Dragon Age Novels
#1
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 08:38
#2
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 08:46
#3
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 09:30
#4
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 09:31
#5
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 09:36
#6
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 09:56
#7
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 10:03
Modifié par Drelynx56, 16 janvier 2010 - 10:03 .
#8
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 10:56
#9
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:02
Having some speech described as "BLABLABLA, he said lamely" is rather... well...
Regardless I think David has put a lot of effort into this and created some interesting characters. It would be good if he could now add on personalities to the characters -not same thing- and I look forward to his prose skills evolving and his shift+F7 ability to improve ;P
I'm not being mean, just some constructive criticism. It was an entertaining read and well worth it for any fan of the game. There is lots of room to grow and I really hope we see more and better with each installment.
#10
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 11:16
Some books would spend a chapter or more describing a characters history and personality, myself I find this to be boring.
David on the other hand unfolds the history and personality of his characters slowly throughout the entirety of the book holding the readers interest from the beginning to the conclusion of the story.
Modifié par Pinkleaf, 16 janvier 2010 - 11:39 .
#11
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 12:44
Pinkleaf wrote...
I like how David keeps the story flowing and never gets himself bogged down in meaningless mush, a thing many other novels suffer greatly from, needless to say I will be snatching up a copy of his third book as soon as it is for sale.
Some books would spend a chapter or more describing a characters history and personality, myself I find this to be boring.
David on the other hand unfolds the history and personality of his characters slowly throughout the entirety of the book holding the readers interest from the beginning to the conclusion of the story.
Whilst overindulging in unnecessary detail can be detrimental to the flow and appeal of a story, the approach to these books has been rather simplistic. Many important events are stated rather than narrated, which might make it easier to retain the interest of those with a short attention span, but is not conductive to immersive prose.
I still think they are good backstories for Ferelden, however if David aspires to become an author beyond this, he will have to refine his technique and polish acquired skills, eventually leading to a very different formatting and development of the project. Since I think he has a brilliant imagination and inspirational flair, I hope that's the case.
#12
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 12:48

#13
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 03:16
#14
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 05:24
And Robert Jordan's.
On the other hand, I enjoy reading Milton and Shakespeare (just not the sonnets, please), as well as Dostoevsky.
I don't think the novels are amateurish at all. It really depends on what you want from a novel, I guess, and if you like long-winded descriptions, pages of history of towns, and lengthy (horrible) poetry from fantasy writers, maybe Gaider's books aren't for you.
I'd say they are more Salvatore than Tolkien, more Gibson than Stephenson, more Feist than Jordan.
Really, unless you are a paid, published writer or a professional editor/publisher, the extent of your literary critique (even if you are an English major) should probably stick to what you like or dislike about it and back carefully away from making sweeping statements like calling the lead writer at a major game studio and the published author of two successful books "amateurish."
Modifié par MerinTB, 16 janvier 2010 - 05:24 .
#15
Guest_Colenda_*
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 05:55
Guest_Colenda_*
Oh wait, no I haven't, the style was amateurish. But since so many professional authors write like that, Mr Gaider's hardly going to be held back by it.
#16
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 06:15
Colenda wrote...
Well, I was going to post and say that I found the free online chapters pretty amateurish in style, but since someone who's read Milton and Shakespeare (and enjoyed them too! Is't possible?) has cautioned against making sweeping statements, I've thought twice about the whole thing.
Oh wait, no I haven't, the style was amateurish. But since so many professional authors write like that, Mr Gaider's hardly going to be held back by it.
Ok, honestly, listing of classic literature I enjoy wasn't an attempt at authority - especially in a post that was essentially making a point of saying we aren't authorities on "amateurish writing" - it was merely an attempt to show that I don't only read comic books so it isn't someone who can't read complex works saying that he didn't find Gaider's writing amateurish. My opinion on a written work is no more or less valid than your own.
Seriously though - do those of you throwing out that word (amatuerish) know what it means? It isn't a synonym for "simple" or "easy to read" or "hailed by critics" or "taught in literary classes" or "not liked by me."
Amateurish = Lacking the required professional skill
Professional = participating for gain or livelihood in an activity or field of endeavor often engaged in by amateurs OR characterized by or conforming to the technical or ethical standards of a profession OR having a particular profession as a permanent career
Again, Gaider is PAID for his writing skills. Bioware put him as lead writer, and he has two published books out that are, by their audience, well-received.
Being a published writer, being put at the head of team of writers for a story-based game, these qualify him as a PROFESSIONAL writer.
