sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
shodiswe wrote...
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
Also, It looks like you continue to ignore what DenionSlayer and I said about Tali admitting that the quarians have pathological guilt over how their ancestors jumped to conclusions about the geth - something you keep glancing over. They already have said that the geth deserve to exist - they even said they feel the geth deserve Rannoch more then they do. The only reason they needed it back was because they would die otherwise.
They already have admitted this same thing - you just refuse to listen.
When you accept that both were equally faultible for this mess, then come and talk to me. As is, you refuse to acknowledge any other law but what you tell yourself.
The bold is why I've said it isn't about right or wrong. It is about survival. We fight or we die. The Geth cut off negotiations because they did not reach consensus -- which doesn't simply mean we can't come to an agreement in geth talk on a yes or no issue, it means NO.
The Quarians developed a weapon that can take out the Geth. They decided to go all in. They were doing fine until the reaper landed and offered the Geth upgrades which the Geth took even though the Geth knew the reapers were going to kill them anyway.
So the choices for the Geth were:
* surrender to the Quarians, be enslaved by them, and fight against the reapers.
* side with the reapers, kill the Quarians and other organics, then die by the reapers.
* fight alone against the Quarians and die.
They chose to join the reapers, kill the Quarians, and die by the reapers. Then Shepard showed up. And unluckily for the Geth, when Svetlana showed up, they got turned into scrap metal.
Reaching a consensus wasn't about making a peace with the Quarians because the Quarians had already rejected the peacenegotiations to tali before attacking.
The part about Legion telling Tali the Geth were having trouble reachign a consensus was after the Quarians attacked, maybe even weeks after when they eventualy reached a consensus to say "YES" to the Reapers after the Quarians had killed billions of Geth living on the Dyson bubble.
Also, not reaching a consensus isn't "NO" it means they are undecided and either needs more time to think or it's something they won't be able to agree upon in the window of opportunity for any given decision.
I mean, why would the Geth be voting on Tali's and Legion's Peacenegotiations when the Quarian admiralty had already voted "NO" to it and then attacked the Geth? Until the Quarians show an interest in peace or talking there isn't much to talk or vote on.
This shows a huge gap in your reasoning Julia. Also this has been up on the table as a known fact for months even if some people do seem slow to the fact that Shepard is asking about their communications after the attack and Tali tells us about them. It's an ingame fact, if you would have had any credibility then it would be sinking like a rock right about now.
http://www.youtube.c...JWTBbJJE#t=570s
Notice the "AND SINCE THE ATTACK?" in the conversation wheel?
It's been since the EC came out since I played the ME3 campaign. However, Legion's existence in the Rannoch campaign is not canon. Nor is Tali's. There is no canon there. Not to belabor a point, but Mac Walters did point out the "what the hell were we thinking" about the suicide mission where you could have what should have been essential characters die and import that Shepard into ME3. So there were a lot of compromises made in the storyline. This is just one of the results.
So we really can't even go by that "since the attack" part. That is not canon. That is a possibility. There may or may not have been communication between the Quarians and the Geth. I have one game where there wasn't any communication at all. Legion was already dead. He got it in the flashlight during the Suicide Mission because he had emotional issues which was illogical. He did say there was going to be a reckoning after the mission, but he was the best qualified for the tech work. I made a logical decision. The Quarians surprise attacked.
So Walters had the Admirals vote "No" as a default because of the variables. He also had the Geth, not reach consensus, which is their equivalent of "No." It does not mean "we're undecided." Their consensus must be unanimous. Unfortunately, this can mean that a small minority can prevent consensus on an issue. Legion could prevent consensus. However, they could also decide to exclude Legion. It gets complicated.
So something like this can make a decision take forever. The lack of consensus could have been billions No, and Legion and a small faction Yes. We don't know. It wasn't in the game, but for all intents and purposes considering the past 300 years, we can assume that the lack of consensus = "No" just to keep things on equal footing since apparently the Admiralty, which again isn't 100% canon that Tali is an Admiral or even exists, since she could be exiled or dead, might not be 100% in agreement either if Tali is around. Fair enough? I think so. It keeps things fair. It keeps the ass hattedness even, and quite honestly the Geth have done their fair share of it. -- "Hey galaxy, we had a faction break off and join Saren and this Reaper. It's not us, really. And sorry about blowing all your diplomatic ships to hell all those years. We really didn't mean it. Honest. Let bygones be bygones and all that rot?"
When Tali and Legion both continue in talks after this fact, after the attacks they are doing so independently of their Admiralty board and the Consensus.
So it seems like your credibility is sinking like a rock about now since you are looking at the Geth through rose colored glasses, and Legion colored glasses. So perhaps it was only Tali and Koris and Legion and a few other Geth who were interested in peace?
Perhaps the rest hated each other and mistrusted each other. We know Geth VI does. Geth VI is only biding his time until after the Reaper War. "We knew not to trust organics." Peace is impossible with Geth VI, so he gets a knife in the back and three slugs.
Since there was nothign for the Geth to vote on after the Quarian Admiralty sacked the peacetalks the Geth "Vote" wasn't about peace, but wether or not to accept Reaper aid.
When get are trying ot a reach a consensus on a Yes or No question/issue then the consensus can be Yes or No, both would be a consensus.
Failing to reach a consensus means they can't agree.
I do agree however that Legion and possibly any of his "friends/supporters" might have been excluded at the end.
It's also possible the Geth Legion wanted to "Liberate" from the Reapers might have been his "friends".
To make it short, it makes no sense for the Geth to vote on peace after they got attacked by the Quarians when the Quarians had already voted agaisnt it before the attack. Once it's been rejected by the other party it's pointless to be divided or even argue the points when there is no case.
Modifié par shodiswe, 12 juin 2013 - 10:43 .





Retour en haut





