Aller au contenu

Photo

Can't destroy the Reapers conventionally. Really?


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
642 réponses à ce sujet

#251
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

Reorte wrote...
I find it very hard to swallow the idea that not one single previous cycle managed to work out what was coming.


As you should because it's not true. The Protheans knew the Reapers were coming. Who knows how many other cycles did? It simply didn't make a difference.


Where was that revealed? Vigil on Ilos stated that the Reapers appeared without warning.

Just kidding, I guess that whole part got retconned.

Modifié par ImaginaryMatter, 04 janvier 2014 - 09:58 .


#252
TheMyron

TheMyron
  • Members
  • 1 807 messages

TheMyron wrote...

Too bad we never see the Leviathan spheres used to mind control one Sovereign-class Reaper into attacking another...

And why is the "Dominate" power unavailable on multiplayer?! You don't have to be an AY, just hold up your own Apple of Eden Leviathan Sphere and watch the fun...



P.S. I was kinda hoping we would start with an advantage because we had at least three years worth of forewarning... The Protheans were taken completely by surprise; listen to Vigil's Story.

#253
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

TheMyron wrote...

TheMyron wrote...

Too bad we never see the Leviathan spheres used to mind control one Sovereign-class Reaper into attacking another...

And why is the "Dominate" power unavailable on multiplayer?! You don't have to be an AY, just hold up your own Apple of Eden Leviathan Sphere and watch the fun...



P.S. I was kinda hoping we would start with an advantage because we had at least three years worth of forewarning... The Protheans were taken completely by surprise; listen to Vigil's Story.


Plus, the current cycle controls the Citadel, the supposed control center of the Relay network.

#254
Gkonone

Gkonone
  • Members
  • 270 messages
The reason Reapers couldn't be killed conventionally is that it wouldn't allow for that pseudo intellectual ending we got.

#255
wolfhowwl

wolfhowwl
  • Members
  • 3 727 messages
With the situation presented at the end of ME2 with hundreds of reapers at the galaxy's doorstep and next to no preparations made how would a conventional victory work?

The Crucible plot already required a ridiculous amount of stupidity on the Reapers part just to let the galaxy stagger to victory.

For example if they had bothered to send more than a single Destroyer to seize control of the Geth, the Reapers could have wiped out the Quarians in hours and then used the Geth's 30+ Dreadnoughts and supporting fleets to steamroll opposition.

#256
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
Uh, no. Wrong. Bringing in all the Reapers you want wouldn't stop the quarians from just fleeing.

Also, I like how you completely fabricate numbers to support yourself. Where exactly is it said the geth have "30+ dreadnoughts"?

Modifié par David7204, 05 janvier 2014 - 12:56 .


#257
wolfhowwl

wolfhowwl
  • Members
  • 3 727 messages
The Reapers would be able to "pin" the Quarian fleet (Gerrel's words) in the Rannoch system in the same way the reaper upgraded Geth did.

Oh and by the way...

From the Geth war assets page: "Unbound by the Treaty of Farixen, the synthetic intelligences built almost as many dreadnoughts as the Turian."

The Turians had 39 dreadnoughts as of 2185.

Damn you look stupid now, David.Thanks for accusing me of lying.

Modifié par wolfhowwl, 05 janvier 2014 - 01:10 .


#258
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
And tell me, how many of those were lost when the quarians attacked the geth with a weapon they had literally no defenses against? And remember, since dreadnoughts are slow, they would tend to stay close to installations. Such as the one the quarians attacked.

#259
Reorte

Reorte
  • Members
  • 6 601 messages

David7204 wrote...

And tell me, how many of those were lost when the quarians attacked the geth with a weapon they had literally no defenses against? And remember, since dreadnoughts are slow, they would tend to stay close to installations. Such as the one the quarians attacked.

Considering that the sum total of the quarian attack on the dreadnought you board was one hole and a damaged docking tube, probably none of them.

#260
wolfhowwl

wolfhowwl
  • Members
  • 3 727 messages

David7204 wrote...

And tell me, how many of those were lost when the quarians attacked the geth with a weapon they had literally no defenses against? And remember, since dreadnoughts are slow, they would tend to stay close to installations. Such as the one the quarians attacked.


You receive the Geth assets after Rannoch concludes.

If there were losses to the dreadnoughts apparently Bioware didn't deem them material enough to be mentioned in the Geth fleet war assets blurb.

#261
Clayless

Clayless
  • Members
  • 7 051 messages

ImaginaryMatter wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

Reorte wrote...
I find it very hard to swallow the idea that not one single previous cycle managed to work out what was coming.


As you should because it's not true. The Protheans knew the Reapers were coming. Who knows how many other cycles did? It simply didn't make a difference.


Where was that revealed? Vigil on Ilos stated that the Reapers appeared without warning.

Just kidding, I guess that whole part got retconned.


Not retconned, the wiki isn't a source.

#262
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 844 messages

David7204 wrote...

Uh, no. Wrong. Bringing in all the Reapers you want wouldn't stop the quarians from just fleeing.


Why not? The geth seemed to be pretty good at stopping the quarians on their own. The reapers would have simply wiped them out, considering that they can outrun just about anything the quarians or alliance have. 

#263
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

Robosexual wrote...

ImaginaryMatter wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

Reorte wrote...
I find it very hard to swallow the idea that not one single previous cycle managed to work out what was coming.


As you should because it's not true. The Protheans knew the Reapers were coming. Who knows how many other cycles did? It simply didn't make a difference.


Where was that revealed? Vigil on Ilos stated that the Reapers appeared without warning.

