Aller au contenu

Photo

Recent Gameplay Stats


607 réponses à ce sujet

#301
Guest_LineHolder_*

Guest_LineHolder_*
  • Guests
The N7 characters are the best group though. It must be fun to role play by having a team full of N7s.

#302
Megakoresh

Megakoresh
  • Members
  • 610 messages

Domnuxx wrote...

8. Human Male Soldier (2.49%)

This surprises me, I hardly ever see Human Soldiers.


Hard to use, that's why most likely. I would never take a HS into a PuG.

Modifié par Megakoresh, 10 mai 2013 - 09:15 .


#303
Amusingthree93

Amusingthree93
  • Members
  • 1 267 messages

BOSSTER23 wrote...

Amusingthree93 wrote...

Only 3% on platinum.

Rio box-of-shame whiners have no right to complain. 97% of matches do not involve the box.


Does the fact that most people play legitimately justify the scrubiness involved in the Box O' Shame

I think not...

And does that scrubbiness justify ruining the map for 97% of the players? I think not...

#304
Amusingthree93

Amusingthree93
  • Members
  • 1 267 messages

b00g13man wrote...

Amusingthree93 wrote...

Only 3% on platinum.

Rio box-of-shame whiners have no right to complain. 97% of matches do not involve the box.

Erm, I think the problem is the large percentage of that 3% that involves the box.

Even if that "large percentage" is 99% of 3%, that doesnt change that fact that the magnitude of the "problem" is still atmost 3% of the total games (probably a lot less). Platinum is not meant to be pugged. If you play it with friends (the way it is meant to be played) then the box of shame "problem" is 0%. So (surprise surprise!) there is no "problem" at all.  B)

#305
Dr. Tim Whatley

Dr. Tim Whatley
  • Members
  • 7 543 messages

Amusingthree93 wrote...

Even if that "large percentage" is 99% of 3%, that doesnt change that fact that the magnitude of the "problem" is still atmost 3% of the total games (probably a lot less). Platinum is not meant to be pugged. If you play it with friends (the way it is meant to be played) then the box of shame "problem" is 0%. So (surprise surprise!) there is no "problem" at all.  B)

Sounds like you've got a poor grasp of numbers, so I'll break it down...

Assume there are only 100 platinum games going on, and 99 of them involve the box of shame. Do you not think that's an issue for players looking for a legit plat game?

#306
Amusingthree93

Amusingthree93
  • Members
  • 1 267 messages

b00g13man wrote...

Amusingthree93 wrote...

Even if that "large percentage" is 99% of 3%, that doesnt change that fact that the magnitude of the "problem" is still atmost 3% of the total games (probably a lot less). Platinum is not meant to be pugged. If you play it with friends (the way it is meant to be played) then the box of shame "problem" is 0%. So (surprise surprise!) there is no "problem" at all.  B)

Sounds like you've got a poor grasp of numbers, so I'll break it down...

Assume there are only 100 platinum games going on, and 99 of them involve the box of shame. Do you not think that's an issue for players looking for a legit plat game?

97% >> 3%, so it is your grasp of numbers which is poor. If you are looking for a legit plat game, play with friends.

Modifié par Amusingthree93, 10 mai 2013 - 10:48 .


#307
Dr. Tim Whatley

Dr. Tim Whatley
  • Members
  • 7 543 messages

Amusingthree93 wrote...

97% >> 3%, so it is your grasp of numbers which is poor. If you are looking for a legit plat game, play with friends.

I guessed right the first time. You are indeed a moron.

#308
Amusingthree93

Amusingthree93
  • Members
  • 1 267 messages

b00g13man wrote...

Amusingthree93 wrote...

97% >> 3%, so it is your grasp of numbers which is poor. If you are looking for a legit plat game, play with friends.

I guessed right the first time. You are indeed a moron.

Hey, now. Why are you doing personal attacks? I am simply quoting numbers and statistics. And I did not attack you.

#309
N7-RedFox

N7-RedFox
  • Members
  • 4 007 messages

Amusingthree93 wrote...

b00g13man wrote...

Amusingthree93 wrote...

97% >> 3%, so it is your grasp of numbers which is poor. If you are looking for a legit plat game, play with friends.

I guessed right the first time. You are indeed a moron.

Hey, now. Why are you doing personal attacks? I am simply quoting numbers and statistics. And I did not attack you.


Insulting someone's 'grasp of numbers' is a sly dig. Settle down people, settle down. Image IPB

Modifié par N7-RedFox, 10 mai 2013 - 12:12 .


#310
legion9511

legion9511
  • Members
  • 433 messages
Thanks for the stats Eric.

Any chance we can get stats on most/least used weapons for gold/platinum.

