Morlath wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
YES. I HAVE.
I have a friend - a girl I met - whose grandparents were jews that were part of the Holocaust. Survivors. And she in turn has a friend whose father was a conscripted German soldier in the war. PTSD from the things he did under orders. Hell, both my grandfathers served in that same war, my father's father the gunner for a B-2 bomber.
So YES, I believe I DO understand perfectly well the things that happened in that War, and how disgustingly insulting it is to drag up the dead and suffering for a fictional debate. This isn't real life - the people in these games are not real, and equating and comparing fictional characters to ones that died horibly in real-life in insulting to the memories of those people.
If you really want to go down this route then I'm o Polish-Jewish descent, my granfather was part of the BAF and we lost an entire branch of our family in Auswitch.
I've had Hitler thrown in my face out of humour and out of pure malice. I've also had conversations that came from fictional foundations that directly related to the war.
Trying to use something like that in a video game debate is insulting, and devaluizes the meaning of that horror. It's A complete, disgustingly callous disrespect to everyone that died in that war to try and equate their deaths to those of pixalized simulations. I know enough about human history to know that it ISN'T respectful to equate it to simulated events. It's insulting and offensive to history to do that.
If a book/game/show creates talk about the horrors of a military being in charge of a people, the physical/psychological abuse of men and women, makes people ask the questions "what is life?" or anything else like that then it is not disrespecting these events.
The concept of Genocide is there in all three ME games. Shepard is put in the position of wiping out an entire species in ME1 (Rachni), destroying or brainwashing a people simply because their views are dangerous to the rest of the galaxy (Heretics) and forced to fight against the genocide of the entire galaxy while being stuck in a situation where s/he picks which SPECIES lives or dies from a war that (it could be argued) didn't need to happen.
So your ravings about real world events not being used in discussion about the game don't hold water.
That being said...
They AREN'T martching on an innocent peace-loving faction. They are going up against a group of isolationists whose people attacked the capitol of the largest government in an act that was NEVER disavowed or disclamed, and that have given no apperant desire to negotiate, aside from an unconfirmable proposition from a self-admitted rouge. And are doing so NOT out of conquest or racial hatred, but because as far as they know, the only other option is to either die, or drag everyone else down with them as burdens.
The geth closed their borders and enforced their isolation at gunpoint. They butchered anyone that tried to speak with them. They allowed a rouge faction to willingly leave them to aid in a genocidal campaign for said faction's self-gain. They never bothered to differentate themselves from their rouges in any way for the following three years. They never offered any form of indication that they were willing to talk with others. What were people supposed to think? It's prety hard to believe someone is peaceful when they blow the head off of everyone that knocks on the door of their stolen house, and who never speaks to you even once when a group of them go out and burn down the town.
Also, the quarians WILLINGLY CHOSE war in majority vote, even though they didn't want it, because of the fact that, again, they thought the alternitive was certan death. Their military leaders did NOT force them.
ONCE AGAIN, you have a more accurate idea aboyt both being at fault but COMPLETELY mess up the comprehension. And fail to mention any fault the geth had in creating the current situation.
Everything you said here is absolute right. With one small error...
...you're basing everything on organic morals, organic thoughts and organic opinions.
The Geth weren't created with any moral coding, they weren't fitting with the concept of "all life is holy". They were built as slave labour for the Quarians as well as an armed force (did you see what I did there? I was able to seperate the two as independent areas. Something you're unable to do). The Quarians kept tinkering with the Geth programing to push it closer to a true AI sentience and, like most arrogent scientists, didn't expect it to backfire in their face.
Well it did. The Geth became sentient. The Quarians wanted the Geth to shut down so that they could "fix" the program and the Geth refused, instead asked simple questions like why? What have I done wrong? What can I do to make this better? Childlike and innocent questions. But even if you don't want to believe the recording Tali says herself how the Quarians attacked the Geth before the Geth decided they didn't want to be slaves any more.
So the Quarians started a war with their synthetic children. Synthetic children that had no concept of right or wrong, morality or the sanctity of life. The Geth responded to the extermination order using the most logical method, kill as many of the enemy as possible so that they can't kill you.
