Modifié par Rassler, 30 avril 2013 - 07:06 .
Modifié par Rassler, 30 avril 2013 - 07:06 .
Rassler wrote...
On my first play I wanted to kill him since I knew Bethany will be back and she can heal good enough in last battle. However there was a conversation option to ask your other allies about what to do with Anders. Merrill intently and quite surely said I must spare him and give him a chance to redeem himself... also Varric hints he doen't want to lose blondie as well. I couldn't deny Merril and Varric lol
Given merrill's character especially when you romance her its very unlikely of her to be so intent on something so I listened and spared Anders, later before final battle I spoke with Anders and he was no longer annoying at all and all he wanted was to redeem himself. After that on my second play I romanced Anders and got to know him, he just needs help, a help that never came from people who didn't like him from the beginning hence never really knew him.
Rassler wrote...
he just needs
Modifié par secretsandlies, 30 avril 2013 - 12:30 .
Modifié par Rassler, 30 avril 2013 - 04:55 .
Rassler wrote...
I just found this lying around my computer... Notice the Tevinter chantry amulet.
Modifié par EdwinLi, 30 avril 2013 - 05:45 .
EdwinLi wrote...
Rassler wrote...
I just found this lying around my computer... Notice the Tevinter chantry amulet.
He obtained that through Hawke as a gift if you did not know about that quest in DA2 during Act 2.
On topic:
I hope they make Justice into come kind of boss in DA3. Not because i want to kill him since I spared him so he can live to obtain is real redemption (Death is never true justice but only a escape from True Justice) and sided with the Mages in DA2 but because it would kind of fit more to have Veangence as a Boss since he is a psychopathic spirit now.
However, the final battle with Veangence should be determined by Anders' fate in DA2.
The Final part of Veangence Boss battle should take place in the Fade where...
1) If Ander survived DA2, the final battle stage will have Anders and Vengeance splitting up in the Fade finally because now their ideals are different and Anders will fight with you to stop Vengeance. On the 2nd stage we are separated from Anders and must fight different bosses. Each stage of the battle will end with a cutscene showing Anders fighting Vengeance while the MC and his group are separated from them to fight a different boss that is making Vengeance stronger unless we defeat them. It ends with Vengeance's death and Anders dies as well because of the separation from Justice but not before saying his final words and goodbye in a cutscene. (If you romance Anders in DA2 he will mention Hawke as his love during his goodbye)
2) If Anders died in DA2, The final battle stage with Vengeance will have us facing Vengence with our companions and once we reach the 2nd stage we will face vengeance alone in Anders place because he did not survive DA2. The strategy required will be different from the battle if Anders Survives because one part is that we will not have our companions with us in this version of this boss battle and different strategies will be needed to defeat Vengeance. The cutscene we see will have out character take Anders' place and our actions in the cutscene are determined by our class and weapons.
Enad wrote...
1. Yes I'd like to see Anders again if he was spared, not necissarily as a companion though. I'd rather leave space for new stories to be told.
2. No, I definitely don't want Justice to take over another once good mage and turn them into a lunatic.
BubbleDncr wrote...
Enad wrote...
2. No, I definitely don't want Justice to take over another once good mage and turn them into a lunatic.
This. Having Anders/Justice play more than a camero role would really start to turn the DA series into the Anders/Justice series.
Modifié par Renmiri1, 01 mai 2013 - 02:29 .

Modifié par Goneaviking, 01 mai 2013 - 03:03 .
Educated guess,somebody involved in franz ferdinand's assassination. Don't know the name so your point is proven.Goneaviking wrote...
I honestly hope never to hear of Anders in the next instalment.
Aside from disliking him as a character (no slight on the writer, she did a creditable job of taking an obviously disturbed man and radicalizing him through the story), I'd really rather the mage-templar war be associated with the issues in contention rather than the deranged warblings of an abomination with messianic delusions.
Also, if he didn't survive DA2 how many people are left that knew of his involvement and how much motivation do they have to broadcast it?
He has as much to do with the conflict as this fellow has to do with the First World War.
How many of us can honestly give his name without looking it up?
Goneaviking wrote...
I honestly hope never to hear of Anders in the next instalment.
