370 réponses à ce sujet

[SpamBot2000]

Solaxe wrote...

Funny how synthesis/control fans are fine with picking other endings...

...but destroy fanatics are mad without their ending

Eh, not that funny. They are just people who give a damn about how the story ends. As opposed to "what if talking pink bicycles swam across the sea of Uranus, proclaiming the greatness of the Shepard for putting Intel chips into pineapples? So deep, maaan!"

Of course, "Destroy" sucks too. Just less than the others.

Modifié par SpamBot2000, 18 avril 2013 - 02:01 .

[3DandBeyond]

ElSuperGecko wrote...

I'd feel pretty damn violated if my preferred ending was removed, since my preferred ending is headcanon.

Considering the fact is that (supposed) major head canon is no longer an allowable discussion, for many their preferred ending has been removed.  Both BW and some fans have decided it's not an appropriate topic any longer.  So the head canon police have already violated some.

And yes, I agree, my preferred ending does not exist in the game, so head canon is all I have (not the head canon that shall not be named type, but an unequivocal real victory).  My alternate head canon is less satisfying because it means the moronic crucible must become a big cannon in space and target only the reapers (the intended goal all along).  Since Bioware was incapable (they said this) of writing such an ending with a story that made sense and was satisfying, I have to keep playing it out in my head.  Amazingly enough, something they couldn't do is something fans themselves can.

[ghost9191]

first choice: Destroy

second would be mehem . you know what if you can add head cannon . aka fanfic i can choose it too

and fyi destroy is the option that preserves the universe we know and love... the reapers aren't around . like it was. the geth are gone. like they were when they hid behind the veil . and the relays an citadel are up and running.... how is that different ?

but yeah destroy. if it is not in there than well i just wouldn't care enough to play

won't be mad , but i just don't like the other endings enough to choose them

Modifié par ghost9191, 18 avril 2013 - 02:07 .

[3DandBeyond]

SpamBot2000 wrote...

Solaxe wrote...

Funny how synthesis/control fans are fine with picking other endings...

...but destroy fanatics are mad without their ending

Eh, not that funny. They are just people who give a damn about how the story ends. As opposed to "what if talking pink bicycles swam across the sea of Uranus, proclaiming the greatness of the Shepard for putting Intel chips into pineapples? So deep, maaan!"

Of course, "Destroy" sucks too. Just less than the others.

Even Killer Klowns From Outer Space has a better ending.  And actually much of it sounds like where BW got this ending, until the actual end. 

http://en.wikipedia....rom_Outer_Space

Torso Shepard should have used an ice cream cooler to escape the tube explosion.

Modifié par 3DandBeyond, 18 avril 2013 - 02:05 .

[fizzypop]

Preferred Ending:  Destroy
Second Choice: Control
Explanation for Second Choice: Picked that mainly because I can't pick green. I don't want to change everyone without their consent into half machines. Plus I have a feeling they'll replace organic parts over time with more and more tech becoming more machine than organic.  Kind of like the collectors that'd freak me out. I believe too much in individuality and the right to make our own choices in life. So control is really the only option if destroy isn't possible.

Modifié par fizzypop, 18 avril 2013 - 02:14 .

[ghost9191]

Solaxe wrote...

Funny how synthesis/control fans are fine with picking other endings...

...but destroy fanatics are mad without their ending

actually i see more synthesis fans trying to force their ending on others. fitting given the choice i suppose


 but that is just what i have seen.  probably way anytime someone makes a destroy support page . fans of the other endings come to attack... but same can be said for all


simply put. each "group" has ppl that are guilty of that

[SyK18]

Preferred Ending: Destroy
Second Choice: ...die in ME 2
Explanation for Second Choice: So i never have to choose Synthesis or Control

[Steelcan]

Preferred ending -High EMS Destroy
Second choice - Control

I pick Destroy because I reject the Catalysts's assertions and I want to free the galaxy from the constraints of the cycles. Control would also let me do this. But I'm not a fan of how it is portrayed in game. I'd sooner completely switch to PC gaming, buy the trilogy, and download MEHEM before I picked Synthesis or Refuse.

