PC vs XBOX
#76
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:32
#77
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 01:11
#78
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 01:23
I have only completed ME on 360 so I will need to start a new character for ME2 on PC. As the PC versions of ME2 is out on the same day its a no brainer for me which one I will get.
Dragon Age runs perfectly on my PC on max settings so thatd another reason I decided to go with PC this time.
#79
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 02:01
#80
Guest_SirenCurse_*
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 02:16
Guest_SirenCurse_*
#81
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 09:50
#82
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 10:04
yours is up to date. The output can be displayed on a television screen provided certain equipment is available.
Choose Xbox if:
PC is below recommended system reqs. Get keyboard mouse and keyboard/mouse adapters to play FPS with. A much better system than the Xbox controller
#83
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 10:17
#84
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 10:52
#85
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 10:52
NOOB this thread is stupid FAIL.Eragondragonrider wrote...
Okay I have played ME1 on my XBox and liked how it played, my question is was ME1 better on PC or Xbox? What was the different between the 2? and is there going to be a tool set for this one like DA:O?
#86
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 10:59
And I actually have a new rig I built almost exclusively for Dragon Age, so power/stability isn't an issue for me. I'm still getting ME2 for the 360.
#87
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:01
Kabraxal wrote...
Console all the way. There are very few games that are truly better on the PC and then it is merely because of the mods. The graphics, while better, are not leaps and bounds above the console versions for the most part. The controller interface for consoles is far better than a mouse/keyboard. For most games, this alone nulls any advantage the PC ever had.
And I actually have a new rig I built almost exclusively for Dragon Age, so power/stability isn't an issue for me. I'm still getting ME2 for the 360.
When you say the controller interface is "Far better" , what you mean is you like iit better. For me, it's clumsy and difficult to use. For you, obviously not.
As has been said many times in this thread, it's an issue of personal preference.
#88
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:03
yeah your dumb for replying to this topic NOOB,FAIL!Funkcase wrote...
Why do people always make these dum vs topics? It's what you enjoy that matters not what someone else thinks is best.
#89
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:08
also
like the 360. I just like it better. A computer is too complicated for me. I'm an idiot.
lol well said
#90
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:08
For shooters keyboard/mouse is better.Kabraxal wrote...
The controller interface for consoles is far better than a mouse/keyboard.
Modifié par Peer of the Empire, 16 janvier 2010 - 11:13 .
#91
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:19
Clearly Mass Effect 1 is graphically better and more stable on the PC...check from page 5-10 for pictures.
But since Mass Effect 1 and 2 can't be modded (I asumme ME2 won't be) they're basically the same thing. If you prefer the comfor of your couch over a computer chair get the 360 version. I play on PC with a much high resolution then the 360 can support so Mass Effect 1 for me looks amazing and running amazing with vertical sync on I always get 60 fps compared to the 360 version which is always slowing down.
Modifié par Ringo12, 16 janvier 2010 - 11:25 .
#92
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:31
izmirtheastarach wrote...
Kabraxal wrote...
Console all the way. There are very few games that are truly better on the PC and then it is merely because of the mods. The graphics, while better, are not leaps and bounds above the console versions for the most part. The controller interface for consoles is far better than a mouse/keyboard. For most games, this alone nulls any advantage the PC ever had.
And I actually have a new rig I built almost exclusively for Dragon Age, so power/stability isn't an issue for me. I'm still getting ME2 for the 360.
When you say the controller interface is "Far better" , what you mean is you like iit better. For me, it's clumsy and difficult to use. For you, obviously not.
As has been said many times in this thread, it's an issue of personal preference.
I was just stating my preference. I understand that some people prefer the mouse and keyboard interface. Meant to place an IMO in the sentence, just forgot. Playing DA on both the 360 and the PC, I prefer some of the keyboard elements (the hotkeys and TAB is easier than using the left trigger to highlight items), but using it move the character... ugh, hate it.
As for ME: since it is a shooter, the controller for the consoles will trump the PC for me. I always hear so many people laud the mouse as more "precise" and better for shooters, but I always had issues... to put it lightly. I find the dual analog control far more responsive and precise. I am a sniper with the console controller but with a mouse...
Modifié par Kabraxal, 16 janvier 2010 - 11:56 .