Aside from disliking him as a character (no slight on the writer, she did a creditable job of taking an obviously disturbed man and radicalizing him through the story), I'd really rather the mage-templar war be associated with the issues in contention rather than the deranged warblings of an abomination with messianic delusions.
Also, if he didn't survive DA2 how many people are left that knew of his involvement and how much motivation do they have to broadcast it?
He has as much to do with the conflict as this fellow has to do with the First World War.
How many of us can honestly give his name without looking it up?
Rassler wrote...
You make a nice point, but I never asked for forcing anders in Dragon age 3. Those who killed him shouldn't see him at all. All I ask is having him in DA3 only if he was spared, is it too much? Btw David Gaider wrote Anders for Awakening and he also decided that he should also have a big role in DA2 but his character in DA2 was written by Jennifer Helper.
So does that mean that my choosing to kill him for his crimes mean I was wrong to do so? Anders' role in DA I is martyr to the cause. There should be nothing else. "But he's cute" or "but he's cuddly" isn't justification to let him live. He deserved death for what he did, and I gave it to him. If it's retconned to "psyche, you can't really kill him", it'll be retconned to "psyche, you can't really have my money". He blows up the Chantry to make sure a war starts, and will even tell you so. So people that are innocent of any crimes have to die so he can get his war? The worst part? If you're a mage supporter, as I was in my first playthrough, you're fixing to fight that war anyway, so it was needless. Abominations are abominations, I didn't spare any of the others on my way to that point, even though I was supporting mages, why would I spare a man that did that?Renmiri1 wrote...
The "World of Thedas" book has a full body depiction of Anders.
robertthebard wrote...
So does that mean that my choosing to kill him for his crimes mean I was wrong to do so? Anders' role in DA I is martyr to the cause. There should be nothing else. "But he's cute" or "but he's cuddly" isn't justification to let him live. He deserved death for what he did, and I gave it to him. If it's retconned to "psyche, you can't really kill him", it'll be retconned to "psyche, you can't really have my money". He blows up the Chantry to make sure a war starts, and will even tell you so. So people that are innocent of any crimes have to die so he can get his war? The worst part? If you're a mage supporter, as I was in my first playthrough, you're fixing to fight that war anyway, so it was needless. Abominations are abominations, I didn't spare any of the others on my way to that point, even though I was supporting mages, why would I spare a man that did that?Renmiri1 wrote...
The "World of Thedas" book has a full body depiction of Anders.
So his role should be martyr. After all, extremist are historically renown for that.
He confesses to the crime, judgment is passed. Hawke is given the opportunity to do whatever by the only surviving ranking officer in the City. The player then gets to judge him according to what they believe. I believe his action was an abomination, and as such, he got the same treatment as all other abominations I have encountered.OdanUrr wrote...
robertthebard wrote...
So does that mean that my choosing to kill him for his crimes mean I was wrong to do so? Anders' role in DA I is martyr to the cause. There should be nothing else. "But he's cute" or "but he's cuddly" isn't justification to let him live. He deserved death for what he did, and I gave it to him. If it's retconned to "psyche, you can't really kill him", it'll be retconned to "psyche, you can't really have my money". He blows up the Chantry to make sure a war starts, and will even tell you so. So people that are innocent of any crimes have to die so he can get his war? The worst part? If you're a mage supporter, as I was in my first playthrough, you're fixing to fight that war anyway, so it was needless. Abominations are abominations, I didn't spare any of the others on my way to that point, even though I was supporting mages, why would I spare a man that did that?Renmiri1 wrote...
The "World of Thedas" book has a full body depiction of Anders.
So his role should be martyr. After all, extremist are historically renown for that.
I was expecting an option to judge him, not outright kill him or spare him.
robertthebard wrote...
He confesses to the crime, judgment is passed. Hawke is given the opportunity to do whatever by the only surviving ranking officer in the City. The player then gets to judge him according to what they believe. I believe his action was an abomination, and as such, he got the same treatment as all other abominations I have encountered.OdanUrr wrote...
robertthebard wrote...
