90 réponses à ce sujet

[Obadiah]

Kunari801 wrote...

Liamv2 wrote...

It does look nice at times but stuff like this just kills my immersion

https://encrypted-tb...Fo27dq9ljEqNize

I whould rather it remains consistant than switch between looking amazing to looking like ass

Where in that shot from?  

They enabled the fly-cam, then zoomed into the background, then complained about it.

[o Ventus]

CDR David Shepard wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

I never said ME3 was the best looking game of all time. Simply that, compared to the other two games, it's a lot more detailed and vibrant looking.

It is more detailed in certain aspects, you're right, but then you're wrong to say that the overall package is more detailed compared to 1 and 2, where there are hilarious examples of proving this the opposite. 

Just because there are examples where ME3 is not detailed doesn't make it wrong.

ME3 is more detailed despite these examples.

How does this at all disprove our counter what he said?

[spirosz]

Let's get picky, shall we?

[o Ventus]

And they don't look any better with flycam turned off.

[adayaday]

www.youtube.com/watchsome running,some birdies and a little bit of sliding.

[Obadiah]

wiggles89 wrote...

Obadiah wrote...

Kunari801 wrote...

Liamv2 wrote...

It does look nice at times but stuff like this just kills my immersion

https://encrypted-tb...Fo27dq9ljEqNize

I whould rather it remains consistant than switch between looking amazing to looking like ass

Where in that shot from?  

They enabled the fly-cam, then zoomed into the background, then complained about it.

You can see them without fly-cam enabled.

Not this big at this angle. I can't count the number of times I've played through this intro, and I noticed those pixelated dudes a grand total of once when I saw a post about it on this forum and went looking for them. I've always missed them since. The notion that this would be the example that shows that Mass Effect 3 is less detailed that the other sequels is just complete nonesense.

[NeonFlux117]

ME3 is a good looking game. But it's not Witcher 2 good or even close to crysis 3. But it's nice looking.

[Peranor]

 



Can't wait to see how ME4 will look. With a new generation of hardware to play with it should look magnificent!
No more technical limitations holding back the artists imagination. Well, not as much at least. I'm at least sure the sprites won't return 

[Brovikk Rasputin]

A next gen Mass Effect game is indeed going to be amazing to look at. The designers and artists at Bioware are amazingly talented, even when working with 8 year old hardware.

[Cainhurst Crow]

Lot's of cherry picking going on in this thread.

I mean, me1 could have some good looking scenery...depending on if you got to the exact right spot, and angled the camrea at the exact correct angle.

Otherwise, all you'll see is







And of course the mako in it's natural state.

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 25 avril 2013 - 10:18 .

[mdp310]

A lot of the unexplored planets in ME1 looked like crap. ME2 at least had trees on that one planet you use the Hammerhead to explore.

It's a completely insane and unfair comparison, but Crysis came out the same year as ME1.

[spirosz]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

Lot's of cherry picking going on in this thread.

Proving the point.

[Cainhurst Crow]

spirosz wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

Lot's of cherry picking going on in this thread.

Proving the point.

But of course. Show how the people picking at ME3 is wrong by using their same tactics on ME1.

I find it's a good way of making a point.

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 26 avril 2013 - 12:15 .

[FlamingBoy]

The reality is me3 is not the prettiest game out there