429 réponses à ce sujet

[Argolas]

Not much to say- vote!

EDIT: This thread turned against its creator- I deny responsibility!

Modifié par Argolas, 03 mai 2013 - 07:30 .

[Steelcan]

+2 internets for you good sir!

[KaiserShep]

One of the options does make me wonder, why the AI core all the time? They put a geth in there, then the killer fembot. I find the Normandy's lack of a brig disturbing. I'm surprised they didn't put Grunt's tank in there. 

Good poll. Personally I like mobile EDI, even though I disapprove of the more exaggerated designs of character bodies, but I guess I'm just clinging to the past. 

Modifié par KaiserShep, 02 mai 2013 - 02:48 .

[Argolas]

Steelcan wrote...

+2 internets for you good sir!

Why thank you good sir!

[Argolas]

tickle267 wrote...

Oh thanks a lot. That makes it feel waaaay better...

[Xilizhra]

Oh, hey, the "different opinion" option has the most votes. Quelle surprise.

Anyway, no, there's nothing wrong with EDI's body, and reactionary flailing in response to it is rather irksome.

[KaiserShep]

Xilizhra wrote...

Oh, hey, the "different opinion" option has the most votes. Quelle surprise.

Anyway, no, there's nothing wrong with EDI's body, and reactionary flailing in response to it is rather irksome.

I do like how it's addressed directly in the game. I think Donnelly's reference is the best. 

[AlexMBrennan]

Anyway, no, there's nothing wrong with EDI's body

So, you dispute that it's a cliche and that placing a hostile infiltrator robot unguarded in the AI core is a dumb thing to do?

Quelle surprise.

It's called "maths" - if you split the 75% majority into ten equal parts then each will be smaller than the 25% minority. Amazing, isn't it?

[Xilizhra]

So, you dispute that it's a cliche and that placing a hostile infiltrator robot unguarded in the AI core is a dumb thing to do?

Everything is a cliche if you look at it that way, and putting the robot body there has nothing to do with the merits of the robot body itself. In any case, EDI was deliberately examining it and trying to extract data.

It's called "maths" - if you split the 75% majority into ten equal parts then each will be smaller than the 25% minority. Amazing, isn't it?

Thus far, there's only a majority by 19-16.

[Exile Isan]

KaiserShep wrote...
I do like how it's addressed directly in the game. I think Donnelly's reference is the best. 

I liked Legion's when he called it "top heavy". Anyway, I have no problem with EDI's body probably because I don't find it all the sexy to begin with. (Although, this is coming from someone who thinks Garrus' dinosaur feet are sexy so take it with a grain of salt.)

[MassivelyEffective0730]

Too many options. Streamline it.

I hate the EDI's body and Joker love bit.

[KaiserShep]

I always had my Shep advise against getting with EDI, because brittle bones don't make for a good robosexual.

[Xilizhra]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Too many options. Streamline it.

I hate the EDI's body and Joker love bit.

And why is this?

Also, as synthetics are unlikely to accidentally exert too much strength, I really doubt that Joker's bones would be a huge issue.

[themikefest]

I hated it. It took up a squadmate position that could've been filled by a ME2 character.
It was better in the ship like it was in ME2.

I would like to of had the option to tell it to get out of the platform or risk the airlock.

[Bizinha]

tickle267 wrote...

WTF! UglyJack?

[Steelcan]

themikefest wrote...

I hated it. It took up a squadmate position that could've been filled by a ME2 character.
It was better in the ship like it was in ME2.

I would like to of had the option to tell it to get out of the platform or risk the airlock.

[S.A.K]

Poor Joker's gonna end up dead...

[Mangalores]

Xilizhra wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Too many options. Streamline it.

I hate the EDI's body and Joker love bit.

And why is this?

Also, as synthetics are unlikely to accidentally exert too much strength, I really doubt that Joker's bones would be a huge issue.

Well, however you put it, it's creepy and it would be healthy for Joker to meet someone. EDI is an AI, it's not really that "it" should be even interested in this kind of thing beyond research. Yes, she is a person, that doesn't mean she suddenly gets a sexdrive by possessing a hot android body or something.

It would be less cheesy if they played it straight aka have EDI reject Joker because she knows she cannot give him what he needs beyond being a good friend because she isn't anything remotely the same as a human being (even if she is as valuable as an individual).

I wonder why we couldn't boink Grunt or Wrex... and I implore you not to Google that!

[hiraeth]

EDI was fine when she was just the ship. I'm OK with the idea of giving her a body, but not one that's incredibly sexualized. I'd even be OK with a bot that has the option to become "sexy," but her permanently walking around in that body annoyed me.

[Xilizhra]

Mangalores wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Too many options. Streamline it.

I hate the EDI's body and Joker love bit.

And why is this?

Also, as synthetics are unlikely to accidentally exert too much strength, I really doubt that Joker's bones would be a huge issue.

Well, however you put it, it's creepy and it would be healthy for Joker to meet someone. EDI is an AI, it's not really that "it" should be even interested in this kind of thing beyond research. Yes, she is a person, that doesn't mean she suddenly gets a sexdrive by possessing a hot android body or something.

It would be less cheesy if they played it straight aka have EDI reject Joker because she knows she cannot give him what he needs beyond being a good friend because she isn't anything remotely the same as a human being (even if she is as valuable as an individual).

I wonder why we couldn't boink Grunt or Wrex... and I implore you not to Google that!

Are you sure? She may have altered her programming to take more enjoyment from sex. I hardly see why its my business to tell Joker and EDI what's best for them or not, if they genuinely like each other. EDI certainly seems to be interested for purposes other than research.

[Iakus]

MassEffectFShep wrote...

EDI was fine when she was just the ship. I'm OK with the idea of giving her a body, but not one that's incredibly sexualized. I'd even be OK with a bot that has the option to become "sexy," but her permanently walking around in that body annoyed me.

Pretty much all this.

Did they have to turn EDI into yet another doll in the Mass Effect Barbie collection?

[Argolas]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

Too many options. Streamline it.

Decisions! Decisions everywhere! Don't care if it's meaningful, replayability ftw!