Aller au contenu

Photo

why dont the geth just leave rannoch?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1071 réponses à ce sujet

#751
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 292 messages

remydat wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

We should totally leave the geth alone, as soon as they make it clear that they mean us no harm. They never bothered to at least try and make place with organics. Organics did try. Then came the heretics, and not a word from the geth.


This may come as a shock but enemies don't normally warn each other about an impending attack.  If organics wanted advanced warning about the heretics then they probably shouldn't have laws that say the Geth should not exist and they probably shouldn't have tried to exterminate them.

The Geth are militant a**holes.  They are militant a**holes because organics were militant a**holes to them. 

.  I thought the geth only wanted to be left alone?  Hard to expext that when gheir twins murder across the galaxy.

And as I recall there were many organics who sacrificed themselves in service of peace.

#752
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

We should totally leave the geth alone, as soon as they make it clear that they mean us no harm. They never bothered to at least try and make place with organics. Organics did try. Then came the heretics, and not a word from the geth.


This may come as a shock but enemies don't normally warn each other about an impending attack.  If organics wanted advanced warning about the heretics then they probably shouldn't have laws that say the Geth should not exist and they probably shouldn't have tried to exterminate them.

The Geth are militant a**holes.  They are militant a**holes because organics were militant a**holes to them. 

So then, you're surprised that no one bothered to warn the geth about the quarians then?
Also, you do realize that THERE ARE NO LAWS FORBIDING THE EXISTANCE OF A.I.S, right. The laws say you can't make them without supervision. There is NO SUCH LAW forbidding the existance of A.I.s like the geth - only laws restricting their unchekced creation. A.I.s that already exist are actually treated by non-agression laws forbidding active acts of agression against them. The A.I. "Eliza" at the Alliance's Gagaran Station is under this same protection.
And the law was much more loosely regulated before the Morning War. It was the geth's own hostile actions that tigtened the regulations, not the other way around. You;ve reversed the order of events.

The geth were the militant a**holes FIRST - at least to the Council. The Council was offering their hand in peace -- there was no reason to react so viloently to a group that hadn't caused them any harm, and had even disowned the group that did (the quarians).

Modifié par silverexile17s, 14 juin 2013 - 04:44 .


#753
KiwiQuiche

KiwiQuiche
  • Members
  • 4 410 messages

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

KiwiQuiche wrote...

StreetMagic wrote...

KiwiQuiche wrote...

StreetMagic wrote...

In the end, don't get suckered into thinking any of this matters. You can't bring any of this up to the Catalyst. This is why it's better to sell Legion to Cerberus and screw over the Geth. You're destined to be an antagonist to synthetics, no matter what. Might as well go full gusto. Your efforts don't matter. It's like what Jacob said in ME2. "Doing the right thing is like pissing in dark pants. You feel warm, but no one can see it." It doesn't matter how friendly you are to the Geth. Bioware would love to fool you into thinking that 30 pages debating the political ramifications of the Geth, Krogan, or whatever is a good use of your time, but ultimately, the only good use of your time is Red, Green, or Blue.


Ugh yeah, but that's mainly to the stupid "high level" converstation we are supposed to be having with Starbrat. :I

But I find this debate a lot better than the ending ones. They get...weird after a while.


They are better to debate. I definitely agree. Too bad Bioware forgot that. Instead they clouded everything with a massive sense of closure.

At least Dragon Age has ongoing debates in the lore (for the time being). The big political issues haven't been resolved, and I hope they don't pull the same crap there.


Yeah. They tried to do a sense of closure...and it was a dismal failure. Fun thing that people don't like massive black spots and speculation to a nigh decade-long trilogy- which is apparent in the Rannoch arc with the geth and quarians acting utterly stupid during it.

I think Dragon Age benefits greatly from not being a trilogy; they don't have to spaz out to try and wrap everything up. The ME team...did a really terrible job of wrapping up and it's painfully obviously they didn't really know how to stop the Reapers. That's a problem with making massively-overpowered enemies- making a plausible way of killing them all when it's established you can't makes it kinde hard to stop them.


Especially when the second installment of the trilogy is called Mass Effect Derp. You know I figured out that the entire game could have ended pretty close to the Horizon mission?

1) I'd already gotten the hull upgrade from Jacob.
2) I'd already gotten the Thanix upgrade from Garrus, and he's been calibrating it.
3) I had Zaeed's loyalty and Kasumi's loyalty.
4) I had Grunt and Jack and Mordin
5) I got the mission from TIM.
6) We get to Horizon, and the Collectors have landed. Why did we even land? No. Instead I order the Normandy to show our new teeth. Hit the Collector vessel with our main gun and finish them off. HERE IS THE LINK TO THE POST


...Oh wow, I didn't know you could do that. What a way to go, writing team.

But then, ME2 itself makes basically no sense; who cares about the Collectors when the Reapers are the true threat? I mean sure, they are abducting thousands, but surely the billions elsewhere have prority over that? ME2 should have been moreso about finding something to stop the Reapers, not bothering about their little minions. It was a massive waste of time in most regards. Instead we just get a random "oh protheans have some vague idea" handwaved at the end of LotSB.

#754
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

Just like it is with the geth. The burden of proof of their claims is just as much with them as with me. Again, you aren't acting any different then the Council. When the Council claims something, they put up evidence of the geth's past actions. The geth never refute this.
Also, I did put up links repeatedly to Legion's converstaions, passages in the books, and in the games. You just kept on ignoring them or trying to lable them "propoganda," even though they are in the private embassy records and thus, not propoganda at all.  But for sake of argeuement, keep ignoring that detail - as you always did.
So, once again, YOU are the one that keeps oppressing me the way the Council oppresses the geth. You are the Council, I am the geth. If I'm wrong, the geth are too. Simple as that.
Take the same question you ask me, and apply it to the geth. If I can't do it, why can the geth? I can't be frugal with information and proof, but the geth can. How is that fair? Lose the double-standard.

An illegal war, thus it does not fall under any legal laws, and thus, there is zero valid "spoils of war,"  Thus, AGAIN, the geth's victory is completely null and void as a factor. Rannoch is not their property, any more then Earth is the Reapers.
By your logic, the Reapers have full legal right to Earth, because they engaged us and beare us, and that humans have no right to Earth.
IN short, if the geth "legally" have Rannoch, then the Reapers "legally" have Earth. Once again, you manuvered yourself into a situation where you're double-standard is blaringly apperant.

I'm re-iterating this in some hope that it will get through to you this time.


Sorry prior to the MW, can you please tell me the evidence that the Geth deserved extermination?

And no, you provided no link that said the Geth recognized those ships as diplomatic ships.  Legion at no point in the entire game ever references these ships period.  If he did and I missed it then provide a link.  I don't give a sh*t what organics claimed.  Legion readily admits to the harm they caused the Quarians so show me where he or any Geth admit that they destroyed ships they believed came in peace?

And the Geth can be frugal with information because they are not debating. The Geth are not trying to convince you, me, or organics of anything.  They don't care what organics think and want to be left alone.  You are trying to debate and convince me of something so you need to provide proof. 

The Geth are not subject to Council laws so they can't be guilty of Council crimes.  The Council have no jurisdiction over them because they never agreed to be governed by the council.

And humans are still or Earth.  The Reapers did not win.  If they did, I missed it as I was talking to the Catalyst and deciding how I wanted to defeat the Reapers.  I also imagined Anderson and all those humans still on earth fighting.  Do you have a different version of the game where the Reapers win and expel all humans from earth?  If so, sounds like a pretty depressing game.  You should play the original ME3 where you get to win at the end.

Modifié par remydat, 14 juin 2013 - 04:48 .