So does that mean that my choosing to kill him for his crimes mean I was wrong to do so? Anders' role in DA I is martyr to the cause. There should be nothing else. "But he's cute" or "but he's cuddly" isn't justification to let him live. He deserved death for what he did, and I gave it to him. If it's retconned to "psyche, you can't really kill him", it'll be retconned to "psyche, you can't really have my money". He blows up the Chantry to make sure a war starts, and will even tell you so. So people that are innocent of any crimes have to die so he can get his war? The worst part? If you're a mage supporter, as I was in my first playthrough, you're fixing to fight that war anyway, so it was needless. Abominations are abominations, I didn't spare any of the others on my way to that point, even though I was supporting mages, why would I spare a man that did that?Renmiri1 wrote...
The "World of Thedas" book has a full body depiction of Anders.
So his role should be martyr. After all, extremist are historically renown for that.
I was expecting an option to judge him, not outright kill him or spare him.
Modifié par Rassler, 01 mai 2013 - 04:43 .
Rassler wrote...
Wynne is an "abomination" too. And this is not the first war that innocents die mind you and won't be the last. Elthina was innocent indeed but she was also ignorant to suffering of mages. She didn't deserve death, obviosuly but ignorance never gets by unpunished.
OdanUrr wrote...
Rassler wrote...
Wynne is an "abomination" too. And this is not the first war that innocents die mind you and won't be the last. Elthina was innocent indeed but she was also ignorant to suffering of mages. She didn't deserve death, obviosuly but ignorance never gets by unpunished.
I don't think she was ignorant, but I do believe she turned a blind eye all too often and prayed for the best, which is worse.
azarhal wrote...
OdanUrr wrote...
Rassler wrote...
Wynne is an "abomination" too. And this is not the first war that innocents die mind you and won't be the last. Elthina was innocent indeed but she was also ignorant to suffering of mages. She didn't deserve death, obviosuly but ignorance never gets by unpunished.
I don't think she was ignorant, but I do believe she turned a blind eye all too often and prayed for the best, which is worse.
Elthina's idea was that "the Maker will do what is right and his children will see the light and compromise". The way I take the end is that her dying and Meredith/Orsino going insane is the Maker's will.

Modifié par Rassler, 01 mai 2013 - 09:30 .
Rassler wrote...
azarhal wrote...
OdanUrr wrote...
Rassler wrote...
Wynne is an "abomination" too. And this is not the first war that innocents die mind you and won't be the last. Elthina was innocent indeed but she was also ignorant to suffering of mages. She didn't deserve death, obviosuly but ignorance never gets by unpunished.
I don't think she was ignorant, but I do believe she turned a blind eye all too often and prayed for the best, which is worse.
Elthina's idea was that "the Maker will do what is right and his children will see the light and compromise". The way I take the end is that her dying and Meredith/Orsino going insane is the Maker's will.
Couldn't agree more!
The things I'd do to see thise scene...
Sebastian depends on hawke all the time to bring "justice" to people who he thinks are guilty, but its simply act of pure vengeance which he can't do without help of hawke. He has broken his vows to his beloved maker so many times he himself has lost counting yet he swears to bring "true justice" to all of kirkwall. I couldn't surpress laughter when he made that empty threat. Only if his writer(s) made him a bit more... badass.
Anders ftw
Rassler wrote...
Wynne is an "abomination" too. And this is not the first war that innocents die mind you and won't be the last. Elthina was innocent indeed but she was also ignorant to suffering of mages. She didn't deserve death, obviosuly but ignorance never gets by unpunished.
Btw I'm not really a "fan" of Anders I just notice a good character when I see one. In my expereince everyone either like Anders or completely hate him . Some people ignore some characters because they have no interest in them but such is not the case for Anders. He is ready to do everything neccessary for his cause, and having an spirit inside him removes any limit in his path. He didn't want to start a war though it was inevitable, He believes that there can be no compromise and he is right. Mages are either free or imprisoned, there is no other way. And he choose freedom.
Also you're saying he should be martyr. Probably in your playthrough because I didn't kill him and I want him to have a good role in DA3 and be a hero for mages not a martyr because you can't be a martyr while alive.
Modifié par Goneaviking, 01 mai 2013 - 11:11 .
Sejborg wrote...
I agree. Killing innocent bystanders is awesome and should be rewarded with kisses.
not.
Modifié par Renmiri1, 03 mai 2013 - 12:50 .