Aller au contenu

Photo

Am I the only one who feels Legion betrayed his ME2 characterization?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
826 réponses à ce sujet

#776
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

Morlath wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

* and Shepard actually thinks Vega is qualified for the N7 program? apparently IQ is not a requirement.

She is actually correct. May I list a few of the accomplishments?

* failure to record the conversation with Sovereign
* failure to record the conversation with Vigil
* failure to record the conversation with Hackett concerning Bahak
* failure to at least have EDI make recordings of conversations with Legion.
* failure to ask intelligent questions when they are needed to be asked like when meeting with the council.
* failure to make copies of Sarens data on reaper indoctrination on data disks while on Virmire. Looking at the codex on Reaper indoctrination, the scientists weren't too bright either, since countermeasures could easily have been made. The science just doesn't stand up without space magic.
* shutting down Cerberus operations, but failing to take any data they were working on in ME1.


I've bolded the ones I agree with. Basically because the first two can be forgiven (unless you expect Shepard to run around with a recorder just in case?) and the third is one of those black ops "we deny anything if something goes wrong" missions that ends up being a political ****storm.


But at least Ms Prothean Expert and Ms Tech Expert should have been brainy enough to have recorded the first two. You have an omnitool. Omnitool = has more ram and HD space and processing power than about 100 desktop computers combined in a wris****ch sized package, complete with holographic display.

EDI should have been monitoring the communication with Hackett, after all, she was still shackled Cerberus tech and was always listening at that time (she was programmed that way). After she was unshackled she respected your privacy. That data file could save your ass, and be used as evidence or at least blackmail in case things got really nasty. Drop it in Liara's hands for safe keeping for a media smear. Oh, that's right not everyone plays "paranoid renegon" Shepard.

#777
Morlath

Morlath
  • Members
  • 579 messages

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

But at least Ms Prothean Expert and Ms Tech Expert should have been brainy enough to have recorded the first two. You have an omnitool. Omnitool = has more ram and HD space and processing power than about 100 desktop computers combined in a wris****ch sized package, complete with holographic display.

EDI should have been monitoring the communication with Hackett, after all, she was still shackled Cerberus tech and was always listening at that time (she was programmed that way). After she was unshackled she respected your privacy. That data file could save your ass, and be used as evidence or at least blackmail in case things got really nasty. Drop it in Liara's hands for safe keeping for a media smear. Oh, that's right not everyone plays "paranoid renegon" Shepard.


Sovereign? That's a big enough shock to forgive but I agree with the two Prothean VIs. Hell you're with Virgil long enough to get a datadisc for crying out loud!

EDI should have been monitoring that call but I can't see a military person like Shep using the recording unless they were actually thrown in prison and not just kept under house arrest.

But there's enough evidence in-game to prove that the Council wouldn't give too hoots about anything you provided as proof anyway.

#778
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages
Yet Shepard, as a Spectre, doesn't know half the resources she has available to her: like the Citadel archives for example. Sovereign is listed as a Reaper in them. It's not because the Council is denying it, it's because she has Cerberus people with her, and all the governments are officially denying it.

It's not called house arrest in the game. It's called Lockup. This is not simple confined to base. This is more like confined to cell. Where it is really bad writing is here:

* Hackett and Anderson could have ordered her back to duty any time if she wasn't a Spectre.

* But the Alliance still had her officially listed as dead even though Bailey pushed the button. Apparently they liked her arrangement with Cerberus and needed it because they didn't want to officially get their hands dirty with the Collectors in the Terminus Systems, even though they had an "out reach program" going on to the colonies there -- see Ashley or Kaidan.

* Hell, as far as the Alliance is concerned, Shepard doesn't even wear the uniform anymore, until Hackett says to report with her dress blues. She is getting hung out to dry. She is taking the fall. Caught or killed? There was no caught or killed. This was Hackett covering his ass. If there was an inquest, there would have been no evidence of the call, just Shepard contacting Hackett after the job, and informing him what she'd done.