The Quarians leave, the Geth start looking after the planet and any and all opinions and morality that they come up with over the next 300 years is by choice and design. Is it logical to seek out organics to tell them you don't want any contact? No. Is it logical to seek out organic life after the experience of fighting the Quarians (the Creators) to see if they might be friendly? Empirical evidence up to that point shows organics as being dangerous to synthetics so no.
Then you come to the Heretics. The Geth have studied history and know that mankind's is filled with the death and destruction of millions due to disagreements of beliefs. They make an active decision not to be the same way and allow the Heretics to go their own way.
Once again. The Geth have no moral obligation towards warning organics. The Geth have come to the conclusion that every species and every group has the right to find their future in their own way. The Heretics become a program when they want to interfere with the Geth's future.
All of these events are logical progressions stemming from the single fact that the Quarians didn't create morality or a in-built law putting organic life ahead/on par with Geth. The Geth come about any care or morality through their own logical progression and AI growth. The Geth DO show loyalty and an emotional connection to the Quarians that is only explored once peace in ME3 comes about. The Geth CHOOSE to be labourers for the Quarians. They want to help their Creators.
At no point in this argument has anyone explained WHY the Geth should get in touch with organic races to explain things apart from "well everyone then assumes it's all Geth as the enemy". Since that was the assumption BEFORE ME1 and Eden Prime, there's no indication that such a message would have been believed and there's no reasoning why the Geth need to care about what the organics think of them as long as both sides stay away from each other.
1. So then surely you can understand where I'm coming from, in that it's insulting to throw that stuff into this fictional debate.
2. It
IS if you try to throw it out with no form of respect. These are real people that died horribly - you want to respect them, you don't dregde their names and their suffering through the mud by using it as ammo in a debate on a fight between two factions that don't even share the aftermentioned moral traits of the factions in question. Nither the geth or quarians have any ressemblence to what Hitler did. The geth didn't act out of ethnic clensing - they simply
didn't care about anyone else. Not a malicious intent, but more a lack of concern for anyone else. The quarians didn't act out of prejudice and ethnic clensing EITHER time - they acted because they thought the ONLY alternitive was certan death. So the point doesn't even relate. It's just dregdung up old ghosts for an irrlivent point.
3. That's my point. Being from an alien culture, how exactally is using things like the Holocaust in this justified in any way, discounting the fact that it's blurring fact and fiction?
And AGAIN, look at the geth recordings - the same onses you so admimately defend. We know that isn't true - it's just what the quarians believed. The geth did have rudimentry morals, given how at least one tried surrender in the months before the Morning War. The geth tossed out all form of caring about other in any way when the war broke out.
And AGAIN, they were built for BOTH, and each could instantly become the other (See what
I did there? I used what Legion actually
told me was the case with the geth. Something
you're unable to do), just like the drell did for the hanar. So of course, the fact that all could become a massive army at the drop of a dime scared the hell out of the quarians. Also, again,
dead wrong, because Legion's statement directly contridicts that, stating that the geth reached sentiance
themselves, WITHOUT quarian imput or interfearance. Once again, you are pinning something on the wrong side. The only thing the quarians did was give them the power to self-optimize. THAT'S IT.
Sorry, but no matter how much you want to make yourself believe otherwise, Legion's own statements directly contridict you on that. The geth's own
self-improvements made them sentiant.
Also, don't you even find that strange that the quarians first impulse
wasn't to just destroy them? That they tried an alternitive so that they wouldn't have to resort to destroying them outright, unless there was no choice? I mean, that's any different then picking between destroying and rewriting the Heretics? Anyone that supports rewriting them would support the same here, over destroying them outright. And AGAIN, a gun/tool isn't supposed to be asking those things. Fixing problems is supposed to be the creator's job. The gun/tool isn't supposed to be ignoring shut-downs, and/or fiddling with it's own safeties. That makes it potentally dangerous and a public threat to you, your family, and everyone around you. You really think that's not worth being worried about? And AGAIN, no known moral or emotional imperitive. Just what would there be to reason with? Logic alone isn't going to cut it at all, as there is no logical way to move forward - the quarians have nothing that the geth don't already have, or can't make on their own.
