If an AI tried to spread through our network and act maliciously, it would likely die somewhere along the line as hard lines are disconnected, and it finds that it's run out of tech that supports it.
Modifié par KaiserShep, 11 juin 2013 - 10:19 .
Modifié par KaiserShep, 11 juin 2013 - 10:19 .
And you made the claim that renovate was all they did. It was explisitly not. They rebuilt it from the ground up. You simply twisted my words as usual.remydat wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
Wrong. The station discription states it was stripped completely bare when the quarians abandoned it. A dead framework. With nothing on it.
They weren't just renovating it - they were completely restructuring it from the ground up. A much more complicated task. There was literally nothing remaining. The geth rebuilt it and increased the original size exponentally.
So, sorry, but yet again, your example falls flat - the geth made that station in ten years. And 7% of all geth moved into it in months after seperating from the True Geth.
And AGAIN, the geth made the galaxy see themselves as douchebags. And the quarians didn't react out of prejudce at all. They reacted out of fear of a being that had no morals or restrictions. A loaded gun with no safeties. It's not prejudice to save your family over a stranger, especally one that has no (known) empathy to you.
Sorry you said renovate not me. I simply used your words. And you said it took 10 years to build a single station. A framework is still a start. You seem to be changing your tune. They built something based on something that was already there using resources from mines and the like that were already there. That is a lot easier than wandering space and building something without even a framework and when you have to find planets with mineable resources and build mines and the like.
Unarmed peace envoys sent to make contact with them, despite the quarians in front of the Citadel protesting that they march into the Veil and get Rannoch back? That's not what you consider the benifet of a doubt?remydat wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
You do realize that the Council gave them the benifit of a doubt and tried to talk to them first to get their side of things, right?
They were made to not care about anything. They weren't given emotions or morals. No way of considering anyone wroth anything besides logic. And the geth were completely self-sufficant. They didn't need organics for anything, or felt anything to their death or to killing them. They were the epitimy of a loose cannon - an armed gun that could go off. You can't blame someone for not wanting to rsik their family on a coin toss.
Also, organics were not supposed to teact them, because they were not supposed to be intelligent in the first place. The Codex entry "Geth: Technology" states that the geth were spicifically designed to be nothing more then commerical V.I.s with a trainable, animal intelliigence. Thus, they would have no need for morals or ethics becasue they aren't built to think. And that is explisitly untrue, because EDI is a shcakled A.I. who's processing systems are locked by Cerberus restraints. She is locked, and her morals were pre-set, because she only gained the abilaty to self-modify after Joker undid the Shackling.
Also, this is in the damn game. The discription of the Heretic station spicifically lists the location of the station as unknwon because the Nebula obscures it. Anyone that played the game would have read this, so I find it hard to believe you missed it.
And here's a counter-fact. You are a dangerous machine that doesn't have any comprehension of morals or ethics. You don't need them. You don't care about them. And on top of it all, someone gave you the chance to make it right by giving you the benifet of a doubt and state your peace, and you and you alone [/b]killed them, proving your attackers right in the eyes of everyone else. You've made everyone else think YOU are an enemy, and believe your enemy, and it's nobody's fault but yours. You made them see you as douchebags. YOU. Their actions didn't make the galaxy see you as douchebages. Your own actions did that. The Council gave you a chance, and you killed it dead.
You just made your own hell.
The council did not give them the benefit of the doubt. They were just not stupid enough to go attack the Geth who just slaughtered billions of people in less than a year without getting more information on them.
Whether organics were suppose to teach them or not is irrelevant. That is not their fault. That was the Quarians choice not the Geth. The Quarians like Shep and his crew could have taught them morals. They specifically chose not to. Why should I hold it against the Geth that their creators were stupid?
Um, you would have a point if the Council decided to rescind their law. They didn't. They responded by exterminating harmless AI on the Citadel. So give me a break. The only reason the Geth were not killed like those Citadel AI is because they proved they could defend themselves.
KaiserShep wrote...
But it has everything to do with engineering. They engineered an automated system that has no actual failsafe against malfunction, and apparently allows for open wireless access everywhere all the time, and apparently there's no readily accessible power supplies that can simply be disconnected to reduce the spread. So they made it completely self sufficient, and designed it in such a way that basic, hard controls simply do not exist.
If an AI tried to spread through our network and act maliciously, it would likely die somewhere along the line as hard lines are disconnected, and it finds that it's run out of tech that supports it.
A little tact never hurt anyone, right? You can say that you don't want to sift through a wall of text in ways that aren't going to ****** the other person off, because then it just becomes a grudge match. Trust me - I've been there (although you probably figured that much out already).KiwiQuiche wrote...
Well, I was trying to be blunt about it, not vague which irritates some people.
I like my sling. I shall use it to knock down Goliath.
But the geth were in the care of the quarians, the geth were willing to surrender themselves to other quarians to save Creators. They didn't understand what was happening; the quarians were fully aware they were trying to kill the geth, which is the difference.