#93
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:35
Peer of the Empire wrote...
For shooters keyboard/mouse is better.Kabraxal wrote...
The controller interface for consoles is far better than a mouse/keyboard.
Depends on your preference. For me, shooters are easier with an xbox controller than a mouse/keyboard.
Modifié par Fates end, 16 janvier 2010 - 11:36 .
#94
Posté 17 janvier 2010 - 12:08
Kabraxal wrote...
I was just stating my preference. I understand that some people prefer the mouse and keyboard interface. Meant to place an IMO in the sentence, just forgot. Playing DA on both the 360 and the PC, I prefer some of the keyboard elements (the hotkeys and TAB is easier than using the left trigger to highlight items), but using it move the character... ugh, hate it.
As for ME: since it is a shooter, the controller for the consoles will trump the PC for me. I always hear so many people laud the mouse as more "precise" and better for shooters, but I always had issues... to put it lightly. I find the dual analog control far more responsive and precise. I am a sniper with the console controller but with a mouse...
Yep. Like I said, very much a personal thing. I've been playing games with a mouse any keyboard for 15 years, to they feel perfect to me. On the other hand, I absolutely could not play a shooter on the Xbox 360. Action games, platformers, etc. Maybe. But not a shooter.
#95
Posté 17 janvier 2010 - 12:10
#96
Posté 17 janvier 2010 - 12:16
Modifié par Zaikor, 17 janvier 2010 - 12:19 .
#97
Guest_Maviarab_*
Posté 17 janvier 2010 - 12:18
Guest_Maviarab_*
unnoticeable improvement in graphics with the privilege of having to put up with a much smaller screen and the uncomfortable desk as opposed to the awesome couch and much larger TV screen along with far more comfortable controls of the awesome controller and the ability to have some snacks and a drink nearby without risking to fry an expansive computer.
PC=the expensive, non-cinematic, buggy and uncomfortable way to play a cinematic game.
Thinks someone needs a better PC, I personally have a 32" monitor, or can play games though my TV via the PC....
and gaming on a PC for 3 extra pixels or throwing money in upgrading my PC every year as well as more money to repalce it every 3 to four years with a newer one just to be able to run the newest gmes
So will you buy the new xbox when it comes out? Hmm....think we all the know the anser to that. The cost is the same when averaged out, cost pof a ncie tv, console every few years....same as building a new pc....
#98
Posté 17 janvier 2010 - 12:23
Darth_Trethon wrote...
The PC version was....well....the PC version.....bug ridden with tons of issues and waited over a year for a proper patch and so on. You get the idea....a complete nightmare for an unnoticeable improvement in graphics with the privilege of having to put up with a much smaller screen and the uncomfortable desk as opposed to the awesome couch and much larger TV screen along with far more comfortable controls of the awesome controller and the ability to have some snacks and a drink nearby without risking to fry an expansive computer.
PC=the expensive, non-cinematic, buggy and uncomfortable way to play a cinematic game.
360 and PS3=the non-expensive, very cinematic, clean of bugs and absolutely comfortable way to play a cinematic game.
I know this might be a bit hard for a sad little x-box fanboi such as yourself to understand this.
But a lot of 'Larger' TVs these days have this thing, you might have heard of it, it's called a HDMI slot which can also be used by PCs that have... *gasp* a graphics card that is better than the x-box 360 AND has a HDMI port so that the cable can go from the PC to the TV.
Next... have to sit at a desk?
Erm, nope, you see in this wonderful technological age we have these days, there is this thing... it's called Wireless keyboards and trackballs. So a PC gamer could casually if they want to crash back on a couch and play away with far better access as far as controls are concerned, whereas a 360 controller might need a couple of clicks, the PC gamer can do it in 1.
As mentioned due to these wonderful gizmos that means that the PC tower can be parked next to the TV whilst the foodstuffs can be nicely sat on a table next to the couch.
Stop trying to create a sad little console/PC war, your just making yourself look pathetic
Dagnamit Mav, you ninja
Modifié par Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien, 17 janvier 2010 - 12:24 .
#99
Posté 17 janvier 2010 - 12:24
#100
Posté 17 janvier 2010 - 12:27




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