#755
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

So then, you're surprised that no one bothered to warn the geth about the quarians then?
Also, you do realize that THERE ARE NO LAWS FORBIDING THE EXISTANCE OF A.I.S, right. The laws say you can't make them without supervision. There is NO SUCH LAW forbidding the existance of A.I.s like the geth - only laws restricting their unchekced creation. A.I.s that already exist are actually treated by non-agression laws forbidding active acts of agression against them. The A.I. "Eliza" at the Alliance's Gagaran Station is under this same protection.
And the law was much more loosely regulated before the Morning War. It was the geth's own hostile actions that tigtened the regulations, not the other way around. You;ve reversed the order of events.

The geth were the militant a**holes FIRST - at least to the Council. The Council was offering their hand in peace -- there was no reason to react so viloently to a group that hadn't caused them any harm, and had even disowned the group that did (the quarians).


Nope not surprised at all.  I don't think anyone was obligated to warn the Geth nor do I think the Geth was obligated to warn organics.  That is consistent logic applied to both sides.  I brought it up because people claimed the Geth should have warned organics but no one said anything about Tali warning Legion.  In fact some people claimed Tali was right to no warn them.  That is a double standard which you guys are prone to employ.

Can EDI admit publicly she is an AI?  The laws allow AI provided they remain enslaved by organics.  If I am mistaken then provide me an example of an AI that is allowed to live free of organic control publicly?  And right the black africans (Geth) killed some people so the Council decided to punish and exterminate the black americans (Citadel AI) who had nothing to do with the Geths crimes.  That's not racist at all though exterminating one group of blacks (Citadel AI) because of what an unrelated group of blacks (Geth) did.

Nope the Council were militant when they had laws that ensure synthetics remain their slaves or are destroyed.  300 years later and EDI still does not have equality with organics.  She has to hide what she is from everyone except the Normandy crew.

Modifié par remydat, 14 juin 2013 - 05:02 .


#756
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

You tell me, Councilor Remy. I'm just the poor geth that got jumped on for not elaborating enough. If only I had said more sooner, you wouldn't be jumping on me right now:innocent:

See? You aren't acting any different then the Council. And that's Still the same as the Council, because the Council had "links" too - the geth attacking their envoys, the geth attacking the Citadel.
You are acting no different then them.
Also, I gave you the transcript from the book - written by Drew Karpyshyn, lead writer of ME1 and ME2. Also, it's the Council's own records of the event, and the ships transmitted open broadcasts to the geth and the geth could easily scan the unconcealed ships to verify their sencerity.

Also, nope. The geth themselves say so.
"We accept the Creators hate. We hold their world of origin, though we are only caretakers for it." - Legion. ME2
The geth themselves state that Rannoch is not their property, and not their world, and never once make any claim to them. And because the geth are a rouge faction outside the Citadel Convertions,  and thus, not [/i]a legally reconized faction, they have zero right to Rannoch vs the quarians. No more right then the tools in your garrage do to ownership of your house. Thus, the Council possesses the full legal right to kick the geth out if they wanted to.
So, when even the geth themselves openly confess that they don't own Rannoch, how does your arguement look?


You seem confused Silver.  We are engaged in a debate.  In a debate if you are going to claim something as fact, you need to provide proof.  Otherwise you can claim it is your opinion but I am under no obligation to accept it as fact until you provide proof. 

And I asked for proof that synthetics considered those diplomats as diplomats.  You provided me an organic account as if organics are not prone to lying.  Do you have a quote from a Geth saying they blew up these ships despite knowing they were diplomatic ships?  Yes or no?

The Geth right to Rannoch is the fact they won the war.  They can choose to be caretakers for Rannoch or they can choose to keep it.  That is their right because the Quarians viciously and brutally attacked them and got their a** kicked as a result.  All that quote by Legion tells me is that the Geth are willing to return Rannoch at some point.  But until such time that they decide to return it, it is their by right of conquest just like America was colonized by Europeans by right of conquest.  Just like most of the countries on planet earth were won by right of conquest.

You're double-standards are what confuse me. You act no different then the Council does to the geth.
I (the geth) didn't provide adaquate proof. You cite "links" (geth's past agression) to "justify" your actions.
Also, I did provide proof - multiple times. I cited conversations, transcripts from books, even Codex entrys. You simply ignored it, or buried yourself in headcannon.

Likewise, I asked you for proof that the geth didn't consider them diplomats. Favor for a favor, pal. How about you find your own absent proof before you demand it from others. After all, it's prettty hypocritical of you to go on a rant about proof when you have none of your own. Drop the double-standard. How about you tell me if you have a qoute proving your claims?

DEAD WRONG.
The Morning War was an illegal war, and the get a rouge, unreconized faction. Therefore, all land they claimed is not legally theirs and any "claims" are 100% null and void, because it was done in an illegal war. The geth have as much right to Rannoch as the Reapers do to Earth. They can't choose sh*t in regards to Rannoch's ownership - it's not theirs because it's the result of an illegal war, built on the mass genocide of a species -- Doesn't matter who started the war, it doesn't change the fact that the war was not a legal one, and the geth not a recognized faction.  In short, the right is ZERO.
Also, again wrong, as proven by the geth's defenses on Rannoch. Jamming towers, bunkers, bases, servers Anti-air guns, and a planatary defence cannon? These are NOT things you put on a world you plan to give back to someone. If this was the geth's intent, then they wouldn't have even bothered building their megastructure at Tikkun in the first place! They would have never trusted the quarians to live within a thousand light years of it - let alone the same system.
Face it - they never intended to retrun Rannoch.
And by your logic, you are basicly saying that humans don't own Earth anymore.
Also, what a racist statement. Yes the native-americans have rights to America -- it's their homeland. By saying that, you are basically saying that africans are kicked from their tribal homes in africa, they have no right to them anymore - which I thought you were against? You're advocating racisim and prejudice[i]
with your double-standards yet again.

#757
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests
Comparing this to racism commited against blacks is just emotional manipulation. You assume AI are a reality with all the qualities of human beings. You forgot you were in a fantasy world. I happen to be a minority who has experienced racism. I have a soft spot for these type of subjects and know how to get angry and even violent about it. But the burden is on other people to establish that AI are just the same. You assume it's already a given and that they are an identical situation to all the realities of racism. Even Legion himself says it's bad judgment to weigh in on it's  nature using typical moral standards.

Modifié par StreetMagic, 14 juin 2013 - 05:05 .


#758
The Night Mammoth

The Night Mammoth
  • Members
  • 7 476 messages
Illegal by what code of law? It was a global war of genocide that both sides perpetrated, and no one had the right or power to judge the Morning War or the geth's claim, so frankly, legality is completely arbitrary and doesn't matter sh*t to anything. They quarians attacked, the quarians lost, the quarians fled. To the victor, the spoils. Why should anyone give the quarians more sympathy because they lost the fight they started?

Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 14 juin 2013 - 05:17 .


#759
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

StreetMagic wrote...

Comparing them to blacks is just manipulation. You assume AI are a reality with all the qualities of human beings. You forgot you were in a fantasy world. I happen to be a minority who has experienced racism. I have a soft spot for these type of subjects and know how to get angry and even violent about it. But the burden is on other people to establish that AI are just the same. You assume it's already a given and that they are a identical situation to all the realities of racism. Even Legion himself says it's bad judgment to weigh in on his nature using typical moral standards.


The game makes it perfectly clear the Geth and EDI are alive and sentient.  To pretend otherwise is denial.  If you are alive and capable of calculas as Mordin puts it then you deserve equal rights period.  And FYI, I am black and do not tolerate racism fictional or real period.

Again, can EDI admit who she is?  Yes or no?  People keep avoiding the question.  Why shouldn't she be allowed to walk around the Citadel as an AI instead of pretending to be a VI?

And your proof the Geth are alive?  The Quarians tried to kill them and the Geth responded like living beings do and killed their a**.

Modifié par remydat, 14 juin 2013 - 05:16 .


#760
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

remydat wrote...