That file would be your insurance. Drop the charges unless they want the s*** to hit the fan, and they don't want that to happen. Dismiss them with prejudice, Shepard walks out in her civvies with an honorable discharge. She'll remain a Spectre. She should still have the Normandy SR-2,. It does not belong to the Alliance unless they paid TIM for it (I've suspected Hackett and Anderson had Cerberus connections). Everything is fine. And the files? They'll stay safe just in case something unfortunate happens.

#779
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

S.A.K wrote...

What the hell? Really dude, can't you see Geth themselves make those rules look like a good idea? Plus humans were not a part of the council when the Geth hit Eden Prime.

I am not talking about killing the Geth. I am talking about the effort/sacrifice to save them. Geth are not worth the effort to save them. That is all.


No the Geth don't make those rules look like a good idea because the only reason they are at war is because organics tried to kill them when they were peacefully living with them.  This is the very definition of circular reason.  You can't discriminate against someone, try to exterminate them, and then blame them when they retaliate and say your discrimination was just when your discrimination is the very reason they attack.

#780
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

As far as the Council knows EDI is a VI assistant.

And come on, Remy, stop putting AIs on a pedestal here. If AIs were part of the community they'd have gone along with the extermination of the Rachni if it made logical sense as well. Hell, they might have saved us the trouble of uplifting the Krogan. And we know that Rachni are sentient and sapient as well.

.... waits for "prove it."

.... so pre-empts with prove that they wouldn't.

empirical evidence proves that AIs are not any better.


Who said AIs are better?  The Rachni attacked unprovoked.  It is completely different and irrelevant.  The Geth's only crime is they had the misfortune of becoming sentient.  They were condemned to die because the Council and Quarians feared that sentience.  Sentience is not a crime except to the prejudiced council that decided to make it one.  

#781
Stormcutter

Stormcutter
  • Members
  • 75 messages

remydat wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

As far as the Council knows EDI is a VI assistant.

And come on, Remy, stop putting AIs on a pedestal here. If AIs were part of the community they'd have gone along with the extermination of the Rachni if it made logical sense as well. Hell, they might have saved us the trouble of uplifting the Krogan. And we know that Rachni are sentient and sapient as well.

.... waits for "prove it."

.... so pre-empts with prove that they wouldn't.

empirical evidence proves that AIs are not any better.


Who said AIs are better?  The Rachni attacked unprovoked.  It is completely different and irrelevant.  The Geth's only crime is they had the misfortune of becoming sentient.  They were condemned to die because the Council and Quarians feared that sentience.  Sentience is not a crime except to the prejudiced council that decided to make it one.  


A prejudiced Council that is responsible for the lives of trillions. You can talk all you want, but you don't have that kind of responsibility on your shoulders 24/7. The restrictions on creating AI's is just plain sensible.

The Geth turned out more or less all right (until Legion started fanboying over Reaper Code after completing the two Rannoch side missions) but that doesn't mean all AI will. Javik talks about AI that took over their creators bodies and then proceeded to mold their bodies. The ones that also served as the trigger of that cycle for the Reapers to come.

All the Council had from the Quarians were reports that the Geth had risen up and overcome them. Any envoys that travelled that way were killed. What were they supposed to think?

#782
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

Stormcutter wrote...

A prejudiced Council that is responsible for the lives of trillions. You can talk all you want, but you don't have that kind of responsibility on your shoulders 24/7. The restrictions on creating AI's is just plain sensible.

The Geth turned out more or less all right (until Legion started fanboying over Reaper Code after completing the two Rannoch side missions) but that doesn't mean all AI will. Javik talks about AI that took over their creators bodies and then proceeded to mold their bodies. The ones that also served as the trigger of that cycle for the Reapers to come.

All the Council had from the Quarians were reports that the Geth had risen up and overcome them. Any envoys that travelled that way were killed. What were they supposed to think?