[FireW4lker]

Preferred ending: Control
Second choice: Synthesis .
My 'canon' Shepard is a full Paragon so I think he'd always choose what's best for the entire galaxy . Control stops the cycles and even helps the galactic community rebuild with Shep acting as guardian . Sythesis is the second choice because it also does good for the galaxy except that it forces the change to everyone (DNA modification and all that) , whereas Control doesn't (mostly) . Also , I'd pick synthesis because the music and EDI's narration . Those are just brilliant

[SyK18]

Yestare7 wrote...

N7-RedFox wrote...

 No one knows if Shepard will survive (post-breath-scene) or simply bleed out. And since Bioware has stated that Shepard will NOT be in ME4, then we get no closure at all thanks to that cliff-hanger. We can't mourn his passing nor can we get relief knowing Shep survived. Great....

RedFox:  YOU decide!! This is your game, your story. Write an ending! Make a picture! Play it out in your head.
Don't waste your time waiting for someone telling you she is dead or alive. What do YOU think?

BW: "there is no Canon, it is whatever the player decides"



Have fun.

I hate you people. I use that word with lots of hate towards haters and haters hating hateers,,,haters!!

In all seriousness though. I bought a game for $80...yea i did. When i support a company because of thier storytelling and fork over my hard earned money because they have a rep for GREAT storytelling, I expect great storytelling. Now, all of you will say "oh, but ME had a crappy story. It was only succesful because of romance and ****." No, no it was not, shut up right now. ME had the best story and ME 2 had the best ending. ME3 had nothing but romances...hmm and ME3 suked

RedFox says "You decide". Are you fuking kidding me?! This is not a book where you let the majority of the story come from your imagination. This is a video game, where someone else's imagination has been brought to you and countless others through video games. Might I add, it is Bioware's game, thier vision, they say so themselves. It's not up to players to finish Shepard's story offscreen. You don't just add a scene in the end and say "well, u finish it now". That is a big insult to fans and the laziest way a developer can write a story.

If developers can't finish a game you have enjoyed over 6 years, are you gonna keep on supporting them? What's next if you do? 

"We are announcing ME4. It's 1 mission long and you need your imagination to finish it. Btw it's $100 now, because thanks to some people who are okay with ****, we can get away with it."

So, with that Destroyers have every right to be annoyned, because even after the **** that was delivered to us in ME 3, with few exceptions (Tuchunaka), we never got closure for our Shepard like green or blue did. Pure horse**** Bioware, pure horse****.

[Morty Smith]

Can´t happen.

[ElSuperGecko]

3DandBeyond wrote...
Considering the fact is that (supposed) major head canon is no longer an allowable discussion, for many their preferred ending has been removed.  Both BW and some fans have decided it's not an appropriate topic any longer.  So the head canon police have already violated some.

True, but the BSN =/= the internet.  The speculators, contemplators, detectives and those who simply enjoy talking about the concepts hidden within the game have simply moved on to pastures new, where they can discuss their ideas without being unnecessarily locked down.

It's amusing, to be honest:

Bioware:  *grand, sweeping gesture* Our masterpiece is here!  Speculate away, my friends!  Speculate away! 

(9 months later)

Bioware:  No.... wait... .no... YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG!  Go sit in the corner!  NO MOAR SPECULATION!  *end of line*

[Iucounou]

ElSuperGecko wrote...

Bioware:  *grand, sweeping gesture* Our masterpiece is here!  Speculate away, my friends!  Speculate away! 

(9 months later)

Bioware:  No.... wait... .no... YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG!  Go sit in the corner!  NO MOAR SPECULATION!  *end of line*

I have to admit I laughed at that. The kind of laugh that ends with me realising I'm laughing at something that it is actually true. It usually ends in me going silent and saying "Why I laugh?"

It does make me wonder what we won't be allowed to talk about next, however.

[Ryzaki]

Iucounou wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

Iucounou wrote...

Solaxe wrote...

Yestare7 wrote...

very.

It also proves that they're very close-minded

Or it proves that the synthesis/controllers don't have much faith in their chosen ending?

So I must now be intolerant of any others to believe in my favorite ending?

As opposed to what most religions teach, mental inflexibility is not a virtue. If you aren't even willing to deal with a "what if" scenario, it's particularly telling.

You can believe in whatever ending you like, of course. That's up to you.

I was merely providing a counterpoint to the ridiculous assertion that all destroyers are close-minded. An assertion which, it seems, you also believe in.