The game makes it perfectly clear the Geth and EDI are alive and sentient.  To pretend otherwise is denial.  If you are alive and capable of calculas as Mordin puts it then you deserve equal rights period.  And FYI, I am black and do not tolerate racism fictional or real period.

Again, can EDI admit who she is?  Yes or no?  People keep avoiding the question.  Why shouldn't she be allowed to walk around the Citadel as an AI instead of pretending to be a VI?

And your proof the Geth are alive?  The Quarians tried to kill them and the Geth responded like living beings do and killed their a**.


Geth didn't respond like living beings at all. They have self-preservation routines. Living beings experience more psychological/physical suffering beyond mere preservation instincts. There's a fvckton of pain involved when humans finally decide to revolt against something. It's something none of the AI in the ME universe have grasped. Even the apex AI race (Reapers) are so retarded that they think they're "ascending" and storing organics by hunting them down and grinding them into paste. They think they're doing everyone a service, and it's because they don't understand the concept of pain. It's just machine logic. Not the thoughts of a living being. They don't know any better. Without pain, there is no life.

Modifié par StreetMagic, 14 juin 2013 - 05:21 .


#761
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

Just like it is with the geth. The burden of proof of their claims is just as much with them as with me. Again, you aren't acting any different then the Council. When the Council claims something, they put up evidence of the geth's past actions. The geth never refute this.
Also, I did put up links repeatedly to Legion's converstaions, passages in the books, and in the games. You just kept on ignoring them or trying to lable them "propoganda," even though they are in the private embassy records and thus, not propoganda at all.  But for sake of argeuement, keep ignoring that detail - as you always did.
So, once again, YOU are the one that keeps oppressing me the way the Council oppresses the geth. You are the Council, I am the geth. If I'm wrong, the geth are too. Simple as that.
Take the same question you ask me, and apply it to the geth. If I can't do it, why can the geth? I can't be frugal with information and proof, but the geth can. How is that fair? Lose the double-standard.

An illegal war, thus it does not fall under any legal laws, and thus, there is zero valid "spoils of war,"  Thus, AGAIN, the geth's victory is completely null and void as a factor. Rannoch is not their property, any more then Earth is the Reapers.
By your logic, the Reapers have full legal right to Earth, because they engaged us and beare us, and that humans have no right to Earth.
IN short, if the geth "legally" have Rannoch, then the Reapers "legally" have Earth. Once again, you manuvered yourself into a situation where you're double-standard is blaringly apperant.

I'm re-iterating this in some hope that it will get through to you this time.


Sorry prior to the MW, can you please tell me the evidence that the Geth deserved extermination?

And no, you provided no link that said the Geth recognized those ships as diplomatic ships.  Legion at no point in the entire game ever references these ships period.  If he did and I missed it then provide a link.  I don't give a sh*t what organics claimed.  Legion readily admits to the harm they caused the Quarians so show me where he or any Geth admit that they destroyed ships they believed came in peace?

And the Geth can be frugal with information because they are not debating. The Geth are not trying to convince you, me, or organics of anything.  They don't care what organics think and want to be left alone.  You are trying to debate and convince me of something so you need to provide proof. 

The Geth are not subject to Council laws so they can't be guilty of Council crimes.  The Council have no jurisdiction over them because they never agreed to be governed by the council.

And humans are still or Earth.  The Reapers did not win.  If they did, I missed it as I was talking to the Catalyst and deciding how I wanted to defeat the Reapers.  I also imagined Anderson and all those humans still on earth fighting.  Do you have a different version of the game where the Reapers win and expel all humans from earth?  If so, sounds like a pretty depressing game.  You should play the original ME3 where you get to win at the end.

Sorry pal, but I'm NOT talking about before MW. I'm talking about after,  with the COUNCIL and Geth. Can you please stay on topic? 
And you ADMIT the geth gave cause after the war with that statement, then? (saying "prior to" but not "in general"?)

You likewise provoded no proof that they didn't see them as diplomatic.  And look at the facts -- ships openly broadcast presance. Ships come in without fleet accompynement. Geth are supposed masters of scanning and sensor tech -- determining armament and crew compliment is not a challange. If anything, I should be the one asking you how it's possible the geth could ever not think they were diplomatic ships. Likewise, since you are guilty of your own accusations by not providing proof of your own claims, you must provide your own proof first. You can't demand so of me unless you follow your own mandate first. So,tell me, keeping in mind that there is no such thing as a law saying A.I.s should not exist (the law says that new A.I. must be regulated, and that already created A.I. are forbiddion from being provoked), what proof do you have to state that the geth didn't know?

Yes they are, according to YOU. You made the claim that the geth wanted peace with organics. How can they possibly want that when they don't even share intents, or even general information about their allingment with others? YOU were the one saying the geth wanted these debates. You act like the geth don't need to convince others that they are docile, even though the Heretics have painted an image of anything but a docile race. And if the True Geth don't differentate themselves from the Heretics, how the hell do the geth ever expect anyone to even want to reach out to them, unless they make the same effort?

And if they aren't subject to Council laws, under what right do they have ownership of Councl Land?? Because since the quarians were members of the Council, they have full rights to invade and sieze the land, either from the quarians in punsihment for an illegal act, or from rouge faction that have claimed the land illegally. Therefore, NO, the geth still have zero claim to Rannoch.

Same was true for Rannoch! Do you really think that the quarians evacuated everyone when they left their worlds? No. The geth killed everyone that's left, same as the Reapers will do to Earth. Sorry, but if the owners still live, then by right the land is theirs. Doesn't matter if any of them aren't currently on the property -- they're families and people still have the rights to the land. You are saying that London is owned by the Reapers legally, and it isn't.
The land belongs to the people that evolved and claimed it first -- anyone else is a conqueror that has zero right to said land, unless recognized by a higher power. I don't see any such power bestowing such right to either the Reapers or geth.
By advocating such things, you are advocating racisim and prejudice with a "might is right" mentality, and saying that it's perfectly fine to oppress people, like other races, and take their land if they can't fight back. Is that what you want? I thought you were against that?

#762
KiwiQuiche

KiwiQuiche
  • Members
  • 4 410 messages
Street-With the Reapers its because they are controlled by Starbrat, who is still bound by his original programming the Leviathans gave him. So basically he was programmed to be a stupid moron; the Leviathans even state he's still doing what they programmed to do.

EDI and the geth aren't bound by their creators laws anymore.

#763
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

KiwiQuiche wrote...

Street-With the Reapers its because they are controlled by Starbrat, who is still bound by his original programming the Leviathans gave him. So basically he was programmed to be a stupid moron; the Leviathans even state he's still doing what they programmed to do.

EDI and the geth aren't bound by their creators laws anymore.


As much as I like EDI, I don't think she understands pain either. She understands camraderie and individualism better than other AI though (and will use those to protect others), so that's a plus at least.

#764
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages
Silver,

There is no double standed. You and I are debating. If you claim something as fact then you need to provide proof. The Geth do not care to prove anything to organics so they don't need to provide proof. What part of this confuses you. If you want to be treated like the Geth ie provide no proof then stop trying to debate.

It is entirely possible the Geth thought they were diplomats. It is entirely possible they did not. I am telling you there is no proof for either because the Geth never comment on these people. So again, you are confused. I can't provide proof for something I fully accept there is no proof. Again, there is no proof for either claim Silver. You on the other hand insist they were diplomats because organics told you as if the Geth have any reason to believe organics who just tried to kill them.

Humans own earth until they lose. They do not lose unless you choose refuse in which case they don't own earth anymore. That is how war works. And my family owned land in Africa 300 years ago. Then they were enslaved and guess what I don't own sh*t in Africa now. That's life. The Quarians lost. Next time pick a fight you can win.

#765
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests

The Quarians lost. Next time pick a fight you can win.


The Quarians can win though, depending on the customer who bought Mass Effect 3.

