Mass Effect 4: Alternate Universe?
#1
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 08:59
#2
Guest_KnossosTNC_*
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 09:32
Guest_KnossosTNC_*
Seriously, they would have to explain it to me, because I wouldn't understand it. Are they trying to reboot, re-imagine, play with mirror universe tropes or what?
#3
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 09:33
KnossosTNC wrote...
Bioware would have a lot of explaining to do.
Seriously, they would have to explain it to me, because I wouldn't understand it. Are they trying to reboot, re-imagine, play with mirror universe tropes or what?
I think it would be more like a reboot like DC's New52.
#4
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 09:38
#5
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 09:40
#6
Guest_Guest12345_*
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 09:57
Guest_Guest12345_*
I'm sure that is too much for some people, but I don't need the backdrop to change. The only thing I am really tired of is reapers. They are done and over, so now I either want to see a setting where the Reaper conflict is resolved, or it never existed in the first place.
I think this kind of alternative universe with no reapers is a better option than a prequel before the ME trilogy.
#7
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 10:11
#8
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 10:26
#9
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 10:28
#10
Posté 12 mai 2013 - 10:59
ImperatorMortis wrote...
How would you feel if Bioware pulled a Marvel/DC, and had ME4 be set an in alternate universe? Same races, and stuff(hopefully no reapers), but different characters, and events. And possibly some minor changes to existing races?
Hahaha in an alternative universe ME3 had a cool ending where Harbinger's mind was the central hub that controlled all other Reaper forces. Shepard and squad board Harbinger and plant the Catalyst (Javik) inside its core who then takes control of the crucible via the Reaper network and remote controls it to self-destruct all Reapers, giving his people revenge and dying a hero's death. Shep and squad must hold off the indoctrinated Cerberus grunts who are inside Harbinger until Javik has time to do his part.
The crew board the Normandy while Javik is making everything go boom. The Protheans are remembered as heros to all and Shepard lives.
If only you'd have thought of it first Bioware, if only. You had such a good hand to play but u folded
Modifié par N7-RedFox, 13 mai 2013 - 12:27 .
#11
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 01:37
#12
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 02:37
#13
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 02:38
#14
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 02:50
#15
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 03:06
I don't think the Reapers should be removed, but removing the CatalyStalin, dark energy, tech singularity and Leviathans would be good.
Modifié par spockjedi, 13 mai 2013 - 03:08 .
#16
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 04:00
spockjedi wrote...
I approve, rebooting is the only way to fix the mess created by ME3's ending. Or, if you are more critical about the trilogy, the mess that started at ME2.
I don't think the Reapers should be removed, but removing the CatalyStalin, dark energy, tech singularity and Leviathans would be good.
10-4 on that.
#17
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 04:47
I'd rather Bioware created a new IP instead of pressing the reset button on the Shepard trilogy, and pretending nothing from the last 5 years and 3 games happened.
#18
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 05:35
Han Shot First wrote...
I wouldn't be fond of it.
I'd rather Bioware created a new IP instead of pressing the reset button on the Shepard trilogy, and pretending nothing from the last 5 years and 3 games happened.
Who said a reboot would have to include Shepard? Or even any of the characters we know?
Same universe concept, different characters.
Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 13 mai 2013 - 05:36 .
#19
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 10:08
#20
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 12:27
Ethalin wrote...
I'd rather they make it take place between ME1 and ME2 in the "missing" 2 year span playing as a Cerberus team.
That could be an interesting game. Just so long as it wasn't Jacob.
#21
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 01:03
spockjedi wrote...
I approve, rebooting is the only way to fix the mess created by ME3's ending. Or, if you are more critical about the trilogy, the mess that started at ME2.
I don't think the Reapers should be removed, but removing the CatalyStalin, dark energy, tech singularity and Leviathans would be good.
I would buy.
#22
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 01:27
I would be upset. I want the same universe but in a different time.ImperatorMortis wrote...
How would you feel if Bioware pulled a Marvel/DC, and had ME4 be set an in alternate universe? Same races, and stuff(hopefully no reapers), but different characters, and events. And possibly some minor changes to existing races?
#23
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 02:33
#24
Guest_Data7_*
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 02:54
Guest_Data7_*
ImperatorMortis wrote...
How would you feel if Bioware pulled a Marvel/DC, and had ME4 be set an in alternate universe? Same races, and stuff(hopefully no reapers), but different characters, and events. And possibly some minor changes to existing races?
Orgasmic.
(first off, I love marvel/dc, second, they would also be pulling a star trek, a doctor who, a red dwarf, a star gate SG1, they'd basically be pulling off every other concept that deals with sci-fi.)
It's a fitting and logical situation to make the next mass effect a mirror reality with obscure differences.
Though upon it's release, I could see many people who would claim that it would be a game trying to be Borderlands2 (not being very different from the first game) Or claiming that the next mass effect was trying to captivate the Bioshock infinite fanbase with the concept of a dual reality complex. . . (even though it would just be following Sci-fi standard scenarios which was kicking around for far longer)
#25
Posté 13 mai 2013 - 03:03
I would prefer if it's just set in the future of the mass effect universe, after the reaper story was concluded.





Retour en haut