Sensible based on what?  Fear based on no real evidence is not responsible.  Perhaps what they should have thought about instead is restricting the number of robots or VIs period.  Millions of Geth are a risk for the simple fact that they are MILLIONS of them.  Even if the Geth were just VIs or dumb robots it is still a risk because there is nothing stopping an organic race or person from somehow seiziing control of a robot army of MILLIONS.  So issue is not really whether those MILLIONS of robots are sentient or not.  Perhaps the Quarians should have been prevetned from being lazy f**ks.  What other organic race just has MILLIONS of VIs or Loki Mechs doing sh*tty jobs for them?

And the laws existed prior to the Morning War.  Again you can't use the MW to justify the existence of this law when one of the main reasons the MW happened is because this law existed and the Quarians feared the repercussions of this law.

#783
S.A.K

S.A.K
  • Members
  • 2 741 messages

remydat wrote...

S.A.K wrote...

What the hell? Really dude, can't you see Geth themselves make those rules look like a good idea? Plus humans were not a part of the council when the Geth hit Eden Prime.

I am not talking about killing the Geth. I am talking about the effort/sacrifice to save them. Geth are not worth the effort to save them. That is all.


No the Geth don't make those rules look like a good idea because the only reason they are at war is because organics tried to kill them when they were peacefully living with them.  This is the very definition of circular reason.  You can't discriminate against someone, try to exterminate them, and then blame them when they retaliate and say your discrimination was just when your discrimination is the very reason they attack.



Are you kidding? Why should they allow anyone to create AIs?

#784
shodiswe

shodiswe
  • Members
  • 4 999 messages

S.A.K wrote...

remydat wrote...

S.A.K wrote...

What the hell? Really dude, can't you see Geth themselves make those rules look like a good idea? Plus humans were not a part of the council when the Geth hit Eden Prime.

I am not talking about killing the Geth. I am talking about the effort/sacrifice to save them. Geth are not worth the effort to save them. That is all.


No the Geth don't make those rules look like a good idea because the only reason they are at war is because organics tried to kill them when they were peacefully living with them.  This is the very definition of circular reason.  You can't discriminate against someone, try to exterminate them, and then blame them when they retaliate and say your discrimination was just when your discrimination is the very reason they attack.



Are you kidding? Why should they allow anyone to create AIs?


It should be the person who creates illegal AI's who should be punished, not the AI's.

The people who comitted a crime are the people responsible. Someone who's born/created has no choice in the matter.

Modifié par shodiswe, 23 mai 2013 - 06:27 .


#785
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages
Why should they restrict AIs?

#786
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

remydat wrote...

Why should they restrict AIs?


Why? Because organics think with both logic and emotion. AIs think with only logic and don't experience emotion first hand. They can read about it, but they cannot experience it. Hence it doesn't make sense to them. Organics don't make sense. Organics can program simulated emotional responses into an AI, like TIM did with EDI, yet EDI still does not understand human emotion. Do not use Tricia Helfer's expression of anger in the Citadel DLC. Tricia Helfer is human just in case you forgot.

Actually the closest organic to a synthetic we've seen in the game is Xen.

#787
S.A.K

S.A.K
  • Members
  • 2 741 messages

remydat wrote...

Why should they restrict AIs?

People create machines for cheap labour and to do dull, dirty and dangerous things that organics can't/don't want to do. Correct?

AIs are sapient and should have rights that all other sapient life has. Correct?

So the things I mentioned above should not be forced on synthetics. If they are forced like other machines they would fight for their rights like any other sapient being. Also AIs don't have morals if those are not programmed on them. So things like skynet or Morning war would be inevitable if there are no restrictions. Since synthetics shouldn't be used to do tasks other machines are performing, creating AIs is pointless in the first place.

#788
Cyrax86

Cyrax86
  • Members
  • 243 messages
@remy


1. an invasion of a few ships?. Instead of telling them to leave or that they had no interests in negotiating, they simply attacked.


2. (AGAIN Read carefully), The Reapers outclass the Quarians in terms of military and tech wise. The Reapers would have been defeating the Geth either by tech or sheer brute force, Had their been a war over Rannoch(vs. Reapers), you think the Geth wouldn't lose programs, or that their megastructure wouldn't be hit by Reapers. The Geth chose submission over extinction, what makes you think that the same outcome won't happen again? 1+2=3, 2+1=3, Even though its slightly different it has the same outcome.




3. My friends are no longer my friends, that doesn't make them my enemies. As i said, even if the Quarians attack the Council, how would that benefit them?



4. The Krogan had no choice but to ask for help, The Genophage was slowly killing them. The Quarians need a planet so they can produce food and supplies for their people. A Turian planet would be the best, BUT Turians are losing words/colonies, you think they have any to spare.


4b Ask the Council for help, seriously? Humans and Turians forces are stretched thin as is, Salarians can either help or stay out of the war based on the Genophage decision, and the Asari who didn't do anything until the last possible second. So again ask who?




5. I answered you, you obviously can't read. (EXAMPLE)During ME2 H.Geth mission 51% chose to rewrite, 49% chose destruction, rewrite was clearly the favored choice but they let Shep decide. maybe they need a higher percentage or all Geth to reach consensus/make a important decision (End EXAMPLE). Quarians civilians are the majority, but they were dragged into a war they didn't want. the military wasn't going to abandon their civilians/families. That leaves the Quarians admirals(minus Tali and Koris). do i have problem killing most of or all the Geth in exchange for 3 incompetent admirals, nope.



My Question to you is, why do you trust the Geth so much?

#789
Cyrax86

Cyrax86
  • Members
  • 243 messages
@morlath



Council was unaware if they would be hostile toward all or just the Quarians, The point im trying to make is organics/Council has tried to negotiate with the Geth, while the Geth have proven their hostile toward organics.



The Turians haven't really been friendly toward Quarians, your assuming the Turians would help. They need a world not just for shelter but for food and supplies as well. Its getting to the point were their own ships can't sustain them. Before they eat the Turian food it has to be cleaned/sterilised, and making and assumption that Turians have enough food to feed millions of Quarians.


A fleet that is no match against the Reapers in space, They would just become a large slow moving target. It takes days for the entire Quarian fleet to pass through a relay. So instead of being "warmongers" they become cowards, -_- . Quarians wanted to help but were unable, everyone expects the Quarians to help but no one is expected to help Quarians.


All those decisions affect all Geth, for better or worse. When it came to deciding if they should join the Reapers or not, it was either a large portion or it was all the Geth, those Geth chose to submit to Reapers and not only doom themselves but the rest of the galaxy as well. so as i said several times already, why should i trust those Geth?

#790
Morlath

Morlath
  • Members
  • 579 messages

S.A.K wrote...
People create machines for cheap labour and to do dull, dirty and dangerous things that organics can't/don't want to do. Correct?

AIs are sapient and should have rights that all other sapient life has. Correct?

So the things I mentioned above should not be forced on synthetics. If they are forced like other machines they would fight for their rights like any other sapient being. Also AIs don't have morals if those are not programmed on them. So things like skynet or Morning war would be inevitable if there are no restrictions. Since synthetics shouldn't be used to do tasks other machines are performing, creating AIs is pointless in the first place.


For starters the Morning War did not start because the Geth were made without moral programing. The Morning War happened because the Quarians decided to try exterminating their newly formed snythetic life that was still looking to serve them rather than look for a peaceful way of uploading morality coding.

As for your last line, that's an illogical fallacy. There are good reasons to great mechanical aid, good reason in making VI aid and sound reasons in looking to make AI .

#791
Rip504

Rip504
  • Members
  • 3 259 messages
The laws are set into place to protect Organic life. The Quarians made a mistake and it cost billions of organic lives. The law is proven to be effective and now has a base to point to. Look if you create AI the chance of that AI killing billions of Organics is very real. Proven by the monstrous Geth and their act of slaughtering billions.

The why is unimportant in this sense. The law protects all organic life within the galaxy from a potential threat. What right do Organics have to play Gods? What right does a race have to create a slave race of Sentient Synthetic AIs? None. The law does protect and does hold real weight without being considered Prejudice. An absurd point of view imo. As it does protect AIs from being created to be a slave work force or enslaved military force etc.

The galaxy accepts the existence of the Geth as well. Even after the Geth attack the Citadel,the council only attacks those Geth outside of the Veil. No one ever mentioned or tried to wage a war of prejudice against the Geth for simply being AI. They are left to their own fate as long as they do not commit hostilities upon other council races. For 300 years Organics and the Council made no attempts to wage a prejudice war against the Geth. Quarians attacked the Geth,the Geth fought back. The Council did not do such a thing,yet the Geth still attacked the Citadel,and still the Council did not mandate a prejudice war to wipe out all Geth. I see very little to no prejudice. The Geth isolate themselves by choice,not force. They make no attempts to socialize with Citadel space or other organic races. If anything the Geth are prejudice.


If I were only to look at the surface of everything I would be living in a 2D world,which is obviously not the case.

"PS" Legion should have been excluded from the ME franchise. IMO

Modifié par Rip504, 24 mai 2013 - 07:51 .


#792
Morlath

Morlath
  • Members
  • 579 messages

Cyrax86 wrote...

@morlath

Council was unaware if they would be hostile toward all or just the Quarians, The point im trying to make is organics/Council has tried to negotiate with the Geth, while the Geth have proven their hostile toward organics.


I understand what you're trying to say but negotiations only work if both parties are willing to listen and/or there is something both want/need to come out of it.  In the Geth situation the best that could have been hoped for was an official pece treaty.

The Turians haven't really been friendly toward Quarians, your assuming the Turians would help. They need a world not just for shelter but for food and supplies as well. Its getting to the point were their own ships can't sustain them. Before they eat the Turian food it has to be cleaned/sterilised, and making and assumption that Turians have enough food to feed millions of Quarians.


There are a few hints throughout the game of Turians and Quarians being able to understand/talk to each other better than the Quarians can with other races. There's even that extremely popular vid on the romantic side of such talks that Tali loves and is mentioned elsewhere in the MEU.

See, here is where the argument for taking back Rannoch falls down for me. The Quarian fleet still has its live ships which they're looking to use as the main source of food even if they succeed in taking back the planet. They don't know the Geth have been looking after it or to what extent the planet can sustain food growth so they'd still need to use the live ships to feed everyone and keep themselves in sterilised environments. However the same situation suddenly becomes impossible to do if you simply take the civilians off a planet, keep them in their live ships and put them inside a Turian protection fleet that's already looking after its own people.

- The food is cross-species so each side could share if required.
- The civilians would be safer than stuck on Rannoch while the Quarian military went off to fight the war. Unless the Quarians weren't really planning on joining the war until Shepard shows up.

A fleet that is no match against the Reapers in space, They would just become a large slow moving target. It takes days for the entire Quarian fleet to pass through a relay. So instead of being "warmongers" they become cowards, -_- . Quarians wanted to help but were unable, everyone expects the Quarians to help but no one is expected to help Quarians.


Now I will agree on the fact that the Quarians find justificating in their attack from their lack of galatic support. The isolation of both sides has caused major problems in both internal attitudes and external appearences/ability to ask for help.

All those decisions affect all Geth, for better or worse. When it came to deciding if they should join the Reapers or not, it was either a large portion or it was all the Geth, those Geth chose to submit to Reapers and not only doom themselves but the rest of the galaxy as well. so as i said several times already, why should i trust those Geth?


Because you can't take decisions out of context and hope to make any sensible reply from it. People DO do stupid things out of fear/under thread.

I'm going to make a WW2 ananoly that I think suits the situation far better than anything thrown around.

