire, I gave you a ceasefire for 2 days and then one of you chose to violate that ceasefire and here we are.
A ceasefire with YOU. You interposed yourself into this. We were talking about the ramafacations of Destroy in the long run. YOU were the one that brought in the geth vs quarian and orgnaic vs synthetic argument into this. NOT @Khelish. It was all about if the death of a race is justifiable in the long run if it saves everyone else. It was NEVER about bias or one being more valuble then the other. It was about if said sacrifice is worth the entire galaxy or not. YOU were the one that broke the "ceasefire". The only fault is on you.
(P.S. - Ceasefire? Really? And you accused me of taking this too seriously way back when?)
Modifié par silverexile17s, 19 avril 2013 - 07:05 .
Did you see how in the OP, 5 Geth specific reasons are listed as to why the Geth should be destroyed? It was blatantly obvious where this road would lead.
P.S. - Khelish ask for both sides to chill. Hence he asked for a ceasefire. Not that difficult a concept to grasp.
Retour en haut
