NeroonWilliams wrote...
lindisfaran wrote...
For me it's hard to pick a second option... the way I see it, the three non-refuse endings are actually split into two categories. Trust starkid / don't trust starkid. So while it is fairly simple for someone who already trusts starkid to pick a second option in the same category, it is more difficult for a non-truster to do so. However, laying that aside for the sake of the thread, here's my response.[b]
To me, even choosing Destroy requires putting at least some trust in the AI. And if you're willing to go that far, why not go all the way?
I get what you're saying. I'll try and explain my thinking...
Since ME3 is a game, you have to follow the game "rules" somewhat. No matter what choices you make, the general path of the game is decided in advance by the story writers, that's a very broad example of what I mean by "rules".
When the catalyst is explaining the different options to you, the game itself actually plays cut scenes (or at least when I played it did, maybe part of the EC?) to show you what each choice will look like. So in essence, I felt that the game itself was pulling me out of the character world and saying, "Look, here's what you do to follow the choice the catalyst is describing."
I trust that the devs were giving me an accurate tutorial, if you will, of how to accomplish each choice that the catalyst set out. Now as to what the catalyst actually said, I didn't put much stock in it... so, would destroy actually destroy? Synthesis actually synthesize? Or control actually control? I believe so, because the game itself pointed that way... but would everything the catalyst said come to pass? I doubt it.
It's a different thing to trust a game mechanic than to trust what an in-game character says.