139 réponses à ce sujet

[Sebby]

6) withheld content as day 1 "dlc".

[Ash Wind]

- Framed Narrative - where next to nothing changes over 7 years
- New questions with no answers to old questions
- 1 Dungeon, that is dungeon A when door 1 is open and door 2 is closed, and dungeon B when door 1 is closed and door 2 is open.
- Elves that look like the mutant offspring of a donkey and a Broodmother
- A protagonist that 'conveniently disappears' at the end

Modifié par Ash Wind, 07 mai 2013 - 12:41 .

[I WANT YOU TO FUCK ME JERY]

5) Wave combat
4) Ridiculous over-the-top animations (and weapon models...)
3) Too many re-used environments. Some are excusable, but...
2) Don't bring back characters for the sake of bringing them back, and in the process messing with headcanons, epilogues, etc. Especially not romance characters, like Leliana in DA2...still butthurt about that, I know, I know...
1) Forced human protagonist. Too late, I know, but I'm putting it in here anyway.

Modifié par SergeantSnookie, 07 mai 2013 - 12:44 .

[sandalisthemaker]

Seraph Cross wrote...

Gaider creates a gay character. I don't believe nothing about that character should be changed at all since that's what he originally intended. It's the same if a character were to be bisexual, heterosexual, or asexual. I dont believe these aspects of a character should be altered just because people create threads asking for it. 

There is no way for you to definitively know a character's sexuality unless said character explicity spells it out for you in game, or the character's creator explicity spells it out for you. Because of this, there is no real basis for you to claim that their sexuality is being "altered" in order to "pander."

Why do you care so much if their sexuality is "altered" (according to you). I see this idea tossed around a lot and I just don't see why it is such a huge deal.

[cJohnOne]

Dodging, Jumping, and Rolling. Dodging should be an old school dice roll in my opinion. Don't want them to spend time on jumping. and Rolling is a evasive techinique I'd rather not deal with.

Also don't want twriling. maybe I'm probably just jealous of that. Nope just hate it.



Edit: also hate blocking.

Modifié par cJohnOne, 07 mai 2013 - 12:49 .

[NoForgiveness]

these are not in order:

!) Cullen

2) all demons being absolutely evil. I would like one demon that doesn't want to feast on every living person in thedas. maybe one like Cole, though idk if he is truly a demon or what kind of spirit he really is.

3) the PC owning a mabari, especially a brown one.

4) modern assault rifles.

5) star child or any type of DA equivalent.

[fallen_fate]

Star Child.

[Iakus]

5) Retcons of past actions.characters. 

4) Gimmicky boss fights

3)  Armorless/pantsless/shirtless/whateverless characters who's appearance I can't change.  If characters are going to be charging into battle on a regular basis, they should look like they're dressed for the situation.  I understand the need to make characters look distinctive, but I believe this can be accomplished while keeping them from looking like cariactures

2) Multiplayer:  Automatic "Wait until the end of the dlc cycle to purchase", at least

1) Forced tragic endings.  Seriously, DAO had a nice spread of outcomes.  Good.  Bad.  In-between, based on player choice.  Use that as a model.  Not...a certain other game...

[Knight of Dane]

1) Unnecessary cameos
2) Tallis
3) Morrigan and/or OGB
4) Companions that outright hate each other
5) Dungeon recycling

[Twisted Path]

I think most of mien have already been said but:

1.) Superhuman combat animations. I know "realistic" is a loaded word that can lead to endless arguments but can we at least go back to believable-looking combat?

2.) Cameos. I'm really fine with never seeing a character from the previous games again. Would prefer it that way.

3.) Filler combat. Like the OP said. When we fight someone there should be a believable reason for it. No endless hoards of bandits falling from the sky please.

4.) Over-the-top companion introductions. I don't need to see a potential companion kill a million ninjas or beat up a bunch of guys or pull off a cool impossible looking archery move and then strike a pose the first time I see them.

5.) Focus group tested fanservicey love interests. Alas, why can't companions be believable, interesting, three dimensional characters first and foremost? Characters like Thane, Fenris and Isabella seemed like they were designed by committee to be sexy.

[Sundance31us]

1) Purchasing DLC items and then having them be worth nothing when I try to resell them in game.
2) Finding pointless loot items; at least in DAO a "Rusty Metal Spoon" would be an items you could use to build a trap.
3) Being forced to "help" bloodmages who will later kidnap a family member.

[sandalisthemaker]

Reused environments- hope they keep their promises.

Non-bisexual/playersexual LI's (unless there is an equal number of orientations per gender)

OGB as canon

Not being able to do some serious damage to the Qunari if they appear as aggressors

Isabela in any way, shape, or form

Modifié par sandalisthemaker, 07 mai 2013 - 01:24 .

[FaWa]

sandalisthemaker wrote...
Non-bisexual/playersexual LI's (unless there is an equal number of orientations per gender)

I will NEVER understand why people hate the All-Bi characters so much. It makes everything so so so so so much easier for Bioware, and it means a lot to gay people like me who really would have loved to romance Garrus, Alistair, etc. 

I agree Anders should not have come on to the player. But I really think its possible for characters to be straight in one play through, and gay in another. People who complain about this stuff need to learn empathy...

[sandalisthemaker]

FaWa wrote...

sandalisthemaker wrote...
Non-bisexual/playersexual LI's (unless there is an equal number of orientations per gender)

I will NEVER understand why people hate the All-Bi characters so much. It makes everything so so so so so much easier for Bioware, and it means a lot to gay people like me who really would have loved to romance Garrus, Alistair, etc. 

I agree Anders should not have come on to the player. But I really think its possible for characters to be straight in one play through, and gay in another. People who complain about this stuff need to learn empathy...

Yeah, I don't get it either.

[Mikoto8472]

Ditto on the "No forced tragic endings."

And "No God Baby as canon."

[Melca36]

No Fetch and Deliver quests!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Elrena]

There was another of these, and it was locked for negativity.
As I mentioned in my post on the top five things I would LIKE to see in DA3, a reduction in enemy wave spawns.

[fallen_fate]

FaWa wrote...

sandalisthemaker wrote...
Non-bisexual/playersexual LI's (unless there is an equal number of orientations per gender)

I will NEVER understand why people hate the All-Bi characters so much. It makes everything so so so so so much easier for Bioware, and it means a lot to gay people like me who really would have loved to romance Garrus, Alistair, etc. 

I agree Anders should not have come on to the player. But I really think its possible for characters to be straight in one play through, and gay in another. People who complain about this stuff need to learn empathy...

Agreed 100%

[iOnlySignIn]

Seraph Cross wrote...
A person that actually doesn't want Cullen? That's a first

Oh I want Cullen alright. I want his skull to use as an ashtray. And no, I don't smoke. It would be strictly for guests.

On topic:

(1) Cullen

(2) Bodhan

(3) Childish/childlike LIs

(4) Traps that require Rogues to detect

(5) Cameos of Hawke/Warden that "canonizes" them ala Revan in SWTOR

Modifié par iOnlySignIn, 07 mai 2013 - 02:14 .