Guest_Aotearas_*
SpamBot2000 wrote...
Wow, dude is 16. It would be illegal for him to play ME3 here.
Isn't it kinda low to pick on a kid though? Wishing a giant corporation sued him and ruined his life and so on... I mean, is that who you want to be?
Modifié par SpamBot2000, 07 mai 2013 - 06:52 .
Guest_Aotearas_*
SpamBot2000 wrote...
And there ya go. Didn't take very long for someone to urge EA lawyers to take this kid's future.
Modifié par Neofelis Nebulosa, 07 mai 2013 - 06:54 .
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
SpamBot2000 wrote...
And there ya go. Didn't take very long.
Might you please elaborate what you mean to say with this comment?
SpamBot2000 wrote...
And there ya go. Didn't take very long for someone to urge EA lawyers to take this kid's future.
MegaSovereign wrote...
I say we feed his corpse to the Vorcha.
MegaSovereign wrote...
@masster blaster
Because the seller is trying to make profit off of a fan made interpretation, one that he probably didn't even help develop himself..
Guest_Aotearas_*
Veganterror wrote...
SpamBot2000 wrote...
And there ya go. Didn't take very long for someone to urge EA lawyers to take this kid's future.
Link?
Modifié par Neofelis Nebulosa, 07 mai 2013 - 06:59 .
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
SpamBot2000 wrote...
And there ya go. Didn't take very long for someone to urge EA lawyers to take this kid's future.
Of course, because me stating the obvious cause and effect relationship between actions is actually just me wishing for the kid to be prosecuted.
Reading comprehension fail.
Modifié par SpamBot2000, 07 mai 2013 - 07:00 .
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
Veganterror wrote...
SpamBot2000 wrote...
And there ya go. Didn't take very long for someone to urge EA lawyers to take this kid's future.
Link?
He's referring to me.
And no, being underage or otherwise immature/inexperienced is no "out-of-jail" card. You break the law, you're accountable for that. It's the reality of society.
Guest_Aotearas_*
SpamBot2000 wrote...
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
SpamBot2000 wrote...
And there ya go. Didn't take very long for someone to urge EA lawyers to take this kid's future.
Of course, because me stating the obvious cause and effect relationship between actions is actually just me wishing for the kid to be prosecuted.
Reading comprehension fail.
"Not me, no way, no how. I was just settin' here, talkin' about cause and effect in the abstract!"
Please.
Modifié par Neofelis Nebulosa, 07 mai 2013 - 07:04 .
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
That person is using copyrighted material to earn money. He's plagiarizing thoughts that are not his own and publicly available for free, again to earn money.
No matter how much you or anyone else might want to ignore that fact, it is against the law.
AlanC9 wrote...
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
That person is using copyrighted material to earn money. He's plagiarizing thoughts that are not his own and publicly available for free, again to earn money.
No matter how much you or anyone else might want to ignore that fact, it is against the law.
Really? What law?
People are allowed to write about creative works. They do not need the copyright holder's permission, and they are permitted to quote portions of the work to support whatever argument they're making.
EA could certainly abuse the legal system and shut the kid down if they like, but they'd be wrong.
OdanUrr wrote...
So, for instance, if I wanted to, I could release another book on the IT?
Guest_Aotearas_*
AlanC9 wrote...
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
That person is using copyrighted material to earn money. He's plagiarizing thoughts that are not his own and publicly available for free, again to earn money.
No matter how much you or anyone else might want to ignore that fact, it is against the law.
Really? What law?
People are allowed to write about creative works. They do not need the copyright holder's permission, and they are permitted to quote portions of the work to support whatever argument they're making.
EA could certainly abuse the legal system and shut the kid down if they like, but they'd be wrong.
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
That person is using copyrighted material to earn money. He's plagiarizing thoughts that are not his own and publicly available for free, again to earn money.
No matter how much you or anyone else might want to ignore that fact, it is against the law.
Really? What law?
