Aller au contenu

Photo

Elvhen Kingdom: Questions and Speculation


164 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Sir JK

Sir JK
  • Members
  • 1 523 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

I'm not saying it'd be perfect, nor did I say I would be perfectly fine with it either. I said the Elves might be content with it. And as a note, it's less about the religion/culture paving the way for leadership and more the fact that out of the Dalish and CE, the former are the ones who actually have more practiced leadership. The culture revival is simply a byproduct.

And, as you'll note, I said that there would be CE leaders as well because of the desire the Dalish have to learn from them how to live alongside the humans (some Dalish, anyway). So it would not be the Dalish in total control. Given that the City Elves would have, in the first time ever, an actual voice in a society -- as opposed to just amongst their own tight-knit group -- I'm sure they'd convert.

And I'm sure concessions could be made on the part of the Dalish for at the very least a statue to be built (or remain) in certain areas of Andraste so that they could honor her part in their liberation. The Dalish do in fact honor Andraste, even if they don't revere her. 

Hell, for all we know the two religions could intersect and become a new religion, not denying either belief. In that perhaps the Maker created the Creators, who are the guardians of the Elves.

There's always going to be historical errors for nigh-obliterated cultures though, and that's no different for the Dalish. Though I dislike using my Native American (Anishinabe) heritage to prove a point -- not because I'm ashamed of it, but because it just feels like I'm trying to sound like some special snowflake every time I bring it up  -- I understand where you're coming from because of what I've learned Native American history itself.

Granted, that was not so long ago, so history's easier to reclaim for it (easier, but by no means easy itself).

I don't even believe everything the Dalish say.


It's perfectly possible you're right, that the Dalish will prove fairly tolerant and the need for the city elves will cause tempers to mellow a bit. It all depends on how much stress the new society faces. If Orlais and the Chantry are acting very belligriently I expect the life for andrastians in any new dales would turn sour quickly... but a century of peace would likely lead to a society that meshes well together, assuming no larger leadership struggles or factional warfare within the kingdomm

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

As well as the Dalish seeking to have the City Elves teach them how to interact with the humans. This was in one of the codexes.

EDIT: Or maybe it was dialogue. Can't recall. Looking for the source now.


I'd ve very interested in reading this, I hope you find it.

Personally,
I think the Elves would be fine with the Dalish having more authority
then most City Elves. It's not like the Dalish don't revere Andraste
(though simply as a hero for them). And the Dalish do know more about
their lost culture, so it's only natural for them to be in charge.


This, if anything, is precisely the behaviour that would cause city elves to reject the dalish. Noone likes to be patronized.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Which is actually a very wrong outlook for them (the Chantry) to hold.

If venerating your
ancestors is so wrong, then I'll stand upon the graves of all of my
ancestors -- those who fought in wars, those who didn't, those who died
of disease, etc. -- and say "Sorry everybody, seems I'm not acting
accordingly to how people want me to be!"


Mind that venerating and worshipping ancestors are different.
Regardless, religious prosyletization tend to be more about values and the creation of social groups than exact wording in liturgy (though it often looks like the latter). In that sense it's much like politics. Just by advocating that they should not prosetylize you're technically doing the same thing, promoting one value over others. It just happens not to be strictly religious (unless it is?)

One source
in-game even said that when the Dalish and City Elves come together, the
Dalish could teach the CE about their lost culture while the CE could
teach the Dalish about how to live alongside humans.


Is this the same one as above? If not I'd love to be pointed to both. :)

The Dalish
also have a quasi-permanent settlement in Rivain.  Isabela's ignorance
on that could be due to not really traveling to Rivain that much. We
have no idea of how she traveled by ship, where she stopped, how long
her journeys took, etc. while Merrill's lack of knowledge is shown
in-game -- when Thrask asks if she knows Arianni, Merrill retorts with a
smirk that not all Dalish know each other.


Isabela's from Llomeryn, the city where the dalish supposedly live. She reveals that in her romance. One of her monikers is also: "Sharpest blade of Llomeryn", which Zevran gives us in DAO.