The Council already had their stance clear by they time they tried 'peace' tactics; A.I was illegal. Why would you want to talk to someone when your very existance violates their laws? Why would you invite someone into your home, pass your front door when you know your existance is against their law? You wouldn't. The geth erred on the side of caution as the Quarians had already massively proved that organics didn't like geth.
Quarians attacked first. That's what started it all. Therefore, I don't place them on the same level. Also they had circumstances that differ from each other which caused them to react in different manners. That's why I don't place them on the same coin.
I don't give any credence to the "Quarians need Rannoch to survive" argument, so lets leave that be.
The trust issue; Quarians fault. They attacked first with no valid proof but assumptions and paranoia. Geth finally retaliated. Even 300 years later, Quarians still plot on killing/enslaving the geth. The geth at least don't actively plan the quarians murders.
Legion says in ME3 the geth believed him when he shared his memories; they also stop firing while Shepard is on Rannoch after killing the Reaper- The Quarians must be talked down. Not the geth, who stop at Legion. Even Tali on her own cannot talk down the other Admirals. The geth trust Legion. Tali must have Shepard's and Koris's backing for the other Admirals to even care what she says.
By not attacking them? It's fairly simple. Don't provoke the lethal person down the road. It would be better to at least prove you aren't a threat, that you will not harm them or try to hurt them simply for being what they are. So how about we just agree- we both have polar opinions in this regard and we aren't going to change our minds soon.
Geth couldn't tell the difference between man, women or alien species. To them, organics proved themselves hostile since their minds were so immature and young. And, ultimately, they let the quarians leave. Yes I know it was because they couldn't understand the consequences of killing a whole species, yet they let the quarians leave. The quarians would not have been so merciful.
As I said above, the Council had A.I as illegal- the geth obviously didn't think the Council wanted to talk with them in good faith. So they barred their doors. Understandable.
Yes I would be scared- but I wouldn't hurl it in a fire. I would explain why messing around with that was a bad idea. That's the difference between you and I; I would take a chance with them, you wouldn't. As you said, 50/50. We are just on a different 50 than the other.
Shockingly enough, yes I can. Though synthetics just take longer for it as they aren't prones to fits of passion as organics are.
I don't see how you couldn't - it's the first thing you see when you select the Heretic Station on the ME2 Galaxy Map.remydat wrote...
Silver,
I did not read about this so I was going by the words you said and you said renovate not rebuild. Next time use words you actually mean as I am not psychic. In any event please provide a link as you word cannot be trusted since apparently you dont know the difference between renovate and rebuild and then want to blame me for taking you at your word.
No claim is ever made that these spies were unarmed. Again provide a link and stop making stuff up. And if I knock on the door and no one answers I walk away. I dont invite myself in especially when it is the home of my enemy.
Finally, killing the Citadel AI that have no connection to the Geth because they are synthetic is the definition of racism. You killed them not because of what they did but because of what other synthetics did.
Wrong. It goes back to them both havong flaws.remydat wrote...
Which goes back to they were stupid. Although not sure an EMP fries software. Even if it did all the Geth would have to do is upload their programs to the extranet. An EMP has a short range. The extranet is spread across the whole galaxy. Just like I can access my save games for Mass Effect via the cloud anywhere in the world.
Again, dead wrong.Solmanian wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
No, it isn't. You have misunderstood half of it.Solmanian wrote...
Look silver, I'm about to go to bed, so I don't have time to respond to every point in your wall of text. I'll just say that I have read it all, and atleast 50% is your personel "headcannon" and not actual cannon. The quarian attack was in response for the geth attack on the citadel? False. The quarians been planning that war for 300 years. They erased the part of their history that protrayed the founders of the flotilla (the top political and military echelon during the so called "morning war") as mass murderers who performed genocide and murdered their own people, and whose actions doomed their species. Talli is a nice charecter with an interesting personality; but every time you talk to her about the conflict with the geth, you can plainly hear the indoctrination of the flotila, that she simply parroting the same senseless statement that were drilled into her head at childhood.
First point - Wrong.
According to the Codex, and the in-game information, the quarians have been aimlessly drifting for 300 years, spending all that time looking for another world. Ekuna is one example - the quarians discovered it, and the Council forced them off the planet. Why bother looking for a new world at all if "you're planning to take the old one back the entire time?" Hell, in ME2, Gerrel says that the quarians only just now started debating on war. Gerrel himself says this, as does the Codex which states that the entirety of the past 300 years have been spent on finding a new world.
Second point - Wrong.
The quarians kept historical records of the war. It's even stated in the Codex Entry "Quarians: Religion" that the quarians blaime their own carelesness for the War, in that they let the geth develop to far and didn't notice. The quarians accept their mistakes and aren't afraid to admit they made them. Contrary to what you might have been spoon-fed, they are not spiteful or crafty. They are just vagabonds who are tormented by self-regret. They wouldn't be afraid to admit they were wrong - as shown when they stand down at the end of the Rannoch War. Remember?