People are allowed to write about creative works. They do not need the copyright holder's permission, and they are permitted to quote portions of the work to support whatever argument they're making.
EA could certainly abuse the legal system and shut the kid down if they like, but they'd be wrong.
The moment you want to use copyrighted material in any commercial way, you have to get clearance from the copyright holder.
I can write about Mass Effect, or whatever else all day if I want, correct. But the moment I try to sell what I am writing, if it is based on proprietary work, I have to get the permission to do so, or it's plagiarism.
Plagiarism is punishable by law. Punishing the kid as per the law would be right, since he obviously broke it. Would it be necessary to punish him? That's another question, one that I have not tangled with contrary to what some people in here might think.
There's a diffrence between writing and selling. This person did both, which is illegel if he did not get premission. How can people not see this?AlanC9 wrote...
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
That person is using copyrighted material to earn money. He's plagiarizing thoughts that are not his own and publicly available for free, again to earn money.
No matter how much you or anyone else might want to ignore that fact, it is against the law.
Really? What law?
People are allowed to write about creative works. They do not need the copyright holder's permission, and they are permitted to quote portions of the work to support whatever argument they're making.
EA could certainly abuse the legal system and shut the kid down if they like, but they'd be wrong.
If the writer is using stuff from the IT vids on youtube and he did not get premisison from the creators, that is in fact plagiarism and those people can sue this kid.essarr71 wrote...
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
That person is using copyrighted material to earn money. He's plagiarizing thoughts that are not his own and publicly available for free, again to earn money.
No matter how much you or anyone else might want to ignore that fact, it is against the law.
Really? What law?
People are allowed to write about creative works. They do not need the copyright holder's permission, and they are permitted to quote portions of the work to support whatever argument they're making.
EA could certainly abuse the legal system and shut the kid down if they like, but they'd be wrong.
The moment you want to use copyrighted material in any commercial way, you have to get clearance from the copyright holder.
I can write about Mass Effect, or whatever else all day if I want, correct. But the moment I try to sell what I am writing, if it is based on proprietary work, I have to get the permission to do so, or it's plagiarism.
Plagiarism is punishable by law. Punishing the kid as per the law would be right, since he obviously broke it. Would it be necessary to punish him? That's another question, one that I have not tangled with contrary to what some people in here might think.
Something tells me you're not a copywrite lawyer. The fact you don't know what plagiarism is comes as a huge red flag you're making this up as you go.
Guest_Aotearas_*
Mr.House wrote...
If the writer is using stuff from the IT vids on youtube and he did not get premisison from the creators, that is in fact plagiarism and those people can sue this kid.essarr71 wrote...
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
AlanC9 wrote...
Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
That person is using copyrighted material to earn money. He's plagiarizing thoughts that are not his own and publicly available for free, again to earn money.
No matter how much you or anyone else might want to ignore that fact, it is against the law.
Really? What law?
People are allowed to write about creative works. They do not need the copyright holder's permission, and they are permitted to quote portions of the work to support whatever argument they're making.
EA could certainly abuse the legal system and shut the kid down if they like, but they'd be wrong.
The moment you want to use copyrighted material in any commercial way, you have to get clearance from the copyright holder.
I can write about Mass Effect, or whatever else all day if I want, correct. But the moment I try to sell what I am writing, if it is based on proprietary work, I have to get the permission to do so, or it's plagiarism.
Plagiarism is punishable by law. Punishing the kid as per the law would be right, since he obviously broke it. Would it be necessary to punish him? That's another question, one that I have not tangled with contrary to what some people in here might think.
Something tells me you're not a copywrite lawyer. The fact you don't know what plagiarism is comes as a huge red flag you're making this up as you go.
Modifié par Neofelis Nebulosa, 07 mai 2013 - 07:34 .
Mr.House wrote...
]If the writer is using stuff from the IT vids on youtube and he did not get premisison from the creators, that is in fact plagiarism and those people can sue this kid.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut