Aller au contenu

Photo

ME2 System Requirements


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
25 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Jaymo147

Jaymo147
  • Members
  • 211 messages
Anyone know them?
I'd rather get them here, then from a random website from Google.....


Thanks in advance.

#2
seven9st surfer

seven9st surfer
  • Members
  • 64 messages
Here ya go, from the old website, posted by the DEVs:

PC MINIMUM System Requirements

* OS = Windows XP SP3 / Windows Vista SP1 / Windows 7
* Processor = 1.8GHz Intel Core 2 Duo or equivalent AMD CPU
* Memory = 1 GB RAM for Windows XP / 2 GB RAM for Windows Vista and Windows 7
* Hard Drive = 15 GB
* DVD ROM = 1x Speed
* Sound Card = DirectX 9.0c compatible
* Direct X = DirectX 9.0c August 2008 (included)
* Input = Keyboard / Mouse
* Video Card = 256 MB (with Pixel Shader 3.0 support). Supported Chipsets: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 or greater; ATI Radeon X1600 Pro or greater. Please note that NVIDIA GeForce 7300, 8100, 8200, 8300, 8400, and 9300; ATI Radeon HD3200, and HD4350 are below minimum system requirements. Updates to your video and sound card drivers may be required. Intel and S3 video cards are not officially supported in Mass Effect 2.


PC RECOMMENDED System Requirements

* Windows XP SP3 / Windows Vista SP1 / Windows 7
* 2.6+ GHz Cure 2 Duo Intel or equivalent AMD CPU
* 2 GB RAM
* ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT, NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT, or better recommended
* 100% DirectX compatible sound card and drivers
* DirectX August 2008

Modifié par seven9st surfer, 16 janvier 2010 - 09:31 .


#3
izmirtheastarach

izmirtheastarach
  • Members
  • 5 298 messages
Beat me to it. Lousy customers.

#4
Jaymo147

Jaymo147
  • Members
  • 211 messages

seven9st surfer wrote...
snip/

Thank you!

Looks like I am above and beyond the recommended specs ^_^

Any mod is free to lock this.

Modifié par Jaymo147, 16 janvier 2010 - 09:34 .


#5
Akwild

Akwild
  • Members
  • 66 messages
Anyone know if this game takes advantage of 64bit?

#6
izmirtheastarach

izmirtheastarach
  • Members
  • 5 298 messages

Akwild wrote...

Anyone know if this game takes advantage of 64bit?


Takes advatage how? You mean, is the game 64bit? Are any games, aside from Far Cry?

#7
Akwild

Akwild
  • Members
  • 66 messages

izmirtheastarach wrote...

Akwild wrote...

Anyone know if this game takes advantage of 64bit?


Takes advatage how? You mean, is the game 64bit? Are any games, aside from Far Cry?


Crysis does also.

#8
hallben3000

hallben3000
  • Members
  • 59 messages
Not the highest specs those, I might have to get it on PC as well.

#9
izmirtheastarach

izmirtheastarach
  • Members
  • 5 298 messages

Akwild wrote...

Crysis does also.


Same company of course. Love those games.

Anyways, no I wouldn't think ME2 would.

#10
Akwild

Akwild
  • Members
  • 66 messages

izmirtheastarach wrote...

Akwild wrote...

Crysis does also.


Same company of course. Love those games.

Anyways, no I wouldn't think ME2 would.


O'well it would've been nice.

#11
izmirtheastarach

izmirtheastarach
  • Members
  • 5 298 messages
Crysis 2, man!

#12
Gorath Alpha

Gorath Alpha
  • Members
  • 10 605 messages
What I find hilarious is that the official System Requirements for ME-1/PC were really so screwed up regarding video card naming, with the X1300 XT named as minimum Radeon, while the X1600 Pro was supposedly below minimum (right!  That's the same video card -- two names).  The old setup caused the X1300 owners some consternation, because their more mundane cards were just too slow. 