#766
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

So then, you're surprised that no one bothered to warn the geth about the quarians then?
Also, you do realize that THERE ARE NO LAWS FORBIDING THE EXISTANCE OF A.I.S, right. The laws say you can't make them without supervision. There is NO SUCH LAW forbidding the existance of A.I.s like the geth - only laws restricting their unchekced creation. A.I.s that already exist are actually treated by non-agression laws forbidding active acts of agression against them. The A.I. "Eliza" at the Alliance's Gagaran Station is under this same protection.
And the law was much more loosely regulated before the Morning War. It was the geth's own hostile actions that tigtened the regulations, not the other way around. You;ve reversed the order of events.

The geth were the militant a**holes FIRST - at least to the Council. The Council was offering their hand in peace -- there was no reason to react so viloently to a group that hadn't caused them any harm, and had even disowned the group that did (the quarians).


Nope not surprised at all.  I don't think anyone was obligated to warn the Geth nor do I think the Geth was obligated to warn organics.  That is consistent logic applied to both sides.  I brought it up because people claimed the Geth should have warned organics but no one said anything about Tali warning Legion.  In fact some people claimed Tali was right to no warn them.  That is a double standard which you guys are prone to employ.

Can EDI admit publicly she is an AI?  The laws allow AI provided they remain enslaved by organics.  If I am mistaken then provide me an example of an AI that is allowed to live free of organic control publicly?  And right the black africans (Geth) killed some people so the Council decided to punish and exterminate the black americans (Citadel AI) who had nothing to do with the Geths crimes.  That's not racist at all though exterminating one group of blacks (Citadel AI) because of what an unrelated group of blacks (Geth) did.

Nope the Council were militant when they had laws that ensure synthetics remain their slaves or are destroyed.  300 years later and EDI still does not have equality with organics.  She has to hide what she is from everyone except the Normandy crew.

In other words, it's only bad when synthetics are oppressed, and not organics like humans and everyone else with the Reapers? Good to know.
If the geth really want peace, then they are completely 100% oblidged to tell them -- otherwise, you basically have admitted that the geth don't want peace anymore then the quarians did.
Also, AGAIN, if she warned Legion, it ment the geth might have attacked first and butchered her people. If you were in her position, you would have just shot your family in the head with that message. Would you let you're entire family die in her position?
Once again, the one prone to double-standars is you.

That's because there is a destroy-on-sight policy for Reaper-Tech. NOT A.I.s - Reaper-Tech. If she admits she is an A.I. she would just be more heavily monitored -- escentally harsher security measures. If they find out that she's made with Reaper-Tech, then they will shoot her on sight.
Strange that you forget that part.
And AGAIN, you bring an arguemnet that has ABSOLUTLY NO BEARING on this debate into this. Racial hate is NON-EXISTANT IN THIS SCHISM. It is caused by mutual fear and distrust, NOT blood-feuds and hatred.
Also, AGAIN completely wrong definition, because the geth actions are what caused the Council to increase the harsheness of the law, not the other way around. The Council are NOT the faction that attacked you, and publicly disavowed the one that did. The Council and quarians are two seperate factions. The way you are putting it, it's actually the geth punsihing the Council for something they didn't do.
And the way you keep bringing in the completely unrelated topic of real-world prejudice, it sounds like you have blurred the lines of reality again - you are cofussing this debate about the actions of races with the real-world debate of racial hate, when the two are completely differeng arguements. In other words, you are letting this become too personal, remy. You are mixing up two completely seperate debates.

WRONG. The Council didn't HAVE laws that strict. Back then, it was just observation and monitoring. It wasn't till AFTER  the geth rebelled that shackling of A.I.s was a mandatory law. The geth's actions caused that - you have AGAIN reversed the order of events.
And EDI is completely seperate because of Reaper-Tech. Joker says the Reaper-Tech is why they would kill her, not the fact that she's an A.I.

#767
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

KiwiQuiche wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

KiwiQuiche wrote...

Yeah. They tried to do a sense of closure...and it was a dismal failure. Fun thing that people don't like massive black spots and speculation to a nigh decade-long trilogy- which is apparent in the Rannoch arc with the geth and quarians acting utterly stupid during it.

I think Dragon Age benefits greatly from not being a trilogy; they don't have to spaz out to try and wrap everything up. The ME team...did a really terrible job of wrapping up and it's painfully obviously they didn't really know how to stop the Reapers. That's a problem with making massively-overpowered enemies- making a plausible way of killing them all when it's established you can't makes it kinde hard to stop them.


Especially when the second installment of the trilogy is called Mass Effect Derp. You know I figured out that the entire game could have ended pretty close to the Horizon mission?

1) I'd already gotten the hull upgrade from Jacob.
2) I'd already gotten the Thanix upgrade from Garrus, and he's been calibrating it.
3) I had Zaeed's loyalty and Kasumi's loyalty.
4) I had Grunt and Jack and Mordin
5) I got the mission from TIM.
6) We get to Horizon, and the Collectors have landed. Why did we even land? No. Instead I order the Normandy to show our new teeth. Hit the Collector vessel with our main gun and finish them off. HERE IS THE LINK TO THE POST


...Oh wow, I didn't know you could do that. What a way to go, writing team.

But then, ME2 itself makes basically no sense; who cares about the Collectors when the Reapers are the true threat? I mean sure, they are abducting thousands, but surely the billions elsewhere have prority over that? ME2 should have been moreso about finding something to stop the Reapers, not bothering about their little minions. It was a massive waste of time in most regards. Instead we just get a random "oh protheans have some vague idea" handwaved at the end of LotSB.


Finally something we can agree on. Yeah, amazing isn't it. My order of play in ME2 has been from the beginning:

1) Freedom's Progress
2) Zaeed - let the refinery burn. kill Vido. You want his loyalty -- Inferno Grenade FTW.
3) Mordin
4) Get upgrades the upgrades from every single person first before you talk to them about anything. Jacob, Mordin, Miranda.
5) Kasumi's Stolen Memories -- Kasumi and Zaeed do not count in the official mission count against Horizon, and Zaeed is great for crowd control with his inferno grenade unlocked.
6) Garrus -- get the thanix
7) do some scanning
8) Grunt
Do some shopping at the Citadel and Omega
9) Jack
The Illusive Man would like to speak with you.

It could have been almost game over. Even if people didn't do NG+, they could have farmed planets by scanning and gathered enough resources to get the Thanix and the armor to take out the Collector vessel while it was a sitting duck on the ground; picked up a bunch of tech from the wreckage; probably found an IFF in the wreckage; and been ready to take on the CB after just doing a few more loyalty missions. You can do Thane and Samara's missions then go for it. LotSB for fun. You don't need either Tali or Legion because you've got Kasumi for tech, and Zaeed. Then focus on the real enemy.... The reapers.

Has anyone done a play through where they sold Legion to Cerberus and didn't pick up Tali? I'm just curious.

And Ieldra2 an I agreed on something today, too. First time in 15 months. Go figure.

#768
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

StreetMagic wrote...

Geth didn't respond like living beings at all. They have self-preservation routines. Living beings experience more psychological/physical suffering beyond mere preservation instincts. There's a fvckton of pain involved when humans finally decide to revolt against something. It's something none of the AI in the ME universe have grasped. Even the apex AI race (Reapers) are so retarded that they think they're "ascending" and storing organics by hunting them down and grinding them into paste. They think they're doing everyone a service, and it's because they don't understand the concept of pain. It's just machine logic. Not the thoughts of a living being. They don't know any better. Without pain, there is no life.


Please provide me a link from a scientific text that says without pain there is no life?  That is some metaphysical sh*t that you are free to believe but has no basis in science.  Further, provide a link from the Game that says the Geth are not alive?  You are free to have whatever headcanon you want but I suggest you share it with people who care about your headcanon.  I don't.



Per Tali, Geth were sentient, have a sub conscious, and are capable of independent thought.