That said, that's not saying they don't have the permanent settlement. I've heard Ayesleigh too (but cannot remember where) and it's also possible it's another city alltogether. But it seems unlikely to be Llomeryn itself (makes sense... considering it's on an island).
It's a pity we don't have this in the codex or World of Thedas though.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

There are some City Elves
living in Halamshiral IIRC. The fact that there's a city there with its
own smiths (The Summer Sword talks of a human smith living there) and
the Dalish still manage to hold their Arlathvhens there is quite
interesting.


WoT says that 10 years after the fall of the Dales, the Winter Palace was turned into the Orlesian imperial family's and the nobility's seasonal retreat. Essentially making Halamshiral Orlais' second capitol (talk about rubbing it in towards the elves^_^). So there's definantely a significant human presence and has been for 710 years.

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

As
David Gaider said briefly (and as the games talked about in more
detail), the Dales was actually ruled by a collective council of Mages
with the Keepers (and potential Firsts) drawing their lineage from those
councilmen -- Hassandriel being one of them. However, this does not
mean everyone in the clans is descended from nobility.


Everyone, no. But they probably draw their history and legitimacy from them.

Also... could you point me to where the games discuss this?

#102
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 948 messages
I can't really see there being very many Dalish, given their lifestyle, and the need to not attract unwelcome attention from the human lands they travel through.

City Elves, we know the Val Royeaux Alienage contains 10,000 people. Though that's the largest in Thedas.

A lot about a theoretical new elven nation would depend on the circumstances of it's founding, I'd think. Was it won in war? Was it granted in recognition of some service? Did the Dalish fight alone, or did the City Elves play a significant part? Was there an alliance with human nations or factions?

#103
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 585 messages

Sir JK wrote...
I'd ve very interested in reading this, I hope you find it.

It was Ilen in the Dalish Elf Origin:
"We shall teach the flat-ears the lore they lost... and perhaps they will teach us to understand the shemlen at
last. That is the only way we shall truly live in peace."
He is still using those derogatory terms but, at least, it's a more enligthened attitude than Keeper Gisharel's, for instance.

Modifié par MisterJB, 26 mai 2013 - 12:43 .


#104
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...
Forcible relocation could be an option. Again, I'm not going to presume how the leadership of the People will actually handle this. However, given how intolerant many of the Andrastian faith are towards other religions, their racist views towards elves, and their disdain for mages and magic, then I think relocating the humans currently there might be seen as a viable option to avoid bloodshed.


And yet:

LobselVith8 wrote ... 
The elves don't need to commit genocide to reclaim the kingdom of the Dales.


Hmm... I think I need to bring up what a crime agaist humanity is, how that counts as genocide, and how you're not only condone it, you're actively advocating for it. Your views are repugnant and offensive. 

#105
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
Personally, I think the Elves would be fine with the Dalish having more authority then most City Elves. It's not like the Dalish don't revere Andraste (though simply as a hero for them). And the Dalish do know more about their lost culture, so it's only natural for them to be in charge.


I think it's hard to ask a victimized and oppressed group of people who have always been excldued from social institutions of power to forcibly give up their lifestyle, assimilate into different beliefs, and then be forcibly excluded from social institutions of power based on where and how they were born. 

#106
Aolbain

Aolbain
  • Members
  • 1 206 messages
Actually, I changed my mind. It would be fun to see the elves kill/throw out the native population of southern Orlais and then have the dalish forming a racist government to oppress the city elves. That would kill the notion that elves are morally superior to humans (yeah right).

#107
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages
Don't forget that humanity would have to bend over backwards otherwise they're evil oppressors.

#108
StarcloudSWG

StarcloudSWG
  • Members
  • 2 659 messages
They probably had a gerontocracy too. They seem to refer to their Elders a lot, and back when the Elvhaan has long lifespans and an intimate connection to the Fade, the perspective of hundreds or thousands of years would be valuable.

#109
Asdrubael Vect

Asdrubael Vect
  • Members
  • 1 507 messages

Aolbain wrote...