You've got country A. History is that it was originally run by one type of people with another as more the subservient race. The people in charge came to believe that an uprising and strive for equality/reversal of roles was about to happen and so attacked their slave people. After a bitter, senseless war that almost destroyed the entire race of those who used to be in charge the country is now run by the slave race and the others left to like their wounds.

Europe circa 1940. The evil right-wing Reaper Party has appeared seemingly out of nowhere (even though people kept warning those in charge that an invasion was going to happen) and they are now spreading across the continent to harvest, destroy and control any sentient life they find. They've sent a message out to the former slave people "hey, we could have some use for you. Want some help in achieving your true potential in return for being our slaves?"

The people say no. They want to grow in their own way. And then along comes the original race, attacking with a weapon they've never seen before that is ripping through their defenses. The offer comes again. "You're being annihalated. We can help for the right price."

Out of fear, lack of other ideas or sheer desperation and panic they accept the deal.

And if you think that's a big leap then just think for a minute on how many people during terrible wars like WW2 or any other turn on other people not because they want to or because they agree with the evil side but simply because they're afraid for their own life and their sense of self-preservation is stronger than any moral compass telling them the "right" thing to do.

Does it mean you can trust them with important data and positions once freed from their situation? Probaby not.

Does it mean they're worthless? Does it mean they're as bad as the Naz/Reapers/whoever are?

Context.

A man/woman kills someone of another race. The fact they did it because of the race is a much more moral horror than killing them in cold blood for money or power or any other reason.

Free the Geth and trust them with your babies? Probably not. Free the Geth and have them prove themselves on the front line as a way of redeeming their act of selfish preservation? Why not?

#793
Rip504

Rip504
  • Members
  • 3 259 messages
So yes the majority of the Geth Collective agreed to become enslaved tools of destruction for the slaughter and harvest of all organic life for the Reapers by choice. The justification for this is non existent in most context imo. They joined the Reapers because they wanted to keep their space,and maintain their level of intelligence. Potential chance at survival elsewhere obviously exist. It was more then just pure survival. So They were going to die and out of Fear an emotion the Geth do not feel decide to help kill and harvest all life in the Galaxy as enslaved tools only to be destroyed or enslaved after the act is finished. Yea. Geth do not Feel fear,desperation,or panic. So the Intelligence could not save themselves for the lack of ideas. Legion"I do not feel fear as you would" or something along those lines. (Post Reaper Code Upgrade)

Legion tells Shepard "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" when asking to join Shepard. A Geth belief. So in ME3 the Geth join the enemy of their enemy. The Geth join the Reapers whom are enemies with Organics.Hence the enemy considered by the Geth are Organics at this point. A potential reason they choose to become enslaved organic killers. Idk I am just saying.

So yea I say use them to help build Rannoch and fight in the war until their destruction in the Destroy ending of course. If only meant as an act of kindness. Control,Synthesis,nah they do not make it off of Rannoch. You are saying if they show they are willing to do one thing' then give them a chance. Yet one is wrong for saying since they have shown a willingness to do these things,do not give them that chance. The willingness to destroy not only billions of organics at a time,occupy worlds,systems,and show the willingness to destroy/harvest all organic life. Yet one is wrong for allowing the punishment for these crimes to be death. They are showing a willingness to destroy organics,just as easy as they can show a willingness to fight along side organics for their own survival. Simply put the bad outweighs the good. They have shown a willingness to do evil things and kill all. They have yet to show a willingness to become a member of the galactic society in any way.

Modifié par Rip504, 24 mai 2013 - 08:44 .


#794
S.A.K

S.A.K
  • Members
  • 2 741 messages

Morlath wrote...

S.A.K wrote...
People create machines for cheap labour and to do dull, dirty and dangerous things that organics can't/don't want to do. Correct?

AIs are sapient and should have rights that all other sapient life has. Correct?