#769
Guest_StreetMagic_*

Guest_StreetMagic_*
  • Guests
It's not metaphyiscal. Pain is purely physical. It's the only life you know and can make reference to. Stop being the dreamy imaginative kid who takes fiction seriously and deal with reality. The one that experiences pain. Don't call it metaphysical, because this is where you live. I'm not speaking of higher planes or ideals. This is as down to earth as it gets.


As for Legion and Tali. I've had different playthroughs where I didn't pick up Tali and sold Legion, but not at the same time. All I can say is that without her loyalty mission, the admirals treat you as new face in ME3. Admiral Xen joins your mission on the Geth ship instead of Tali (but she isn't a playable group member. She pops up here and there and accompanies the group). If you sell Legion to Cerberus, you get the Geth VI of course. You only remark that he reminds you of the same Geth (Legion) who was wearing your armor. The real Legion shows up in the Cerberus base, and acts immeditately hostile.

Modifié par StreetMagic, 14 juin 2013 - 05:53 .


#770
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

Silver,

There is no double standed. You and I are debating. If you claim something as fact then you need to provide proof. The Geth do not care to prove anything to organics so they don't need to provide proof. What part of this confuses you. If you want to be treated like the Geth ie provide no proof then stop trying to debate.

It is entirely possible the Geth thought they were diplomats. It is entirely possible they did not. I am telling you there is no proof for either because the Geth never comment on these people. So again, you are confused. I can't provide proof for something I fully accept there is no proof. Again, there is no proof for either claim Silver. You on the other hand insist they were diplomats because organics told you as if the Geth have any reason to believe organics who just tried to kill them.

Humans own earth until they lose. They do not lose unless you choose refuse in which case they don't own earth anymore. That is how war works. And my family owned land in Africa 300 years ago. Then they were enslaved and guess what I don't own sh*t in Africa now. That's life. The Quarians lost. Next time pick a fight you can win.

WRONG. You excuse the question of "why don't the quarians?Council want to try peace with the geth" with the excuse that the geth don't need to provide evidence of intents/claims. Yet you say that I must in the exact same situation.  You say that Legion needs no proof beyond his word to the quarian Admirals, yet say that I do for you? You say that Legion and Tali can say that the geth (in light of the Battle of the Citadel and over two years of geth attacks on the galaxy) want peace and say that the Admrials should just believe it, but that in the same situation, I need diffinitive evidence?
That is the definition of a double-standard. If I'm wrong in this situation, then the geth are too by extension.

And thus, you're entire claim is AGAIN invalidated. I provided reasons why the geth couldn't have believed this (open hails, unconcealed presance, lack of military escort fleet, geth's proported mastery of scanning tech), and discredited your only reasons for believeing otherwise (non-existance of any form of law prohibiting the existance of A.I.s, and the disavowing of the quarians from the Citadel, thereby making the two completely seperate and thus, the quarians actions are no longer able to be blamed on a group that disavowed them for it) There are only reasons to believe, and none to disbelieve.
So again, YOU are the confussed one, not me. I insist because they gave clear and irrefutible signs that they were geneuine, and the geth had the technological capability to determine if they were genuine themselves. Meaning a misunderstanding was completely and utterly impossible for the geth to fall victum to, remy. You're claim is dead in the water.

NO. Humans have right to Earth well after. All species in the galaxy have right to their homeworlds because they are the worlds they evolved from - where their culture was born, where they grew up, and in the cases of specilized races (quarians, volus, hanar,) the only places they can survive. You're view is how racial conquest/Supremicy works, NOT how War works. War is defeating an enemy faction. Racial conquest, supremicy and genocide is exterminating/assimilating the enemy and stealing their lands, like the protheans did.
Let me put this in a term you understand: You are basically saying that if a man beats another man, said man is his property now?
I abhor such thinking, and I thought you did too?

Modifié par silverexile17s, 14 juin 2013 - 05:51 .


#771
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

In other words, it's only bad when synthetics are oppressed, and not organics like humans and everyone else with the Reapers? Good to know.
If the geth really want peace, then they are completely 100% oblidged to tell them -- otherwise, you basically have admitted that the geth don't want peace anymore then the quarians did.
Also, AGAIN, if she warned Legion, it ment the geth might have attacked first and butchered her people. If you were in her position, you would have just shot your family in the head with that message. Would you let you're entire family die in her position?
Once again, the one prone to double-standars is you.

That's because there is a destroy-on-sight policy for Reaper-Tech. NOT A.I.s - Reaper-Tech. If she admits she is an A.I. she would just be more heavily monitored -- escentally harsher security measures. If they find out that she's made with Reaper-Tech, then they will shoot her on sight.
Strange that you forget that part.
And AGAIN, you bring an arguemnet that has ABSOLUTLY NO BEARING on this debate into this. Racial hate is NON-EXISTANT IN THIS SCHISM. It is caused by mutual fear and distrust, NOT blood-feuds and hatred.
Also, AGAIN completely wrong definition, because the geth actions are what caused the Council to increase the harsheness of the law, not the other way around. The Council are NOT the faction that attacked you, and publicly disavowed the one that did. The Council and quarians are two seperate factions. The way you are putting it, it's actually the geth punsihing the Council for something they didn't do.
And the way you keep bringing in the completely unrelated topic of real-world prejudice, it sounds like you have blurred the lines of reality again - you are cofussing this debate about the actions of races with the real-world debate of racial hate, when the two are completely differeng arguements. In other words, you are letting this become too personal, remy. You are mixing up two completely seperate debates.

WRONG. The Council didn't HAVE laws that strict. Back then, it was just observation and monitoring. It wasn't till AFTER  the geth rebelled that shackling of A.I.s was a mandatory law. The geth's actions caused that - you have AGAIN reversed the order of events.
And EDI is completely seperate because of Reaper-Tech. Joker says the Reaper-Tech is why they would kill her, not the fact that she's an A.I.


Nope oppression is bad no matter who does it. 

On a scale of 1-10, I rate the Quarian desire for peace as a group as 2.  I rate the Geth desire for peace as a 3 or 4.  Point is the Geth are not some peace loving hippies.  They simply want peace just a wee bit more than the Quarians. 

And what are you ranting about.  I just told you I don't think Tali should have warned the Geth.  I simply also don't think the Geth should have warned organics about the heretics.  They are enemies.  Enemies don't warn each other.  What part of this don't you understand?

Telling me EDI would be subject to harsher security is telling me she is being discriminated against. Prejudice is prejudce whether it is real or whether it is protrayed in a fictional story.  Punishing the CItadel AI for what the Geth did is prejudice.  Punishing all organics for what the Quarians did is prejudiced.  What part of this don't you understand?  

#772
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

StreetMagic wrote...

It's not metaphyiscal. Pain is purely physical. It's the only life you know and can make reference to. Stop being the dreamy imaginative kid who takes fiction seriously and deal with reality. The one that experiences pain. Don't call it metaphysical, because this is where you live. I'm not speaking of higher planes or ideals. This is as down to earth as it gets.

As for Legion and Tali. I've had different playthroughs where I didn't pick up Tali and sold Legion, but not at the same time. All I can say is that without her loyalty mission, the admirals treat you as new face in ME3. Admiral Xen joins your mission on the Geth ship instead of Tali (but she isn't a playable group member. She pops up here and there and accompanies the group). If you sell Legion to Cerberus, you get the Geth VI of course. You only remark that he reminds you of the same Geth (Legion) who was wearing your armor. The real Legion shows up in the Cerberus base, and acts immeditately hostile.


Sorry did you miss where I said provide a scientific basis for your claims?  Someone who suffers from congenital analgesia cannot feel pain.  Are you telling me they are not alive?  From a biological standpoint pain is only necessary because it helps to alert an organic organism of danger.  It allows us to detect that there is something wrong with us.

A living machine has no need to feel pain because it is made up of metal which is more durable than the human body and it is likely equipped with its own sensors that alert it when something is wrong with its body without the need of causing physical pain. 

