Xilizhra wrote...
I agree in concept... but transcendence rejected could lead to even more terrible wars, if too much was given in a way that too many people rejected.
Not more terrible wars, just more wars, with more advanced weapons. The issue I have here is that people are always going to make war whilst operating under the laws of Darwinian nature anyway. They'll strive to be the apex race because that's essentially what nature wants -- for someone to be at the top of the food chain. The only way you can fix that is by overriding nature with something unnatural, something that has the wisdom of absolute fairness. Thus, people within a posthuman culture aren't going to be inclined toward war, unless it comes from the outside.
A posthuman culture is absolutely inevitable, it has to happen. The only alternative is for us to die on this resource-drained rock of ours due to our selfishness, our greed, our avarice, our narcissism, our self-interest, and so on. That's the way humans are, humans are very, very self-invested by default. It's hard for a human to think of even one other person outside themselves, this is why there are so many issues with family these days, so much divorce, so many kids ending up in broken homes or orphanages. The human just wants what's best for the human.
Any human like that is going to essentially be lead into war by their own instincts. Either to impress their own superiority upon everyone else, so that they are in an absolute position of despotic rule, or out of greed for another's resourecs. To use another common example? Fallout. Fallout shows one future that may await us, when certain world powers start annexing other countries for their resources. If we don't achieve a state of global understanding, something that defies the current human condition and nature, then we are ultimately doomed.
I see that as the 'test' of every sapient race. I think that this is what the galactic culture waits for. Are you going to achieve global understanding and become part of the greater galactic whole, or are you going to war, and consume, and war, and consume until there's nothing left on the rock you're forced to die on? That's why I believe that galactic culture is already in a post- status. I'd imagine that every sapient species out there which has achieved space travel is actually mind-networked, likely with the help of an AI to manage the details (a la Helios).
Many people are too self-interested to understand a point of view like mine. That's fine. You can't do anything with a limited thinker. But my point is is that a limited thinker outside of a post-status society won't actually change. So they'll always be drawn to war. There can't be more terrible wars than the wars they'd be engaged in anyway. A pre-Singularity society is either going to reach the Singularity or destroy itself, ultimately. So the worst wars will be those brought about via not having a post-human society. Since all you have then is war. Bigger weapons, greater greed, and so on. The cycle of war is only ended by the creation of a post-human state.
With Synthesis, you have a state of absolute equality for everyone. That's the wisdom of the Singularity. In the Mass Effect Universe it does seem like the majority have accepted this wisdom. So the minority will either head into isolation and war themselves into non-existence (as nature demands), or they'll eventually see all the good that comes of a post-human society and warm up to it. The post-human society won't force them into this, as there'll be no need. And the speed at which technology will develop when all is shared between organics and synthetics will likely be fast enough to develop defensive technologies, anyway.
Ultimately, I don't think it's an issue. People are going to war themselves into non-existence anyway. That's a fact of human nature. We're doing it all the time. Cold wars, conspiracies, world wars, terrorist attacks, skirmishes in populated areas, and so on. It'll just get worse and worse over time, and as the resources of our little rock dry up then the only thing left for us will be war, until the perfect example of nature is created, left to sit upon his throne in solitude. Deus Ex also covers this to a degree with the Omar, that's the distant future of humanity if we don't opt for a post-human state. We have only extinction to look forward to as we all fight for dominance.
And whlst I may tease and not like people, I would never actually wish war or death upon anyone. As annoying, or stupid, or unenlightened, or poorly educated as I might find a person to be, I'd want them around. Everyone has different perspectives, and those perspectives are
valuable, I'll never understate the value of them in my own mind, even if they disagree with mine. (This is why I ran all of those polls, I'm sure you remember the torrent of polls.) I tend to find the individual's attitude repugnant sometimes, but never the ideas, ideals, or opinions. You have to be able to look past it.
I know some people have trouble with that. Some people will hate a work of art because of the artist behind it. That's a very petty attitude. Whilst I may fight and squabble, I do actually appreciate that we're all different. What I want however is for us to be different
and not dead.