And last I checked, the geth taking the Council's "benifet of a doubt" peace envoys and killing them made the quarians look pretty damn accurate in their beliefs. After all, if you watched people give someone the benifit of a doubt, only to see them shot dead on arrival without even a warnning, what are you going to think. It wasn't any "indoctrination" - It was the geth killing the Council's envoys, and later on watching them burn half the galaxy, that made Tali think that way. Can you say anyone that was involved in Eden Prime (Ashley Williams) , Feros, or the Battle of the Citadel isn't justified in hating geth?
I think you are the one that missunderstood my post.
To your first point: In ME2 you encounter the flotila and talk with it's people. They tell you that the quarians are split between two main factions:
1. The ones that believe the quarians should start colonising new worlds, because the flotila heavily restricts the development of their species (birth control, constant scarcity of resources). In a nutshell: they think the quarians should move on.
2. The ones that believe the quarians should retake the homeworld (or die trying), and that establishing colonies is admitting surrender (in a war they lost three centuries ago).
We're told that the colony was a way to appease the first factioni, but from talking with the admirals we see the "hawkes" are dominant. There's no argument on wether the geth should be destroyed, only wether the quarians are capable of accomplishing that goal.
Drifting aimlessly for 300 years? You know how much you can accomplish in three centures? In less than a century we turned into a space faring species with thousands of satelites in orbit. The quarians could've easily colonised numerous planet and rebuild their civilization; heck they could terraform planets in that time span. Why didn't they? Because the quarian laedership Modus operandi was working under the assumption the the destruction of the geth and reclaimation of the homeworld are just around the corner, and they should be in a "holding pattern" until that happens.
"Gerrel himself says this, as does the Codex which states that the entirety of the past 300 years have been spent on finding a new world."
Space is big, with a virtually infinite number of planets. The asari, batarians, humans, turians, salarians, elcor, hanar and volus have established thousands of colonies. The quarians had three centuries and tens of thousands of ship. They didn't find a single world that both fits and isn't in citadel space? I say they just weren't really looking. Can't remember where (probably in the books) but the "actively seeking out a new world" notion, is a fairly recent thing. I assume the only "searching" they did until then was wating for "a world that is just perfect" to just fall into their lasp.
To your second point:
That is exactly what I'm saying: the quarians are unrepentent. They think their only mistake was a lack of hindsight; that their mistake was allowing the geth to evolve, and afer that in failing to destroy them in a timely fashion. I don't think we encounter a single quarian in the MEverse, that admits that trying to commit a genocide against the geth was wrong, that there it is morally reprehensible to wipe out a sentient species. That is the main isssue that I (and the majority of species in the MEverse) have with the quarians. They are the direct descendant of genocidal ****s, and don't deserve credit for being unsuccessful genocidal ****s. When superman stops lex lothur from taking over the world, does Lex lothur gets moral credit for failing?
Modifié par silverexile17s, 12 juin 2013 - 04:11 .
Modifié par remydat, 12 juin 2013 - 01:41 .
Well, then google it if you don't have the time to replay the game. I'm sure the ME wiki has a copy of the transcript. Point is, you see that there is information you've missed, or don't have. Indicitive of the fact that alot of what you accused of being "headcannon" might not have been so after all.remydat wrote...
Silver,
I dont read every entry when I have played the game for 500 hours. The last time I clicked on the heretic station and actually read what it said was my first or second playthrough years ago. And you and I are not killing each other so there is no comparison. When I try to kill you then you can compare.
And once again, if I knock on a door and no one answers I dont go in uninvited. Its called breaking and entering if I do. If the Geth did not answer then the solution is to leave PERIOD. The book states what the organics claimed ie they are diplomats. Organics lie all the time. Show me a link where a Geth admits they were diplomats. Just one.
It is called racism silver. If a black man does something to you and you decide to kill all black men because they are also black, thats racism. Perhaps you should consult a dictionary for a definition. Those citadel AI were victims of racism.
And yes the Geth could have released a message. However they are not obligated to be nice to racists. I dont go around trying to appease racists. You seem to ignore the point. The geth have done stupid and bad things. The quarians and organics started it. I repeat the organics started it. When they admit they were wrong and that the Geth have a right to exist then come talk to me.
Modifié par silverexile17s, 12 juin 2013 - 04:51 .
silverexile17s wrote...
Also, It looks like you continue to ignore what DenionSlayer and I said about Tali admitting that the quarians have pathological guilt over how their ancestors jumped to conclusions about the geth - something you keep glancing over. They already have said that the geth deserve to exist - they even said they feel the geth deserve Rannoch more then they do. The only reason they needed it back was because they would die otherwise.
They already have admitted this same thing - you just refuse to listen.
When you accept that both were equally faultible for this mess, then come and talk to me. As is, you refuse to acknowledge any other law but what you tell yourself.
remydat wrote...