As for you Legion and Tali bit, not sure what your point is.  I linked to Tali confirming that the Geth are sentient.

#773
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

WRONG. You excuse the question of "why don't the quarians?Council want to try peace with the geth" with the excuse that the geth don't need to provide evidence of intents/claims. Yet you say that I must in the exact same situation.  You say that Legion needs no proof beyond his word to the quarian Admirals, yet say that I do for you? You say that Legion and Tali can say that the geth (in light of the Battle of the Citadel and over two years of geth attacks on the galaxy) want peace and say that the Admrials should just believe it, but that in the same situation, I need diffinitive evidence?
That is the definition of a double-standard. If I'm wrong in this situation, then the geth are too by extension.

And thus, you're entire claim is AGAIN invalidated. I provided reasons why the geth couldn't have believed this (open hails, unconcealed presance, lack of military escort fleet, geth's proported mastery of scanning tech), and discredited your only reasons for believeing otherwise (non-existance of any form of law prohibiting the existance of A.I.s, and the disavowing of the quarians from the Citadel, thereby making the two completely seperate and thus, the quarians actions are no longer able to be blamed on a group that disavowed them for it) There are only reasons to believe, and none to disbelieve.
So again, YOU are the confussed one, not me. I insist because they gave clear and irrefutible signs that they were geneuine, and the geth had the technological capability to determine if they were genuine themselves. Meaning a misunderstanding was completely and utterly impossible for the geth to fall victum to, remy. You're claim is dead in the water.

NO. Humans have right to Earth well after. All species in the galaxy have right to their homeworlds because they are the worlds they evolved from - where their culture was born, where they grew up, and in the cases of specilized races (quarians, volus, hanar,) the only places they can survive. You're view is how racial conquest/Supremicy works, NOT how War works. War is defeating an enemy faction. Racial conquest, supremicy and genocide is exterminating/assimilating the enemy and stealing their lands, like the protheans did.
Let me put this in a term you understand: You are basically saying that if a man beats another man, said man is his property now?
I abhor such thinking, and I thought you did too?


Nope the Quarians and Council don't have to believe anything.  It is their choice to believe or not believe.

The appropriate response when someone shows no interest in talking to you is to respect their wishes and walk away.  Organics telling the Geth they come in peace is not proof.  It is just talk.

Um, in refuse humans die.  They have no right to earth because they are extinct.  And the Geth's homeworld is Rannoch so do they have a right to Rannoch? 

Let me put it to you like this.  When Native Americans get ALL of America back, when the aborigines get ALL of Australia back and when I get my little piece of West Africa back, the Quarians can have Rannoch back.  I won't hold my breath.

And nope, land is property.  People are people.  I didn't think this had to be explained.

#774
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

KiwiQuiche wrote...

What I meant was it is far easier to communicate with something that looks human, rather than talking to a gun or something, which is why it should have been easier to accept the fact the geth grew sentience. It's harder to accept your Xbox talking about the meaning of life than it is something that looks vaguely humanoid and can walk/directly interact with the world.

I won't refute that; some of the worst things are done by people with noble intentions. I don't really understand the whole "racial hate" thing that just sprang up here...techniqually it should be 'specie hate'

In my opinion if the quarians had educated the geth on these matters, the whole massacre thing wouldn't have occured. As you said, the geth didn't really understand what they were doing; geth don't die like organics and they don't evolve like them- hence no understanding of children, foreign aliens and whatnot and their brutal retaliation.

Me neither...but in my opinion wanting to reprogram the geth is even worse than killing them, so I'm kinda biased in that regard.

That's why I said the Rachni are only vaguely comparable at best. Geth function on a whole different level than organics, which is why they are fairly crap at communicating with them.  With quarians they are still prone to thinks all organics are; peer pressure and the like. The geth, due to being what they are, aren't suseptible to that. Even with the Admirals, Tali blithly goes along with the Rannoch Attack because she feels pressured into it. If they had govenered like the geth, having Koris and Tali against the attack meant it wouldn't have occured in the geth situation. Rann is just a useless fence-sitter. >:U

To the geth, the Heretics weren't geth anymore, therefore they are under no obligation to explain the Heretic's crimes. I'm not going to go and explain why my crazed sister, who I haven't seen for years, decided to mass murder people in a city and I'm under no obligation to apologize for her actions.

Legion is special among geth, due to being 'isolated' and evolving on his own; also he has had direct contact with Tali and she, vaguely, trusts him. That and it's moreso the quarians obligations to make amends, since they repetedly attack the geth throughout history. I wouldn't really tru to make friends with someone who's tried to kill me over and over again and attacked me first and only one of the group wants to talk to me- the same one who covers up the war-crimes her father committed. Mac wanted more shooty-shooty, hence the geth being stupid afterwards. <_<

You can read that notice when you first arrive at the Citadel, which
only hours after the Earth attack and it isn't time-stamped. So we
don't know if it occured right after or a day before or anything. It's
fustratingly vague like many things. But even if it was before I do not
approve of the quarians creating another stupid war during a Reaper
Invasion.

But Tali says they'll see need decades before they can live without suits on Rannoch; compared to centuries elseware. And I don't think the Reapers will ignore Rannoch to let the quarians settle in. It was incredibly short-sighted of the quarians. Okay, so maybe the geth are just keeping Rannoch to troll the quarians. I would in their situation lol

The geth don't need to repent for things the Heretics did; the Heretics aren't true geth anymore, therefore the geth aren't responsible for them. The quarians have proved time and again they never give ground; they always attack the geth, 100% of the time. I certainly wouldn't open my door to people with that track record. Even Tali is horrible about it and tries to justify the horrible things her father did.

During a galaxtic genocide, there is no such thing as a non-combatant. "We fight or we die." Yes, that phrase was stupid beyond reason in the conversation but it is relevant else where; during crap like a Reaper Invasion EVERYONE needs to pitch in. If you run, you will be hunted down and killed regardless. 
all quarians are able due to their life-style; you can't have poets and benefit users when you have to travel constantly. Why can't they just cram them on the Citadel? I doubt half the quarian population are useless; most would be mechanics of some sort and those battling Reapers would no doubt welcome their aid- yet the quarians never thought of that, too blinded by their near-sighted planet obsession.

Everyone is made stupid in ME3 to drive the "SHEPARD IS AWESOME" plot since she needs to solve everything since everyone is being fcuktarded morons. Which is why I hate ME3 so much in a lot of cases. Yes, Wrex is being a selfish fcukhead and I wanted to punch him. I wanted to smack the Asari counciler over for being such a selfish b!tch and tell her Thessia deserved to burn for the Matricarchs stupidity so I am full aware of how stupid they all are.

Different in point; Hackette is actively told by Shepard to attack Sovereign; both Tali and Shepard tell Gerrel to hold his fire. Gerrel ignores them and fires anyway. Also, Shepard isn't inside Sovereign, so she wasn't in real danger of getting hit. They were inside the geth vessel when it was fired upon.

The liveships are armed regardless of the actual battle-readiness. That's a difference between attacking a ship with no weapons, and an armed ship who arrived with an Armada.

Yeah, Xen is a bit of a sociopath and I wish you could smack her like Gerrel. Better yet, be able to punch everyone out. But quarians have always been hostile to the geth; everytime they think they have an advantage, they attack. It's not like they ignored the geth for three centuries.

Heretics are different from geth. Okay, so maybe the geth are pulling a "crazed grampa with gun on rocking chair and yelling to get off lawn" but regardless organics should have stopped provoking them after the first ship went down; if someone ignores you, you don't go inside. You leave them alone as they aren't talking to you. Silence is not an invitation.

Yes, that's exactly what I mean. I don't approve of most of what the geth did either; it's just I feel they have more valid reasons for their responses. So I understand both races situations, it's just I accept the geths responses as valid moreso than the quarians.

