172 réponses à ce sujet

[Supreme Leech]

I completely suck with both. My only wish would be to be able to play both these characters well, without dying every 10 seconds. Though I must say, I do prefer the asari sentinel.

[Blind2Society]

Valkyrie doesn't stand a chance.

[MaxShine]

Both are a bit dull

[Mister Blip]

Blind2Society wrote...

Valkyrie doesn't stand a chance.

I'd like to see anyone do better with the Fury solo than with the Valkerie solo on any map but glacier.

Edit: And close quarters combat I mean, of course. I actually believe that the fury is  better played as a ranged soldier with high capability in close range encounters.

Modifié par Mister Blip, 23 mai 2013 - 12:09 .

[Original Twigman]

Mister Blip wrote...


So let's throw the Reegar aside for a moment. I stomp people who Reegar when I Piranha in the same lobby, even on Platinum. I find that killing a whole mook spawn with one warp and 3-6 piranha shots is optimal and it's actually as fast as the Fury. Beside that, you can deto tech armour whenever you like. So Fury's supposed mook killing superiority is myth when a Valkerie is played well.

considering that a mook will die with 3 of the 22 "bullets" the reegar has,i don't think the pirahna will out dps the reegar.... nothing can... whether mooks or bosses, especially in CQC, which the piranha requires

[Mister Blip]

You badly misunderstand the post twig man The piranha is able to hit and put down more targets in the same amount of time than the Reegar is. Most of the Reegars ammunition is wasted.

In fact, no one mentioned "DPS". It doesn't matter for **** how much "DPS" is present, if you don't hit the enemy with every bullet. Also, the piranha does not require close range combat. It is actually extremely effective for midrange. Unlike, I may say, the Reegar. Which brings up the question of why you made that comparison if you believe for some reason in the superiority of the Reegar.

[Swan Killer]

It's like trying to compare the Juggernaut and EDI Bot. The poll is irrelevant, totally different characters, totally different playstyle.

ps: Unless you're a moron and try to play like the Fury as the Valkyrie. And vica versa.

Modifié par tivesz, 23 mai 2013 - 12:37 .

[Tallgeese_VII]

I voted for fury because I think she is bit more versatile at the end.

[DHKany]

Fury

Period.

[PsychoticBiotic]

Fury, no question.

[Zyzimorph]

Valkyrie has nothing on the fury

[iOnlySignIn]

Fury's butt is much better. As is her voice.

Human Women > Asari

Voted for Valkyrie though as she's more focused on close quarters than the Fury.

Modifié par iOnlySignIn, 23 mai 2013 - 01:08 .

[Original Twigman]

Mister Blip wrote...

You badly misunderstand the post twig man The piranha is able to hit and put down more targets in the same amount of time than the Reegar is. Most of the Reegars ammunition is wasted.

In fact, no one mentioned "DPS". It doesn't matter for **** how much "DPS" is present, if you don't hit the enemy with every bullet. Also, the piranha does not require close range combat. It is actually extremely effective for midrange. Unlike, I may say, the Reegar. Which brings up the question of why you made that comparison if you believe for some reason in the superiority of the Reegar.

lol

[Grammaton Dryad]

My opinion is that the Fury is better when your weapons/manifest are not very good. Her BEs/Biotics are a little better, but the Valkyrie is a better weapons platform, thus at the end of the day I think the Valkyrie is better.

And I use Warp Ammo on my Valkyrie.

[RoZh2400]

Spell "Valkyrie" correctly and I'll agree with whichever side you want, OP.

[BIGGLESBY]

100RenegadePoints wrote...

Both are a bit dull

[+100 Renegade]

[drmoose00]

imo, the fury is a easy-cheesy char to play, that works well for players with less experience, No question can be used effectively with experienced players too of course, but is a early goto char for less experienced players looking to play gold

the valk is much more difficult to play effectively. But in the right hands, I am guessing that a valk outscores fury most of the time. 

Overall, the fury is more versitile/"useable". the valk is more powerful when used effectively.

imo

[Original Twigman]

thank you, biggs

i was afraid i had lost that

[Shadow of Terror]

The playstyles are pretty different. A Fury can get everywhere and explode stuff much quicker than a Valkyrie, but a Valkyrie can melt bosses quicker (Also, you can kill more enemies with a clip of a Reegar than a Piranha, I don't think it's even debatable).

So ignoring all of that, the only input I can think to mention that nobody else has is that the Fury has a better downed to standing death stagger animation cancel. The teleporting melee gets you far away from where your character went down at, while the asari's dodge doesn't really do much, and the asari heavy melee has the period after where she has to recover.

[BIGGLESBY]

_only1biggs_ wrote...

SerBiggs wrote...

_only1biggs_ wrote...

SerBiggs wrote...

hey, there's only 1!

This sounds like a Thunderdome of Biggsly proportions.

Only use Shuriken and only spec Tech Armor.

hahaha i'd love that, but you're on ps3 right?

Yes sir, though I'm taking it you're not.

[Kalas747]

Mister Blip wrote...


So let's throw the Reegar aside for a moment. I stomp people who Reegar when I Piranha in the same lobby, even on Platinum. I find that killing a whole mook spawn with one warp and 3-6 piranha shots is optimal and it's actually as fast as the Fury. Beside that, you can deto tech armour whenever you like. So Fury's supposed mook killing superiority is myth when a Valkerie is played well.

Strato, I'm trolling you with gifs as well for that statement.

[Mister Blip]

Gifs or not, "Valkyrie" is not most effective with a Reegar. The ability to kill a Banshee in two clips and an explosion or two is present with both guns. I personally don't think you can say that killing an Atlas/prime/praetorian a bit faster is more valuable than being able to dispatch multiple lieutenant-class enemies without reloading.

Bomb>AF continued damage means than anything else (including on-host phantoms) needs 1-4 shots to kill with Piranha. There is a charge up time for Reegar meaning that you can't toggle it per individual enemy, and it's glitchy as **** meaning up to 40% of that amazing theoretical DPS never occurs.

Yes, you can sometimes one-clip a Platinum Banshee. That's amazing, but it doesn't automatically render superiority in comparison to being able to rapidly dispatch 3 Platinum pyros or a spawn full of marauders and captains. That's like saying the Javelin GI is automatically better than the Fury because he can kill a single target slightly faster.