Chris Priestly wrote...
Yep, and why it will not be reopened.

I'm sorry Mr Priestly but that is a rather convenient
excuse. One user opening a duplicate thread based on personal grievances with a handful of other users is somehow more "bickering" than the entire ending controversy where dissenting threads were created
every couple of seconds? I think not, and I don't recall anyone threatening to shut down the Story and Campaign Section. And should we mention the Multiplayer forum and the so-called "nerf wars", particularly around topics of Infiltrators and Tactical Cloak? Did any of those people get locked down and banished to groups? Not to my knowledge.
The difference is you had a use for these things. The MP team almost had their work done for them with everyone and their mother stress-testing weapons and game mechanics and posting about it (not that I'm accusing the devs of not doing their jobs), and as for the ending controversy, well I think we all know how much publicity that generated. The character forum on the other hand drew you no benefit. What's more, once IT served its purpose it got the boot as well.
Regardless, the politics of the situation don't address the fundamental problem of moderation on these forums. Simply put, Mr Priestly, there's not much moderation to speak of. You simply lockdown/ban when it's convenient (ie you're online) and the devil may care about the rest. Why is it that out of that list of mods at the bottom only you, Ninja Stan and RaenImrahl are actually active? I know mods can delete specific threads. I know they can delete specific
posts. Yet none of you do. It's just whoops, lockdown, too bad if you were having a nice intelligent discussion before one or two trolls ruined it, have a nice day. Let's not get into which topics you tend to ban, that's a discussion for another time. But despite the fact that many feel that you moderate to the point of censoring via the lockdowns, I say you hardly moderate at all, really moderate as in filter out the undersirable elements without hurting discussion.
And locking down a whole subform
is hurting discussion. Despite the organizational benefit of groups I'm sure you're aware of their serious drawbacks, namely segregation and visibility (to say nothing of their technical limitations- not everyone is savvy enough to manually BBcode their replies). Banishment to groups is a sentence of stagnation. I joined the BSN two years ago because I googled Miranda in ME3 and came upon the thread in the character forums. Despite some setbacks and disappointments I have enjoyed my time here overall. Your groups on the other hand aren't as publically visible and I highly doubt they show up on Google the same way. There is now a portion of fans that are potentially being denied the same in I had. And why? Because we can't take care of a few bad apples without purging the whole cart?
This is the Internet Mr Priestly, and giving people a semi-anonymous voice on it practically guarantees you some unsavory results. But that's why we have moderation- to keep that element at bay without, I repeat,
without bringing the whole thing crashing down. Blaming a forum closure on people being dicks on the Internet is like blaming an old toilet for leaking- what'd you expect? And a better question is: what did you do about it? Fix it? Or just condemn the whole bathroom?
Modifié par CrutchCricket, 22 mai 2013 - 03:01 .