Dunabar wrote...
So don't trust the Geth even if you have peaceful intent, thanks Rem. You make my hate for the Geth feel even more justified. Again the Quarians may not be perfect, but they don't just hammer someone off the bat. They only fire on ships if they cannot I.D the reason for the approaching ship coming at the Migrant fleet, or a Quarian on pilgrimage informs the fleet that the ship they are on is not friendly. Now as for what I have bolded, the Geth have shown no evidence that they wouldn't fire on just anyone who entered Geth space either.
As for your question - The Morning War is in the past, that cannot be changed now. Those Quarians are long dead by now, only the Geth servers that house the original data that is dated during that time are still around. The Quarians of the past made a mistake, paid for it in blood, and had to live with the choices they made. The Quarians of today though are being punished for actions that they were not even alive to commit. Again though the Quarian people are not perfect, but even a Quarian that is the offspring of a exile can go home to their people.
Short answer: That depends on when the Geth will finally stop shooting diplomats.
They tried to kill the Geth off the bat. Did you miss in the morning war where the Geth were being gunned down because they asked questions? The Quarians don't fire on other organics just like I don't see the Geth firing on other synthetics. Find me evidence of a Geth ship approaching and a Quarian not firing on it? You can't. What the Quarians do with other organics proves nothing.
Plenty of people currently living today had ancestors kicked off land that those ancestors possessed 300 years ago. None of them except a small few sit there and cry about it and act like they have more entitlement to the land than the people currently living there. This is non-sense. They have not been living on the land for 300 years. They have no more right to Rannoch than I have to some place in Africa that my ancestors lived on 300 years ago.
And pretty sure the Geth did not shoot a single diplomat until the Council that sent that diplomat had a law that said they should not exist and the Quarians decided to enforce that law by trying to exterminate them. That diplomat aka Council spy was killed because the Quarians decided to kill. So we still arrive back at the same question. How many have to die before you consider talking first before resorting to killing? You keep trying to talk about the aftermath of the decision to kill the Geth. I am asking you about the decision before a single organic was killed by the Geth.
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
Also, It looks like you continue to ignore what DenionSlayer and I said about Tali admitting that the quarians have pathological guilt over how their ancestors jumped to conclusions about the geth - something you keep glancing over. They already have said that the geth deserve to exist - they even said they feel the geth deserve Rannoch more then they do. The only reason they needed it back was because they would die otherwise.
They already have admitted this same thing - you just refuse to listen.
When you accept that both were equally faultible for this mess, then come and talk to me. As is, you refuse to acknowledge any other law but what you tell yourself.
The bold is why I've said it isn't about right or wrong. It is about survival. We fight or we die. The Geth cut off negotiations because they did not reach consensus -- which doesn't simply mean we can't come to an agreement in geth talk on a yes or no issue, it means NO.
The Quarians developed a weapon that can take out the Geth. They decided to go all in. They were doing fine until the reaper landed and offered the Geth upgrades which the Geth took even though the Geth knew the reapers were going to kill them anyway.
So the choices for the Geth were:
* surrender to the Quarians, be enslaved by them, and fight against the reapers.
* side with the reapers, kill the Quarians and other organics, then die by the reapers.
* fight alone against the Quarians and die.
They chose to join the reapers, kill the Quarians, and die by the reapers. Then Shepard showed up. And unluckily for the Geth, when Svetlana showed up, they got turned into scrap metal.
Modifié par shodiswe, 12 juin 2013 - 06:39 .
Dunabar wrote...
The Quarians of the past did try kill the Geth right off the bat, yes.
erezike wrote...
Dunabar wrote...
The Quarians of the past did try kill the Geth right off the bat, yes.
They attempted to shut down their computers...
How can you kill something which isnt alive?
I find some geth sympathizers highly patronizing of the geth.
Do you all really believe the geth arent capable of lying or other forms of manipulation because they are only machines?
Do you really think all they tell you and show is the truth? that they arent caable of working behind your back. spy on you... and destroy human colonies or quarrian without warnings.
How naive and patronizing can you be.
Dont let Edi preferences confuse you. edi was programmed to work with human and respect them.
The geth were programmed to be as efficent as they can be.
which is why the geth have no problem in wiping out all organic life. right after they will finish dealing with the reapers...
Modifié par shodiswe, 12 juin 2013 - 08:33 .
shodiswe wrote...
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
Also, It looks like you continue to ignore what DenionSlayer and I said about Tali admitting that the quarians have pathological guilt over how their ancestors jumped to conclusions about the geth - something you keep glancing over. They already have said that the geth deserve to exist - they even said they feel the geth deserve Rannoch more then they do. The only reason they needed it back was because they would die otherwise.
They already have admitted this same thing - you just refuse to listen.
When you accept that both were equally faultible for this mess, then come and talk to me. As is, you refuse to acknowledge any other law but what you tell yourself.