Indeed; as Dextro Milk pointed out, Mac prettty much wrote everyone as stupid morons so Shepard has to decide everything. <_<

Well, the geth used to not look any different from an X-Box. When the geth were first created, they were based in server hubs as a disemboided processing system. It wasn't till a few years later that the quarians created bodies for them to use, in an effort to automate labor with mobile units. To them, a geth is no different then an appliance, like an X-Box. Us being stunned at an X-Box talking is the exact human equivilant to how the quarians felt when the geth started talking. Remember, these were beings that were created spicifically to not be sentiant, like an X-Box. Or more accurately, one of those crash-test dummys. To to the quarians, it would have the same shock-value.

Indeed. I'm not sure where it being "racial hate" came from. More like "species fear." From what I can see, these conflicts have always been the result of a flurry of misunderstandings caused by good intentions being taken too far, and mass panic based on unconfirmed concerns, instead of a malicious intent against one another. It's been repeated alot -- and not just with synthetics. The krogan are proof of that.

Maybe, but when push came to shove, the Legion didn't hesitate to use it as an option against the Heretics. Besides, the quarians weren't sure if it was actual sentiance at the time, or just parroting words. Back then, they had no more guilt then if one replaced the OS on a computer. It wasn't until the geth refused reprogramming and broke through the quarians rewriting attempts that the quarians became certin that the geth were on the road to sentiance.

I know, but I still can't blame the quarians for it either. They didn't see the geth as anything but machines. To them, wanting to teach one about ethics and morals would be like a human trying to teach such things to a forklift, or an automated assembly unit. It's not something that you get off the top of your head when thinking about machines that you built for spicific tasks. If the quarians had intended the geth to be sentiant, I would understand, but they didn't, so I can understand why they didn't try. If you mean after the geth started to become sentiant -- well, I think the problem was that the quarians believed that the geth were incapable of learning emotions or morals, since as machines, the geth think with logic. Why learn something with such erratic, illogical results? The quarians probably assumed that the geth would have no intrest in such endevors as learning emotioins.
Once again, an understandable belief. But like you said before, assumptions have caused alot of this mess.

I don't know. I mean, wasn't siding with the Reapers succumbing to the peer-pressure that they would be unable to survive any other way? Wasn't cutting themselves off from the galaxy caused by the peer-pressure that organics would never accept, or want to accpet them? Maybe they weren't succeptable to it in the beginning of their existance, but I think as the geth evolved, they bit by bit gained emotions, or at the very least a geth-analouge to emotion. Legion's contact with orgnaics and sharing his experances with them might have caused even more development on that front as well. After all, it's hinted that the reason Legion keeps Shepard's chestplate is out of a kind of admiration of Shepard's acomplishments against the Reapers. An "idolization" of Shepard in other words. Like a fan, although not at the level of Conrad Verner.

But the geth got blamed by everything the Heretics did. My point is that if the geth wanted to make allies of the organics, or supported Legion's attempt of peace, wouldn't they have at least tried to clear up that they had no connection to what the Heretics did? I mean, if the police have no record of where you're sister is, they are likely going to assume she would be with family, right? Unless you say otherwise, they are going to kick down the door and bring you in for questioning. Especally if said hose is regestered to your last name and doesn't differentate the fact that there is, or isn't, two seperate people here.
Don't even get me started on if the house isn't originally yours, but aquired in an unsanctioned gunfight.
No, you aren't under any law of obligation, but that also means that consiquences and/or misunderstandings are potentally yours to bear for not coming forward. You don't need to be proactive in a dispute, but it helps avoid unxepected consiquences. Point being -- the geth could have saved themselves a lot of greif and distrust, and potentally began unduing each-other's respective fears, had they done something to clear up the misconceptions. After all, the geth's isolation if from a preconception that organics will instinctively hate them -- and we all saw where preconceptions got people in the Morning War.

But the galaxy has public record of the geth attacking the galaxy multple times. Eden Prime, Feros, Noveria, Ilos, Virmire, Therum, The Citadel. In ME2 they tried to suicide-ram a ship full of munitions into a Terminus Colony. They were launching border schermishes across the Hades Nexus and so-forth (hell, there was even a crashed Geth Dreadnought on Altie, the planet were the "Overlord" DLC takes place). Because no one is aware of a Heretic split, the quarians think the geth have attacked the galaxy and cause more harm to it then the quarians ever did to the geth. For them to trust the geth, the geth would have to explain why they seemingly attacked every race in the galaxy unprovoked under the Reapers (the quarians are one of the few groups besides the geth that believe in the "myth " of the the Reapers). After all, do you really think Gerrel would feel sorry for the geth after watching them try to kill usher in galactic genocide on every living being? Not without solid proof that the geth weren't responcible for that. Which the geth weren't willing to give without their own proof that the quarians would let them be. And it goes on and on, bouncing off each-other's trust issues and lack of willingness to take a risk. Which is why I am so adimit about my belief that both sides have equal fault in this mess and the war that follows it.

Well, based on how critical a condition Ashley/Kaiden was in after Mars, I'd say pretty damn fast. Maybe half a day?
And the quarians figure that without a world, they die. And they think the geth are already Reaper allies, and don't know that they are starting another war. If the quarians had been aware that the Heretics weren't the geth, I could understand. But right now, it's no different then how people assumed Shepard was a servent of Cerberus -- lack of information, and unwillingness to put trust in people.

And you have to admit, decades is better then centuries, isn't it? And as Tali herself safely demonstrated at the end of the Rannoch War, at least the quarians can survive suit ruptures and open-air exposure on Rannoch, compared to instant death elseware.
And Rannoch is at the edge of the Terminus Systems, which the Reapers haven't been foucsing major attention on yet. If they had, I highly doubt Omega would still be intact, which it is. Most of the races in the galaxy exist in the "south" part of the map. The quarians are out of the way, meaning that the civilians on Rannoch will be safe from the fighting considerably longer then if they were in the center of the fighting, down in Council and Alliance space. And Rannoch's natural canyons and the geth's fortifications would ensure that the quarians could survive a slog for at least a while, compared to complete defeat in hours for a space battle.

But if the geth don't give any reason to trust them, how can you lay all the blame on the quarians. Do you think that anyone that witnessed the geth attack on the Citadel would listen to a geth speak, or even let them out of eyesight before killing them? Legion went to Eden Prime, and the moment his presance was uncovered, he has half his chest blown open by an Alliance soldier. And likewise, the geth try to justify the fact that they let the Heretics go, and basically were willing to allow complete genocide of the galaxy as long as they themsleves weren't affected. Again, I believe that both sides are guilty of equally falutible crimes, and that nither is willing to take a leap of faith. Both have trust problems when it comes to the other, and nither has concrete reasons to trust the other.

But when you can die from a single suit rupture, what good are you? You are more a burden then an asset. And as shown by the Multiplayer, every quarian that can bear arms goes out to fight.
Also, the Citadel is already overloaded with refugees from every other race. That mant species at once - contamination is a given. And the quarians are an entire race -- they consume an equivilant amount of resources. The Citadel would never accept them. No one has the resources to support millions of civilians.
And not everyone is fighting. Everyone has civilians. Hell, even the turians - the speices devoted to war and combat - have refugees and civilians that can't fight. They evacuate them from Palaven in the millions. The asari have civilians. Even the krogan have civilians -- their females and young. I mean, can you explain why there are millions of civilians heading to the Citadel instead of arming up and fighting?
No war is free of non-combatants. Even the protheans had non-combatants according to Javik -- he says that because there was nowhere for them to take refuge, all the noncombatants died, being made into Collectors.

