XxDrunkSniperxX wrote...
dont know about emo but hes definitely emotionally retarded
That is why many girls like him so much
XxDrunkSniperxX wrote...
dont know about emo but hes definitely emotionally retarded
Herr Uhl wrote...
TeenZombie wrote...
13eelzebub wrote...
Unless he was that baby @ the end of the Calling, therefore he subconsciously knew Duncan for all his life
Well, if he's Fiona's son, it's entirely possible that Duncan would have come to visit him throughout his childhood. The game doesn't explicitly say that Duncan and Alistair never met before he recruited him.
This implies that he did not: http://social.biowar...ex.php/Alistair
Kimarous wrote...
Pissed for very believable reasons =/= emo
TeenZombie wrote...
Herr Uhl wrote...
TeenZombie wrote...
13eelzebub wrote...
Unless he was that baby @ the end of the Calling, therefore he subconsciously knew Duncan for all his life
Well, if he's Fiona's son, it's entirely possible that Duncan would have come to visit him throughout his childhood. The game doesn't explicitly say that Duncan and Alistair never met before he recruited him.
This implies that he did not: http://social.biowar...ex.php/Alistair
That could be written off as heresay since it's from the journal of some templar who didn't know Duncan or Alistair well, and was just present at the tourney. And Duncan could already know him at that point, but is making a point of asking about him because he already knows he wants to recruit him.
I'm not saying that it is or isn't true, but if they ever decide to clear up who Fiona's son is, either way they'll probably have some conflicting existing lore.
ejoslin wrote...
With as much as Alistair talked about Duncan, if Duncan had been a fixture in Alistair's life, if he was even making an occasional visit to Ali in the Chantry, you think he would have mentioned it.
I let him run off to get drunk. I don't miss him either way, he spends my games in camp with his box of Kleenex.Costin_Razvan wrote...
robertthebard wrote...
Wow, this, again? I have answered this before, but I'll answer it again, if Riordan suggested recruiting Howe, I would. As I said in the very first thread this was suggested, I'd distance myself from him, and feel all dirty, and be sure to sacrifice myself to the Archdemon, but I'd do it. Of course, comparing Howe to Loghain is out there in the extreme, and it's funny that the HN origin can be used to ignore Alistair's whining, since Alistair will completely ignore the fact that your whole family was killed to whine more about Duncan. Losing Cailan means next to nothing to Alistair, other than with Cailin dead, he might have to own up to his bloodline, and then you get to hear all the emo crap about that too. Who do you think inspired the Kleenex box in my sig?highcastle wrote...
*sigh* It really confounds me how many people can't see things from Al's perspective. How about this: have you played as a human noble? What would you do if Al wanted to recruit Arl Howe?
Al lost his father figure and his brother to Loghain. He can't play nice with the guy. He just can't. And I really don't blame him.
So I take it you are the type who spares Loghain just to execute Alistair?
lala_lover wrote...
I'm sick of people saying Alistair is being whiney because he didn't approve of Loghain joining the grey wardens, most normal people in his shoes would be angry too, hell if I were him I probably be so angry that I would attack the pc. Wouldn't you be just as angry as Alistair if he tried to recruit Arl Howe, Vaughan, or Bhelen?
Ancient Greece, much?mousestalker wrote...
"Alistair appeared taken aback by the response, but perhaps not unpleasantly so. He stared agape until Duncan, with the slightest hint of a smile, suggested that the young man go and collect his gear for they would be leaving immediately. Alistair ran off with such speed that it brought knowing glances from members of the crowd.
Nothing was heard from Alistair after that night, but such is not unusual when it comes to Grey Wardens. What is known is that the templar barracks are far, far quieter without him.”
What's missing from that account (as found in the codex and the wiki article is the following line:
"For it is known that the Grey Wardens are a quiet folk much given to using an excess of lubrication."
maxernst wrote...
To hell with whether it gives them glory and honor. Do you want to go into battle with someone you can't trust? I don't care how good a warrior they are if I'm not sure they're on my side.
lala_lover wrote...