So the things I mentioned above should not be forced on synthetics. If they are forced like other machines they would fight for their rights like any other sapient being. Also AIs don't have morals if those are not programmed on them. So things like skynet or Morning war would be inevitable if there are no restrictions. Since synthetics shouldn't be used to do tasks other machines are performing, creating AIs is pointless in the first place.


For starters the Morning War did not start because the Geth were made without moral programing. The Morning War happened because the Quarians decided to try exterminating their newly formed snythetic life that was still looking to serve them rather than look for a peaceful way of uploading morality coding.

As for your last line, that's an illogical fallacy. There are good reasons to great mechanical aid, good reason in making VI aid and sound reasons in looking to make AI .

I was talking about the reason for laws against creating AI. Not the start of the MW.

I am talking about AI, not VI. I would like to know those reasons to make AIs you mentioned. Do you think creating AI is a good idea? What are the things AI can do that organics + VI assistance cannot do?

#795
Morlath

Morlath
  • Members
  • 579 messages

S.A.K wrote...

I was talking about the reason for laws against creating AI. Not the start of the MW.

I am talking about AI, not VI. I would like to know those reasons to make AIs you mentioned. Do you think creating AI is a good idea? What are the things AI can do that organics + VI assistance cannot do?


Off the top of my head?

A VI has too many set parameters and limitations. It can only do what it's been programed to do and respond to stimuli the way it's been programed to respond. EDI mentions in ME2 that her cyberwarfare and defence areas only really work because she's an adaptable AI. AIs can learn, grow and help develop not only what they're built to work on but other areas.

Essentially the initial startup for an AI would be to treat them like savants. What the ME universe seems to fail at constantly (EDI excluded) is creating AIs in such a way that forces them to grow as personalities before they become "all powerful".

I don't understand why versions of the Laws of Robotics aren't included in ME (or a lot of other SF) AIs.

#796
S.A.K

S.A.K
  • Members
  • 2 741 messages

Morlath wrote...

S.A.K wrote...

I was talking about the reason for laws against creating AI. Not the start of the MW.

I am talking about AI, not VI. I would like to know those reasons to make AIs you mentioned. Do you think creating AI is a good idea? What are the things AI can do that organics + VI assistance cannot do?


Off the top of my head?

A VI has too many set parameters and limitations. It can only do what it's been programed to do and respond to stimuli the way it's been programed to respond. EDI mentions in ME2 that her cyberwarfare and defence areas only really work because she's an adaptable AI. AIs can learn, grow and help develop not only what they're built to work on but other areas.

Essentially the initial startup for an AI would be to treat them like savants. What the ME universe seems to fail at constantly (EDI excluded) is creating AIs in such a way that forces them to grow as personalities before they become "all powerful".

I don't understand why versions of the Laws of Robotics aren't included in ME (or a lot of other SF) AIs.

I am sorry but you are being naive. VIs can also be programmed to mimic various behaviour (Elcor use those for everything). Several VIs coupled with organics can do anything AI can do minus Skynet.

EDI got better because she had a chance to learn from the Normandy crew. Before that She killed every soldier on that Luna base. Another example would be the rogue AI on the Citadel from ME1. The point is too much can go wrong AIs and you cannot expect all organics to treat them like living beings. And there is nother that cannot be done without AIs.

Those rules against AI development is there for a reason.

#797
S.A.K

S.A.K
  • Members
  • 2 741 messages
Going back to the original point: I still don't see why Shepard should be concerned about Geth dying to pick some ending other than Destroy.

#798
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Why? Because organics think with both logic and emotion. AIs think with only logic and don't experience emotion first hand. They can read about it, but they cannot experience it. Hence it doesn't make sense to them. Organics don't make sense. Organics can program simulated emotional responses into an AI, like TIM did with EDI, yet EDI still does not understand human emotion. Do not use Tricia Helfer's expression of anger in the Citadel DLC. Tricia Helfer is human just in case you forgot.

Actually the closest organic to a synthetic we've seen in the game is Xen.