Just kidding, I guess that whole part got retconned.


Not retconned, the wiki isn't a source.


What wiki? Now I'm confused.

#264
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

KaiserShep wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Uh, no. Wrong. Bringing in all the Reapers you want wouldn't stop the quarians from just fleeing.


Why not? The geth seemed to be pretty good at stopping the quarians on their own. The reapers would have simply wiped them out, considering that they can outrun just about anything the quarians or alliance have. 


Plus wasn't the point of boarding the Geth Dreadnough disabling it so the Quarians could counter attack or flee, which implies that they couldn't flee when it was there.

#265
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 844 messages
Yeah, it was. It was an opportunity squandered by Gerrel when he opted to strike against the dreadnought instead. Of course, there was no way to know that the reapers had a backup on Rannoch itself.

Modifié par KaiserShep, 05 janvier 2014 - 02:06 .


#266
Clayless

Clayless
  • Members
  • 7 051 messages

ImaginaryMatter wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

ImaginaryMatter wrote...

Where was that revealed? Vigil on Ilos stated that the Reapers appeared without warning.

Just kidding, I guess that whole part got retconned.


Not retconned, the wiki isn't a source.


What wiki? Now I'm confused.


You mentioned that Vigil said the Reapers appeared without warning, then you said that part got retconned.

With no source except the wiki.

The wiki isn't a source. Without an actual source you can't say that part got retconned.

#267
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Robosexual wrote...

ImaginaryMatter wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

ImaginaryMatter wrote...

Where was that revealed? Vigil on Ilos stated that the Reapers appeared without warning.

Just kidding, I guess that whole part got retconned.


Not retconned, the wiki isn't a source.


What wiki? Now I'm confused.


You mentioned that Vigil said the Reapers appeared without warning, then you said that part got retconned.

With no source except the wiki.

The wiki isn't a source. Without an actual source you can't say that part got retconned.


Yup. I'll give you my source:

My source is Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 3.

In ME1, Vigil states the Reapers attacked without warning, completely catching the Protheans with their pants down.

In ME3, Javik states that the Protheans had advance knowledge of the Reapers, but were unable to prepare in time. 

Retcon.

Also, prescribing a false source to a person and claiming they used it (when such person is showing signs of ignorance to your statement) doesn't contradict said person's claim. In fact, it makes you look like a jerkass.

#268
AlexMBrennan

AlexMBrennan
  • Members
  • 7 002 messages

David7204 wrote...

Uh, no. Wrong. Bringing in all the Reapers you want wouldn't stop the quarians from just fleeing.

No, the quarian's unrivalled idiocy will see to that - every last captain fully backed a utterly suicidal final attack with no hope of achieving anything (if Shepard sides with Legion), and if they won't fall back when to avoid certain complete extermination of their species then I don't think the Reaper threat will do anything.

#269
Clayless

Clayless
  • Members
  • 7 051 messages

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

In ME3, Javik states that the Protheans had advance knowledge of the Reapers, but were unable to prepare in time. 

Retcon.


That's not a source.

If Javik said that, link it, source it.

Until then, your word is suspect, and in no way counts as a source.

#270
AlanC9

AlanC9
  • Members
  • 35 700 messages
A YouTube link would be nice.

#271
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

Nightwriter wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

It took like half of the Alliance fleet to take out a Geth platoon and ONE Reaper.

And we're still having this conversation? Really?

Well, yeah.

Look, it's not "conventional vs Crucible" really. The underlying argument is "The Way BioWare Did It vs. Some Other Way."

There are lots of different offshoots of Some Other Way. Conventional victory is one of them, perhaps one of the more misguided. But the underlying elements are the same: The Way BioWare Did It haz hated Catalyst and Icky Ickies (see: can't win on own steam, don't agree with the problem, hate the solutions, dislike Catalyst -- list is endless). The Some Other Way (in this case, conventional victory) haz winning on our own and no Icky Ickies.

So for as long as people are unsatisfied with the endings there will probably always be a few who are emotionally drawn to conventional victory despite the clear problems it has if it isn't coupled with something clever. Maybe it's because that is the only method they hear mentioned in the game aside from the Crucible, I don't know. Maybe it's that some people wanted EMS to matter more, wanted to believe it could be possible to win martially if you play all your cards absolutely perfectly. Maybe "let's just fricking charge them" is the first thought that enters their minds after "God that ending sucked what was that kid even saying I am so confused." I really don't know.

Either way, it got talked about so much that somewhere along the line Some Other Way and "winning purely conventionally" got muddied together, until people started assuming you supported conventional victory if you opposed the Catalyst at all.


To that I say there are other fish in the sea! Move on man, move on!

#272
TheMyron

TheMyron
  • Members
  • 1 807 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...



To that I say there are other fish in the sea! Move on man, move on!


Most fish in the sea aren't edible.

#273
KaiserShep

KaiserShep
  • Members
  • 23 844 messages
That's a quitter's attitude. Anything is edible if you put your mind to it.

#274
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

KaiserShep wrote...

That's a quitter's attitude. Anything is edible if you put your mind to it.


Well my mind might be up to it, but I think the human body would strongly object.

#275
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Yup. I'll give you my source:

My source is Mass Effect 1 and Mass Effect 3.

In ME1, Vigil states the Reapers attacked without warning, completely catching the Protheans with their pants down.

In ME3, Javik states that the Protheans had advance knowledge of the Reapers, but were unable to prepare in time. 

Retcon.


I'll just point out those statements aren't mutually exclusive. You only have to assume the Protheans didn't know when the Reapers would come, and that the Reapers attacked suddenly, which seems obvious.