393 réponses à ce sujet

[Nerevar-as]

CJHook wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

I'm going to throw out a little theory of mine here:

Only destroyers and/or anti-enders don't think a sequel is possible.

My canon Shep destroyed and I think a sequel is possible.

Really really really difficult. But possible.

In fact is the easier way. Galactic civilizations are weakened, so a new threat is viable. Control would require some stupid reason for ShepAIrd not sending its Reapers against the new threat (sadly, stupid writing was the norm in ME3, so not impossible), and in Green the threat should be extragalactic as everybody´s happy now.

Or they could pull an Invisible War and ****** off everybody. Anyway I find worrying that they didn´t show the ending choice statistics. Wonder if they´ll pull  the "vocal minority" again here too.

[AresKeith]

Robosexual wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

That's my input there. I'm just going to wait a bit until I see a Controller/Synthesiser who doesn't think a sequel is possibly though. Because right now it's looking like my theory rings true.

Because your constantly ignoring what others are saying, a sequel is possible but its very difficult without causing a problem.

Which makes others say its not possible

Others who happen to be Destroyers and/or Anti-Enders? I ignore the people who don't think a sequel is possible and fall exactly into the catagory I said they would? You mean I haven't ignored one person who goes contrary to my theory? You mean I've in fact openly engaged with the Contollers and Synthesisers who blow it straight out the water?

Weird.

Believe it or not, there has been people who said a sequel would be difficult for the same reasons I told you

You just don't care because the fact we don't like the ending and over-generalize people

[crimzontearz]

I love people who create theories based on faulty premises

[Clayless]

@KaiserShep

Even with the Reapers it could just be said that they're out fighting the bulk of the threat, but losing due to the threats technology.

Even Destroyers could have Reaper-tech ships that could fill the role the Reapers do in the other scenarios.

Modifié par Robosexual, 22 mai 2013 - 10:26 .

[Clayless]

AresKeith wrote...

Believe it or not, there has been people who said a sequel would be difficult for the same reasons I told you

You just don't care because the fact we don't like the ending and over-generalize people

Controllers and Synthesisers? I would absolutely love to meet them.

[adayaday]

Robosexual wrote...

adayaday wrote...

Synthesis create galaxy wide peace,which remove conflict,and if you havn't noticed  what makes the charaters in the MEU or any other game is conflict.
Ofc it might not  create galaxy wide peace,but then you removes the main reason to pick it in the first place.

That's why I said Intergalactic.

Then you missed my point,the internal conflict is what made ME intresting in the first place.ME2 appears the most popular game out of the 3, and mostly revolved around minor and petty internal conflicts.

[crimzontearz]

Robosexual wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

Believe it or not, there has been people who said a sequel would be difficult for the same reasons I told you

You just don't care because the fact we don't like the ending and over-generalize people

Controllers and Synthesisers? I would absolutely love to meet them.

mcfly is a controller and he believes a sequel would be VERY hard to do and -insert qualifying statement here-

Modifié par crimzontearz, 22 mai 2013 - 10:37 .

[Legbiter]

Shepard's story arc is played out. There's nothing more to be added to it.

[Cainhurst Crow]

Robosexual wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

Believe it or not, there has been people who said a sequel would be difficult for the same reasons I told you

You just don't care because the fact we don't like the ending and over-generalize people

Controllers and Synthesisers? I would absolutely love to meet them.

Hey there, big control ending fan here.

I think a sequel would be difficult to do becasue of the 4 endings. Not impossible, just hard to do.

[AlanC9]

Robosexual wrote...

I'm going to throw out a little theory of mine here:

Only destroyers and/or anti-enders don't think a sequel is possible.

How about "anyone who thinks a sequel is impossible is either a destroyer or an anti-ender"? Seems much more likely to be true.

[AresKeith]

AlanC9 wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

I'm going to throw out a little theory of mine here:

Only destroyers and/or anti-enders don't think a sequel is possible.

How about "anyone who thinks a sequel is impossible is either a destroyer or an anti-ender"? Seems much more likely to be true.

It would still be wrong because we all know its possible just extremely difficult to the point where it probably won't happen

[spirosz]

Could barley make a proper trilogy, I doubt sequel is favorable.

[teh DRUMPf!!]

 Uhh, have you seen their fans?? I'd be reluctant to make any one of them a turkey sandwich, let alone video-game! 

[XI BlackHawx IX]

spirosz wrote...

Could barley make a proper trilogy, I doubt sequel is favorable.