Have fun with that.

Yep each ending to their own.

Also one could argue Control and Synthesis are alike in some ways (Reapers still around, technological progress due to control of/aid with the Reapers, synthetic life still around (changed in Synthesis unchanged in Control, People are living with Reapers, Reapers helping rebuild). They're not exactly the same of course but they have similar advantages.

There's nothing else similar to destroy. There isn't another ending where organics live free of Reaper BS and fix their own crap on their own.

Maybe if Control had Shep fly those bastards into the sun...but that's not what AI Shep does.

You get destroy or refuse (which is a BW sized FU ending).

So this "See they wouldn't pick another choice111!" crap is dumb. There is no choice even slightly similar.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 18 avril 2013 - 02:45 .

[ElSuperGecko]

Iucounou wrote...
I have to admit I laughed at that. The kind of laugh that ends with me realising I'm laughing at something that it is actually true. It usually ends in me going silent and saying "Why I laugh?"

It does make me wonder what we won't be allowed to talk about next, however.

I believe Bill Hicks put it best:  www.youtube.com/watch

[teh DRUMPf!!]

 I won't call into question one's values, but it *is* pretty moronic to reply by saying "I'd uninstall gaem."

When playing "Would you rather?"-games you don't have/get the option of saying "I would pick neither."

It's stupid. It defeats the purpose of hypothetical entirely. You're supposed to pick between what you usually wouldn't.

[Yestare7]

Solaxe wrote...

Yestare7 wrote...

very.

It also proves that they're very close-minded

It sure does!!:lol:

[Iakus]

HYR 2.0 wrote...

 I won't call into question one's values, but it *is* pretty moronic to reply by saying "I'd uninstall gaem."

When playing "Would you rather?"-games you don't have/get the option of saying "I would pick neither."

It's stupid. It defeats the purpose of hypothetical entirely. You're supposed to pick between what you usually wouldn't.

That's just it.  For me it wasn't a hypothetical.

It was "Been there.  Done that"

[teh DRUMPf!!]

 ^ The OP is expressly asking which, out of RGB, do you pick.


So, again, it's like...

> Would you burn to death, or freeze to death?
> hurr.. neither!!

Obviously nobody ever actually chooses either one IRL even if they can, but that's not the point of the question.

Modifié par HYR 2.0, 18 avril 2013 - 04:41 .

[SpamBot2000]

Yeah, some people are just "What If" Game haterz! They don't get the amazingly deep Art of the What If... Team!

Modifié par SpamBot2000, 18 avril 2013 - 05:26 .

[teh DRUMPf!!]

SpamBot2000 wrote...

Yeah, some people are just "What If" Game haterz! They don't get the amazingly deep Art of the What If... Team!

 "I don't know what drugs you're on, but stay back and I won't shoot you."

Modifié par HYR 2.0, 18 avril 2013 - 05:28 .

[Ryzaki]

HYR 2.0 wrote...

 ^ The OP is expressly asking which, out of RGB, do you pick.


So, again, it's like...

> Would you burn to death, or freeze to death?
> hurr.. neither!!

Obviously nobody ever actually chooses either one IRL even if they can, but that's not the point of the question.

And they said it already. It's Destroy or nothing.

They gave an answer. Turning of the game is picking a third option. Shep does this constantly in the series.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 18 avril 2013 - 05:36 .

[teh DRUMPf!!]

^ It's semantically the same as saying "I would pick neither" cop-out.

[Ryzaki]

HYR 2.0 wrote...

^ It's semantically the same as saying "I would pick neither" cop-out.

True though...they really could pick "turn the game off".

Unless we're arguing from Shep's perspective. And that brings up the wtfery of the destroy choice not being in the crucible in the first place and why Shep should believe any of Starbrat's garbage then.

[Yestare7]

It's not a cop-out.

Some people would rather turn off the game then be forced into whatever atrocious ending is left.
(Think Synthesis/Control)[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/happy.png[/smilie]

From the very top:

IntelligentME3Fanboy wrote...

 remove Destroy?OK...

Step.1 Grab ME3
Step 2 Break it

Fortunately, we also have MEHEM. Oh wait, the op (Synth supporter) also took that away.

Modifié par Yestare7, 18 avril 2013 - 08:26 .