I am sympathetic towards TIM and Cerberus.
#1
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 12:48
I understand the need for control. Look in our actual world: technological progress and advancement is the result of mastering, understanding and controlling our environment. Lives become better as a result of this control. Medicine, information technology, engineering. All of these advancements have improved the quality of life and extended the average lifespan.
Think of the benefits of integrating Reaper technology in the ME universe for society. It would give a better understanding of the nature of consciousness and how it works, for one thing. The obvious example is through indoctrination. It would also extend the lifespan of a person. It could make humans live potentially indefinitely.
Their methods are extreme, but not beyond reason or below humanity. Abhorrent and horrific, but I do believe Cerberus' ends justify the means.
If siding with Cerberus was an option, my main Shep would help TIM.
#2
Guest_Finn the Jakey_*
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 12:51
Guest_Finn the Jakey_*
Modifié par Finn the Jakey, 05 mai 2013 - 01:13 .
#3
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 12:55
Their methods involved forcibly converting humans into husks and trying to control them. Ignoring how completely morally bankrupt it is, it's beyond belief how stupid it is as an actual plan. There's no reason to believe that controlling a husk is anything like controlling a reaper, or that the kind of indoctrination signal used by reapers to capture organics is at all like what it would take to control a reaper - if that were even possible.
#4
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:00
Modifié par David7204, 05 mai 2013 - 01:02 .
#5
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:07
Taking control of the Reaper bodies without having to unleash massive destruction across the galaxy has some moderate appeal. Mainly in that Reaper technology is obscenely advanced, and they could be reverse-engineered to understand and apply that technology to other things.
Cerberus, no. When a man tries to see far into the distance, what's the first thing he does? He narrows his eyes. It's exactly their philosophy that their end will justify any means that's the problem. That's a recipe for finding newer and better means as time goes on, so long as the end hasn't been achieved. We need to melt Los Angeles into a pool of goop; well, them's the breaks. We're fighting for the greater good. (A good greater than millions of people being alive, anyway.)
#6
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:08
David7204 wrote...
It seems like pretty much every tactic discussed on the BSN is either an instant-win miracle that would easily defeat the Reapers in 5 minutes if the allied forces used it more heavily, or the stupidest thing ever, ever.
What are the things people tout as instant win miracles?
#7
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:11
Of course he could have never done that as the catalyst was already pulling his strings.
Modifié par Armass81, 05 mai 2013 - 01:20 .
#8
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:13
Getting nice and close to the Reapers so you can shoot them without them shooting you.
Staying far away from the Reapers so you can shoot them without them shooting you.
Building a bunch of the super-ultra-guns like the one on Klendagon.
'Graphite-aluminum rockets'...just heard that one a couple of days ago.
Nukes.
Space EMPs.
Blowing up Mass Relays. That's a big one.
Modifié par David7204, 05 mai 2013 - 01:16 .
#9
Guest_Finn the Jakey_*
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:15
Guest_Finn the Jakey_*
You missed out building a bajillion Dreadnoughts in in the six months between ME2 and 3!David7204 wrote...
Boy, all kinds of things.
Getting nice and close to the Reapers so you can shoot them without them shooting you.
Staying far away from the Reapers so you can shoot them without shooting them you.
Building a bunch of the super-ultra-guns like the one Klendagon.
'Graphite-aluminum rockets'...just heard that one a couple of days ago.
Nukes.
Space EMPs.
Modifié par Finn the Jakey, 05 mai 2013 - 01:15 .
#10
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:19
Armass81 wrote...
All TIM would have done with the reapers is to create a galactic fascist state, with himself as a immortal god like catalyst on the top, who no one could have challenged.
Which of course could not happen with another mortal being electrocuted in his stead, eh?
As for the OP, finishing Sanctuary first time around made me think: given the possibility of wresting control away effectively from Reap-hurr forces, which could end up being a game-changer towards the overall war-effort...just how significant is the scale of lives lost in the process when a galaxy of billions is thus saved?
BW could have gone somewhere with that, had they not turned TIM into the megalomanical dupe he was made to be and declared as at the very end. As is, yeah, not exactly sad that I do not have to see TIM's goal being vindicated again on my screen.
#11
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:31
#12
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:35
David7204 wrote...
Boy, all kinds of things.
Getting nice and close to the Reapers so you can shoot them without them shooting you.
Staying far away from the Reapers so you can shoot them without them shooting you.
Building a bunch of the super-ultra-guns like the one on Klendagon.
'Graphite-aluminum rockets'...just heard that one a couple of days ago.
Nukes.
Space EMPs.
Blowing up Mass Relays. That's a big one.
Yeah, I'd also file those under varying degrees of stupid. Although the underlined plans are my favourite. On the level of "we fight or we die".
#13
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:36
Armass81 wrote...
All TIM would have done with the reapers is to create a galactic fascist state, with himself as a immortal god like catalyst on the top, who no one could have challenged. And make no mistake, he would have ended up dominating his own race as well, as human dictators have shown, they havent got mercy even on their own kind, who they treat worse than animals.
This delightful and likely accurate description of a TIM/Control scenario is actually tempting me to yet play ME3 with my human supremacist Shep - cause that would end exactly this way. I haven't played him because of the pro-Alliance/anti-Cerberus stance every Shep is forced into, but damn, the ending would be so much fun with him!
#14
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:38
Chashan wrote...
As for the OP, finishing Sanctuary first time around made me think: given the possibility of wresting control away effectively from Reap-hurr forces, which could end up being a game-changer towards the overall war-effort...just how significant is the scale of lives lost in the process when a galaxy of billions is thus saved?
Well, lives are the most valuable thing you have in a war, potentially. You need those refugees to replenish your military force as the engagement drags on, and you certainly need them to rebuild your society once the war actually ends. It's also an open-ended cost.
#15
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 01:54
He was never a benevolent force. He has been trying to kill and exploit as many aliens as he could get away with his entire adult life. That was before the Reaper indoctrination began. That just made him more dangerous.
If siding with Cerberus was an option, my main Shep would have gotten a face to face with TIM and created a singularity inside his skull.
Modifié par Bardox9, 05 mai 2013 - 01:56 .
#16
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 02:15
#17
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 02:28
#18
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 02:46
Megaton_Hope wrote...
Illusive Man's plan to build Reaper
technology into his head, and then control the Reapers using his head,
was really dumb. I don't care what he's got in there; it will not work
as well as the entire Reaper fleet cooperating. Plus, he won't live
forever.
Taking control of the Reaper bodies without having to
unleash massive destruction across the galaxy has some moderate appeal.
Mainly in that Reaper technology is obscenely advanced, and they could
be reverse-engineered to understand and apply that technology to other
things.
Cerberus, no. When a man tries to see far into the
distance, what's the first thing he does? He narrows his eyes. It's
exactly their philosophy that their end will justify any means that's
the problem. That's a recipe for finding newer and better means as time
goes on, so long as the end hasn't been achieved. We need to melt Los
Angeles into a pool of goop; well, them's the breaks. We're fighting for
the greater good. (A good greater than millions of people being alive,
anyway.)
The metaphor is incorrect, since seeing several
moves ahead of you means you can see the bigger picture. Seeing one
piece of that picture means you may easily the wrong decision. Sometimes
it's correct to sacrifice some so that others may live, if it means all
will die otherwise.
Finn the Jakey wrote...
Cerberus doesn't care about the
galaxy at large, they would use the Reapers to enslave the other races
for humanity's benefit. TIM would effectively become
Space-Hitler.
Human-centric =/= anti-alien. There is no
good reason to think that Cerberus would attempt to subjugate and
enslave all alien races. I think you're conflating the idea of
controlling the Reapers and using their technology to benefit humanity
with controlling all other alien races. One does not necessarily follow the other.
#19
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 02:46
#20
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 02:55
#21
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 02:55
I support a stronger humanity, unified with purpose and not simply bowing to the Council.
I support more unorthodox expansions into tech/weapons/ship/propulsion/medical research and design.
However...
I do not support experimenting on human populations.
I do not support "implanting" of Reaper tech among human forces.
I do not support the idea of humanity dominating other races.
Modifié par Astartes Marine, 05 mai 2013 - 02:56 .
#22
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 02:57
#23
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 03:27
I think the Cerberus idea is good, but when your staff is made out of military rejects, xenophobic morons, idiolectal purists, and homicidal maniacs bent on galactic domination... bad things are going happen. That good idea will become warp and twisted into a radical fundamentalist group that makes itself feel better by convincing themselves that " This is for the greater good. I am protecting humanity!"
Modifié par Bardox9, 05 mai 2013 - 03:28 .
#24
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 06:37
Everything that went wrong at places like Project Overlord, Teltin, Project Lazarus, Sanctuary & the derelict Reaper was a result of their own staff, management or actions failing obviously and spectacularly. Every one of those places started out with promising ideas and discoveries that could have been realised if they hadn't rushed blindly in with no thought for the consequences. Their refusal to collaborate with other organisations or alien groups which could have made beneficial contributions is just further sludge to the delicious sewage cake that is Cerberus.
#25
Posté 05 mai 2013 - 06:43
Modifié par KaiserShep, 05 mai 2013 - 06:44 .





Retour en haut







