MissOuJ wrote...
If Sony keeps the online features free it keeps getting my money. Assuming of course that the price of a PS4 isn't completely unreasonable, and that the console seems like it's worth my money (has good games, doesn't have invasive features etc.). I probably won't be buying at lauch anyway, depending on my financial situation...
I don't know, there's so much still in the air. I might just as well go with the XBO if it truly ends up being the better console, but from my very European, ice-hockey loving point of view, Microsoft seems to have very little to offer me. Granted, both Sony and Microsoft have been somewhat quiet / cryptic about what their console really does and doesn't do, so I quess I'll just hang at the back with my PS3 and wait for a while. I honestly don't care which one I end up getting as long as it meets my needs well enough.
But anyway...
Gatt9 wrote...
Actually, these arguments have been around forever. It's not that the consoles are "Doing thing for the pc crowd to take notice", there's nothing a console can do that couldn't be done, and done better, on a PC. Even living room gaming could be done significantly better with a PC if Microsoft had developed their OS to facilitate that. They haven't, simply because it would cannibalize their console market*.
Generally, these arguments start because console players are trying to validate their choice, because they (naturally) want to believe that they have the best possible system. It usually ends up with people tossing out a variety of myths about consoles, like the oft repeated "The Console is a dedicated game machine so it's better at it", when the reality is that the PC consistently remains far more powerful and adaptable.
True, but PC gaming lacks one thing that the consoles have: user-friendliness.
I've gamed both on consoles and the PC, and the fact is that by gaming on the PS3 I haven't had any compatibility issues, no "programme encountered an unspecified error" -messages, no mysteriously vanishing saves, and no need to pay several hundred euros for new graphics card or other upgrades. I can also buy used games at significantly lowered prices, and I can game comfortably -- PC gaming almost killed my shoulders. By gaming on a console, I pop in the disk, wait for install, possibly download some patches and updates, and then I play. No finding out about extra hoops I have to take to take to make this game work on this version of my OS, no deleting cache-files or turning off the antivirus software because it messes with the launcher, and so on.
Of course by gaming on the consoles you lose some awesome features PC gaming has, like modding and the ability to optimise graphics to your liking: my PS3 copy of DA:O looks absolutely hideous most of the time, but when played on a high-end PC, it looks gorgeous.
Your argument that console gamers are just making up excuses to make themselves feel better is really misguided, since both console gamers and PC gamers are right: consoles are made for gaming, so for some people they're the better option, and PC games are more powerful and adaptible, and have cool features that the consoles lack. But console gamers and PC gamers are talking straight past eachother, since this is a game of "win some, lose some" and both parties are prioritizing different issues, and arguing about whose priorities are better is just pointless.
I have to say that I somewhat agree with you about the end of consoles; since both XBO and PS4 seem to have cloud gaming features, this could very well be the last console cycle. I woundn't agree they are PC's, since while that might be technically / functionally true, I can't (and I don't want to) do my shopping, operate word processing software, or pay my bills on the PS3 / PS4, which is what most PC's are for -- or at least in most cases and for most people those are some if their primary functions -- so I wouldn't say consoles have turned into PCs.
You'll encounter errors on consoles, numerous console games had save corrupting bugs when they shipped, I've run into several that would lock up and I'm sure google can turn up lists of those issues. Just because the "An error has been encountered" screen isn't presented to the user doesn't mean it isn't there.
Additionally, you don't need to pay several hundred euros for a graphics upgrade. Moore's law is dead, a PC from 5 years ago is still able to run games fine, and in better quality than either current console.
Console games, even used console games, aren't cheaper than PC games. I can buy games for as little as $5 on Steam. used console games are quite often just a couple of dollars less than a new copy. A newly released game on the PC is generally the price a used console game will be sold at months down the line.
Your comments about installation and such are OS issues, these could *easily* be handled by OS if it was in the best interests of Microsoft to do so. Until now, it hasn't been, Microsoft benefits from making PC gaming require more "Hoops", if the PC was easy, connected to a TV, with it's better quality, the X-box wouldn't sell. It's been in MS's best interests for the last 8 years or so to improve their OS for gaming.
They have turned into PC's, you're talking about applications, not architecture. They are PC's, they're using x86 processors with SoC designs meant to be used in laptops. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see someone hack one of these things and have it running Windows 7 within the first year of release.