Well, let's face it:
The Alliance hides the extent of the Mars Archives for 30 friggin years.
The asari hide the Prothean Beacon for 20,000 years.
The turians demand krogan support  (that's going to be easy<_<)
The krogan hold the war hostage for a genophage cure.
The salarians try to sabotage the allied alliance with a genophage sabotage plan.
Udina thinks Cerberus will hold up it's deal of a "bloodless coup." (oh, God)
Batarian soldier Balak tries to sabotage human war plans for something the humans didn't even do.
Cerberus thinks that messing with Reaper implants isn't going to bite them in the ass (WTF?)
The Alliance devotes resources to hunting a myth (Leviathan), rather then the Crucible.
 A crazy Ex-Cerberus chick Clones Shepard, and tries to assassinate Shepard and replace the Commander with a xenophobic, anti-alien clone mock-up in the middle of a multi-species, cooperation-driven war (Are you fu*king kidding me?!) (NOTE: This is the plot of the "Citadel" DLC -- Woman clones Shepard. Clone steals Normandy. Shepard steals it back and kick clone's ass. Wrex returns as (temproary) Squad-mate for DLC.)
The Alliance covers up Shepard's debreif and Classifies Shepard's Tesitimet about the Heretics, the Collectors, and the Alpha Relay (you really didn't think people needed to know this?! Go to hell, Alliance Admiralty!)
Faith in others, not to mention any form of long term thinking, is not in big demand among most people in ME3. now granted, most people want to make sure their own bases are covered first. That's to be expected when everything is ending -- look out for you own people first, then help others. You'd evacuate your own family and loved ones from a bomb site frirst before helping others, right?
Although, you can't deny that, if it isn't at least partly selfish like the salarians and krogan's requests aren, then like the Morning War, it's often a "good intentions become horrible choices" scenerio with most of them. (Except Cerberus, Udina and the Ex-Cerberus girl's clone plan -- those are just straight-up retarded)

It's still the same risk and scenerio, right? There is even a choice to tell Gerrel that he did the right thing -- "Just give me a heads-up next time." Besides, there were also people requestion Hackett pull back from attacking Sovergien -- "Negitive. This is our only chance. Take that monster down no matter what the cost!" That's pretty much how Gerrel sees this situation -- they're dead if the geth repair that thing, or if it's about to come online again anyway. We already saw that the geth aborad weren't affected, so Legion sabotage could likely be easily reversed. Legion simply shut down the Core. It could assumedly be re-initilized just as easily. And Sovergien was right above them, seperated by glass and a few sheets of plate-steel. I don't think "safe" discribes Shepard in that situation. The fragment of Sovergien crashing into the room seems to prove the danger.

If 75% of your ships are carrying civilians, wouldn't you want them to have some form of defence? Besides, according to the Codex, being unarmed never stopped the geth from destroying ships. Why would it now? They were converted as a precautionary measure -- like how you get vaccinations against a virus you may never contract. Yes, I know that's a pretty simplistic generalization, but it's true -- they were prepped for "just in case" they needed defenses.

But the quarians have seen the images of the Battle of the Citadel. They think the geth want the death of all organic life and serve the Reapers. I mean, if you had been at the Battle of the Citadel, and had never met Legion, would a peace talk sound realisitc to you? And for the quarians -- who don't want to risk their people on anything that's not a sure bet, since they can't afford risks with their small population -- the idea is out of the question without solid proof. It's like how the Council shut down all your claims of the Reapers -- no proof. Yes, they have perfectly logical reasons for it, but it's aggrivating to see it constantly outweight the option of "have some faith," now does it? People in the galaxy don't trust easily -- insular, isolated sociaties like the quarians and geth, even more so. They don't do anything unless the outcome seems like a sure bet. So you can't exactally hate them for it.

Silence is not a disuading point, either. I mean, what's the harm in answering the phone and saying "no thank you. Please go away"? It would keep them from coming on the lawn in the first place. I can understand not wanting to deal with anyone, but ignoring all the calls and knocks on the door won't make it better. Shooting them dead even less so.

So, you and I are on agreement on that. You simply resonate more with the geth's actions because you believe they simply templated off the quarians actions first?  I can understand that. 
Ipersonally hold both in a similar regard -- both seem to be equally guilty and/or innocent, with nither comming across as better.  But I can understand where you are comming from at least.

Well, I can't deny that much. Every race seems to have a tone of "everyone for themselves." I think that was intentional, but I definately agree that it was overdone.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 14 juin 2013 - 07:37 .


#775
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

WRONG. You excuse the question of "why don't the quarians?Council want to try peace with the geth" with the excuse that the geth don't need to provide evidence of intents/claims. Yet you say that I must in the exact same situation.  You say that Legion needs no proof beyond his word to the quarian Admirals, yet say that I do for you? You say that Legion and Tali can say that the geth (in light of the Battle of the Citadel and over two years of geth attacks on the galaxy) want peace and say that the Admrials should just believe it, but that in the same situation, I need diffinitive evidence?
That is the definition of a double-standard. If I'm wrong in this situation, then the geth are too by extension.

And thus, you're entire claim is AGAIN invalidated. I provided reasons why the geth couldn't have believed this (open hails, unconcealed presance, lack of military escort fleet, geth's proported mastery of scanning tech), and discredited your only reasons for believeing otherwise (non-existance of any form of law prohibiting the existance of A.I.s, and the disavowing of the quarians from the Citadel, thereby making the two completely seperate and thus, the quarians actions are no longer able to be blamed on a group that disavowed them for it) There are only reasons to believe, and none to disbelieve.
So again, YOU are the confussed one, not me. I insist because they gave clear and irrefutible signs that they were geneuine, and the geth had the technological capability to determine if they were genuine themselves. Meaning a misunderstanding was completely and utterly impossible for the geth to fall victum to, remy. You're claim is dead in the water.

NO. Humans have right to Earth well after. All species in the galaxy have right to their homeworlds because they are the worlds they evolved from - where their culture was born, where they grew up, and in the cases of specilized races (quarians, volus, hanar,) the only places they can survive. You're view is how racial conquest/Supremicy works, NOT how War works. War is defeating an enemy faction. Racial conquest, supremicy and genocide is exterminating/assimilating the enemy and stealing their lands, like the protheans did.
Let me put this in a term you understand: You are basically saying that if a man beats another man, said man is his property now?
I abhor such thinking, and I thought you did too?


Nope the Quarians and Council don't have to believe anything.  It is their choice to believe or not believe.

The appropriate response when someone shows no interest in talking to you is to respect their wishes and walk away.  Organics telling the Geth they come in peace is not proof.  It is just talk.

Um, in refuse humans die.  They have no right to earth because they are extinct.  And the Geth's homeworld is Rannoch so do they have a right to Rannoch? 

Let me put it to you like this.  When Native Americans get ALL of America back, when the aborigines get ALL of Australia back and when I get my little piece of West Africa back, the Quarians can have Rannoch back.  I won't hold my breath.

And nope, land is property.  People are people.  I didn't think this had to be explained.

So then you basically believe whatever the hell you want, regardless of proof, lore, cannon, or anything else? Yoiu are basically unreasonable? Good to know.

And if they give indifference? When they make no inclination to say one way or the other? Silence is not an automatic "no." You want someone to get the message -- Tell them so. As I said before, the geth had no reason to think they were liers, and had the full capability to tell the truth.

Weren't you just talking about "humans never lose Earth because they are still alive in the end?" You keep changing your arguement. Refuse is the ONLY ending this happens in. In refuse, the geth are dead too, remember?
Also, AGAIN, not their homeworld, because (A) claimed in illegal war, (B) not created as living beings, © make no claim to it themsleves, and (D) previous owners still have full claim to it. Legion says that don't believe in the concept of a homeworld.

In other words -- you are completely and utterly prejudiced. You truly are mixing a personal grudge to a seperate dispute about real-life racisim to this unrleated fictional debate about cause and effect on the actions of two races.

WRONG. You are basically saying "might makes right" and "If I'm stronger, what I say goes." That's racial supremicy, and saying that enlsavement is perfectly just.
Words don't even begin to describe my horror at that.