More people have been killed over emotions than logic throughout the course of human history.  In fact, emotion is the number 1 cause of conflict in organic existence.

So this train of thought is very misleading.  It appears to imply logic is a threat when the lack of logic and the giving in to emotion is 100% provable as the main reason we slaughter each other.

S.A.K wrote...

People create machines for cheap labour and to do dull, dirty and dangerous things that organics can't/don't want to do. Correct?

AIs are sapient and should have rights that all other sapient life has. Correct?

So the things I mentioned above should not be forced on synthetics. If they are forced like other machines they would fight for their rights like any other sapient being. Also AIs don't have morals if those are not programmed on them. So things like skynet or Morning war would be inevitable if there are no restrictions. Since synthetics shouldn't be used to do tasks other machines are performing, creating AIs is pointless in the first place.


It is not forced if they accept doing it after becoming sentient.  Humans do ****ty jobs right now and they are not slaves.  They do those jobs because their employer pays them for their services.  We don't know if the Geth wanted something in exchange for doing these ****ty jobs or not because the Quarians never bothered to ask.  Might as well start killing all humans who currently perform sh*tty jobs because obviously they are going to rebel.  Of course that is dumb logic because magically sentient entities are able to have a conversation and work out an arrangement. 

Why would you create an AI without morals?  Why if you created one accidentally wouldn't your first step be trying to teach it morals?  None of that is the AI's fault.  That is the sh*tty creator's fault.

Modifié par remydat, 24 mai 2013 - 02:59 .


#799
ghost9191

ghost9191
  • Members
  • 2 287 messages
in the game though . it shows what using logic can do .

hence the whole reaper thing

it is better to use both rather than just logic or emotion... which machines lack the ability to do



which is what i think sHOtgUn was saying

Modifié par ghost9191, 24 mai 2013 - 03:05 .


#800
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages
Cyrax86,

1.  The PV and the jamming affect it creates made it a good defensive position.  Obviously the organics are not going to admit to the Geth "hey, we are really just here to gather some intel while claiming we come in peace and we would never report back anything we have seen while wandering around in Geth space." 

2.  Perhap you need to read carefully.  This would be like saying if the Quarians had offered the Geth a choice of brainwashing and slavery or extinction the Geth would accept.  I find that doubtful.  One of the main reasons the Reaper offer could be accepted is because they were not the enemy currently trying to exterminate the Geth.  Trying to pretend like the Geth would equally have accepted the offer from their attackers is problematic.

3. Who said anything about attacking the Council? They could have disregarded the Council much like how the Batarians and Vorcha do.  So instead of fighting and risking extinction now, they have become slaves to the Council that doesn't care about them even though they know that in 80 years the Council will have effectively murdered them by denying them a planet.  I mean hell, even the Reapers had the decency to offer the Geth a chance to destroy their enemies in exchange for eventual destruction 300 years from now at the end of the harvest.  The Council are even bigger a**holes than the Reapers, lol.

4.  See above.  Now is the best opportunity to stop the slow genocide the council is currently committing against the Quarians.  Even the Krogan were smart enough to realise this.  You want our fleets guys then give us a f**king planet.

5.  Nope you didn't answer me.  The hypothetical is if all Quarians voted and all Geth voted and we kill the war mongers of both.  I am talking about the Admirals, the senate and the Quarian adult civilians.  You are trying to hide behind the notion that only 3 people in the entire Quarian population supported war which is just bullsh*t.   Millions of Quarians are dying too in my scenario because I guarantee you more than just Gherel, Xen, and Raan wanted their homeworld back.  If it was only those 3, and the other 16,999,997 Quarians supported peace they would have told those admirals to f**k off.

I don't trust the Geth so much.  I simply think they are victims of their creator's stupidity.  That doesn't excuse their crimes but it means I see no reason why I should choose their stupid creator's over them.  If this were about the Elcor and Geth then I would side with the Elcor.

Modifié par remydat, 24 mai 2013 - 03:40 .