I'm sick of people saying Alistair is being whiney because he didn't approve of Loghain joining the grey wardens, most normal people in his shoes would be angry too, hell if I were him I probably be so angry that I would attack the pc. Wouldn't you be just as angry as Alistair if he tried to recruit Arl Howe, Vaughan, or Bhelen?
Yep, that is how I used it.Well, Alistair was very emotional about it, so I think the word Emo is tacked on quite correctly in this circumstance, although I doubt the OP actually meant it that way.
And BFF totally means Best Frog Forever!
I would let him join the Grey Wardens coz my character is good. In real life, I prolly won't but I'm role-playing an all-good character in this game. To let Loghain redeem himself (not revenge) is the "good" choice.How about this: have you played as a human noble? What would you do if Al wanted to recruit Arl Howe?
Probably not from Kings point of view..^^StarMars wrote...
Ferelden comes first. Loghain is still a good general.
Sry, but a general who might spontaneously decide, that the orders given him are crap and leave the battlefield does noting other than deserting wich is generally seen as worst quality a soldier can have.
Usually a single soldier deserting does not convict thousands of people to death btw.
StarMars wrote...
Probably not from Kings point of view..^^StarMars wrote...
Ferelden comes first. Loghain is still a good general.
Sry, but a general who might spontaneously decide, that the orders given him are crap and leave the battlefield does noting other than deserting wich is generally seen as worst quality a soldier can have.
Usually a single soldier deserting does not convict thousands of people to death btw.
Well, he said he made one tactical error. And what I meant is more on his warrior skills than his leadership skills.
Modifié par tonydizzle, 17 janvier 2010 - 01:24 .
errant_knight wrote...
Personally, I think Alistair makes perfectly valid points and there's certainly a difference between anger and hysteria. It seems that, for many, emotion=weakness, grief=whining, and anger=hysteria. I find that bizarre. If anything, the PC is a bit of a cold fish. I know why that is. It's necessary to allow for different styles of gameplay, but it would be nice if one had the option of letting the PC show more honest emotion, as Alistair does.
Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 17 janvier 2010 - 06:13 .
Costin_Razvan wrote...
Alistair is a emo, simply because he DEMANDS the throne for himself AFTER saying for most of the game that he loathes even the idea of it! ( even hardened )
tonydizzle wrote...
StarMars wrote...
Probably not from Kings point of view..^^StarMars wrote...
Ferelden comes first. Loghain is still a good general.
Sry, but a general who might spontaneously decide, that the orders given him are crap and leave the battlefield does noting other than deserting wich is generally seen as worst quality a soldier can have.
Usually a single soldier deserting does not convict thousands of people to death btw.
Well, he said he made one tactical error. And what I meant is more on his warrior skills than his leadership skills.
It was more than a tactical error... And being a good warrior =/= a good General. Loghain was a complete moron who abandoned his King and tried to blame the only ones that actually stood by the King. He is the epitome of "worst general ever". Regardless of his past, he changed and so that means he becomes a bit shorter and doesn't have to worry about doing his hair anymore.
ejoslin wrote...
errant_knight wrote...
Personally, I think Alistair makes perfectly valid points and there's certainly a difference between anger and hysteria. It seems that, for many, emotion=weakness, grief=whining, and anger=hysteria. I find that bizarre. If anything, the PC is a bit of a cold fish. I know why that is. It's necessary to allow for different styles of gameplay, but it would be nice if one had the option of letting the PC show more honest emotion, as Alistair does.
It's not that emotion = weakness. In fact, you see emotion in other characters who come across as much stronger than Alistair. It's not what Alistair feels that makes him seem weak -- it's how he expresses himself and lets those feelings guide him. One thing all the origins have in common is the PC just lost EVERYTHING they held dear (well, maybe not the dwarf commoner so much), their homes, their families; they have undergone a crisis that had they let it do to them what Alistair allowed Ostegar do to him, all of Ferelden would have been swallowed by the blight.
This is not saying Alistair is a bad person, just that one of them had to be strong, and that one ended up being the PC. Which makes Alistair seem weak. He is unable to put what he feels aside to take care of what needs taking care of. Until, of course, he can. Hardening him and then making him king makes him a far stronger man than any other ending. If you have any doubts, make Anora solo queen and sacrifice yourself and see what happens to Alistair.