Am sure some of the most used weapons should be quite obvious i.e. javelin,claymore

but want to see if harrier is in the top 10 most used weapons. Havent seen anyone use it in the pugs i have played for the last few days.

#311
Daxamite

Daxamite
  • Members
  • 2 498 messages

Amusingthree93 wrote...

b00g13man wrote...

Amusingthree93 wrote...

Even if that "large percentage" is 99% of 3%, that doesnt change that fact that the magnitude of the "problem" is still atmost 3% of the total games (probably a lot less). Platinum is not meant to be pugged. If you play it with friends (the way it is meant to be played) then the box of shame "problem" is 0%. So (surprise surprise!) there is no "problem" at all.  B)

Sounds like you've got a poor grasp of numbers, so I'll break it down...

Assume there are only 100 platinum games going on, and 99 of them involve the box of shame. Do you not think that's an issue for players looking for a legit plat game?

97% >> 3%, so it is your grasp of numbers which is poor. If you are looking for a legit plat game, play with friends.


Amusing, your reasoning is flawed. 

Must say i was a little surprised to see that platinum is still only 3% of games, wasnt expecting it to be massive, but more than 3%. Bronze is STILL 46% of games?? Maybe a lot of people are buying the new trilogy game but not starting MP for a while. I didnt try MP until about 2 months after buying the game, 

#312
Guest_BlastoTheEnkindled_*

Guest_BlastoTheEnkindled_*
  • Guests
Nice add Eric!
I must admit I'm surprised that still half the games are bronze matches...but this reinforces the thesis that the game is not dead, exactly the opposite I dare to say.

#313
Prestacious

Prestacious
  • Members
  • 4 321 messages
Thanks for the stats. Mass effect multi lives on. I'll still be playing until the next ME comes out or the serves are shut down.

#314
Star fury

Star fury
  • Members
  • 6 394 messages
So only 21% plays on gold & platinum, interesting stat. Only 1 out of 5 goes there. I love how people play completely different set of classes on bronze & silver compared to gold+. Except juggernauts.

#315
NeoDobby

NeoDobby
  • Members
  • 168 messages

Amusingthree93 wrote...

b00g13man wrote...

Amusingthree93 wrote...

Even if that "large percentage" is 99% of 3%, that doesnt change that fact that the magnitude of the "problem" is still atmost 3% of the total games (probably a lot less). Platinum is not meant to be pugged. If you play it with friends (the way it is meant to be played) then the box of shame "problem" is 0%. So (surprise surprise!) there is no "problem" at all.  B)

Sounds like you've got a poor grasp of numbers, so I'll break it down...

Assume there are only 100 platinum games going on, and 99 of them involve the box of shame. Do you not think that's an issue for players looking for a legit plat game?

97% >> 3%, so it is your grasp of numbers which is poor. If you are looking for a legit plat game, play with friends.


97% of the games played don't matter when you're looking for a platinum game and must of them are preset on Rio. So yeah, the "whiners" kind of DO have a right to complain. Who cares about the 97% of games that are not platinum, when the pool of games you can drop into when looking for platinum are that 3%?

#316
Mindlog

Mindlog
  • Members
  • 1 910 messages

Mindlog wrote...

For every AIU I see in a lobby there are 2 Juggernauts.

B)

I'm going to play a few times and stick exclusively to classes on the 'Least Played' list. Really interesting numbers and a big thanks for sharing them.

Amusingthree93 wrote...
Platinum is not meant to be pugged.

I disagree.
And challenge accepted.
We really need a smug smiley.

Modifié par Mindlog, 10 mai 2013 - 04:17 .


#317
Amusingthree93

Amusingthree93
  • Members
  • 1 267 messages

NeoDobby wrote...

Amusingthree93 wrote...

b00g13man wrote...

Amusingthree93 wrote...

Even if that "large percentage" is 99% of 3%, that doesnt change that fact that the magnitude of the "problem" is still atmost 3% of the total games (probably a lot less). Platinum is not meant to be pugged. If you play it with friends (the way it is meant to be played) then the box of shame "problem" is 0%. So (surprise surprise!) there is no "problem" at all.  B)

Sounds like you've got a poor grasp of numbers, so I'll break it down...

Assume there are only 100 platinum games going on, and 99 of them involve the box of shame. Do you not think that's an issue for players looking for a legit plat game?

97% >> 3%, so it is your grasp of numbers which is poor. If you are looking for a legit plat game, play with friends.

0

97% of the games played don't matter when you're looking for a platinum game and must of them are preset on Rio. So yeah, the "whiners" kind of DO have a right to complain. Who cares about the 97% of games that are not platinum, when the pool of games you can drop into when looking for platinum are that 3%?

