191 réponses à ce sujet

[NuclearTech76]

At least on a class with built in shield stripping ability. Superior mod choices, better CD, infinite ammo, comparable damage versus armor. I wonder why I don't see it used more often?

Modifié par NuclearTech76, 06 mai 2013 - 07:29 .

[SilentStep79]

Tech, i'll bow to your expertise in this matter.

...but you're pushing me ;P

[Ledgend1221]

"At least..."

Boom, arguement destroyed.

[HoochieHamiltoe]

NuclearTech76 wrote...

At least on a class with built in shield stripping ability. Superior mod choices, better CD, infinite ammo, comparable damage versus armor. I wonder why I don't see it used more often?

You obviously aren't in enough games with me then.

It is also fantastic at applying ammo powers. 

Modifié par HoochieHamiltoe, 06 mai 2013 - 05:01 .

[IUsedToDieAtWaveOne]

Because the Harrier I is easier to use.

[dysturbed0ne]

I would use it, if I could unlock it >.<

Modifié par dysturbed0ne, 06 mai 2013 - 04:59 .

[donasdogamma]

agree. It's probably my most used gun. I never use the harrier

[NuclearTech76]

Ledgend1221 wrote...

"At least..."

Boom, arguement destroyed.

You could make an argument for it being superior overall on a high damage power class as well. 30% buff on power damage is nothing to scoff at.

[Ledgend1221]

NuclearTech76 wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

"At least..."

Boom, arguement destroyed.

You could make an argument for it being superior overall on a high damage power class as well. 30% buff on power damage is nothing to scoff at.

I could, but that would be constructive.

[mumba]

lolno.

[NuclearTech76]

Ledgend1221 wrote...

NuclearTech76 wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

"At least..."

Boom, arguement destroyed.

You could make an argument for it being superior overall on a high damage power class as well. 30% buff on power damage is nothing to scoff at.

I could, but that would be constructive.

LOL. Yeah I would say the harrier is better on weapons based classes like Infiltrators, soliders, etc. Any power spamming class, engineers, adepts, vanguards,etc you're probably better off with the comparable damage and the increased power damage. The harrier does have smooth target to target headshotting and great range though but proccing, weight, and power buffing go to the CSMG.

Pretty much my rule is if I'm speccing power damage in the passive tree then I have to consider the CSMG.

[doozerdude]

Every gun is superior, that isn't saying much. Harrier is the lowest of the low. Everyone knows this.

CSMG is pretty awesome though.

[TMB903]

Shhhh let's keep that a secret shall we?

[Admiral Dreck]

I love my CSMG X. I use it much more often than my Cerberus Harr.. (LETTERS EMPTY)

[IBlest]

would use it if had at 10

[Sulaco_7]

I love the csmg much more than the Harrier or Lancer.. even so, you can equip the piercing mod/extended barrel with the Harrier, allowing it to do a ton more damage. With csmg, one slot is always taken.

[Adamziomal]

Maybe for casters. I feel that on lvl V the clip is still too small.

[Original Twigman]

wow, tech.... you are losing it

[HolyAvenger]

Not that many shield stripping kits in the game tbf.

[Original Twigman]

NuclearTech76 wrote...

At least on a class with built in shield stripping ability. Superior mod choices, better CD, infinite ammo, comparable damage versus armor. I wonder why I don't see it used more often?

u want to challenge your csmg qme vs my harrier qme??

[BridgeBurner]

When both are at X?

Yeah, definitely. CSMG X > harrier X for casters.

At lower levels? Na, definitely not.

[Kalas Magnus]

<insert bender laughing>

[NuclearTech76]

HolyAvenger wrote...

Not that many shield stripping kits in the game tbf.

Doesn't  just have to be shield stripping. Power based kits like adepts, vanguards, and tech classes like engineers.

IE Asari Vanguard with the CSMG and incendiary rounds. You can fire, proc, charge for FE and your charge/lift nades get a 30% buff in damage.

[Pathetisad]

The Harrier is a terrible weapon, on certain maps where ammo boxes don't want to give you any ammo