Dual Wield Warrior

#101
Tenshi

Posté 04 mai 2013 - 10:46

Members
361 messages

Zelto wrote...

xxx2emo4Uxxx wrote...

i dont even need to prove my point... there is no reason to play dw warrior over dw rogue.. if rogue goes strenght he can wear heavy armor... and do exactly same things as warrior + backstabs.

So your argument on why a rogue was better was because they can become warriors...

As I said, if you like DW rogues fine but that in itself isn't a reason for warriors to be able to DW, even if its inferior to that of a rogue.

I see now, you conviced me (No sarcasm intended), thank you for your time.

Modifié par xxx2emo4Uxxx, 04 mai 2013 - 10:47 .

Retour en haut

#102
Mornmagor

Posté 04 mai 2013 - 11:40

Members
710 messages

Imagination is the limit, and some people have none from what i see.

There are enough games out there, mmos or not, where both warriors and rogues can dual wield.

They don't play the same. It's how you design the class from top to bottom that will determine how each class plays.

In other words, imagination, use it.

Retour en haut

#103
Blazomancer

Posté 05 mai 2013 - 06:00

Members
1 298 messages

i dont even need to prove my point... there is no reason to play dw warrior over dw rogue.. if rogue goes strenght he can wear heavy armor... and do exactly same things as warrior + backstabs.

Out of the numerous things that a DW rogue (irrespective of whether you are focussed on STR/DEX/CUNN) can't do in Origins, I'll point out a few things that comes to my mind at present:

# Effective off-tanking (warrior having access to taunt-frightening appearance and threaten in comparison to rogue drawing only 80% of dmg based threat)
# Crowd control (warrior having warcry, holysmite, blood fury)
# Achieve 100% spell resistance
# Achieve Maximum autoattack speed (haste+momentum breaking the limit compared to haste+precise striking+momentum or momentum+blood thirst)

Some minor stuff like:
# Warriors having 10% less fatigue
# Warriors having 0.4 lvl dmg bonus compared to a rogue's 0.2.

Not to mention that you aren't going anywhere near the full damage dealing potential of a DW rogue by investing on STR. Similarly, a DW rogue can do quite a lot that a DW warrior can't. If you didn't find out the differences yourself, it doesn't mean they don't exist.

Having said that, if the DW warrior were to return in DA3, I'll prefer if they had separate DW trees.

Modifié par Blazomancer, 05 mai 2013 - 06:03 .

Retour en haut

#104
Arcane_Warrior_Revan

Posté 05 mai 2013 - 06:34

Members
34 messages

Yeah, I'd like it, and the option to use other weapons too, maybe something with a chain.

Retour en haut

#105
AshenShug4r

Posté 05 mai 2013 - 08:52

Members
498 messages

xxx2emo4Uxxx wrote...

i dont even need to prove my point... there is no reason to play dw warrior over dw rogue.. if rogue goes strenght he can wear heavy armor... and do exactly same things as warrior + backstabs.

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things i have ever heard. At no point in your rambling incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points and may the maker have mercy on your soul.