Actually, I changed my mind. It would be fun to see the elves kill/throw out the native population of southern Orlais and then have the dalish forming a racist government to oppress the city elves. That would kill the notion that elves are morally superior to humans (yeah right).

this would be very easyImage IPBImage IPB

Image IPB
Image IPB
Image IPB

Modifié par Dark Korsar, 27 mai 2013 - 08:13 .


#110
Aolbain

Aolbain
  • Members
  • 1 206 messages

Dark Korsar wrote...

Aolbain wrote...

Actually, I changed my mind. It would be fun to see the elves kill/throw out the native population of southern Orlais and then have the dalish forming a racist government to oppress the city elves. That would kill the notion that elves are morally superior to humans (yeah right).

this would be very easyImage IPBImage IPB


No but you see, evil chantry/humans (remove whichever is appropriate) made him do it. He is actually a really cuddly guy. 

Modifié par Aolbain, 26 mai 2013 - 07:40 .


#111
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

In Exile wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...
Forcible relocation could be an option. Again, I'm not going to presume how the leadership of the People will actually handle this. However, given how intolerant many of the Andrastian faith are towards other religions, their racist views towards elves, and their disdain for mages and magic, then I think relocating the humans currently there might be seen as a viable option to avoid bloodshed.


And yet:

LobselVith8 wrote ... 
The elves don't need to commit genocide to reclaim the kingdom of the Dales.


Hmm... I think I need to bring up what a crime agaist humanity is, how that counts as genocide, and how you're not only condone it, you're actively advocating for it. Your views are repugnant and offensive.


Unless this involves the "mass killings of all members of a nation", then it isn't genocide. It also wouldn't be an act intended to destroy the Andrastian culture or people, but rather relocate them where the humans wouldn't attack the elven people (in this hypothetical scenario) for being independent of human rule and worshipping their own gods again, since that seems to be an affront to the Andrastian faith.

However, the leaders of the People or the elven rebellion currently in occupied Dales may not decide to relocate the humans. As I explained before, it's simply one possible outcome, and I doubt a human protagonist would have any real say in the matter.

#112
Aolbain

Aolbain
  • Members
  • 1 206 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

In Exile wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...
Forcible relocation could be an option. Again, I'm not going to presume how the leadership of the People will actually handle this. However, given how intolerant many of the Andrastian faith are towards other religions, their racist views towards elves, and their disdain for mages and magic, then I think relocating the humans currently there might be seen as a viable option to avoid bloodshed.


And yet:

LobselVith8 wrote ... 
The elves don't need to commit genocide to reclaim the kingdom of the Dales.


Hmm... I think I need to bring up what a crime agaist humanity is, how that counts as genocide, and how you're not only condone it, you're actively advocating for it. Your views are repugnant and offensive.


Unless this involves the "mass killings of all members of a nation", then it isn't genocide. It also wouldn't be an act intended to destroy the Andrastian culture or people, but rather relocate them where the humans wouldn't attack the elven people (in this hypothetical scenario) for being independent of human rule and worshipping their own gods again, since that seems to be an affront to the Andrastian faith.

However, the leaders of the People or the elven rebellion currently in occupied Dales may not decide to relocate the humans. As I explained before, it's simply one possible outcome, and I doubt a human protagonist would have any real say in the matter.


According to the second article of the UN:s Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide the following is
counted as genocide:
" ...any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or
religious group, as such:

        (a) Killing members of the group;
        (B) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
       
© Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated
to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
        (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
        (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. "

So yeah, genocide.
And the land is not the Peoples to take, it belongs to the humans and elves living there now.

Modifié par Aolbain, 26 mai 2013 - 08:46 .


#113
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages
You know what? I'm done posting in this thread again. I'm just going to back away. I only leave the following response here because I can't in good conscious completely step away when someone actively and honestly advocates for crimes against humanity and acts as if that's the moral option

LobselVith8 wrote...
Unless this involves the "mass killings of all members of a nation", then it isn't genocide.


You're wrong. Genocide includes: (i) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (ii) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (iii) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (iv) forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. 

If the Dalish meet the intent requirement, then even killing a few humans satisfies the offence of genocide. 