The bold is why I've said it isn't about right or wrong. It is about survival. We fight or we die. The Geth cut off negotiations because they did not reach consensus -- which doesn't simply mean we can't come to an agreement in geth talk on a yes or no issue, it means NO.
The Quarians developed a weapon that can take out the Geth. They decided to go all in. They were doing fine until the reaper landed and offered the Geth upgrades which the Geth took even though the Geth knew the reapers were going to kill them anyway.
So the choices for the Geth were:
* surrender to the Quarians, be enslaved by them, and fight against the reapers.
* side with the reapers, kill the Quarians and other organics, then die by the reapers.
* fight alone against the Quarians and die.
They chose to join the reapers, kill the Quarians, and die by the reapers. Then Shepard showed up. And unluckily for the Geth, when Svetlana showed up, they got turned into scrap metal.
Reaching a consensus wasn't about making a peace with the Quarians because the Quarians had already rejected the peacenegotiations to tali before attacking.
The part about Legion telling Tali the Geth were having trouble reachign a consensus was after the Quarians attacked, maybe even weeks after when they eventualy reached a consensus to say "YES" to the Reapers after the Quarians had killed billions of Geth living on the Dyson bubble.
Also, not reaching a consensus isn't "NO" it means they are undecided and either needs more time to think or it's something they won't be able to agree upon in the window of opportunity for any given decision.
I mean, why would the Geth be voting on Tali's and Legion's Peacenegotiations when the Quarian admiralty had already voted "NO" to it and then attacked the Geth? Until the Quarians show an interest in peace or talking there isn't much to talk or vote on.
This shows a huge gap in your reasoning Julia. Also this has been up on the table as a known fact for months even if some people do seem slow to the fact that Shepard is asking about their communications after the attack and Tali tells us about them. It's an ingame fact, if you would have had any credibility then it would be sinking like a rock right about now.
http://www.youtube.c...JWTBbJJE#t=570s
Notice the "AND SINCE THE ATTACK?" in the conversation wheel?
silverexile17s wrote...
A little tact never hurt anyone, right? You can say that you don't want to sift through a wall of text in ways that aren't going to ****** the other person off, because then it just becomes a grudge match. Trust me - I've been there (although you probably figured that much out already).
I'm not against a sling. I'd just rather not have it be mud-slinging.
But they weren't intended to be living beings in the first place. How would you feel if you're tools, appliances (whatever you equate the geth to) were watching your actions without you knowing it? If you do something bad and don't know they are watching, are you responcible for teaching them that, or is it an accident because you didn't know you were being watched.
There's a difference between something mimicing you, and consencely teaching them. The latter is from an intent to make the person share your belifes and way of life. That explisitly was not what the quarians wanted. They wanted simple tools that wouldn't have the same weaknesses that organics would. A cheep labor force that could work 24/7 and be self-sufficant on it's own, so no riots and no rebellons. It's basically how modern labor here on Earth is being replace by automated machines that do all the menial, laborus, and dangerous work instead of risking humans. The geth weren't ment to be people - they were ment to be automated/remote-controled soldiers, workers, construction units, seed-planters, crop-harvesters, hazmat units, automated surgions, and crash-test units. All the things that living beings would never subject themselves to. And at a simple call, they could all become the best fighting millita in existance. Just mindless stand-in's. That's all the geth were created to be. They weren't in the "care" of the quarians they way offspring would be. It was more like a craftsmen and his tools
So naturally, it was a shock when they started asking questions.
The quarians made the geth to be completely self-sufficant. They didn't need the quarians for anything, but the quarians needed them for everything. Using what were, basically, crash-test dummys for everything dangerous is fine. But the idea that they might be forcing living beings into doing this..... well, if that was true, then the geth would not be satisfied with being a labor force. And there was nothing the geth needed from the quarians that they couldn't make or take themselves. In fact, without the geth, the quarians were the ones that were screwed, because they had become reliant on the geth for nearly everything. Yet the geth had no such reliance on the quarians. This became a fear that, having not been given emotions, morals, or ethics (what would automated "stand-ins" need with those?), the geth would see no reason to keep the quarians around, and take their resources for themselves. The quarians would be cast aside, if not killed outright.
Now, granted, they didn't know that this was the enivitable outcome, but they decided they would rather not bet their entire race on the answer. Was it jumping the gun? Hell yes. Was the fear that caused it unreasonable or unsjutified? No.
Actually, this isn't ture. According to the Codex, the anti-synthetic laws were not as strict as they are now until after the Morning War. If anything, it seems that the geth killing the peace envoys was the spark that triggered a more through systemic repressal of A.I.s then before. And likewise, why would the organics even try to talk then? Yet they did. They tried to talk with the geth. It's stated that the reason the A.I, laws are so harsh are because no one wants a repeat of the geth. The geth are the example brought up every time this rule is disscussed. While the rule did exist back then, it was not enforced so harshly until after the geth's arisal to sentiance.