100% of people who get double-shotted by rocket troopers all the time are more deserving of love than a puny less than 3% who run into rio/plat lobbies.

The roughly 20% who ran into the old FBWGG were more deserving than a puny 3% who run in to Rio/plat for fixes.

There is a lot of broken content in the game, which affects 100% of us. Rio/plat fixes which affect a puny 3% absolutely do not take any priority over those issues.

Those who say that my reasoning is flawed should kindly understand that 97% is much larger than 3%. If bioware is going to to devote any resources to any fixes they should fix things which affect a 100% of us (including the less than 3% whiners). This will be for the better of the community.

This gentlemen, is my humble opinion.

#318
-Scythe-

-Scythe-
  • Members
  • 494 messages
Hm, I wish I could see where the Drell Adept is, because in no statistic he appears...

At least now I know I'm hipster with my Drell Vanguard destroying... (carrying) Gold PuGs.

#319
NeoDobby

NeoDobby
  • Members
  • 168 messages

Amusingthree93 wrote...

NeoDobby wrote...

97% of the games played don't matter when you're looking for a platinum game and must of them are preset on Rio. So yeah, the "whiners" kind of DO have a right to complain. Who cares about the 97% of games that are not platinum, when the pool of games you can drop into when looking for platinum are that 3%?

100% of people who get double-shotted by rocket troopers all the time are more deserving of love than a puny less than 3% who run into rio/plat lobbies.

The roughly 20% who ran into the old FBWGG were more deserving than a puny 3% who run in to Rio/plat for fixes.

There is a lot of broken content in the game, which affects 100% of us. Rio/plat fixes which affect a puny 3% absolutely do not take any priority over those issues.

Those who say that my reasoning is flawed should kindly understand that 97% is much larger than 3%. If bioware is going to to devote any resources to any fixes they should fix things which affect a 100% of us (including the less than 3% whiners). This will be for the better of the community.

This gentlemen, is my humble opinion.


The point you're coming from is that there are more important
issues because they have an effect on more players, which is true. But a
platinum pugger will run into this issue all the time, so it is more
important to him.

Yes, those are all issues that should be fixed and nobody ever said that the Rio-farmers are a bigger problem than those. But saying that there are issues that affect more players doesn't make this issue non-existent. And yes, it affects less than 3% of the player base, but it is still annoying for them, so the complaints will continue, despite the fact that support for this game has ended and all those issues will never be fixed.

And platinum is not a friends-only difficulty. I mostly play with friends, so I normally don't run into Rio-platinum, but I welcome the option to open the lobby if we aren't enough. And when the puggers get annoyed with getting dropped into Rio, they might get discouraged from pugging, which is bad for lobbies which can't be filled with just friends.

#320
Anders028

Anders028
  • Members
  • 866 messages

Ramsutin wrote...

Where are GIs?


one if my thoughts and there is a lot of puggernauting going on

#321
Eric Fagnan

Eric Fagnan
  • BioWare Employees
  • 561 messages
I've added some map statistics.

#322
MGW7

MGW7
  • Members
  • 1 086 messages
So only 0.3% of games can possibly involve the box of shame, so it is irrelevant as far as needing to be modified.
I'm not overly suprised, it is really boring to do, and I doubt normal pugs even know of it's existance,

Can't wait for the next set of statistics

#323
Amusingthree93

Amusingthree93
  • Members
  • 1 267 messages

Eric Fagnan wrote...

I've added some map statistics.

Thanks ^_^

#324
Amusingthree93

Amusingthree93
  • Members
  • 1 267 messages

Eric Fagnan wrote...

- On Platinum difficulty, Firebase Rio is currently played 11% of the time (3rd place overall after Firebase Glacier and Firebase Giant)
- At its height, Firebase White was played 50% of the time on all difficulties, and 70% of the time on Gold and Platinum.

Only 11%? Lol.

So only one in ten platinum games are rio. That is less then 1% of the total. The problem is not THAT bad and is highly exaggerated. Not nearly as bad as the old FBWGG, which used to be SEVERAL ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE WORSE.

Modifié par Amusingthree93, 10 mai 2013 - 05:49 .


#325
NeoDobby

NeoDobby
  • Members
  • 168 messages

Eric Fagnan wrote...

I've added some map statistics.


Huh. With the complaints about Rio, I really expected it to be played more often than that... :innocent:

Thanks for the update!

Hmm, what else could be interesting? Ratio of public/private games maybe? Or how many unknown map/enemy games are played? Speaking of, enemy statistics could be interesting too. Also, success/failure rates...

Modifié par NeoDobby, 10 mai 2013 - 05:55 .