This is why, for example, why the Circles are actually an example of genocide, by definition. 

But you know what  - let me make the concession here. You're not advocating for genocide. You're advocating for forcible relocation instead, which is one of the most horrible crimes against humanity possible. 

It also wouldn't be an act intended to destroy the Andrastian culture or people,


There are different degrees of intent, not just the subjective "I consciously want to do this" sort of intent. Recklness as to the consequences counts as intent, and that's what we have in both the case of the Circles and in what youre advocating. 

Following as a consequence a course of action that would lead to the destruction of all Andrastian humans in the Dales - which includes their death or relocation - and being reckless as to bringing that consequence about, that gets you past the line (arguably). 

However, the leaders of the People or the elven rebellion currently in occupied Dales may not decide to relocate the humans.


One can only hope that fictional characters don't hold views as morally abhorent as you do, yes. 

Modifié par In Exile, 26 mai 2013 - 08:50 .


#114
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Aolbain wrote...

According to the second article of the UN:s Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide the following is
counted as genocide:
" ...any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or
religious group, as such:

        (a) Killing members of the group;
        (B) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
       
© Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated
to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
        (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
        (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. "

So yeah, genocide.


No one is discussing killing all the humans living in the Dales, or systematically wiping them out all the humans currently living there. The discussion is about the elves reclaiming their kingdom from the Orlesian Empire, who took their land in the same fashion they invaded Nevarra, Kirkwall, and Ferelden. The mention of the elves having a rebellion in their occupied lands makes me hope that the elves might be able to have their own nation again, where they can worship their gods freely and restore their culture again. 

Aolbain wrote...

And the land is not the Peoples to take, it belongs to the humans and elves living there now.


You're welcome to have that opinion, but if I'm given the option to help the disenfranchised elves dislodge the Orlesian Empire from occupying the Dales, then I'll gladly help the elves reclaim their kingdom.

#115
Aolbain

Aolbain
  • Members
  • 1 206 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Aolbain wrote...

According to the second article of the UN:s Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide the following is
counted as genocide:
" ...any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or
religious group, as such:

        (a) Killing members of the group;
        (B) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
       
© Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated
to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
        (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
        (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. "

So yeah, genocide.


No one is discussing killing all the humans living in the Dales, or systematically wiping them out all the humans currently living there. The discussion is about the elves reclaiming their kingdom from the Orlesian Empire, who took their land in the same fashion they invaded Nevarra, Kirkwall, and Ferelden. The mention of the elves having a rebellion in their occupied lands makes me hope that the elves might be able to have their own nation again, where they can worship their gods freely and restore their culture again. 

Aolbain wrote...

And the land is not the Peoples to take, it belongs to the humans and elves living there now.


You're welcome to have that opinion, but if I'm given the option to help the disenfranchised elves dislodge the Orlesian Empire from occupying the Dales, then I'll gladly help the elves reclaim their kingdom.


"Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group". Relocating them by force(at best) sounds like causing serius mental harm. I, too, suport giving the elves a nation of their own (giving them civil rights in the countrys the live in now sound even better) but placing it somwhere another people already lives don't sounds like a good idea.

On the religius angle: A majority of the elves are andrastians, the old gods of Arlathan isnt their gods.
 

#116
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

In Exile wrote...

You know what? I'm done posting in this thread again. I'm just going to back away. I only leave the following response here because I can't in good conscious completely step away when someone actively and honestly advocates for crimes against humanity and acts as if that's the moral option.


I'm advocating for the elves to have a homeland where they will be free to restore their culture and follow their religious beliefs, without being killed for being heathens, or being threatened to convert by the more fanatical elements of the Andrastian Chantry.

In Exile wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Unless this involves the "mass killings of all members of a nation", then it isn't genocide.


You're wrong. Genocide includes: (i) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (ii) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (iii) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (iv) forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.


In other words, what the Chantry of Andraste did to the men, women, and children of the kingdom of the Dales when they forcibly relocated them, stripped them of their culture, and outlawed their religion - to the point of coercing them to worship the Maker and follow human customs.

In Exile wrote...