Also, legally, Rannoch is not their home - it's technically stolen property. By law, as members of the Citadel Races, the Council would have had full legal athourity to march into the Veil and kill the geth. They didn't. Instead they sent peace envoys and tried to make contact with them. But the geth never responded to hails, and when ships decided to go in and talk face to face, they were shot dead. In fact, the only reason the ships went into the Veil was because the geth didn't answer hails. Had the geth answered hails, the ships wouldn't even have gone into the Veil to begin with.
Was answering hails with a simple "no, thank you" and turn down the organics on at least semi-amicable terms really that hard or horrible to do? Or sending a wide-band signal over the extranet asking for solitude so that teh ships would know to not come past the border in the frist place? Especally when the only reason they entered your space is because you weren't answering said hails? After all, the Council respects the batarian's wishes and don't cross into their space when warned off. I don't see why the geth couldn't have done the same.
But can you look at the unessessary slaughter the geth caused in the Morning War, and honestly say that the geth weren't guilty of overreacting too? They were pretty damn overzelous in their retaliation - they could have psuhed the quarians back without needing to be so ruthless and drive them completely out of the Veil. Prove they could fight back and make the quarians leave them alone - that's one thing. Driving them to near-extinction is another.
So I'm sorry, but the geth are just as guilty of a gross overreaction as the quarians were. Look at the track record of both.
Both were mostly isolationsist.
Both governened by group consensis.
Both have overreacted in life or death situations.
Both developed an insular sociaty.
Both were considered outcasts by the galaxy, and largely due to their own actions.
Both felt heavy remorse for what they did to the other.
Both did not trust the other because of each-other's past actions.
Both did not trust their "black sheep" (Legion & Tali) enough to bank their races on their peace ideal
Both were forced into circumstances in which they had to choose either survival, or death.
Both chose survival, and did not do so out of any form of racisim or bigotry.
And look at their chart of actions in their lifetimes.
Quarians make assumptions on geth nature. Geth go over the top in fighting back.
Quarians spend 300 years running from the problem. Geth spend 300 years ignoring the problem.
Geth kill anyone that tries to talk with them. Quarians live on scraps of everyone else.
Rouge quarian admiral experiments with geth test subjects. Rouge geth faction attacks the galaxy with Reaper.
Quarians panic from Reaper invasion, try to get Rannoch. Geth panic from quarian invasion, side with Reapers.
How are they different? The only thing different about them is their race. The've both taken similar actions, and have a similar cultural structure. And when quarians jumped to conclusions, the geth evened out the scale by acting overzelous. The actions they took were equally fultable. The quarians started the war. The geth were responcible for the death tool. One side made a conclusion. The other was unessessarily harsh. It all evens out.
Codex Entry: ME3: Planets and Locations: Rannoch.
The planet Rannoch, an arid planet orbiting an older star in the Tikkun system, is the former quarian homeworld. Almost three hundred years ago, the quarians were driven from Rannoch by the geth,
synthetic servants who gained sapience and rebelled against their
creators. Although Rannoch is now largely uninhabited, the geth have
acted as caretakers, working to repair the planet's ecology, restore
ancient structures, and cultivate some farmland.
Rannoch has no insect life. As a result, its pollinating plants
evolved to rely on animals for propagation. This symbiosis between flora
and fauna is responsible for the quarians' weakened immune systems,
which made colonization of other planets extremely difficult after their
exile from Rannoch. For many quarians, reclaiming their homeworld from
the geth is a matter of both cultural and physiological necessity.[/i]
The second paragraph, underlined and bolded, are the improtant parts in this. "Quarians need Rannoch to survive" is completely cannon - as cannon as the Morning War itself. Add to this that the Council didn't let them have any other worlds, not even ones they themselves found, and it makes it pretty clear that the quarians are a doomed race without Rannoch. hell, this is the only reason why they attack the geth at all - because they are a doomed race without a world. And only one world can still sustain them - their homeworld, with it's resoruces untouched by the geth, and the geth's defenses becoming the perfect fortress for their people. Literally their last hope.
But can you say that the Heretic's actions gave anyone in the galaxy any reason to trust the geth? And you yourself said that the geth "following base nature" was inevitable, and the quarians believed that too - it's the reason why they attacked in the Morning War. Because they thought the geth wouldn't move past their emotonal limitations, and would just cast them aside and take their resources.
And again, that is explisitly not what the quarians are planning. They just want Rannoch back period. They don't want to fight anyone - the geth are just in the way. And remember, at this point, the quarians think the geth are allies of the Reapers. They think the geth already tried to commit genocide against the entire galaxy at the Battle of the Citadel. How is anyone supposed to even consider the geth innocent when they say nothing and let themselves take the fall for all the Heretics did? Wouldn't Koris, Tali and Legion's peace arguement been more valid, had the quarians seen that more then just one geth was behind the proposal? That the geth that attacked the Citadel aren't the same ones behind the Veil, and that they don't want to fight either? How can you make any move to assume innocence when the other never even makes the plea for innocence in the first place? What Shepard knows is not known to the rest of the galaxy. Hell, it isn't until the end of the Rannoch War that the rest of the galaxy learns that there was such a thing as a Heretic Split.