Um.... you DO realize all those things about the geth not understanding right, wrong, or the sanctaty of life is WHY the quarians attacked in the first place, right? I mean, if they don't have any comprehension of those things, how exactally do you think trusting them with the lives of your entire race is ANY kind of a good idea? They have no attachment to the quarians, no idea on the values of life, so WHAT reason is there to trust that they aren't going to just go berserk for the hell of it? It's literally a coin toss that could go either way. You act surprised that the quarians
didn't want to risk their entire species - millions of innocents - on a coin toss for which way the emotinless, moral-lacking, restraint-free walking guns/powerloades would react? You think a machine that can kill you with a wrist-flick, that has no restraints, no moral or emotional imparatives, and no idea on the value of life, is something to trust with your childeren, siblings, family, or the fates of millions?
You just provided the counter for your own arguement - the exact reasons why no one did trust the geth. It's hard to put faith in the sanaty of a machine that, to your knowledge, has no concept of right, wrong, or the value of individuals, or organics in general.
And killing anyone that everyone that comes to your door under a banner of peace, instead of, you know, refusing them and turning them away, is logical HOW? WHAT made killing those envoys prefrerable to turning them away before they ever reached the Veil? HOW is it "logical" to give everyone the impression that you are irridemably hostile? HOW is it "logical" to let an entire splinter faction go and wage a genocidal war for self-gain if you advocate mutual cooperation? When the organics seek YOU out under a banner of peace, killing them outright does NOT teach them anything about synthetics not being monsters. It does the exact opposate.
Also, you ignore the fact that with free access to the extranet, the geth would be fully aware of the differences between cultures. They KNOW they are different - they just don't care.
Um.... dead wrong. The geth didn't care about outside cultures anymore by that point. They only resumed studies after Shepard and Co killed Sovergein. They knew NOTHING about humans at that time, and didn't want to know. It had NOTHING to do with opinions of outside cultures - they simply
didn't care about anyone else. That's the long and short with basically everything the geth did.
AGAIN, completely contridicted by Legion (he seems to be your biggest opposition, despite your claims of being pro-geth. Ironic), who states that they want peace with organics. How exactally does letting everyone think the Heretics represent your mainstream beliefs aid that goal in any way? They did NOT care about others paths. Otherwise, they would not have let the Heretics leave at all, since the geth knew what Sovergein was and what it intended. Legion tells you that all geth shared an interfacing with Sovergien, but the Heretics were the only ones tempted by the offer of Reaper tech. All others decided there was nothing they saw that they couldn't build themselves.
The geth KNEW what Sovergien would do if it brought back the rest of the Reapers - harvest all life in the galaxy. That seems to
completely contridict the notion of letting everyone choose their own path, since this pretty much interfears with
every living being in the entire galaxy.All this stems from the fact that the geth weren't ever supposed to BE thinking beings, because the quarians never WANTED or INTENDED them to be A.I.s. Legion states that the geth self-modified themselves to be sentiant. They were NOT made A.I.s by quarian interfearance. They got there by themselves. And AGAIN, [i]
dead wrong. The geth hadn't advanced far enough to realize "why am I doing all the work for these people?" And that the geth had broken free of all user restraint ment that there was nothing to restrain them when, or if, they did rebel. And since the quarians have nothing the geth couldn't make or take themselves, there is no point of the geth working under the quarians. No living being is going to take that laying down. And with assumedly no moral or emotional imparative to reason with, what makes trying to reason with them seem like a good idea?
At no point in this has anyone ever explained why showing nothing but hostility is any better EITHER. Or why letting everyone think you are a killer is a good idea when ANYONE will tell you that the logical inevitibilaty is that people are going to get to the point where the hate and fear festers to the point that they kick down your door and kill you, because they think you are an unreasonable monster.
And AGAIN, you honestly think that letting the Heretics create pure hell in the rest of the galaxy HELPED the chances of ever crearing peace between organics and synthetics? Or that letting everyone think that crime was comitted by the rest of you helps either? Sorry, but sooner or later, the dam would have broke. And the Heretics pretty much broke the dam themselves.