If the Dalish meet the intent requirement, then even killing a few humans satisfies the offence of genocide.


Except the Dales is an elven nation that has been occupied by a foreign invader that has tried to wipe out their culture and beliefs for centuries, because the Andrastian Chantry thinks the Maker will return if the Chant is spread to the four corners of the world. I'm looking at the big picture, while you're focusing on how to demonize elves for having a place where they can, once again, be free to restore their culture and worship their gods freely, without being persecuted or killed for being heathens.

In Exile wrote...

This is why, for example, why the Circles are actually an example of genocide, by definition.


Since I'm not advocating forcing humans into servitude to the elves, it's not the same thing as the Chantry controlled Circles. I'm talking about helping the elves regain a nation that was theirs, so they can be masters of their own destiny.

In Exile wrote...

But you know what  - let me make the concession here. You're not advocating for genocide. You're advocating for forcible relocation instead, which is one of the most horrible crimes against humanity possible.


I'm saying I'm not opposed to it, because the tenants of the Andrastian Chantry make it violent and intolerant to other religions by virtue of their aim to spread to the Chant to the four corners of the world, which means making everyone follow the same religious views as they do. It's what the Dalish and the elven Warden claim started the war with the Orlesian Empire and the Chantry of Andraste. It's why we have the historical note about the Exalted Marches against Tevinter refer to it as an assault against a nation of heathens. It's why we had entire towns wiped out during the New Exalted Marches, when the people living there couldn't be converted back to the faith of the Chantry of Andraste.

What I'm looking at is the opportunity to give the elves a homeland again, a place where they can be free to follow their own religious views, and have their own culture without being forced to adopt a foreign one. Since that isn't possible within the Andrastian kingdoms, then the only possible solution is for the elves to have their own land again.

In Exile wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

It also wouldn't be an act intended to destroy the Andrastian culture or people,


There are different degrees of intent, not just the subjective "I consciously want to do this" sort of intent. Recklness as to the consequences counts as intent, and that's what we have in both the case of the Circles and in what youre advocating. 

Following as a consequence a course of action that would lead to the destruction of all Andrastian humans in the Dales - which includes their death or relocation - and being reckless as to bringing that consequence about, that gets you past the line (arguably).


It would lead to having a kingdom where the elves can, once again, freely worship the Creators and restore elven culture, which is currently outlawed by the Andrastian kingdoms to the point where templars hunt down the Dalish clans and prohibit the Alienage elves from worshipping anyone but the Maker. The Andrastian Chantry has tried to systematically wipe out elven culture for centuries, and this would be a key moment to help the elves keep their culture and religion from being lost.

In Exile wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

However, the leaders of the People or the elven rebellion currently in occupied Dales may not decide to relocate the humans.


One can only hope that fictional characters don't hold views as morally abhorent as you do, yes. 


I think relocation would be a better alternative to actual genocide, i.e. wiping out the Andrastians humans living there by killing all of them. I don't think the humans should be killed simply for being humans, whether or not they're as racist and intolerant as some of the religious Andrastians we've met.

Modifié par LobselVith8, 26 mai 2013 - 09:23 .


#117
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages
Also, what is up with the absolute hardon for the Dales? They aren't even the OG Homeland. The Elves could literally settle anywhere and make a new home for themselves, as far away from humans as they like.

#118
Aolbain

Aolbain
  • Members
  • 1 206 messages

BlueMagitek wrote...

Also, what is up with the absolute hardon for the Dales? They aren't even the OG Homeland. The Elves could literally settle anywhere and make a new home for themselves, as far away from humans as they like.


Exactly. There are no reasons to destroy the lives to thousands of humans just because some elf was a history buff.

#119
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 948 messages

BlueMagitek wrote...

Also, what is up with the absolute hardon for the Dales? They aren't even the OG Homeland. The Elves could literally settle anywhere and make a new home for themselves, as far away from humans as they like.


Not really sure if there's anywhere in known Thedas that's reasonably habitable that's not settled at least somewhat by humans

#120
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Aolbain wrote...

"Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group". Relocating them by force(at best) sounds like causing serius mental harm.