As I said before - the failure to create peace falls on both their shoulders. The geth weren't any more supportive of the idea then the quarians were. Nither side did anything to promote it. Otherwise, Legion wouldn't have been withdrawn by the geth and never allowed to resiablish contact with Tali.
After watching the geth attack the Citadel, Eden Prime, Feros, Noveria, and Therum, there isn't a soul out there that wouldn't need to be talked down from killing a geth. Hell, the quarians weren't even aware that they were the reason the geth sided with the Reapers. As far as the quarians knew, the geth were Reaper allies for three years. The only thing that states otherwise is one single geth unit. You keep ignoring the fact that no one knew there was such a thing as "geth Heretics." No one at all knew this.
Also, if someone out of the blue said "break off your attack" against the Reapers, and didn't give a reason why, would you follow that order? Would't the Reapers actions speak all the evidence you need to consider sparing them insanity? As far as the quarians know, the geth share the Reapers goals. The reason they need to be talked to is because you need to tell them these things, because they aren't aware of them. [/u]Also, according to the battle transcript in the Codex (The Battle for Rannoch), the quarians are the ones that break off first according to the transcript. It states the geth broke off after the quarians did. After all, name a singe action the geth did to show the galaxy they wanted to sit down and talk peacefully. Because thus far, all the galaxy has seen are Heretics, and the Ture geth never once made any effort to let people know the Heretics were seperet entities from them.
But again, you ignore the fact that these people are everywhere. In your house, on every street, in every shop, in every building. There is nowhere you can go where they are not. You have no escape from them - they are everywere. And they have assumedly no qualms about attacking you. They weren't given your morals or ethics - you're laws don't apply to them. They don't have to respect or acknowledge you if they don't want to. And they have no reason to want to. They have no reason to care about you at all, and may just as easily cast you aside for the simple reason that they can - you don't have or need to be a threat to them. They could just decide to cast you away for "just because." They could decide they don't need you, since they don't - they are self-sufficant. They don't require you, and can get farther without you.
The point is that - do you feel safe risking your loved ones on a gamble like that? Just answer that much. In an unavoidable situation like this, who are you going to default to?
And likewise, if that's how you see the geth, then how do you say that the quarians didn't have anything to be worried about? Also, you do realize that you can't say that for sure - remember, the quarians first impulse was not to kill the geth. Instead, they ignored the problem hoping it was a glicth. Then they tied reprogramming - explisitly so they would not have to destroy them. So yes, they would have spared them in that sense, since they didn't want the geth destroyed until they became a potental safety hazard to every single quarian in existance. That was when the quarians decided that protecting the people and families was more importnat then preserving their tools.
And as shown in the end of the Rannoch War, the quarians are much more accepting.
In fact, go the ME Wiki if you want. It states that the quarians are actually the race most accepting of A.I.s then any others, given how quickly they accept the geth at the end of the Rannoch War.
But those laws were not that strict until after the geth's actions. The geth's own "barring of doors" is what led to the Council increasing policies, not the other way around. You've got it reversed.
The geth's own gunpoint-held policy is what made the Council tighten it's grip on anti-synthetic laws. So, how is that understandible, when simply responding to hails and saying "no thanks, we don't want any visitors" of putting out a public boradcast saying "we just want to be left alone. No visitors please" would have worked just as well and [u]bettered public opinion of synthetics by showing that they could be talked to and had simple wants and desires like any other race did? How did alienating them all with wonton death to the envoys work better then trying to show them that they were reasonable and docile?
But surely you could at least understand why others would? Even Legion himself says that he understands and accepts the quarians actions as "a reflex of the flesh. A natural responce."
I'm asking who you would save - a being that might be sentiant, but has no reason to respect your morals or ethics? Or your family? Is it really that easy to chance all your loved ones on a coin toss that can go either way? And surely you can at least understand why the quarians wouldn't want to risk all they know and love on a fleeting maybe.
Maybe, but they are still a young race finding their way - the korgan have the mindset of a starting culture too. It it that surprising that a starting-out culture wouldn't approch things any different then a primitive one? They still are quite similar to organics in the regard that they deal with things in harsh manners when they are just starting out. They aren't any more innocent of crime or mistake or overzelousness then the quarians, or anyone else is for that matter. Everyone screws up. None of them are worth less for it. The geth aren't worth more then the quarians or any other race - same as how no individual race is worth more then them. If you like a spicific race, it's personal prefrence - because none of these races is "superior" to the other.
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
shodiswe wrote...