The HD 2600s were supposedly below minimum, when in actual fact they outperform the X1600 Pro by a nice margin (The X1600 Pro, like the Geforce 6600 GT, was at best a borderline card at the very edge of the mainline medium category when it was new, while the X1300 was actually almost good enough to have an X1500 name in comparison, or the X1600 should have had an X1500 name, and the X1300 been named X1400.)

(I don't want to start any arguments about those five year old cards.  The X1600 was better with shaders, and did well in Oblivion as a result.  The 6600 GT was less good with shaders and did comparatively poorly in that game, while any game without a lot of shaders usually ran faster on the 6600 GT than on the X1600 Pro.) 

This time around, with basically the same engine, the X1600 Pro is officially the minimum (I'll still consider the X1650 XT to be more practical as minimum). 

Gorath
-

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 18 janvier 2010 - 07:20 .


#13
dunkh

dunkh
  • Members
  • 9 messages
i've an x1600xt, and have ordered a cheap 4850 to help for me2. also, reading the specs, it seems the proc is far less important than the video card as the difference there between minimum and recommended is so small for proc: 2,4 to 2,6. however, what would be the needed system to play with aa4 and all details max in 1280*1024 with good fps?...

#14
cdawg86

cdawg86
  • Members
  • 8 messages
I have an ATI Radeon HD 4670. Will that work?

#15
Popstick

Popstick
  • Members
  • 135 messages
If you played ME1 with your 4670, then you should be fine for ME2. Might have to dial down a setting or two to medium though.

#16
cdawg86

cdawg86
  • Members
  • 8 messages
thanks, I just bought my computer an would hate for it to already be out dated.

#17
MYFQ

MYFQ
  • Members
  • 3 messages

dunkh wrote...

i've an x1600xt, and have ordered a cheap 4850 to help for me2. also, reading the specs, it seems the proc is far less important than the video card as the difference there between minimum and recommended is so small for proc: 2,4 to 2,6. however, what would be the needed system to play with aa4 and all details max in 1280*1024 with good fps?...

I suppose a decent dual core and a 4850 would have no problem maxing it out at 1280x1024.

#18
Niorcs

Niorcs
  • Members
  • 129 messages
I have a laptop, and am able to run ME at ultra-high settings. I'm worried that, because of my RAM and such, I won't be able to run ME2 at all or it'll be shakey. I only have 3.5 gigs of RAM ;_;

#19
Popstick

Popstick
  • Members
  • 135 messages
3.5 is plenty for a linear-ish game like ME2. Heck, its more than enough even for open-world, sandbox games - GTA4, Crysis, FO3 etc.

Modifié par Popstick, 22 janvier 2010 - 06:50 .


#20
Niorcs

Niorcs
  • Members
  • 129 messages
Yeah, it's just I get worried that my laptop will ASPLODE due to all the upgrades that Bioware has made to the series. I was just worried I'm sitting at bare-minimum specs right now, and I just don't want to have to drop from ultra-high to medium/low

#21
MuddVader

MuddVader
  • Members
  • 7 messages
I hope my ATI 4650m does the job, I get like 40-50 fps according to fraps on the first one, so heres to hoping I can get a decent fps on the second without turning everything down >.<

#22
aswan4

aswan4
  • Members
  • 20 messages
i run crysis on 1920x1080, 30 fps, with mostly everything on very high with 4 gbs of ram. no AA, but meh.  ram shmam..

Modifié par aswan4, 22 janvier 2010 - 10:00 .


#23
cdawg86

cdawg86
  • Members
  • 8 messages
you should check www.canirunit.com to test you computer's compatbility with the game

#24
toksikshok

toksikshok
  • Members
  • 55 messages
couldnt tell you, but what i can say is that my rig runs this **** on full settings no problem

#25
Fredvdp

Fredvdp
  • Members
  • 6 186 messages

cdawg86 wrote...

you should check www.canirunit.com to test you computer's compatbility with the game

I hate it when people say that. Can You Run It is the most succesful troll site on the internet. It's so inaccurate you'd think they do it on purpose.