I'm thinking about ending the serious bodily and mental harm that the Alienage elves and the Dalish elves have had to endure for centuries. An inconvenience of relocation for the humans isn't the same as being forced to live in perpetual poverty and being wiped out down to the children in a purge, or the nomadic elves of the Dalish clans who are hunted down by the templars.

Aolbain wrote...

I, too, suport giving the elves a nation of their own (giving them civil rights in the countrys the live in now sound even better) but placing it somwhere another people already lives don't sounds like a good idea.


The elven pantheon is outlawed in the Andrastian kingdoms, and I don't see the Andrastians being tolerant of the worship of other religions in their midst. I'm also not keen on leaving the elves at the mercy of the humans when I've seen the massacre of the Alienage Orphanage in Denerim during the last purge, how everyone ignored the killing of elven children by a serial killer in Kirkwall, and even Bann Vaughan taking women out of the Alienage in broad daylight. As Duncan says, it's difficult to convince humans that elves are people when they've spent their entire lives seeing them as less than people.

Aolbain wrote...

On the religius angle: A majority of the elves are andrastians, the old gods of Arlathan isnt their gods.


What does that have to do with the elves who don't worship the Maker? I'm talking about having a kingdom where the elves can freely worship the Creators and rebuild their culture and society, without being forced to capitulate to the demands of the Chantry of Andraste or the human nations. A place where the elves can be their own masters, instead of being limited to servitude as servants or slaves.

#121
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages
^Wulf :

Isn't the land south of Ferelden, past the Kocari Wilds, Uncharted Territory? As they're all on the same continent, there's no way to escape *all* humans, but there's a difference in settling near barbarian tribes and settling next to established nations.

Modifié par BlueMagitek, 26 mai 2013 - 09:36 .


#122
Aolbain

Aolbain
  • Members
  • 1 206 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Aolbain wrote...

"Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group". Relocating them by force(at best) sounds like causing serius mental harm.


I'm thinking about ending the serious bodily and mental harm that the Alienage elves and the Dalish elves have had to endure for centuries. An inconvenience of relocation for the humans isn't the same as being forced to live in perpetual poverty and being wiped out down to the children in a purge, or the nomadic elves of the Dalish clans who are hunted down by the templars.

Aolbain wrote...

I, too, suport giving the elves a nation of their own (giving them civil rights in the countrys the live in now sound even better) but placing it somwhere another people already lives don't sounds like a good idea.


The elven pantheon is outlawed in the Andrastian kingdoms, and I don't see the Andrastians being tolerant of the worship of other religions in their midst. I'm also not keen on leaving the elves at the mercy of the humans when I've seen the massacre of the Alienage Orphanage in Denerim during the last purge, how everyone ignored the killing of elven children by a serial killer in Kirkwall, and even Bann Vaughan taking women out of the Alienage in broad daylight. As Duncan says, it's difficult to convince humans that elves are people when they've spent their entire lives seeing them as less than people.

Aolbain wrote...

On the religius angle: A majority of the elves are andrastians, the old gods of Arlathan isnt their gods.


What does that have to do with the elves who don't worship the Maker? I'm talking about having a kingdom where the elves can freely worship the Creators and rebuild their culture and society, without being forced to capitulate to the demands of the Chantry of Andraste or the human nations. A place where the elves can be their own masters, instead of being limited to servitude as servants or slaves.


1. Yes, the city elves lives in dispair but I dont see how that justifies throwing people out of their homes.
2. That was what I was talking about, freedom of religion. It would take hard work but it was archivabel in real life and should be posible in Thedas.
3. So we're back at the dalish master race thingy again?.

#123
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages
"They did it first" isn't a valid excuse for genocide, Lobsel.

#124
Aolbain

Aolbain
  • Members
  • 1 206 messages

Dave of Canada wrote...

"They did it first" isn't a valid excuse for genocide, Lobsel.


Of course it is, but only when elves does it.

#125
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages
Aolbain, how dare you suggest such a thing? Now I'm going to need to rant about how your people (the Dwarves) are the cause of all the Dalish's ills! </Dalish Storyteller>