You can dislike his writing style, even consider it bad. You can dislike his characters, his pacing, whatever.
I'm not arguing against you not like or criticizing it.
But to call a paid, professional writer "amateurish" says more about YOU than it does about him.
#17
Guest_Colenda_*
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 06:24
Guest_Colenda_*
Yes, it says that I understand that words can have more than one meaning and a variety of nuances depending on their context. Just think of the etymology of 'amateur'.But to call a paid, professional writer "amateurish" says more about YOU than it does about him.
Modifié par Colenda, 16 janvier 2010 - 06:26 .
#18
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 06:35
I think the Dragon Age novels are written in a simple style in order to be accessible to a large audience. I could compare his writing to that of David Drake or perhaps Fred Saberhagen (both extremely popular and prolific authors), but to say "amateurish" conjures images of trash the likes of Stephenie Meyer.
Is David Gaider the next Dostoevsky or Tolstoy? Probably not. But "amateurish"? Get over yourself.
#19
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 06:37
#20
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 06:41
Sloth Of Doom wrote...
I'm going to weigh in on Merin's side here (I know it is shocking) but in typical fashion be much more of a jerk about the whole thing.
Had I wanted to be ruder I would have simply pointed to the person who had said "those of you who are writers" was probably implying that they themself are a "writer" and they consider their own work far superior -
in effect, showing exactly how unprofessional their conduct is (wait, did I use a different definition of professionalism there? GASP! nuance!) making them the amateurs (I'll make the assumption that they are likely not writers by profession but by desire.)
I could call myself a writer. There are some publishing credits to my name. But I don't kid myself - I'm not paid on a regular basis and I've never made a living at it. I write - until I'm paid and published, I won't insult those who are writers by claiming to be one myself.
David Gaider's published writing that he got paid for sure seems amateurish to everyone with an unfinished fantasy novel on their HDD or un-optioned game design document in their desk drawer, I'm sure.
that more to your liking, SoD?
Modifié par MerinTB, 16 janvier 2010 - 06:43 .
#21
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 06:51
#22
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 06:53
I am a goddamned writer goddamn you! I wrote that! Making words = writer!
Screw you, I'm going to update my livejournal abut what a meaniehead you are, then cry in my room until my mom brings me cookies.
#23
Guest_Colenda_*
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 07:12
Guest_Colenda_*
I'm not a writer, nor do I ever intend to be one, according to whatever definition of writer you please. Well, except for posts on geeky forums, obviously. In fact, I'm a shop-girl. Perhaps that means I should keep my opinions to myself? However, I do read, from time to time. And when I read the sample chapters, I see that the author is competent. Even if it's a generic kind of competence. There. Got that out. Pity none of the smilies have gritted teeth.
Primarily, I said Mr Gaider's writing was amateurish because I was annoyed with you for telling people in a very high-handed manner what they are allowed to say, and what they aren't.
Modifié par Colenda, 16 janvier 2010 - 07:37 .
#24
Guest_Shavon_*
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 07:18
Guest_Shavon_*
Fexelea wrote...
To be honest, the books are good to add more to the story of DA but you will find them... er... amateurish if you write yourself or are heavily into full length novels and fiction.
Having some speech described as "BLABLABLA, he said lamely" is rather... well...
Regardless I think David has put a lot of effort into this and created some interesting characters. It would be good if he could now add on personalities to the characters -not same thing- and I look forward to his prose skills evolving and his shift+F7 ability to improve ;P
I'm not being mean, just some constructive criticism. It was an entertaining read and well worth it for any fan of the game. There is lots of room to grow and I really hope we see more and better with each installment.
That may depend on what you like to read. I guess you could get away with saying this about the Mass Effect novels, but I think Gaider is a very good writer, and did an excellent job with the novels.
imho, of course:whistle:
#25
Posté 16 janvier 2010 - 07:26
Sloth Of Doom wrote...
Hey, screw you Merin! I have 11 pages of badly written, typo-filled angst-trash on my HDD and the other night I had am idea about how maybe I want one of the characters to be if I can figure out a story. So far there are dragons and an evil prince and a good guy from a small farming village and a hot chick who secretly loves both men! And when my masterpiece is done it will start a game franchise where you have all these characters standing in a line and then the enemies stand in a line and everyone takes a couple of steps forward to attack on their turn!
I am a goddamned writer goddamn you! I wrote that! Making words = writer!
Screw you, I'm going to update my livejournal abut what a meaniehead you are, then cry in my room until my mom brings me cookies.
Sounds as if you were going to write the next Eragon





Retour en haut