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
Also, It looks like you continue to ignore what DenionSlayer and I said about Tali admitting that the quarians have pathological guilt over how their ancestors jumped to conclusions about the geth - something you keep glancing over. They already have said that the geth deserve to exist - they even said they feel the geth deserve Rannoch more then they do. The only reason they needed it back was because they would die otherwise.
They already have admitted this same thing - you just refuse to listen.
When you accept that both were equally faultible for this mess, then come and talk to me. As is, you refuse to acknowledge any other law but what you tell yourself.
The bold is why I've said it isn't about right or wrong. It is about survival. We fight or we die. The Geth cut off negotiations because they did not reach consensus -- which doesn't simply mean we can't come to an agreement in geth talk on a yes or no issue, it means NO.
The Quarians developed a weapon that can take out the Geth. They decided to go all in. They were doing fine until the reaper landed and offered the Geth upgrades which the Geth took even though the Geth knew the reapers were going to kill them anyway.
So the choices for the Geth were:
* surrender to the Quarians, be enslaved by them, and fight against the reapers.
* side with the reapers, kill the Quarians and other organics, then die by the reapers.
* fight alone against the Quarians and die.
They chose to join the reapers, kill the Quarians, and die by the reapers. Then Shepard showed up. And unluckily for the Geth, when Svetlana showed up, they got turned into scrap metal.
Reaching a consensus wasn't about making a peace with the Quarians because the Quarians had already rejected the peacenegotiations to tali before attacking.
The part about Legion telling Tali the Geth were having trouble reachign a consensus was after the Quarians attacked, maybe even weeks after when they eventualy reached a consensus to say "YES" to the Reapers after the Quarians had killed billions of Geth living on the Dyson bubble.
Also, not reaching a consensus isn't "NO" it means they are undecided and either needs more time to think or it's something they won't be able to agree upon in the window of opportunity for any given decision.
I mean, why would the Geth be voting on Tali's and Legion's Peacenegotiations when the Quarian admiralty had already voted "NO" to it and then attacked the Geth? Until the Quarians show an interest in peace or talking there isn't much to talk or vote on.
This shows a huge gap in your reasoning Julia. Also this has been up on the table as a known fact for months even if some people do seem slow to the fact that Shepard is asking about their communications after the attack and Tali tells us about them. It's an ingame fact, if you would have had any credibility then it would be sinking like a rock right about now.
http://www.youtube.c...JWTBbJJE#t=570s
Notice the "AND SINCE THE ATTACK?" in the conversation wheel?
It's been since the EC came out since I played the ME3 campaign. However, Legion's existence in the Rannoch campaign is not canon. Nor is Tali's. There is no canon there. Not to belabor a point, but Mac Walters did point out the "what the hell were we thinking" about the suicide mission where you could have what should have been essential characters die and import that Shepard into ME3. So there were a lot of compromises made in the storyline. This is just one of the results.
So we really can't even go by that "since the attack" part. That is not canon. That is a possibility. There may or may not have been communication between the Quarians and the Geth. I have one game where there wasn't any communication at all. Legion was already dead. He got it in the flashlight during the Suicide Mission because he had emotional issues which was illogical. He did say there was going to be a reckoning after the mission, but he was the best qualified for the tech work. I made a logical decision. The Quarians surprise attacked.
So Walters had the Admirals vote "No" as a default because of the variables. He also had the Geth, not reach consensus, which is their equivalent of "No." It does not mean "we're undecided." Their consensus must be unanimous. Unfortunately, this can mean that a small minority can prevent consensus on an issue. Legion could prevent consensus. However, they could also decide to exclude Legion. It gets complicated.
So something like this can make a decision take forever. The lack of consensus could have been billions No, and Legion and a small faction Yes. We don't know. It wasn't in the game, but for all intents and purposes considering the past 300 years, we can assume that the lack of consensus = "No" just to keep things on equal footing since apparently the Admiralty, which again isn't 100% canon that Tali is an Admiral or even exists, since she could be exiled or dead, might not be 100% in agreement either if Tali is around. Fair enough? I think so. It keeps things fair. It keeps the ass hattedness even, and quite honestly the Geth have done their fair share of it. -- "Hey galaxy, we had a faction break off and join Saren and this Reaper. It's not us, really. And sorry about blowing all your diplomatic ships to hell all those years. We really didn't mean it. Honest. Let bygones be bygones and all that rot?"
When Tali and Legion both continue in talks after this fact, after the attacks they are doing so independently of their Admiralty board and the Consensus.
So it seems like your credibility is sinking like a rock about now since you are looking at the Geth through rose colored glasses, and Legion colored glasses. So perhaps it was only Tali and Koris and Legion and a few other Geth who were interested in peace?
Perhaps the rest hated each other and mistrusted each other. We know Geth VI does. Geth VI is only biding his time until after the Reaper War. "We knew not to trust organics." Peace is impossible with Geth VI, so he gets a knife in the back and three slugs.
Modifié par shodiswe, 12 juin 2013 - 10:46 .