429 réponses à ce sujet

[Mr.House]

spirosz wrote...

I'm even surprised with Jack's redesign.



Top right too masculine?

I'm happy they didn't use the top right one, then again I like ME3 Jack more then ME2

[dreamgazer]

Seboist wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

I'll post it, for no other reason than the fact that I like looking at the other designs they considered:

Too bad they didn't use the top right one.

I actually like the idea of where they were going with the lower-left head model. If they had dropped that on top of EDI's alternate appearance from the download pack (with a few, uh, slight modifications), it could've been interesting.

[spirosz]

I'm biased and saying ME2 is better. I don't really like the whole I like Jack better because she looks better mindset (not pointing towards you, but I've seen this so many times).

[Mr.House]

spirosz wrote...

I'm biased and saying ME2 is better. I don't really like the whole I like Jack better because she looks better mindset (not pointing towards you, but I've seen this so many times).

I think you know my view on Jack as it was posted Code Blue group It has nothing to do with her design, I just like her ME3 design more then ME2 design.

[PsyrenY]

*Edited*

Modifié par Optimystic_X, 03 mai 2013 - 05:06 .

[spirosz]

[Seboist]

dreamgazer wrote...

Seboist wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

I'll post it, for no other reason than the fact that I like looking at the other designs they considered:

Too bad they didn't use the top right one.

I actually like the idea of where they were going with the lower-left head model. If they had dropped that on top of EDI's alternate appearance from the download pack (with a few, uh, slight modifications), it could've been interesting.

That alternate appearence ain't bad. It's a shame one can't remove the boobs.

[Inquisitor Recon]

So rather than a discussion about the troubling implications of the robot fetish EDI represents this topic has gone into feminism land? I am disappointed but unsurprised.

[spirosz]

Inquisitor Recon wrote...

So rather than a discussion about the troubling implications of the robot fetish EDI represents this topic has gone into feminism land? I am disappointed but unsurprised.

Look deeper. 

[Argolas]

No problem. I never expected much of this thread, I would have put more effort and less sarcasm into it.

Feminism is always tough. I know a (that means one) feminist that I really respect personally, but I also know a whole bunch who just like to think they are being systematically oppressed. I usually don't go into this on the internet <.<

[Cainhurst Crow]

spirosz wrote...

-snip-

I'm probably going to hell for this, but whining get's what whining deserves, being ignored.

[spirosz]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

spirosz wrote...

-snip-

I'm probably going to hell for this, but whining get's what whining deserves, being ignored.

Depends on the whining and the situation. 

Modifié par spirosz, 03 mai 2013 - 03:03 .

[Cainhurst Crow]

spirosz wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

spirosz wrote...

-snip-

I'm probably going to hell for this, but whining get's what whining deserves, being ignored.

Depends on the whining and the situation. 

Making something that happens to everyone a big deal and framing it as if it only happens to a single solitary group or person.

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 03 mai 2013 - 03:05 .

[spirosz]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

spirosz wrote...

-snip-

I'm probably going to hell for this, but whining get's what whining deserves, being ignored.

Depends on the whining and the situation. 

Making something that happens to everyone a big deal and framing it as if it only happens to a single solitary group or person.

If said person has been in circumstances that fall under "happening" to everyone and doesn't necessarily or hasn't been taught how to deal with it in a way, that will lead them to commit themselves in a negative cycle - is that a good thing, or is that persons fault, or societies?  Or both?  

Just because it happens to everyone, doesn't mean it's justifiable and not everyone can deal with the same situation in an equal matter, that would prove to be just another thing to get past in life. 

[dreamgazer]

BitBomb wrote...


EDI Concept Art

A French maid? Totally oversexualized. 

[MyChemicalBromance]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

spirosz wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

spirosz wrote...

-snip-

I'm probably going to hell for this, but whining get's what whining deserves, being ignored.

Depends on the whining and the situation. 

Making something that happens to everyone a big deal and framing it as if it only happens to a single solitary group or person.

Yeah, that comic is predicated on the assumption that fat men don't get made fun of (which, in a fantastic bit irony, the comic itself does), and that women don't ogle attractive men.

But what can I say, I'm a white straight man; I make my checks out to privilege and oppress everything I can.
 

In all seriousness, a gender politics debate on BSN would be horrific. Let's try and not go there.

[PsyrenY]

MyChemicalBromance wrote...

Yeah, that comic is predicated on the assumption that fat men don't get made fun of (which, in a fantastic bit irony, the comic itself does), and that women don't ogle attractive men.

I noticed that. Wonderful, isn't it?

[Mr.House]

Optimystic_X wrote...

You and Argolas just being excessively prude and Victorian, championing a cause no one needed or asked you to champion.

What a bunch of horse crap, and you know it. But go ahead and assume matters you don't even know.

Modifié par Mr.House, 03 mai 2013 - 03:25 .

[Inquisitor Recon]

MyChemicalBromance wrote...
But what can I say, I'm a white straight man; I make my checks out to privilege and oppress everything I can.

Your mere existence is oppressing somebody. Remember that at all times.

Modifié par Inquisitor Recon, 03 mai 2013 - 03:30 .

[PsyrenY]

Mr.House wrote...

What a bunch of horse crap, and you know it. But go ahead and assume matters you don't even know.

Observation, not assumption. You're being prudish.

[AresKeith]

Optimystic_X wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

What a bunch of horse crap, and you know it. But go ahead and assume matters you don't even know.

Observation, not assumption. You're being prudish.

assumption

[PsyrenY]

AresKeith wrote...

assumption

You know, you're just as much a troll as Auld Wulf. You contribute nothing but attempts to incite. Nice try.

[Mr.House]

Optimystic_X wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

What a bunch of horse crap, and you know it. But go ahead and assume matters you don't even know.

Observation, not assumption. You're being prudish.

No you assume. Not liking something because it was for sex appeal only is not the same as being prudish. Fun fact. I loved TW2 and only had an issue with one character design so ya, you can stop asusming crap like me being prudish. It just makes you look worse.

Better yet, I loved Isabelas design in DA2 and defended it.

Modifié par Mr.House, 03 mai 2013 - 03:52 .