[Shaleist]

Make the sequel a few millennia into the future.
Have most of the details of the Reaper War era become long-forgotten.
???
Profit


Save your Side-quel ideas please Bioware.

[chemiclord]

They don't want to make a sequel for ironically the very thing many fans claim they've abandoned.

Because they have created an ending for speculation and head-canon and don't want to dismiss the choices that led to what they feel are widely divergent stories.

Modifié par chemiclord, 22 mai 2013 - 11:15 .

[Iakus]

HYR 2.0 wrote...

 Uhh, have you seen their fans?? I'd be reluctant to make any one of them a turkey sandwich, let alone video-game! 

And I'd be reluctant to accept one 

[Clayless]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

Hey there, big control ending fan here.

I think a sequel would be difficult to do becasue of the 4 endings. Not impossible, just hard to do.

Technically you wouldn't fall into the category I mentioned, as you think a sequel is possible. I mean the people who are incredibly negative and don't think an sequel is possible at all, and perhaps even the people who think a sequel would only be possible if one of the endings are canonised.

AlanC9 wrote...

How about "anyone who thinks a sequel is impossible is either a destroyer or an anti-ender"? Seems much more likely to be true.

That's what I meant, clarified it on the second page, think I'll just go back and put that in the original post.

Modifié par Robosexual, 22 mai 2013 - 11:34 .

[xlegionx]

Robosexual wrote...

Darth Brotarian wrote...

Hey there, big control ending fan here.

I think a sequel would be difficult to do becasue of the 4 endings. Not impossible, just hard to do.

Technically you wouldn't fall into the category I mentioned, as you think a sequel is possible. I mean the people who are incredibly negative and don't think an sequel is possible at all, and perhaps even the people who think a sequel would only be possible if one of the endings are canonised.

AlanC9 wrote...

How about "anyone who thinks a sequel is impossible is either a destroyer or an anti-ender"? Seems much more likely to be true.

That's what I meant, clarified it on the second page, think I'll just go back and put that in the original post.

As someone who's always picked Destroy, I've always thought as Destroy being the best ending for a sequel, because it has the least absolute outcome, allowing for plenty to happen. In Control and Synthesis, you have the Reaper fleet hanging over everything as a silent threat

[crimzontearz]

.....you do realize a sequel is only possible in 3 instances right? now you are broadening to whole selection to not only the people whom (you think) are saying a sequel is impossible but also those who. add a qualifier? come the **** on

[Clayless]

xlegionx wrote...

As someone who's always picked Destroy, I've always thought as Destroy being the best ending for a sequel, because it has the least absolute outcome, allowing for plenty to happen. In Control and Synthesis, you have the Reaper fleet hanging over everything as a silent threat

It would technically be Control, as that keeps the status quo, whereas Destroy wipes out the Geth and destroys the relays, creating an entirely different galaxy.

[StarcloudSWG]

 I wouldn't be surprised if the way Mac Walters and Casey Hudson set up the ending, was a deliberate attempt to torch the franchise and run.

It seems to me that Mac Walters is more suited to the kind of incoherent comic book plotting typical of DC comics, where no attention is paid to continuity, than to novels, multiple-game series, or anything where he has to pay attention to what happened in previous installments of the story.

It would be good if Mac Walters wrote absolutely nothing for the next Mass Effect game, and let other people do the full story plotting; other people seem to have more capability to remember and research what has happened in previous versions of the Mass Effect series.

[Clayless]

crimzontearz wrote...

.....you do realize a sequel is only possible in 3 instances right? now you are broadening to whole selection to not only the people whom (you think) are saying a sequel is impossible but also those who. add a qualifier? come the **** on

Oh no I can assure you my point has remained the same.

[xlegionx]

Robosexual wrote...

xlegionx wrote...

As someone who's always picked Destroy, I've always thought as Destroy being the best ending for a sequel, because it has the least absolute outcome, allowing for plenty to happen. In Control and Synthesis, you have the Reaper fleet hanging over everything as a silent threat

It would technically be Control, as that keeps the status quo, whereas Destroy wipes out the Geth and destroys the relays, creating an entirely different galaxy.

Control doesn't keep the status quo entirely, as you now have this police force of Reapers. while under Shep-AI, they may be benevolent, ultimately what they say goes. Disagreements are bound to happen somewhere along the road.

The Geth were never a major part of galactic society. besides the wars with the Quarians, the only major interactions they had with organics prior to allying with them was the Battle of the Citadel, which was done under the influence of a Reaper.

As for the relays, they are damaged just as much in Control as in Destroy, the only difference is that they would likely be repaired faster in Control thanks to the Reapers