StreetMagic wrote...
Not to point out the obvious, but they are fictional characters. Not people. And not a real culture. We have no reference for actual people other than ourselves. I refuse to let the human race be equated and measured and judged with some video game concept. I'm a nerd, but not that big of a nerd.
Secondly, Gaider himself has said they're like "Militant Islamic Borg".
Only reason why they garner any strong defense at all is because some of you. Technically, they're not supposed to be all that worthy of support. That is, unless you like militant islamic borg. It's like a segment of players have developed some bizarre form of
Stockholm Syndrome and defend this nonsense just to play out their "I'm
so different" fantasy. Real life Seamuses, I guess.
Probably a good idea to remove that stick from up your arse.
Mages and the Chantry aren't worthy of support either. Mages are inherrently dangerous, corrosive to society and potentially such a threat they can be a bring an entire state into a conflict. While the Chantry are a militant fundamentalist theocracy. Existing in a world where the Feudal state is so unbalanced and the peasant masses starve and die in filth and ignorance, while nepotism rules the higher echelons of society. Yep, completely worth defending the status quo, because of freedom, freedom to starve.
It's that bizarre idea that "freedom" is something to strive for aginst everything when looking at the system without the rose tinted glasses shows it to be inherrently worse and corrupt than the "evil authoritarian" Qun.
The Qun is a way of life and thinking that encompases Qunari society.
The Qunari aren't inherrently racist or xenophobic, there is the Bas and the Qunari, that's all. It's based on meritocracy driven by utilitarianist ideology, not the aquisition of wealth or power, the drive is to equate one's self with the whole and the benefit of all members of the Qun. While they are the most advanced and enlightened of all the races and place people on their ability and, the Qun do not waste resources in petty wars of self agrandisement.
So all you're left with in your argument is "but they're authorative and militant" like the Tevinter Imperium, Chantry, Feudal society. Which weren't oppressive in anyway.
No one said they weren't a dictatorship, they're a benevolent one, and one which brings more benefits that anything the other nations have. You're freedoms don't amount to much when they're an illusion.